Aim. Successful management of native Joint septic arthritis (SA) hinges on the timely initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy coupled with thorough joint debridement. Since 2018 we have implemented a protocol for empirical antibiotic in patients with suspected SA recommending amoxicillin/clavulanate (and cotrimoxazole in cases of beta-lactams allergy) based on local flora. Nevertheless we have recently found that institutional compliance to the protocol is only about 50% and many physicians are still choosing alternative wider spectrum regimens. The aim of this study is to assess whether current clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients treated for this condition justify an update or whether previous recommendations are still valid. Method. All adult patients admitted to our institution with suspected SA between 2018-2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Data was collected from electronic medical records and then compared to similar data previously collected concerning the 2009-2017 period (that served as a basis for the aforementioned protocol). Results. A summary of available data from both time periods can be found in table 1. Overall, among the 35 patients with positive microbiology treated between 2018-2022, amoxicillin/clavulanate is appropriate for 30 (86%) of isolates (vs 88% in historic control). Analysing the whole cohort, we found that previous contact with healthcare services (hospital admission or prolonged ER stay) (p=0.0044) and antibiotic treatment for any infection (p= 0.0213) in the previous six months correlate with resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanate. In these patients, the proposed alternative cotrimoxazole is effective in 77% of cases. Conclusions. The institutional guideline for empirical antibiotic therapy in native joint SA remains adequate and there seems to be no justification to deviate from protocol except in cases of patients admitted to the hospital or antibiotic treatment in the previous six months. In these cases methicillin-resistance coverage is probably appropriate. Pseudomonal coverage is seldom required in SA. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. The aim of the present work was (i) to survey the situation of healthcare regarding the use of antibiotics in orthopaedics and trauma surgery in Germany, (ii) to determine which empiric antibiotic regimens are preferred in the treatment of periprosthethic joint infections (PJI) and (iii) to evaluate the hypothetical antibiotic adequacy of the applied empirical antibiotic therapy regimens based on a patient collective of a German university hospital. Method. A survey on empirical and prophylactic antibiotic therapy was conducted at German university and occupational health clinics (BG clinics), each in the specialties of orthopedics and trauma surgery. A total of 71 clinics were contacted by email. The questionnaire sent included open-ended questions on systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in primary hip arthroplasty; a distinction was made between hip arthroplasty due to femoral fractures and elective hip arthroplasty. In addition, the empirical antibiotic therapy used in PJIs was surveyed. To determine the success rate of prophylaxis and therapy according to sensitivity to the antibiotics applied, the survey results were compared with previously published data on antimicrobial treatment in n=81 PJI patients treated in our department between 2017 and 2020. Results. In 93.2% (elective) and 88.6% (fracture care) of the hospitals, 1st- and 2nd-generation cephalosporins are administered perioperatively for infection prophylaxis in primary hip arthroplasty. In contrast, empiric antibiotic treatment for PJI showed a clearly inhomogeneous therapeutic picture. Monotherapy with an aminopenicillin/betalactamase inhibitor is most frequently used (38.7%); 1st- and 2nd-generation cephalosporins are second most frequently used as monotherapy (18.2%). In addition, dual combination therapies have become established, mostly aminopenicillin/betalactamase inhibitor or 1st- and 2nd-generation cephalosporins, whose administration is supplemented with another antibiotic. The most common combination in PJI is aminopenicillin/betalactamase inhibitor + vancomycin (11.4%). The most widely used therapy (monotherapy with aminopenicillin/betalactamase inhibitor) would have covered 69.0% of PJI patients. Monotherapy with 1st- and 2nd-generation cephalosporins would have been susceptible to 57.8% of PJI patients. In contrast, a combination of vancomycin + 1st- and 2nd-generation cephalosporins would have been most effective, with an efficacy of 91.5% according to the resistograms, but this was used by only two hospitals. Conclusions. Empirical antibiotic therapy for the treatment of PJI is applied in more than half of the clinics with a single broad-spectrum beta-lactamase inhibitor antibiotic. This discrepancy between the everyday care in the clinics and the administration of clearly more effective combination therapies underlines the need for recommendation guidelines

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication of prosthetic joint implantation, with an estimated incidence of 2.18%. Most frequently used treatment strategy for PJI is a two-stage revision procedure. However there are specific patients with a new or persisting infection after primary or revision surgery where further surgical treatment is not attractive. This may be because of medical or local surgical conditions, or patient's refusal to undergo (further) surgical therapy. For these patients suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) may be an alternative treatment. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical and radiological outcome of patients with a PJI of a hip arthroplasty, treated with SAT. Twenty-four patients with a hip arthroplasty treated with suppressive antibiotic therapy for PJI between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2013 were included. All patients had a proven prosthetic joint infection, either by ≥2 intraoperative cultures or joint aspiration. SAT was defined as treatment with antibiotic therapy for more than three months. Most used antibiotics were doxycycline in 15 patients and cotrimoxazole in six patients. Patients were supposed to have a successful outcome when their prosthesis remained in situ and they had no relapse or new infection. Suppressive antibiotic therapy was considered successful in 15 (62.5%) patients with a mean follow-up of 20.6 months. Two patients (8.3%) had to stop the antibiotic therapy due to adverse effects. The mean duration of the SAT was 20.4 months (range 0.92–92.65 months). Mean modified Oxford hip score of the successfully treated patients at the latest follow up was 35 (range 16–49) and mean Harris hip score 71 (range 40–93). The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) was 16 (range 0–70) in rest, 32 (range 0–85) during exercise and 65 (range 10–100) for satisfaction. Of the 9 patients with an unsuccessful outcome, there was a radiological loosening of the cup in 4 patients. In the group of 15 patients that were considered successful, 2 patients had a radiological loosening of the cup and one patient loosening of the stem. Suppressive antibiotic therapy can be an attractive alternative treatment in selected patients with a prosthetic joint infection of a hip arthroplasty who cannot or will not undergo (further) surgical therapy. Further research with a larger number of patients is required. Also the optimal dosage and duration of suppressive antibiotic therapy and possible resistance to the antibiotic therapy is unknown

Spondylodiscitis is a severe infectious disease of the vertebral column and the intervertebral disc space and may be complicated by an epidural abscess. A wide range of pathogens have been described as causative agents. Since several weeks of antibiotics are necessary for successful therapy detection of the causative pathogen is essential. Specific antibiotic therapy improves outcome and reduces antibiotic related complications. Antibiotic Stewardship (ABS) programs are bundled approaches aimed at improving antibiotic therapy. In 2012 an ABS program including weekly interdisciplinary clinical rounds and development of algorithms for diagnosis and therapy of patients with spondylodiscitis was established in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery in a University hospital. We evaluated the effects of ABS with regard to the appropriateness of specimen and pathogen detection and antibiotic therapy in patients with spondylodiscitis. We retrospectively analysed diagnostic procedures and pathogen detection of 100 patients that were hospitalized with spondylodiscitis and compared the data of patients that were treated before (2004–2011) and after introduction of ABS measures (2012–2014). After introduction the effect of ABS on antibiotic therapy was analysed. 100 patients with radiologically confirmed spondylodiscits were enrolled. The pre-ABS group (2004–2011) contained 58 patients. Of these no samples were taken for microbiological examination from 21 patients (36%) and from 8 patients (14%) only swabs were submitted for culture. Aspirates or tissue samples were taken from 22 patients (38%) and blood cultures from 18 patients (31%). Pathogen detection was successful in 18 patients (31%). After introduction of ABS in the beginning of 2012 aspirates or tissue samples were taken from 34 patients (81%) and blood cultures were taken from 34 patients (81%). Pathogen detection was successful in 26 patients (62%). The most commonly detected pathogens were Gram positive cocci (S.aureus, S. epidermidis, and streptococci) in 31 patients. Less common pathogens were found in 12 patients (Gram negative rods (8), fungi (3), Moraxella (1) and Propionibacterium (1). After introduction of ABS antibiotic therapy was changed in 18 of 20 patients (90%) after pathogen identification. In 50 % of cases the inappropriate empiric therapy was changed (MRSA, MRSE and Gram negative rods) and in 50 % broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy could be deescalated. ABS significantly improved the number and quality of samples, increased the number of blood cultures taken and doubled the pathogen detection rates in patients with spondylodiscitis leading to an improvement in antibiotic therapy in almost all patients with pathogen detection

Purpose. To analyse the effectiveness of using outpatient management of paediatric bone and joint infections with parenteral antibiotic therapy in terms of its efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness compared to prolonged inpatient treatment. Method. Paediatric cases of septic arthritis or osteomyelitis were identified over a seven year (2004–2011) period in a regional teaching hospital. This included patients either treated as long-term inpatients or given outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy. The outcome measures recorded included: whether treatment was successful, complications, and length of hospital stay. A cost analysis was also calculated. Results. A total of 41 paediatric patients diagnosed with osteomyelitis or septic arthritis were reviewed, of which 8 were treated as inpatients during the course of their IV antibiotic therapy, and 33 were treated with outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (requiring a PICC line to be in situ). The mean length of hospital stay for the inpatient group was 23 days, compared to 3.9 days for the outpatient group. The cost saving in terms of hospital stay is (19 × £464=) £8816. Treatment was effective in all groups. In terms of complications of therapy, there was 1 antibiotic-related case in the inpatient group, and 4 cases in the outpatient group of which 3 related to antibiotic side-effects and 1 related to the PICC line. Conclusion. Outpatient treatment of paediatric bone and joint infections is both clinically and cost effective when compared to long stay inpatient management. It is safe, well tolerated and we advocate its adoption, wherever resources allow

There is currently no consensus on the use of suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) in prosthetic joint infections (PJI) (1). We describe herein the experience of a French Reference Centre for Complex Osteo-Articular Infections on use of oral cyclines (doxycline and minocycline) for SAT. A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive patients with PJI who received oral cyclines (doxycycline or minocycline) for SAT between January 2006 and June 2014. All patients had surgical management, followed by systemic antibiotic treatment and SAT instauration thereafter. Remission was defined as an asymptomatic patient with a functioning prosthesis. Seventy-nine patients with a mean age of 63.8 ± 16.8 years were included. Sixteen patients (20%) had neoplasia, 9 (11%) diabetes mellitus, 10 (13%) rheumatoid arthritis, and 6 patients (8%) were receiving corticosteroids or chemotherapy. There were 37 knee (47%), 36 hip (46%), 4 elbow (5%), and 2 shoulder (3%) infections, with a mean delay from implantation of 7.37 ± 6.94 months (range 1–27). Surgical management consisted in debridement and implant retention for 60 patients (76%), or in implant exchange for 19 patients (24%). Main pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (37%) and Staphylococcus aureus (41%); 23 patients had polymicrobial infection (29%). The most frequent initial antibiotic regimens debuted before SAT were rifampicin combinations (70%). Mean duration of curative antibiotic therapy was 103 ± 75 days. Indications of SAT were (i) patients unsuitable for or refusing further surgery (n=23), suboptimal (ii) surgery (n=26) or (iii) curative antibiotic therapy (n=11), (iv) complex orthopaedic surgery (n=11), and (v) immunosuppressive status (n=8). Seventy-three patients received doxycycline and 6 patients received minocycline as SAT (n=48). Mean SAT duration was 625± 536 days (range 30–2900), with a mean follow-up of 765 ± 572 days. Adverse events were reported in 13 patients (16%), leading to SAT discontinuation in 5 (6%). During follow-up, 59 patients were considered in remission (75%), and 20 failed including 13 relapses (16%) and 7 reinfections (9%). Among failure patients, 10 pathogens resistant to doxy/minocycline were identified, including 5 with acquisition of cycline resistance. In our study, SAT with cyclines is associated to a 75% remission rate, with an acceptable tolerability. Further studies are warranted to determine ideal regimens and optimal duration of SAT. We would like to thank Dron Hospital and Lille University Hospital medical teams. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest

There have been a worldwide change in the susceptibility patterns of antibiotics by many community-acquired microorganisms including those associated to wound infection after open fractures. However, the current antibiotic prophylaxis practice adopted by orthopedic surgeons to prevent infectious complications following open fractures has not changed, since Gustilo and Andersen classification was published several decades ago. Few studies have addressed the current pattern of infectious organisms identified in open fracture wounds and its susceptibility to antibiotics that have been empirically used. We aim to study the incidence of community-acquired resistant organisms isolated in lower extremities open fracture and analyze if antibiotic therapy based upon identified resistant pathogens, would decrease surgical site infection (SSI) rates. In a prospective, single center cohort study, from August 2013 to March 2015 at a tertiary public university institution, 136 subjects presenting Gustilo type II or III lower extremities open fractures were randomly assigned in two arms. Both arms were submitted to surgical debridement, fracture stabilization, and empirical antibiotic therapy, but subjects on Group II had at least three samples of tissue cultures collected during debridement. Patients previously treated at an emergency department other them ours were excluded. When resistant bacteria was identified, antibiotic therapy was modified according to antibiogram tests. The primary outcome was to compare the infection rates between these two groups, after early 60-days follow up. We included 136 patients with Gustilo-II (43.4%), –III, (34.5%) open fractures, of which 86% were male, with median age of 33.7 years, and 69.1% presented no comorbidities. Group II (collection of tissue cultures) accounted 36.7% of patients, and among them bacterial growth were detected in 36% (16/50). Microorganism resistant to empirical antibiotic therapy was identified in 18% (9/50), including Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococci, Enterococcus sp, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella sp, Serratia sp, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacter sp. Median duration of antibiotic treatment was eleven days. During 60-days of follow up, 71 patients (52.2%) were evaluated for signs of infection using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, of which 63.4% (45/71) and 36.6% (26/71) were on Group I and II, respectively. No significant difference in the rates of SSI was observed between the study arms (19.2% vs 22.2%, respectively, P = 0.95). We detected higher rates of bacterial resistance on Gustilo type II and III open fracture wounds, but adjusting antibiotic therapy towards these contaminants did not affected the rates of infection afterwards

Introduction. Success rate after Debridement-Irrigation, Antibiotic Therapy and Implant Retention (DAIR) for treatment of Acute Haematogenous (AH) and Early Post-surgical (EP) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) varies widely among published studies. Prosthesis exchange is recommended to treat PJI after a failed DAIR. However, no early postoperative prognostic factors permitting to identify future failures have been described. Aim. Identify early prognostic factor of failure after DAIR in order to propose efficient treatment before onset of chronic PJI. Hypothesis. Positive suction drainage fluid culture is a strong early predictive factor of failure. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study, with a minimum 2 years follow-up. Twenty-two consecutive patients (78 years-old +/-10) with EPPJI: i.e. infection within 1 month after joint replacement (n=12; 55%) or AHPJI: i.e. acute haematogenous infection with less than 2 weeks evolution (n=10; 45%) were included. The involved prostheses were: Total Knee Arthroplasty (n=12; 55%), Total Hip Arthroplasty (n=7; 32%) and Hip Hemi-Arthroplasty (n=3; 14%). DAIR was indicated for each patient. Suction drainage fluid was systematically analysed at day 1, 3 and 5 postoperative. Failure of the procedure was defined as: need for iterative surgery to control PJI or suppressive antibiotherapy to control PJI or death related to PJI. Results. At 2 years follow-up, failure rate after DAIR was 55%. Only positive suction drainage fluid culture was statistically associated with treatment failure (p=0,039). Neither type of prosthesis: knee prosthesis vs hip prosthesis (Odds Ratio (OR)=1; IC95%[0.14; 7.21]) nor type of fixation : cemented vs uncemented prothesis (OR=4,39; IC95%[0.29; 269]) were associated with treatment failure. In addition, type of bacteria causing PJI and especially S. aureus (OR=3,1; IC95%[0.42; 28.61]), type of infection (OR= 1,47; IC95%[0.21; 11.37]), delay between onset of symptoms and DAIR (OR= 1,63; IC95% [0.21; 14.85]) or retaining of modular component (OR= 1.32; IC95% [0.17; 10.59)) were not associated with a higher rate of failure. Conclusion. Positive suction drainage fluid culture could be an early postoperative predictive factor of failure after open Irrigation-Debridement, Antibiotic Therapy and Implant Retention for EPPJI and AHPJI

Aim. Antibiotic loaded spacers are often used during a two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) both for its mechanical properties and as a means for local antibiotic delivery. The main goal of this study is to compare the rate of positive cultures during reimplantation with the use of different antibiotic loaded spacers: aminoglycoside only vs. combined glycopeptide/aminoglycoside vs. combined glycopeptide/carbapenem/aminoglycoside. Method. We retrospectively evaluated every two-stage exchange procedures for infected hip/knee arthroplasty between 2012–2018. Microbiological findings in the first and second stage were registered as well as the type of spacer and antibiotic(s) used. Cases in whom no cultures were obtained during reimplantation and cases without sufficient data on antibiotic(s) used in cement spacers were excluded. Results. Fifty-four cases were included (20THA and 34TKA), with an overall rate of positive cultures during reimplantation of 18.5% (10/54). The rate of positive cultures was statistically significant higher among spacers with monotherapy with aminoglycoside compared to spacers with combined antibiotic therapy- 35.7% (5/14) vs. 12.5% (5/40) respectively(p<0.05). Comparing those with combined glycopeptide/aminoglycoside (2/19) with triple glycopeptide/carbapenem/aminoglycoside therapy (3/21) there was no significant difference. Microorganisms present during the second stage were mostly staphylococci (coagulase-negative in four cases, S.aureus in three), Corynebacterium striatum, Enterococcus faecalis, C.albicans in one case each. In most cases (8/10), the isolated microorganism was the same as the first stage and was resistant to the antibiotic(s) used in the spacer in seven cases. Failure rate with the need for subsequent surgery was significantly higher at 60% (6/10) in cases with positive cultures at reimplantation compared to 4.5% (2/44) for those with negative cultures during reimplantation(p=0.0005). Conclusions. It has recently been suggested that adding a glycopeptide to the spacer may be advantageous when compared to spacers with aminoglycoside monotherapy, as it will produce significantly lower rates of positive cultures during reimplantation which have been shown to increase the risk of subsequent failure as is the case in our study. Local unavailability of obtaining powder aminoglycosides has driven us to manually add high doses of vancomycin and meropenem to commercially available low-dose gentamicin cement in many of our spacers and they seem to to perform just as well as commercially available vancomycin/gentamicin combination. Although many other variables not considered in this study may influence the rate of positive cultures during the second stage (quality of initial debridement, systemic antibiotic therapy, etc.), we believe these results portrait a sufficiently accurate picture of clinical results with the use of different spacers

Aim

Local antibiotics, delivered to the site of infection, achieve high tissue concentrations and are used as an adjunct to systemic therapy. Local gentamicin provides levels well above the minimum inhibitory concentration and may be sufficient on its own, however, the efficacy of single or combination local antibiotics has not been studied. This retrospective study evaluated the effect of combination aminoglycoside and vancomycin local antibiotic treatment compared to aminoglycoside alone in the surgical management of bone infection.

The current standard recommendation for antibiotic therapy in the management of chronic osteomyelitis is intravenous treatment for six weeks. We have compared this regime with short-term intravenous therapy followed by oral dosage. A total of 93 patients, with chronic osteomyelitis, underwent single-stage, aggressive surgical debridement and appropriate soft-tissue coverage. Culture-specific intravenous antibiotics were given for five to seven days, followed by oral therapy for six weeks. During surgery, the scar, including the sinus track, was excised en bloc. We used a high-speed, saline-cooled burr to remove necrotic bone, and osseous laser Doppler flowmetry to ensure that the remaining bone was viable. Infected nonunions (Cierny stage-IV osteomyelitis) were stabilised by internal fixation. In 38 patients management of dead space required antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate beads, which were exchanged for an autogenous bone graft at six weeks. Free-tissue transfer often facilitated soft-tissue coverage. These 93 patients were compared with 22 consecutive patients treated previously who had the same surgical management, but received culture-specific intravenous antibiotics for six weeks. Of the 93 patients, 80 healed without further intervention. Of the 31 Cierny-IV lesions, 27 healed without another operation, and four fractures required additional bone grafts. No more wound drainage was needed. Treatment was successful in 91% of patients, regardless of the organism involved. There was no difference in outcome in terms of these variables when the series were compared. We conclude that the long-term administration of intravenous antibiotics is not necessary to achieve a high rate of clinical resolution of wound drainage for adult patients with chronic osteomyelitis

Staphylococcus aureus osteo-articular infections (OAI) are frequently accompanied by blood stream infections (BSI) diagnosed by positive blood culture (BC). Microbiological protocols in adults advise prolonged intravenous antibiotics and repeat BC 48-hourly in the presence of a BSI, however evidence to support the systematic employment of these guidelines in paediatric patients is lacking. We aimed to determine whether there was an increased incidence of orthopaedic and systemic complications in patients with s aureus BSI, and whether a shorter duration of intravenous antibiotics was associated with the development of complications.

Following ethical approval, the departmental surgical database was searched for patients that underwent surgery for acute OAI over a 5-year period. Patients with no sample taken for BC were excluded, as were those with other or no organisms identified from any site. Demographic and clinical data were captured, including duration of IV antibiotics and development of complications. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Following exclusions, 44 patients with a median age of 85 months remained to be analysed. Thirty patients (68%) had a positive BC. A positive BC was associated with a higher rate of systemic complications (p=0.026) but not orthopaedic complications (p=0.159). Patients who had developed any complication had a significantly longer duration of IV antibiotic treatment compared to those without complications (p<0.001). The presenting CRP levels were significantly higher in patients that developed complications (p=0.004).

Patients with staphylococcal BSI in association with an OAI are at increased risk of developing systemic complications. In our cohort, a shorter duration of antibiotic use was not associated with the development of complications, which does not support the systematic use of long courses of IV antibiotics in s aureus BSI. Further research will be required to determine the ideal protocol for these patients.

Aim

An instrumented blood culture system automatically flags when growth within the culture medium has been detected (‘work in progress’), and subsequently when the organism has been identified.

We explore using this data to switch patients to oral therapy within 72 hours post-surgery, reducing costs and improving antimicrobial stewardship.

Infected nonunion of the femur or tibia diaphysis requires resection of infected bone, stabilization of bone and reconstruction of bone defect. External fixation of the femur is poorly tolerated by patients. In 2004 authors introduced in therapy for infected nonunions of tibia and femur diaphysis coating of IMN with a layer of antibiotic loaded acrylic cement (ALAC) containing 5% of culture specific antibiotic.

Seven patients with infected nonunion of the diaphysis of femur (2) and tibia (2) were treated, aged 20–63 years, followed for 2–9 years (average 5,5 years). All have been infected with S. aureus (MSSA: 2 and MRSA: 4) or Staph. epidermidis (1) and in one case with MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All patients underwent 3 to 6 operations before authors IMN application. Custom-made IMN coated with acrylic cement (Palamed) loaded fabrically with gentamycin with admixture of 5% of culture-specific antibiotic: vancomycin (7 cases) and meropeneme (1 case) was used for bone stabilization. Static interlocking of IMN was applied in 4 cases and dynamic in 2 cases. In 1 case the femur was stabilized with IMN without interlocking screws. In 2 cases IMN was used for fixation of nonunion at docking site after bone transport. In 3 cases ALAC was used as temporary defect filling and dead space management. In one case after removal of IMN coated with ALAC, a new custom made Gamma nail and tubular bone allograft ranging 11 cm was used for defect reconstruction.

Infection healing was achieved in all 7 cases, bone union was achieved in 4 from 7 cases. In 1 case of segmental diaphyseal defect ranging over 12 cm infection was healed, but bone defect was not reconstructed. This patient is waiting for total femoral replacement. In another case of segmental defect of 11 cm infection is healed, but allograft substitution and remodeling by host bone is poor. In the 3rd case of lacking bone healing, the 63 year old patients was noncooperative and not willing to walk in walker with weight bearing. This patient refused further treatment.

Custom-made intramedullary nail coated with a layer of acrylic cement loaded with 5% of culture specific antibiotic can provide local infection control, offer comfortable bone stabilization, and replace standard IM nail in therapy for difficult to treat infected diaphyseal nonunion of femur or tibia.

We investigated the effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with different cyclooxygenase (COX) selectivity on orthopaedic device-related infections (ODRIs) in a rat model. We aimed to measure the impact of NSAID therapy on bone changes, bacterial load, and cytokine levels after treatment with antibiotics. We also compared the effects of long vs short-term celecoxib (a COX-2 inhibitor) treatment on the same outcomes. Skeletally mature female Wistar rats were implanted with Staphylococcus epidermidis- contaminated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) screws in the proximal right tibia and monitored for 7 days. All animals received subcutaneous antibiotics (rifampicin plus cefazolin) for two weeks from day 7 to 21. In phase I of the study, rats were randomly assigned to receive 28 days of oral treatment with acetylsalicylic acid, ibuprofen, celecoxib, or vehicle control. In phase II, an additional group received seven days of celecoxib treatment from day 0 to 7. Bone changes were monitored using in vivo micro-CT and histology. Quantitative bacteriology was performed at euthanasia. Plasma samples were collected to measure cytokine levels on days 0, 6, 20, and 28. Combination antibiotic therapy resulted in treatment success in 85.71% of cases, while the addition of long-term celecoxib treatment reduced it to 45.45%. Long-term celecoxib treatment significantly reduced bone loss (33.85% mean difference [95% CI 14.12–53.58], p=0.0004 on day 6 bone fraction) and periosteal reaction (0.2760 μm mean difference [95% CI 0.2073–0.3448], p<0.0001 on day 14 periosteal thickness) during early infection compared to the control group. Short- term celecoxib treatment showed similar radiological results without a reduction in treatment success (88.9%). No differences in the inflammatory markers were observed. Our findings highlight the potential benefits of short-term use of celecoxib in improving bone fraction during the early post-infection period without impairing the efficacy of antibiotic therapy

Aim. Bone infections often manifest with soft tissue complications such as severe scarring, fistulas, or ulcerations. Ideally, their management involves thorough debridement of infected bone and associated soft tissues, along with achieving stable bone structure, substantial tissue coverage, and long-term antibiotic therapy. The formation of a multidisciplinary team comprising orthopedic surgeons, plastic surgeons, and infectious disease specialists is essential in addressing the most complex cases. Method. We conducted a retrospective study during six years (2018-2023) at our university center. Focusing on the most challenging cases, we included patients with bone infections in the leg and/or foot requiring free flap reconstruction. Each patient underwent simultaneous bone debridement and reconstruction by the orthopedic team, alongside soft tissue debridement and free flap reconstruction by the plastic surgery team. Targeted antibiotic therapy for either 6 weeks (acute) or 12 weeks (chronic osteitis) was initiated based on intraoperative cultures. Additional procedures such as allografts, arthrodesis, or autografts were performed if necessary. We analyzed the rates of bone union, infection resolution, and limb preservation. Results. Forty-five patients were enrolled. Twenty-four patients (53.3%) had urgent indications (e.g., open infected fractures, osteitis, acute osteoarthritis, or wound dehiscence), while 21 (46.7%) underwent elective surgery (e.g., septic pseudarthrosis or chronic osteitis). Two patients underwent amputation due to flap failure (4.4%), and one patient was lost to follow-up. Follow-up of the remaining 42 patients averaged 28 months (range: 6–60 months). During this period, 35 patients (83.4%) experienced no recurrence of infection. Similarly, 35 patients (83.4%) achieved bone union. Overall, the rate of lower limb preservation was 93.3%. Conclusions. Managing bone infection coupled with soft tissue defects brings significant challenges. Although the majority of patients treated here belong to a complex framework based on the BACH classification, the outcomes achieved here appear to align with those of the simpler cases, thanks to optimal care with a dedicated septic ortho-plastic team. Our study demonstrates a notable success rate in treating infection, achieving bone consolidation, and preserving lower limb function

Aim. In this study we investigated the effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with different cyclooxygenase (COX) selectivity on orthopaedic device-related infections (ODRIs) in a rat model. Specifically, we aimed to measure the impact of NSAID therapy on bone changes, bacterial load, and cytokine levels after treatment with antibiotics. In addition, we compared the effects of long vs short-term celecoxib (a COX-2 inhibitor) treatment on the same outcomes. Method. Skeletally mature female Wistar rats were implanted with Staphylococcus epidermidis-contaminated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) screws (1.5 × 10. 6. CFU per screw) in the proximal right tibia and monitored for 7 days. All animals received subcutaneous antibiotics (rifampicin plus cefazolin) for two weeks from day 7 to 21. In phase I of the study, rats were randomly assigned to receive 28 days of oral treatment with acetylsalicylic acid, ibuprofen, celecoxib, or vehicle control. In phase II, an additional group received seven days of celecoxib treatment from day 0 to 7. After implantation, bone changes were monitored using in vivo micro-CT and histology. Quantitative bacteriology was performed at euthanasia. Plasma samples were collected to measure cytokine levels at four time points (day 0, 6, 20, and 28). Results. The combination of antibiotic therapy resulted in treatment success in 85.71% of cases, while the addition of long-term celecoxib treatment reduced it to 45.45%. Long-term celecoxib treatment significantly reduced bone loss (33.85% mean difference [95% CI 14.12–53.58], p=0.0004 on day 6 bone fraction) and periosteal reaction (0.2760 μm mean difference [95% CI 0.2073–0.3448], p<0.0001 on day 14 periosteal thickness) during the early post-infection period compared to the control group. Short-term celecoxib treatment showed similar radiological results, however, there was no significant reduction in treatment success in the celecoxib group (88.9%). No differences in the selected inflammatory markers were observed. Conclusion. Our findings highlight the potential benefits of short-term use of celecoxib in improving bone fraction during the early post-infection period without impairing the efficacy of antibiotic therapy. This study suggests that celecoxib may be a useful addition to the multimodal approach to pain management in orthopaedic device-related infections

Aim. There are no definitive criteria for the definition of osteomyelitis in the hand and wrist and published case series are small. It remains a relatively uncommon, but difficult to treat problem. We present a series of 30 cases from 2016 to 2021 from a tertiary referral centre. We propose that the principles of thorough surgical debridement, dead space management, skeletal stabilisation and culture driven antibiotic therapy are the key to management of osteomyelitis in the hand and wrist. In addition, we show how these basic principles can be used for both functional and aesthetic impact for the wrist and digits with illustrated cases. Methods. We conducted a retrospective chart review over a 6 year period and recorded the site of the infection, the soft tissue and bony management, whether antibiotic eluting bone filler was used, the isolated bacterial species, the number of surgical procedures undertaken to treat the infection and the success rate for clearing the infection. Results. 17/30 cases had pre-existing metalwork in-situ. There were 19 phalangeal/metacarpal infections and 11 carpal infections. 24 patients had native joint involvement. A drug eluting bone void filler was used in 23/30 cases in order to manage the dead space. In 7/30 cases had polymicrobial organisms isolated, 15/30 had only one organism cultured. The most common organism cultured was Staphylococcus aureus. Complete resolution of osteomyelitis or joint infection was achieved in 29/30 cases with follow up ranging from six months to six years. 2/30 cases required thorough debridement of the distal phalanx; bone void filler provided an aesthetically optimal result to improve fingertip contour whilst managing the dead space. Conclusion. Osteomyelitis of the hand and wrist is optimally managed with thorough surgical debridement, dead space management with a drug eluting bone void filler, skeletal stabilisation and culture directed antibiotic therapy. In addition, the bone void filler provides pulp support and improves the aesthetic contour of fingertips in which distal phalangeal osteomyelitis was successfully treated

Aim. The management of PJIs is slowed down by the presence of bacteria forming biofilms where they may withstand antibiotic therapy. The use of adjuvant strategies, such as hydrolytic enzymes cocktail targeting biofilm matrices and facilitating their dispersion, is a promising option to limit impact of biofilms. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of enzymes cocktail combined with antibiotic dual therapy of rifampicin and vancomycin in a relevant in-vitro model. Method. Mature methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms were grown on Ti-6Al-4V coupons by adding 1mL of a 8Log10 ATCC 33591 suspension in TGN (TSB + 1% glucose + 2% NaCl) to 24-wells plates containing the coupons and incubating the plates for 24h at 37°C with a continuous 50rpm agitation. The samples were rinsed and placed in 6 wells plates containing 1ml of the enzymatic cocktail (C.D.D.) solution (tris-buffered (pH 7.0) solution of 400 U/ml of aspecific DNA/RNA endonuclease, 50 U/ml of endo-1,4-b-D-glucanase, and 0.06 U/ml of β-N-acetylhexosaminidase). 9ml of TGN or TGN containing antibiotics RIF/VAN (rifampicin 5µg/mL + vancomycin 8µg/mL) at clinically relevant concentrations found locally in bone or joints, was then added and the samples were incubated in identical conditions for 24h. The samples were then recovered and rinsed. CFU counts were obtained by recovering the bacteria with sonication, serial dilutions, and TSA plating. Biomass was determined via crystal violet staining, followed by dye solubilization in acetic acid, and absorbance measurement using a spectrophotometer. Results. Significant reductions in bacterial counts were observed in biofilms exposed to either RIF/VAN or RIF/VAN+CDD, by respectively 2,6 and 3,7Log10 when compared to samples reincubated with TGN alone (p <0.05). Additionally, CFU counts in samples exposed to RIF/VAN+CDD were reduced by 1,1Log10 when compared to those exposed to RIF/VAN (p<0,05). Significant reduction in biomass (-29,8%, p<0.05) was observed for coupons exposed to RIF/VAN+CDD when compared to C.D.D alone (figure 1). Conclusions. The concurrent utilization of enzymes with rifampicin and vancomycin, holds promise as a feasible method to address periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. Chronic osteomyelitis reflects a progressive inflammatory process of destruction and necrosis affecting bone architecture. It presents a challenge to manage, requiring multi-stage multidisciplinary interventions, and the literature reports a wide variety of treatment strategies. This systematic scoping review aims to map and summarise existing literature on treatment of chronic osteomyelitis of the femur and tibia and investigates the full range of treatments reported in order to enhance the reader's understanding of how to manage this complex condition. Method. A comprehensive computer-based search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Emcare and CINAHL for articles reporting treatment of chronic tibial/femoral osteomyelitis. Two reviewers independently performed a two-stage title/abstract and full-text screening, followed by data collection. Studies were included if they described any treatment strategy including at least one surgical intervention. Key information extracted included causative pathogens, treatment protocol and outcome i.e. both success rate, defined as remission achieved following initial treatment with no recurrence during followup, and recurrence rate. Results. A total of 1230 articles were identified, and 40 articles (2529 patients) ultimately included. Although a wide variety of treatment protocols are reported, all revolve around three key principles: removal of infected tissue, dead space management and antibiotic therapy. Variations are evident when considering use of extensive versus more conservative debridement techniques, and delivery and regime of antibiotic therapy, e.g. whether to use one of, or both systemic and local delivery. The majority (84.5%) of patients presented with stage III or IV disease according to the Cierny-Mader classification and staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated organism. Although there is heterogeneity across studies in reporting outcomes, with only 29 studies reporting success rate as defined in this review, 25 (86.2%) of these reported a success rate of at least 80%. Conclusions. It is difficult to identify the optimal treatment strategy when reporting of outcomes is not standardised across studies, even in the context of similar techniques being used. Success rates across studies may also vary depending on patient demographics, comorbidities, severity, type and number of causative pathogens and follow-up length. It is now essential to identify specific patient and treatment related factors that may affect clinical outcomes. Given the current dominance of case series in the literature, there is a need for randomised controlled trials to yield further information that could aid future efficient management