Aims. The aim of this study was to determine if positive Waddell signs were related to patients’ demographics or to perception of their quality of life. Patients and Methods. This prospective cross-sectional study included 479 adult patients with back pain from a university spine centre. Each completed SF-12 and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaires and underwent standard spinal examinations to elicit Waddell signs. The relationship between Waddell signs and age, gender, ODI, Mental Component Score (MCS), and Physical Component Score (PCS) scores was determined. Results. Of the 479 patients, 128 (27%) had at least one positive Waddell sign. There were significantly more women with two or more Waddell signs than men. The proportion of patients with at least one positive Waddell sign increased with age until 55 years, and then declined rapidly; none had a positive sign over the age of 75 years. Functional outcome scores were significantly worse in those with a single Waddell sign (p < 0.01). With one or more Waddell signs, patients’ PCS and ODI scores indicated a perception of severe disability; with three or more Waddell signs, patients’ MCS scores indicated severe disability. With five Waddell signs, ODI scores indicated that patients perceived themselves as crippled. Conclusion. Positive Waddell signs, a potential indicator of central sensitization, indicated a likelihood of having functional limitations and an impaired quality of life, particularly in young women. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:219–25

Previous research has suggested that when subjected to painful lumbar stimulation, chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients with illness behaviour (IB) are unable to effectively engage a sensory modulation system utilised by patients without IB. 1. Furthermore, reduced insular cortex volume in CLBP patients with IB, may compound this problem. 2. . Pain Management Programs (PMP) has demonstrated reductions in IB and disability associated with chronic pain conditions. This current study aims to assess whether the pattern of cerebral response to pain in IB patients could be normalised by participation in a PMP. 12 patients with CLBP and IB (>4/5 Waddell signs present) were recruited prior to attending a 16-day PMP. FMRI scanning occurred prior to (PrePMP) and upon completion of the PMP (PostPMP). 8 healthy volunteers (HC) were scanned once. As in previous research, painful stimuli consisted of intense electrical stimulation delivered bilaterally to the lower back. The presentation of 3 colours indicated the likelihood of receiving 10second stimulation to the lower back (Always, Never and Maybe). IB scores were significantly reduced PostPMP (p <0.05). FMRI group activation maps for the Always condition revealed PostPMP patients increased activation in posterior regions, areas similarly activated by HC. For the Maybe condition, compared to PrePMP group, HC demonstrated greater activation in precuneus and middle and inferior frontal regions. Compared to their pre-treatment selves, PostPMP patients demonstrated increased activation in posterior and frontal regions. The results demonstrate that completion of a 16-day PMP leads to alteration in the brain's response to painful low back stimulation in CLBP patients with IB. Increased activation is seen in regions associated with the top-down modulation of pain. The response is similar to that seen in HC, and greater than before PMP confirming that the PMP process facilitates the utilisation of more normal coping pathways in response to CLBP