Aims. To compare operative and nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged over 65 years. Methods. A total of 100 patients were randomized in this non-inferiority trial, comparing cast immobilization with operation with a volar locking plate. Patients with displaced AO/OTA A and C fractures were eligible if one of the following were found after initial closed reduction: 1) dorsal angulation > 10°; 2) ulnar variance > 3 mm; or 3) intra-articular step-off > 2 mm. Primary outcome measure was the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) after 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE), EuroQol-5 dimensions 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), range of motion (ROM), grip strength, “satisfaction with wrist function” (score 0 to 10), and complications. Results. In all, 89 women and 11 men were included. Mean age was 74 years (65 to 91). Nonoperative treatment was non-inferior to operation with a five-point difference in median QuickDASH after 12 months (p = 0.206). After three and six months QuickDASH favoured the operative group (p = 0.010 and 0.030). Median values for PRWHE were 19 (interquartile range (IRQ) 10 to 32) in the operative group versus ten (IQR 1 to 31) in the nonoperative group at three months (p = 0.064), nine (IQR 2 to 20) versus five (IQR 0 to 13) (p = 0.020) at six months, and two (IQR 0 to 12) versus zero (IQR 0 to 8) (p = 0.019) after 12 months. Range of motion was similar between the groups. The EQ-5D-5L index score was better (mean difference 0.07) in the operative group at three and 12 months (p = 0.008 and 0.020). The complication rate was similar (p = 0.220). The operated patients were more satisfied with wrist function (median 8 (IQR 6 to 9) vs 6 (IQR 5 to 7) at three months, p = 0.002; 9 (IQR 7 to 9) vs 8 (IQR 6 to 8) at six months, p = 0.002; and 10 (IQR 8 to 10) vs 8 (IQR 7 to 9) at 12 months, p < 0.001). Conclusion. Nonoperative treatment was non-inferior to operative treatment based on QuickDASH after one year. Patients in the operative group had a faster recovery and were more satisfied with wrist function. Results from previous trials comparing operative and nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in the elderly vary between favouring the operative group and showing similar results between the treatments. This randomized trial suggests that most elderly patients may be treated nonoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):247–255

This study compares the cost-effectiveness of treating dorsally displaced distal radial fractures with a volar locking plate and percutaneous fixation. It was performed from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) using data from a single-centre randomised controlled trial. In total 130 patients (18 to 73 years of age) with a dorsally displaced distal radial fracture were randomised to treatment with either a volar locking plate (n = 66) or percutaneous fixation (n = 64). The methodology was according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance for technology appraisals. . There were no significant differences in quality of life scores between groups at any time point in the study. Both groups returned to baseline one year post-operatively. . NHS costs for the plate group were significantly higher (p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval 497 to 930). For an additional £713, fixation with a volar locking plate offered 0.0178 additional quality-adjusted life years in the year after surgery. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for plate fixation relative to percutaneous fixation at list price was £40 068. When adjusting the prices of the implants for a 20% hospital discount, the ICER was £31 898. Patients who underwent plate fixation did not return to work earlier. We found no evidence to support the cost-effectiveness, from the perspective of the NHS, of fixation using a volar locking plate over percutaneous fixation for the operative treatment of a dorsally displaced radial fracture. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1264–70

A total of 118 consecutive patients with a fracture of the distal radius were treated with a volar locking plate; 50 patients had no ulnar styloid fracture, 41 had a basal ulnar styloid fracture, and 27 had a fracture of the tip of the ulnar styloid. There were no significant differences in radiological and clinical results among the three groups. The outcome was good and was independent of the presence of a fracture of the ulnar styloid. A total of five patients (4.2%) had persistent ulnar-sided wrist pain at final follow-up. Nonunion of the ulnar styloid fracture did not necessarily lead to ulnar wrist pain. Patients with persistent ulnar pain had a higher mean initial ulnar variance and increased post-operative loss of ulnar variance. The presence of an associated ulnar styloid fracture of the ulnar styloid does not adversely affect the outcome in patients with a fracture of the distal radius treated by volar plating

This multicentre prospective clinical trial aimed to determine whether early administration of alendronate (ALN) delays fracture healing after surgical treatment of fractures of the distal radius. The study population comprised 80 patients (four men and 76 women) with a mean age of 70 years (52 to 86) with acute fragility fractures of the distal radius requiring open reduction and internal fixation with a volar locking plate and screws. Two groups of 40 patients each were randomly allocated either to receive once weekly oral ALN administration (35 mg) within a few days after surgery and continued for six months, or oral ALN administration delayed until four months after surgery. Postero-anterior and lateral radiographs of the affected wrist were taken monthly for six months after surgery. No differences between groups was observed with regard to gender (p = 1.0), age (p = 0.916), fracture classification (p = 0.274) or bone mineral density measured at the spine (p = 0.714). The radiographs were assessed by three independent assessors. There were no significant differences in the mean time to complete cortical bridging observed between the ALN group (3.5 months (. se. 0.16)) and the no-ALN group (3.1 months (. se. 0.15)) (p = 0.068). All the fractures healed in the both groups by the last follow-up. Improvement of the Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, grip strength, wrist range of movement, and tenderness over the fracture site did not differ between the groups over the six-month period. Based on our results, early administration of ALN after surgery for distal radius fracture did not appear to delay fracture healing times either radiologically or clinically. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1544–50

Background. The usefulness of arthroscopic reduction for the intra-articular fracture of the distal radius has been reported, although it is technically difficult. Hypothesis. Our hypothesis is that the reduction using the external fixator is useful as equivalent to the arthroscopic reduction for the intra-articular fracture of the distal radius fracture in the fixation with the volar locking plate. Materials & Methods. The surgery was performed in both methods randomly for 40 patients; average age 64(24 to 92) years, 11 male, 29 female. Image evaluations were performed at 24 weeks after surgery. Ulnar variance, Radial inclination, Volar tilt in the X-ray image, and gap and step in the computed tomogram were evaluated. Clinical evaluation was performed at 6, 12, 24 weeks after surgery. Objective evaluations were ranges of motion and grip strength. Subjective evaluations were disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH). Results. The results of image and objective evaluation had no significant difference between the two groups. DASH in arthroscopic group was significantly inferior at 24 weeks because of minor complications. Discussion & Conclusion. The external fixator and the arthroscopy are equally valuable in reduction of articular surface

Background. Distal radial fractures in the elderly population have been traditionally managed by closed techniques, primarily due to their poor bone quality and low functional demands. Since the introduction of the volar locking plate (VLP), which provides a good fixation in osteoporotic bones, there maybe an increased use of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the elderly population. Aim. We aimed to determine the changes in the management of these fractures in Scotland, and whether this differs between specialist regional centres and district general centres. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively analysed distal radius fractures, in patients aged over 70 years in the period between 1989 and 2008. Data were obtained from the national statistical centre based on admission code and from discharge summaries. Data included patient demographics and treatment method; either open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), Kirschner wire, or manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA). Results. Incidence of distal radius fractures has increased by 75% from 1989 to 2008. In 2003 there were 94 (13.6%) ORIF, 109 (15.1%) K-wire and 492 (71.3%) MUA. In 2008 there were 131 (22.5%) ORIF, 81 (14.2%) K-wire and 361 (63.3%) MUA. There has been a 34% increase in the number of ORIF and a 26% decrease in K-wire procedures. There is a difference in the proportion treated by ORIF in university hospital and district general hospital trusts; 11.8% more fractures are treated by ORIF in university hospitals (p<0.5). Conclusion. There has been an increasing tend to use VLP in the place of K wire fixation. However a vast majority of elderly patients are still treated primarily with MUA. There is an increased tendency to use VLP in university hospital trusts than in distict general hospitals. This may be a reflection of the availability and preferences of specialist orthopaedic hand surgeons

Introduction. Distal radius fractures are one of the most common injuries attended in hospitals. Throughout the years the treatment has change from simple cast to ORIF. Objectives. To compare the functional and radiographic results in the treatment of the distal intrarticular radial fractures treated by volar buttress plate (T plate AO® Synthes, Oberdorf, Suiza) and fixed volar angle locking plate (DVR® Depuy, Warsaw, Indiana, USA). Material and Methods. We performed a comparative retrospective study between two series of patients treated by fixed volar angle locking plate (40 patients) or volar buttress plate (36 patients). Distal radius fractures were classified by the AO/ASIF Müller classification after X-ray study in two views (Anteroposterios and lateral views), surgical treatment was indicated by the type of fracture (unstable fractures) and open fractures. Demographic information was gathered, injury mechanism and postoperatory complications. The minimal follow-up was 10 months. We performed clinical and radiographic evaluations before surgery, postoperatory, to 3 months and at the end of the follow-up (Palmar tilt, radial inclination, radial height and the radioulnar index were measured). Lidström's and Quick Dash scale, by means of telephonic survey, were used for the functional evaluation. Results. The time from fracture to surgery was on average 3.74 days in the group of DVR ® plates and 1.69 days for the group treated with T buttress plates. Henry's approach was realized in every case and the average time spent in surgery was 74 minutes for patients treated with T buttress plate and 80 minutes for patients treated with plate DVR®. In some cases K wires had to be used in 9 cases in the DVR® group and 7 in the other group. DVR® group obtained better results in radiological evaluation except in the radial inclination. In the Quick Dash scale, conducted a telephone survey, the average for the DVR® group was 26.40 (CI: 13.6 to 81.8) and 33.37 (CI: 10.2–90) for the group of T buttress plate (p=0.055). Conclusion. The potential advantages of ORIF in the distal radius fractures are low complication rate, stable subchondral fixation and early active movement of the wrist in the postoperative period. The disadvantages are a high cost, greater complexity and surgical exposure. Locking plates were designed to prevent postoperative collapse of the fracture also allows a better fix system in osteoporotic bone. Both types of plates obtained good results radiological and functional at the end of follow-up but we have obtained better results in the patients treated with locking plates

Aims

The purpose was to compare operative treatment with a volar plate and nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and over in a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Aims

The aim of this study was to examine trends in the management of fractures of the distal radius in Ireland over a ten-year period, and to determine if there were any changes in response to the English Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial (DRAFFT).

Aims

Our aim, using English Hospital Episode Statistics data before during and after the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial (DRAFFT), was to assess whether the results of the trial affected clinical practice.

Objectives

To investigate the differences of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of complex AO Type C distal radius fractures between two different models of a single implant type.

We performed a prospective, randomised trial to evaluate the outcome after surgery of displaced, unstable fractures of the distal radius. A total of 280 consecutive patients were enrolled in a prospective database and 88 identified who met the inclusion criteria for surgery. They were randomised to receive either bridging external fixation with supplementary Kirschner-wire fixation or volar-locked plating with screws. Both groups were similar in terms of age, gender, hand dominance, fracture pattern, socio-economic status and medical co-morbidities.

Although the patients treated by volar plating had a statistically significant early improvement in the range of movement of the wrist, this advantage diminished with time and in absolute terms the difference in range of movement was clinically unimportant. Radiologically, there were no clinically significant differences in the reductions, although more patients with AO/OTA (Orthopaedic Trauma Association) type C fractures were allocated to the external fixation group. The function at one year was similar in the two groups.

No clear advantage could be demonstrated with either treatment but fewer re-operations were required in the external fixation group.