Background: The results of arthroscopic anterior labral (Bankart) repair have been shown to have high failure rate in patients with significant glenoid bone loss. Several reconstruction procedures using bone graft have been described to overcome the bone loss, including autogenous coracoid transfer to the anterior glenoid (Latarjet procedure) as well as iliac crest autograft and tibial allografts. In recent years, trends toward minimally invasive shoulder surgery along with improvements in technology and technique have led surgeons to expand the application of arthroscopic treatment. Purpose: This study aims to perform a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data to evaluate the clinical and radiological follow up of patient who underwent anatomic glenoid reconstruction using distal tibia allograft for the treatment of shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss at 1-year post operation time point. Between December 2011 and January 2015, 55 patients underwent arthroscopic stabilisation of the shoulder by means of capsule-labral reattachment to glenoid ream and bony augmentation of glenoid bone loss with distal tibial allograft for recurrent instability of the shoulder. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation included general assessment by the western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI) questionnaire, preoperative and postoperative radiographs and CT scans. Fifty-five patients have been evaluated with mean age of 29.73 years at time of the index operation. There were 40 males (mean age of 29.66) and 15 female (mean age of 29.93). Minimum follow up time was 12 months. The following adverse effects were recorded: none suffered from recurrent dislocation, 2 patients suffered from bone resorption but without overt instability, 1 patient had malunion due to screw fracture, None of the patients had nonunion. The mean pre-operative WOSI score was 36.54 and the mean postoperative WOSI score was 61.0. Arthroscopic stabilisation of the shoulder with distal tibia allograft augmentation demonstrates promising result at 1year follow up

The primary objective of this study was to establish a safety profile for an all-arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction via iliac crest autograft augmentation for the treatment of shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss. Short-term clinical and radiological outcomes were also evaluated. This study involved a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for 14 patients (male 8, female 6) who were treated for shoulder instability with bone loss using autologous iliac crest bone graft between 2014 and 2018. Of 14 patients, 11 were available for follow-up. The safety profile was established by examining intra-operative and post-operative complications such as neurovascular injuries, infections, major bleeding, and subluxations. Assessment of pre-operative and post-operative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) index, radiographs, and CT scans comprised the evaluation of clinical and radiological outcomes. A good safety profile was observed. There was no occurrence of intraoperative complications, neurovascular injuries, adverse events, or major bleeding. One patient did develop an infection in the neurovascular injuries, adverse events, or major bleeding. One patient did develop an infection in the treated shoulder post-surgery. There were no subluxations or positive apprehension tests on clinical examination post-operatively. Short-term clinical outcomes were seen to be favorable WOSI scores at the most recent follow-up were significantly higher than pre-operative scores, with a mean increase of 39.6 ± 10.60 (p = 0.00055). The average follow-up for CT scan was 4.66 (SD± 2.33) months, where all patients showed bone graft union. Arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability with bone loss via autologous iliac crest bone graft is shown to be a safe operative procedure that results in favorable short-term clinical and radiological outcomes. Further investigations must be done to evaluate the longevity of these positive health outcomes

Purpose. This prospective, expertise-based randomized clinical trial compares arthroscopic to open shoulder stabilization by measuring the disease-specific quality of life outcome in patients with traumatic unidirectional anterior shoulder instability, and determining the incidence of recurrent instability at 2-years post-operatively. Method. One hundred and ninety-six patients were randomly allocated to arthroscopic (n=98) or open (n=98) repair using an expertise-based approach with a surgeon specializing in one type of surgery. Randomization was performed using computer-generation, variable block sizes and concealed envelopes. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 3 and 6 months, 1 and 2 years post-operatively. These outcomes included the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) Index quality of life outcome and the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) functional outcome. Both outcomes were measured on a visual analog scale from 0 to 100, where a higher score represents better quality of life or function. Recurrent instability was categorized as traumatic/atraumatic, and as a subluxation/dislocation. Analyses included ANOVA of repeated measures and independent t-tests. Bonferroni adjustments for pairwise contrasts were made for multiple comparisons. Chi-squared analyses were performed on recurrence. Statistical significance was reported at p < 0.05. Results. There were no statistically significant differences at baseline with respect to gender, involved dominant shoulders, age, WOSI or ASES scores. At 2-years post-operatively, 19 patients in the Open group and 14 patients in the Arthroscopic group were lost to follow-up. A comparison of the baseline characteristics of these lost to follow-up patients showed no statistically significant differences in WOSI and ASES scores, age, involved dominant shoulder, gender and presence of Hill Sachs lesions between the groups. Of the patients that completed 2-year follow-up, there was no difference in mean WOSI score between the two groups: Open = 85 (SD = 20; 95% CI = 81 89), Arthroscopic = 82 (SD = 20; 95% CI = 77 86), p = 0.31. The ASES score for the Open group at 2-years was 91 (SD = 13; 95% CI = 88 94) and 88 (SD = 16; 95% CI = 85 92) for the Arthroscopic group, p = 0.17. Recurrence rates at 2-years were statistically different with 11% in the Open (9/80) and 23% in the Arthroscopic (20/87) groups, p = 0.05. Conclusion. At 2-years post-operative follow-up, there was no difference in disease-specific quality of life between Open and Arthroscopic repair. Open repair had a significantly lower risk of recurrence

Purpose. Electrothermal arthroscopic capsulorrhaphy (ETAC) was a technology introduced for orthopaedic surgery without good scientific clinical evidence supporting its use. This multicentre randomized clinical trial provides the scientific clinical evidence comparing ETAC to Open Inferior Capsular Shift (ICS), by measuring disease-specific quality of life at 2-years post-operatively, in patients with shoulder instability due to capsular redundancy. Method. Fifty-four subjects (37 females and 17 males; mean age 23.3 years (SD = 6.9; 15–44 years) with multidirectional instability (MDI) or multidirectional laxity with antero-inferior instability (MDL-AII) were randomized intra-operatively to ETAC (n = 28) or Open ICS (n = 26) using concealed envelopes, computer-generated, variable block randomization with stratification by surgeon and type of instability. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 3 and 6 months, 1 and 2 years. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) Index is a quality of life outcome measure that is scored on a visual analog scale from 0 to 100, where a higher score represents better quality of life. Two functional assessments included the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) Score and the Constant Score. Post-operative recurrent instability and surgical time were also measured. Analyses included ANOVA of repeated measures with Bonferroni adjustments for multiple comparisons, Chi-square and independent t-tests (p < 0.05). Results. At 2-years post-operatively, mean WOSI scores were not statistically different between the groups (p=0.61): ETAC = 74 (SD = 24; 95% CI = 64 84); Open ICS = 77 (SD = 20; 95% CI = 68 86). There was no difference between groups for mean ASES scores (p=0.34): ETAC = 81 (SD = 20; 95% CI = 73 90); Open ICS = 87 (SD = 18; 95% CI = 79 95), mean Constant scores (p = 0.35): ETAC = 83 (SD = 7; 95% CI = 80 86); Open ICS = 85 (SD = 11; 95% CI = 80 − 90), and recurrent instability (p = 0.41): ETAC = 2; Open ICS = 4. Mean surgical time was 23 minutes for ETAC and 59 minutes for Open ICS (p = 0.00). Three subjects (1 ETAC, 2 Open ICS) had stiff shoulders; however, no major complications were observed. Conclusion. Patient outcomes improved from baseline to all follow-up periods. There was no difference between the ETAC and Open ICS groups in quality of life, functional outcomes, and recurrent instability at 2 years post-operatively