Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the healthcare costs and benefits of enoxaparin compared to aspirin in the prevention of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using data from the CRISTAL trial. Methods. This trial-based economic analysis reports value for money as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained in 2022 Australian dollars, compared to a single threshold value of AUD$70,000 per QALY. Event costs were estimated based on occurrence of VTEs and bleeds, and on published guidelines for treatment. Unit costs were taken from Australian sources. QALYs were estimated using CRISTAL six-month follow-up data. Sensitivity analyses are presented that vary the cost of VTE treatment, and extend the analyses to two years. Results. The CRISTAL trial found that enoxaparin was more effective than aspirin in preventing symptomatic VTE within 90 days of THA or TKA (risk difference 1.97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54% to 3.41%; p = 0.007)). The additional cost after a THA or TKA was AUD$83 (95% CI 68 to 97) for enoxaparin, and enoxaparin resulted in an additional 0.002 QALYs (95% CI -0.002 to 0.005). Incremental cost per QALY gained was AUD$50,567 (95% CI 15,513, dominated) for enoxaparin. We can be 60% confident that the incremental cost per QALY does not exceed the willingness-to-pay threshold of AUD$70,000. Increasing the cost of VTE treatment and extension of costs and consequences to two years suggested greater confidence that enoxaparin is good value for money (70% and 63% confidence, respectively). Conclusion. This analysis provides strong evidence that enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis following THA or TKA reduced VTEs, but weak evidence of net economic benefits over aspirin. If the value of avoiding VTEs is high, and there is a strong likelihood of VTE-related health impairments, we can be more confident that enoxaparin is cost-effective compared to aspirin. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(6):589–595

Aims. The optimal management of an infrapopliteal deep venous thrombosis (IDVT) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unknown. The risk of DVT propagation and symptom progression must be balanced against potential haemorrhagic complications associated with administration of anticoagulation therapy. The current study reports on a cohort of patients diagnosed with IDVT following TKA who were treated with aspirin, followed closely for development of symptoms, and scanned with ultrasound to determine resolution of IDVT. Methods. Among a cohort of 5,078 patients undergoing TKA, 532 patients (695 TKAs, 12.6%) developed an IDVT between 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2019 at a single institution, as diagnosed using Doppler ultrasound at the first postoperative visit. Of the entire cohort of 532 patients with IDVT, 91.4% (486/532) were treated with aspirin (325 mg twice daily) and followed closely. Repeat lower limb ultrasound was performed four weeks later to evaluate the status of IDVT. Results. Follow-up Doppler ultrasound was performed on 459/486 (94.4%) patients and demonstrated resolution of IDVT in 445/459 cases (96.9%). Doppler diagnosed propagation of IDVT to the popliteal vein had occurred in 10/459 (2.2%) cases. One patient with an IDVT developed a pulmonary embolus six weeks postoperatively. Conclusion. The results of this study demonstrate a low rate of IDVT propagation in patients managed with aspirin. Additionally, no significant bleeding episodes, wound-related complications, or other adverse events were noted from aspirin therapy. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):18–22

Aims. There is uncertainty regarding the optimal means of thromboprophylaxis following total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA). This systematic review presents the evidence for acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) as a thromboprophylactic agent in THA and TKA and compares it with other chemoprophylactic agents. Materials and Methods. A search of literature published between 2004 and 2014 was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 13 studies were eligible for inclusion. Results. Evidence from one good quality randomised controlled trial (RCT) showed no difference in rates of venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) in patients given aspirin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) following TKA. There was insufficient evidence from trials with moderate to severe risk of bias being present to suggest aspirin is more or less effective than LMWH, warfarin or dabigatran for the prevention of VTE in TKA or THA. Compared with aspirin, rates of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in TKA may be reduced with rivaroxaban but insufficient evidence exists to demonstrate an effect on incidence of symptomatic DVT. Compared with aspirin there is evidence of more wound complications following THA and TKA with dabigatran and in TKA with rivaroxaban. Some studies highlighted concerns over bleeding complications and efficacy of aspirin. Conclusion. The results suggest aspirin may be considered a suitable alternative to other thromboprophylactic agents following THA and TKA. Further investigation is required to fully evaluate the safety and efficacy of aspirin. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1056–61

The number of arthroplasties being performed increases each year. Patients undergoing an arthroplasty are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and appropriate prophylaxis has been recommended. However, the optimal protocol and the best agent to minimise VTE under these circumstances are not known. Although many agents may be used, there is a difference in their efficacy and the risk of bleeding. Thus, the selection of a particular agent relies on the balance between the desire to minimise VTE and the attempt to reduce the risk of bleeding, with its undesirable, and occasionally fatal, consequences. Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) is an agent for VTE prophylaxis following arthroplasty. Many studies have shown its efficacy in minimising VTE under these circumstances. It is inexpensive and well-tolerated, and its use does not require routine blood tests. It is also a ‘milder’ agent and unlikely to result in haematoma formation, which may increase both the risk of infection and the need for further surgery. Aspirin is also unlikely to result in persistent wound drainage, which has been shown to be associated with the use of agents such as low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and other more aggressive agents. The main objective of this review was to summarise the current evidence relating to the efficacy of aspirin as a VTE prophylaxis following arthroplasty, and to address some of the common questions about its use. . There is convincing evidence that, taking all factors into account, aspirin is an effective, inexpensive, and safe form of VTE following arthroplasty in patients without a major risk factor for VTE, such as previous VTE. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1420–30

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective hip arthroplasty surgery. The balance of post-operative VTE prophylaxis and risk of post-operative haemorrhage remains at the forefront of surgeon's mind. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) has altered their prophylaxis guidance in the setting of total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to present the VTE incidence in 8,890 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty between January 1997 and March 2018 with Aspirin as the primary agent for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. Analysis of prospective data collection from consecutive patients undergoing THA was performed with the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) occurring within 6 months of the index operation as the primary outcome measure. 90-day all-cause mortality of this cohort of patients was also analysed. 8890 patients were reviewed. This included 7235 primary, 224 complex primary and 1431 revision cases. The incidence of DVT was 0.64% after elective THA and the incidence of PE was 0.54%. There was no difference in the incidence between primary and revision cases. The 90-day all-cause mortality was 0.88%. Cardiovascular and respiratory disease were the main causes of death following surgery. Only 0.03% of deaths (n= 3) within 90 days of index surgery were due to VTE. Our results support the use of aspirin as an effective form of prophylaxis against VTE following THA. It is not associated with an increased incidence in symptomatic DVT, PE or death compared to other published studies. The fact that it is inexpensive, readily available, requires no monitoring and does not pose an increased risk of bleeding are other attractive advantages of using aspirin for VTE prophylaxis

We compared thromboembolic events, major haemorrhage and death after total hip replacement in patients receiving either aspirin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). We analysed data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales linked to an administrative database of hospital admissions in the English National Health Service. A total of 108 584 patients operated on between April 2003 and September 2008 were included and followed up for 90 days. Multivariable risk modelling and propensity score matching were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) adjusted for baseline risk factors. An OR <  1 indicates that rates are lower with LMWH than with aspirin. In all, 21.1% of patients were prescribed aspirin and 78.9% LMWH. Without adjustment, we found no statistically significant differences. The rate of pulmonary embolism was 0.68% in both groups and 90-day mortality was 0.65% with aspirin and 0.61% with LMWH (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.11). With risk adjustment, the difference in mortality increased (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.01). With propensity score matching the mortality difference increased even further to 0.65% with aspirin and 0.51% with LMWH (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.98). These results should be considered when the conflicting recommendations of existing guidelines for thromboprophylaxis after hip replacement are being addressed

We compared thromboembolic events, major haemorrhage and death after knee replacement in patients receiving either aspirin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales were linked to an administrative database of hospital admissions in the English National Health Service. A total of 156 798 patients between April 2003 and September 2008 were included and followed for 90 days. Multivariable risk modelling was used to estimate odds ratios adjusted for baseline risk factors (AOR). An AOR < 1 indicates that risk rates are lower with LMWH than with aspirin. In all, 36 159 patients (23.1%) were prescribed aspirin and 120 639 patients (76.9%) were prescribed LMWH. We found no statistically significant differences between the aspirin and LMWH groups in the rate of pulmonary embolism (0.49% vs 0.45%, AOR 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 1.05); p = 0.16), 90-day mortality (0.39% vs 0.45%, AOR 1.13 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.37); p = 0.19) or major haemorrhage (0.37% vs 0.39%, AOR 1.01 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.22); p = 0.94). There was a significantly greater likelihood of needing to return to theatre in the aspirin group (0.26% vs 0.19%, AOR 0.73 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.94); p = 0.01). Between patients receiving LMWH or aspirin there was only a small difference in the risk of pulmonary embolism, 90-day mortality and major haemorrhage. These results should be considered when the existing guidelines for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement are reviewed

The October 2024 Knee Roundup. 360. looks at: Managing the unexpected: treatment of intraoperative medial collateral ligament injuries; Identifying subgroups of patients that may benefit from robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial; Cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin versus aspirin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee arthroplasty: an analysis from the CRISTAL cluster-randomized trial; Cartilage regeneration and long-term survival in medial knee osteoarthritis patients treated with high tibial osteotomy and osteochondral autologous transfer system; Treatment of chronic and complex meniscal tears with arthroscopic meniscus repair augmented with collagen matrix wrapping: failure rate and functional outcomes; Long-term outcomes of multiligament knee injuries in American football players

Purpose: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) on postoperative blood loss following Total Knee Arthroplasty. Methods: We prospectively examined the pre-operative consumption of aspirin and NSAIDS and haematological parameters of 50 consecutive patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty. 22 (44%) patients were on aspirin only, 17 (34%) patients on aspirin and another NSAID and 11 (22%) patients were taking neither aspirin nor a NSAID. (All patients received 150mg of aspirin the evening before surgery as DVT prophylaxis). Results: The average pre-operative haemoglobin of the group taking aspirin and a NSAID, aspirin only and neither aspirin nor NSAID group was 12.9g/dl, 13,8g/dl and 13.49g/dl respectively. The drop between their pre-operative level and Day 3 Haemoglobin level was 3.788g/dl, 4.45g/dl and 4.28g/dl respectively. The same trend was reflected in the PCV drops of 0.111, 0.133 and 0.1273 respectively. Transfusion rates for the three groups showed that those on aspirin and another NSAID had the highest rate with an average of 0.235 units per patient compared to 0.136 for those on aspirin only and 0.10 for those on neither aspirin nor NSAID. Discussion: These findings indicate that the ingestion of aspirin or a NSAID preoperatively does not increase the amount of blood loss following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The higher transfusion rates in the aspirin and NSAID group is because of the lower preoperative haemoglobin as compared to the other groups studied. Conclusion: Observation of transfusion trends within our unit has shown a transfusion rate of 18% in patients with a preoperative Haemoglobin level of greater than 13.0g/dl as compared to 48% with a haemoglobin level of 13.0g/dl or less (review of 180 consecutive patients undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty). The ingestion of aspirin and NSAID does not increase blood loss following TKA but significantly have a lower preoperative Hb level. We feel that pre-operative Haemoglobin levels are the best predictors of transfusion requirements following total knee arthroplasty

Background. Few studies have compared aspirin with DOACs (direct oral anticoagulants = direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following total hip and knee replacement (THR and TKR). We assessed the efficacy and safety of aspirin compared with DOACs for VTE prophylaxis following THR and TKR using the world's largest joint replacement registry. Methods. We studied the National Joint Registry linked to English hospital inpatient episodes for 218,650 THR and TKR patients. Patients receiving aspirin were matched separately to (1) direct thrombin inhibitors, and (2) factor Xa inhibitors using propensity scores. Outcomes assessed at 90 days included VTE, length of stay, and adverse events. Results. Following THR, the risk of VTE was significantly lower in patients receiving direct thrombin inhibitors (0.44%; odds ratio (OR)=0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.55–0.87, p=0.002) and factor Xa inhibitors (0.37%; OR=0.63, CI=0.47–0.85, p=0.003) compared with aspirin (0.63%). Following THR, direct thrombin inhibitors (coefficient=−0.37, CI=−0.43 to −0.31, p<0.001) and factor Xa inhibitors (coefficient=−0.80, CI=−0.87 to −0.74, p<0.001) reduced length of stay compared with aspirin. Similar findings for both outcomes were observed following TKR. Compared with aspirin, DOACs did not increase the risk of short-term revision surgery; reoperation; major haemorrhage; wound disruption; surgical site infection; and mortality. Conclusions. Following THR and TKR, the risk of VTE was lower in patients receiving DOACs compared with aspirin. DOACs were associated with a reduced length of stay, and DOACs did not increase the risk of further surgery, wound problems, bleeding complications, or mortality compared with aspirin

Aims. Thromboprophylaxis following Total Hip Replacement (THR) surgery remains controversial, balancing VTE prevention against wound leakage and subsequent deep infection. We analysed the 90 day cause of death post THR in our institution after the implementation of new thromboprophylactic policy of low dose aspirin for low risk patients, as part of a multimodal regime. Those at high risk were anticoagulated. Patients and methods. The PAS database was used to identify patients undergoing primary THR between January 2012 and June 2017 at The Royal Derby Hospital, and all deaths within 90 days. Trauma cases were excluded. Case note review and Coroner's verdict were utilised to ascertain cause of death. Results were compared to a previous study at the same institution prior to the introduction of the new policy, where thromboprophylaxis was decided upon by surgeon preference for either LMWH, aspirin or warfarin. Results. During this period 4021 THRs were performed. The rate of mortality was 0.22% at 90 days. This compares to 0.58% in the previous study with the only other factor changing being the rapidity of post op mobilization. Of the 9 deaths, only one was due to fatal pulmonary embolism. None of the deaths were at high risk of VTE. This compared to 5 fatal pulmonary embolism deaths in1838 patients in the previous study in the LMWH group. The leading causes of death were heart failure and lower respiratory tract infection. Conclusion. Our institution reports a similar 90 day (0.22%) mortality using aspirin to that in the last 5 years on the NJR (0.3%) in which over 80% use LMWH. We confirm that fatal PE following elective THR with a multi-modal prophylaxis regime is rare. Changing to low dose aspirin in low risk patients is a safe option

Aims. The aim of this study was to present data on 11 459 patients who underwent total hip (THA), total knee (TKA) or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) between November 2002 and April 2014 with aspirin as the primary agent for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. . Patients and Methods. We analysed the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) then compared the 90-day all-cause mortality with the corresponding data in the National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR). . Results. The incidence of PE was 0.6% after THA, 1.47% after TKA and 1.2% after UKA. The 90-day mortality was 0.39% after THA and 0.44% after TKA. No deaths occurred after UKA. The main causes of death were ischaemic heart disease and respiratory failure. PE was responsible for only 18% of deaths. There was a decline in 90-day mortality, from 0.64% between 2002 and 2007, to 0.21% between 2008 and 2013 after THA, and from 0.47% to 0.39% after TKA for the corresponding period. The standardised mortality ratio (SMR) declined from 86.5 (confidence interval (CI) 63.0 to 137.7) to 39.7 (CI 31.2 to 54.3) p = 0.024. The incidence of proximal DVT was 0.3%. . Take home message: With individualised risk assessment and as part of a multimodal approach, Aspirin is safe to use as the main thromboprophylactic agent in primary arthroplasty. It is not associated with an increased incidence of symptomatic DVT, PE or death. . Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:341-8

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication after total hip and knee arthroplasty. There is still no consensus regarding the best mode of thromboprophylaxis after lower limb arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to ascertain the efficacy, safety profile and rate of adverse thromboembolic events of aspirin as extended out of hospital pharmacological anticoagulation for elective primary total hip and knee arthroplasty patients and whether these rates were comparable with published data for low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Data was extracted from a prospective hospital acquired thromboembolism (HAT) database. The period of study was from 1st Jan 2013-31st Dec 2016 and a total of 6078 patients were treated with aspirin as extended thromboprophylaxis after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome measure of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism within 90 days postoperatively was 1.11%. The secondary outcome rates of wound infection, bleeding complications, readmission rate and mortality were comparable to published results after LMWH use. The results of this study clearly show that Aspirin, as part of a multimodal thromboprophylactic regime, is an effective and safe regime in preventing VTE with respect to risk of DVT or PE when compared to LMWH. It is a cheaper alternative to LMWH and has associated potential cost savings

Introduction. Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are at high risk of post operative venous thromboembolism (VTE). Edoxaban, the oral direct and selective factor Xa inhibitor, is available for preventing VTE after TKA. Recently, patients often take antiplatelet drugs including aspirin for their past illness. In our hospital, patients, in general, undergoing TKA receive edoxaban, but patients with aspirin for past illness receive only aspirin for preventing VTE. The aim of this study was to compare edoxaban and aspirin for preventing VTE in patients undergoing TKA. Materials and methods. From April 2012 to March 2014, 137 patients underwent primary TKA under general anesthesia with epidural anesthesia or femoral/ sciatic nerve block. Patients were excluded following; (1) renal dysfunction, (2) have taken anticoagulants such as warfarin for past illness. Finally, a total of 120 patients were enrolled. At the surgery, tourniquet was inflated and mid-vastus approach was used. After prosthesis implantation, tourniquet was deflated and drain tube was inserted. Intra and after operation, an intermittent pneumatic compression device was used. At postoperative day 2, edoxaban or aspirin started after removal of epidural anesthesia or drainage tube. Ninety-seven patients were assigned to receive edoxaban once daily (group E), and the rest of 23 received aspirin again same as before (group A). Edoxaban were scheduled to continue for 10 days. DVT diagnosis. At postoperative day 7, compression and colored Doppler imaging was taken for bilateral common femoral veins, superficial veins, popliteal veins and calf veins by skilled clinical technologist. Augmentation by calf squeezing and by dropped lower leg down were included. Diagnosing DVT criteria was loss of vein compressibility, presence of intraluminal echogenicity and absence of venous flow. D-dimer levels. At preoperative, postoperative days 7 and 14, plasma D-dimer levels were measured. Statistical analysis. Data were compared using independent t-test or the chi-square test. A significant difference was set at p<0.05. Results. Patients’ characteristics were shown in table 1. Age in the group A was significantly higher than in the group E. The total incidence of DVT was 40%. The incidence of DVT was significantly decreased in group E compared to group A at day 7 (group E: 34% versus group A: 65%, p<0.01) (table 2). The D-dimer level in group E was significantly decreased at postoperative day 7 (13.2 ± 6.8 (mean ± SD) vs 17.0 ± 9.1, p<0.05). At day 14, there were no significant differences (Figure 1). Discussion. In this study, edoxaban decreased the incidence of DVT after TKA compared to aspirin. The result of D-dimer supported the efficacy of edoxaban. Results showed that edoxaban is effective for preventing DVT following TKA. Recently, TKA patients often take antiplatelet drugs including aspirin for their past illness. It is still controversial to add an antithrombotic drug for preventing VTE. The incidence of DVT with aspirin was higher than that with edoxaban. Thus, patients received only aspirin might be needed not only to pay attention to VTE, but also to add anticoagulants as edoxaban for preventing VTE

The incidence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) is thought to be low following foot and ankle surgery, but the routine use of chemoprophylaxis remains controversial. This retrospective study assessed the incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications following a consecutive series of 2654 patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery. A total of 1078 patients received 75 mg aspirin as routine thromboprophylaxis between 2003 and 2006 and 1576 patients received no form of chemical thromboprophylaxis between 2007 and 2010. The overall incidence of VTE was 0.42% (DVT, 0.27%; PE, 0.15%) with 27 patients lost to follow-up. If these were included to create a worst case scenario, the overall VTE rate was 1.43%. There was no apparent protective effect against VTE by using aspirin. We conclude that the incidence of VTE following foot and ankle surgery is very low and routine use of chemoprophylaxis does not appear necessary for patients who are not in the high risk group for VTE

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has thus far relied on historical data and predominantly industry-sponsored trials to provide evidence for venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis in joint replacement patients. We argue that the NICE guidelines may be reliant on assumptions that are in need of revision. Following the publication of large scale, independent observational studies showing little difference between low-molecular-weight heparins and aspirin, and recent changes to the guidance provided by other international bodies, should NICE reconsider their recommendations?. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:146–9

Thromboembolic disease is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality. There is increasing pressure for elective orthopaedic patients, including those undergoing foot and ankle surgery, to be prescribed chemical thromboprophylaxis post-operatively in order to reduce the risk of a thromboembolic event. The risks of chemical thromboprophylaxis in terms of increased bleeding, wound problems and HIT are well documented. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of clinically significant thromboembolic events in patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery with and without the use of aspirin. We audited a consecutive series of 1625 patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery between 2003 and 2010. Between 2003 and 2006 inclusive, aspirin was used post operatively as chemical thromboprohylaxsis. Between 2007 and 2010, no chemical thromboprohylaxsis was used. The follow-up period for all patients was at least three months post-operatively. Most patients were reviewed at 3 months by the senior surgeon. Those who were reviewed less than 3 months (patients undergoing minor procedures) were contacted via telephone to confirm whether a thromboembolic event had been diagnosed. There was no loss to follow up. Of the 1625 patients, 555 patients received aspirin and 1070 patients received no chemical thromboprohylaxsis. 5 of 1625 (0.31%) patients developed a clinically significant thromboembolic event. 3 patients developed a DVT at an average time of 5 weeks post operatively. 2 patients developed non-fatal PE at an average time of 7 weeks post operatively. 3 of the 5 thromboembolic events occurred in the aspirin group (all DVT's) whereas 2 of the 5 (all PE) developed in the non aspirin group. The incidence of clinically significant thromboembolic events is low in elective orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery. We suggest that the benefit of chemical thromboprophylaxis does not outweigh its potential risks in foot and ankle surgery

Introduction: The recent BOA blue book on blood conservation in elective orthopaedic surgery highlighted the need for blood saving strategies to be implemented. Perioperative management guidelines of oral anti-coagulation and anti-thrombosis medication have to date concentrated on warfarin use. Information and guidelines on aspirin usage in elective orthopaedics and its effects post operatively are limited. Methods: Data was collected prospectively from 1936 patients who underwent 2024 primary unilateral total hip replacement in a single institution. All patients were treated with the same postoperative transfusion regime and thromboembolic prophylaxis. Preoperative medication, haemoglobin levels and patient demographics were recorded by a standard assessment. Post op transfusion requirements and haemoglobin levels were noted throughout the postoperative period. Results: Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative aspirin use was a significant independent predictor of postoperative transfusion requirement (p< 0.001). Discussion: Expanding indications for the use of aspirin for primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention have meant that large numbers of our patients undergoing total hip replacement are concurrently taking the drug. With increasing and emerging evidence of the risks involved in blood transfusion, including vCJD transmission and immune related reactions coupled with reduced supplies of donor blood further measures to reduce transfusion requirement are needed. We recommend that in the absence of absolute contraindications to stopping aspirin therapy, it should be omitted for 1 week prior to total hip replacement

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalised patients and patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery are at high risk from venous thromboembolism. Thromboprophylaxis, both mechanical and chemical, is commonly administrated to reduce fatality from thromboembolism after surgery. However, there is no convincing evidence in the literature demonstrating that routine chemothromboprophylaxis reduces death rates from pulmonary embolus. Furthermore, it is unclear from the literature which thromboprophylactic agent, if any, should be used. Recent NICE guidelines have recommended that heparin should be routinely administered to patients under-going THR to prevent thromboembolism, although it is unclear from the existing evidence if heparin is the most effective. However, research has suggested that aspirin, which is a low cost prophylactic agent, is effective in preventing DVT and PE after orthopaedic surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the 90-day mortality rate after THR using aspirin as a prophylactic agent. Patients and Methods: Between 2003–2006, 2,286 patients underwent primary THR and 372 patients underwent revision hip replacement (RHR). Routine chemothromboprophylaxis consisting of aspirin 75mg daily for 6 weeks. In addition all patients were treated with anti-thromboembolic stockings. 40mg of subcutaneous clexane, in lieu of aspirin, was given daily to all patients who had previously suffered from a pulmonary embolus or deep venous thrombosis. Patients who died within 90 days of surgery had their death certificates examined. Retrieval at 90 days with regard to death was 100%. Results:. Primary THR. One patient (0.04%) died within 30 days of surgery and a further 3 (0.13%) died between day 30 and day 90, giving a total mortality at 90 days of 0.17% (4/2,286). One patient (0.04%) died from PE and the other 3 patients (0.13%) died from non-vascular causes. Revision hip replacement. One patient (0.27%) died within 30 days of surgery and a further 1 patient (0.27%) died between day 30 and day 90, giving a total mortality at 90 days of 0.54% (2/367). Both patients died from non-vascular causes. Discussion: This study found that the 30-day mortality rate for primary THR and RHR was 0.08% and the 90-day mortality rate was 0.23%. In this study, there was only one death from PE and no deaths from arterial complications. Therefore, although NICE guidelines suggest the use of heparin, this study found that routine aspirin administration is beneficial in protecting against early death after THR because of both thromboembolism and adverse arterial events