Aims. Gram-negative infections are associated with comorbid patients, but outcomes are less well understood. This study reviewed diagnosis, management, and treatment for a cohort treated in a tertiary spinal centre. Methods. A retrospective review was performed of all gram-negative spinal infections (n = 32; median age 71 years; interquartile range 60 to 78), excluding surgical site infections, at a single centre between 2015 to 2020 with two- to six-year follow-up. Information regarding organism identification, antibiotic regime, and treatment outcomes (including clinical, radiological, and biochemical) were collected from clinical notes. Results. All patients had comorbidities and/or non-spinal procedures within the previous year. Most infections affected lumbar segments (20/32), with Escherichia coli the commonest organism (17/32). Causative organisms were identified by blood culture (23/32), biopsy/aspiration (7/32), or intraoperative samples (2/32). There were 56 different antibiotic regimes, with oral (PO) ciprofloxacin being the most prevalent (13/56; 17.6%). Multilevel, contiguous infections were common (8/32; 25%), usually resulting in bone destruction and collapse. Epidural collections were seen in 13/32 (40.6%). In total, five patients required surgery, three for neurological deterioration. Overall, 24 patients improved or recovered with a mean halving of CRP at 8.5 days (SD 6). At the time of review (two to six years post-diagnosis), 16 patients (50%) were deceased. Conclusion. This is the largest published cohort of gram-negative spinal infections. In older patients with comorbidities and/or previous interventions in the last year, a high level of suspicion must be given to gram-negative infection with blood cultures and biopsy essential. Early organism identification permits targeted treatment and good initial clinical outcomes; however, mortality is 50% in this cohort at a mean of 4.2 years (2 to 6) after diagnosis. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(5):435–443

Statement of purpose of study and background. As the treatment of low back pain (LBP) continues to evolve, there is greater recognition of the importance of optimising the therapeutic relationship to better deliver improved patient outcomes. Contextual effects, such as communication, have been shown to influence the therapeutic relationship, but it is not known how these factors evolve over time. This study analysed interviews from two studies (one cross-sectional and one longitudinal) to explore patients’ and physiotherapists’ perspectives of treatment outcomes and experiences in episodes of LBP in the same dialogic space. The objective was to explore the alignment between these perceptions to identify factors that influence the therapeutic relationship over time. Summary of methods used and results. Two secondary thematic analyses were undertaken, one analysing cross-sectional data and the other analysing longitudinal data, from an existing data set from the programme: “Exploring the relationship between communication and clinical decision-making in physiotherapy consultations for back pain”. All data were thematically analysed and organised using a framework approach. Six themes emerged from the cross-sectional data reporting consistency of opinion in the initial consultation stages, but highlighting inadequate patient involvement in shared decision making. Four main themes emerged from the longitudinal data, all of which reported interactional fears and anxieties identified on both the parts of the patient and the physiotherapist. Conclusion. These findings suggest that failing to involve the patient in adequately personalised treatment from the initial consultation may lead to diagnosis hunting and stereotyping behaviours within the therapeutic relationship, in turn leading to increased health resource usage. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of Funding. The primary data set was collected in a research programme funded by Arthritis Research UK (now Versus Arthritis)

A Core Outcome Set (COS) for treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is essential to ensure that the most meaningful outcomes are evaluated and used consistently. Measuring the same outcomes ensures evidence from clinical trials and routine clinical practice of different treatments can be more easily compared and combined, therefore increasing the quality of the evidence base. The SPINE-COS-AYA project aims to develop a gold standard COS which can be used internationally in research and routine clinical practice to evaluate the treatment (surgical and bracing) of AIS. In this qualitative study, the views of adolescents and young adults with AIS (10-25 years of age), their family members and healthcare professionals in a UK region were sought, via interviews, on treatment outcomes. Participants were purposively recruited from a variety of sources including NHS outpatient clinics and social media. Semi-structured interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Key findings will be presented, to include potential core outcome domains identified by the different subgroups. The core outcome domains identified in this research programme will subsequently form part of an international consensus survey to agree a COS. In future, if the COS is used by healthcare staff and researchers, it will be easier for everyone, including patients and their families, to assess which treatment works best

Aims

Implant-related postoperative spondylodiscitis (IPOS) is a severe complication in spine surgery and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. With growing knowledge in the field of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), equivalent investigations towards the management of implant-related infections of the spine are indispensable. To our knowledge, this study provides the largest description of cases of IPOS to date.

Aims. Spinal tuberculosis (TB) remains an important concern. Although spinal TB often has sequelae such as myelopathy after treatment, the predictive factors affecting such unfavourable outcomes are not yet established. We investigated the clinical manifestations and predictors of unfavourable treatment outcomes in patients with spinal TB. Patients and Methods. We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study of patients with spinal TB. Unfavourable outcome was defined according to previous studies. The prognostic factors for unfavourable outcomes as the primary outcome were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis and a linear mixed model was used to compare time course of inflammatory markers during treatment. A total of 185 patients were included, of whom 59 patients had unfavourable outcomes. Results. In multivariate regression analysis, the factors associated with unfavourable outcome were old age (odds ratio (OR) 2.51; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 5.86; p = 0.034), acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear positivity in specimens obtained through biopsy (OR 3.05; 95% CI 1.06 to 8.80; p = 0.039), and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at the end of treatment (OR 3.85; 95% CI 1.62 to 9.13; p = 0.002). Patients with unfavourable outcomes had a significant trend toward higher ESR during treatment compared with patients with favourable outcome (p = 0.009). Duration of anti-TB and surgical treatment did not affect prognosis. Conclusion. Elevated ESR at the end of treatment could be used as a marker to identify spinal TB patients with a poor prognosis. Patients whose ESR is not normalized during treatment, as well as those with old age and AFB smear positivity, should be aware of unfavourable outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1542–1549

Aims. The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement of physician assistants (PAs) in the triaging of patients with Low Back Pain (LBP) based on self-reported data. Patients and methods. A cross sectional vignette study among four PAs was carried out. Vignettes (cases) were constructed including 26 factors that can be self-reported, identified in literature that have predictive value in treatment outcomes (for example red flags indicating serious underlying conditions and yellow flags indicating psychosocial factors). All vignettes were randomly assigned to the PAs who should determine what intervention would be most optimal to the patient (rehabilitation, injections, medications, surgery, primary care psychology, primary care physical therapy). PAs were allowed to advise more than one intervention. Per vignette, 3 PAs were assigned randomly to advise on intervention. Fleish kappas were calculated to determine the interrater reliability. Results. Twenty-five vignettes were judged by 3 of the 4 PAs. Per advise, Fleish kappa values varied between k=0.65 for surgery and medication to k=0.77 for rehabilitation, which can be interpreted as substantial agreement. Conclusion. Based on self-reported data provided by patients, PAs can triage patients with substantial agreement. Adding more information based on history, physical examination and imaging, may influence these outcomes. This study adds to the merit of using questionnaires for guiding clinicians in their triaging process. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Purpose and background of the study. When talking to patients about pain, it has been shown that practitioners can positively or negatively influence health beliefs and treatment outcomes. Multidisciplinary physical and psychological interventions have demonstrated better outcomes for patients with long-term pain. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a form of ‘third wave’ Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) that has been shown to promote resilience and wellbeing. A qualitative auto-ethnographic case study design was used to explore the communication processes and therapeutic outcomes associated with developing an innovative course integrating ACT interventions with osteopathic treatment, delivered by a single practitioner. Methods. Six individual consultations with four patients were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded. Linguistic Ethnography was used to identify pain discourses and analyse links with clinical decisions and patient responses. Transcript extracts were analysed at three levels; micro-level Conversation Analysis of communication processes; Interactional Sociolinguistic Analysis of changes in patient-practitioner roles; and macro-level Discourse Analysis of the wider biomedical and biopsychosocial context. Results. Two distinctive forms of discourse were identified. In predominantly ‘mechanistic’ communication, the ‘expert’ practitioner role was focused on fixing ‘broken’ parts and relieving pain. In ‘facilitative’ discourses, the ‘collaborative’ practitioner focused on promoting patients’ body awareness and active coping. Challenges included learning how to shift between discourses, which required mindfulness and willingness to tolerate uncertainty. Conclusion. This new inter-disciplinary approach enabled an osteopath to re-frame pain discourses to promote patient agency and resilience. Findings were subsequently used to design the OsteoMAP study (Osteopathy, Mindfulness and Acceptance-based Programme) to test outcomes with practitioners in other clinical settings. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Aims

To provide normative data that can assess spinal-related disability and the prevalence of back or leg pain among adults with no spinal conditions in the UK using validated questionnaires.

Aims

The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with poor outcome following coccygectomy on patients with chronic coccydynia and instability of the coccyx.

Background. Exercise is a complex intervention, and often has more than one treatment target. Results from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise interventions for chronic low back pain (CLBP) typically show small to moderate effect sizes, but these may differ where outcomes better reflect the targets of interventions. This review aimed to describe what treatment targets, outcome domains and primary outcome measures are used in exercise RCTs, and examined how well the selected outcome domains match the treatment targets used in each RCT. Methods and Results. A computer-aided literature search was performed in eight databases, from inception to August 2018. Inclusion criteria: RCTs in CLBP, exercise compared to a non-exercise arm, sample size >60 per arm. Title and abstract review, subsequent full text review, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently undertaken by pairs of reviewers. Of 18251 initially identified titles and abstracts, 23 trials were included in the review. 30 treatment targets were extracted, and 6 primary outcome domains identified. A logic model of the treatment targets and outcomes demonstrated diverse relationships. Only 5 RCTs matched their primary outcome domain to the identified treatment targets, 12 used primary outcomes that did not match the reported treatment targets, and 6 were partially matched. Conclusion. The majority of included trials did not match the primary outcome domain to the treatment targets of the exercise intervention. Further research will explore if better matching between treatment targets and outcomes may change the conclusions of exercise trials in CLBP. No conflicts of interest. Sources of Funding: This PhD is funded by the Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University. Prof NE Foster is a UK National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator, and was supported by a UK National Institute for Health Research Professorship (NIHR-RP-011-015). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health

Aims. The aim of the present study was to answer the question whether curve morphology and location have an influence on rigid conservative treatment in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods. We retrospectively analyzed AIS in 127 patients with single and double curves who had been treated with a Chêneau brace and physiotherapeutic specific exercises (B-PSE). The inclusion criteria were the presence of structural major curves ≥ 20° and < 50° (Risser stage 0 to 2) at the time when B-PSE was initiated. The patients were divided into two groups according to the outcome of treatment: failure (curve progression to ≥ 45° or surgery) and success (curve progression < 45° and no surgery). The main curve type (MCT), curve magnitude, and length (overall, above and below the apex), apical rotation, initial curve correction, flexibility, and derotation by the brace were compared between the two groups. Results. In univariate analysis treatment failure depended significantly on: 1) MCT (p = 0.008); 2) the apical rotation of the major curve before (p = 0.007) and during brace treatment (p < 0.001); 3) the initial and in-brace Cobb angles of the major (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and minor curves (p = 0.015 and p = 0.002); 4) major curve flexibility (p = 0.005) and the in-brace curve correction rates (major p = 0.008, minor p = 0.034); and 5) the length of the major curve (LoC) above (p < 0.001) and below (p = 0.002) the apex. Furthermore, MCT (p = 0.043, p = 0.129, and p = 0.017 in MCT comparisons), LoC (upper length p = 0.003, lower length p = 0.005), and in-brace Cobb angles (major p = 0.002, minor p = 0.027) were significant in binary logistic regression analysis. Conclusion. Curve size, location, and morphology were found to influence the outcome of rigid conservative treatment of AIS. These findings may improve future brace design and patient selection for conservative treatment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):373–381

Pain catastrophising is an adverse coping mechanism, involving an exaggerated response to anticipated or actual pain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of pain ‘catastrophising’, as measured using the pain catastrophising scale (PCS), on treatment outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). A total of 138 patients (47 men and 91 women, mean age 65.9; 45 to 78) were assigned to low (PCS score < 25, n = 68) and high (PCS score ≥ 25, n = 70) PCS groups. The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 12 months after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included the ODI and visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, which were recorded at each assessment conducted during the 12-month follow-up period. The overall changes in the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain over a 12-month period were significantly different between the groups (ODI, p < 0.001; VAS for back pain, p < 0.001; VAS for leg pain, p = 0.040). The ODI and VAS for back and leg pain significantly decreased over time after surgery in both groups (p < 0.001 for all three variables). The patterns of change in the ODI and VAS for back pain during the follow-up period significantly differed between the two groups, suggesting that the PCS group is a potential treatment moderator. However, there was no difference in the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain between the low and high PCS groups 12 months after surgery. . In terms of minimum clinically important differences in ODI scores (12.8), 22 patients (40.7%) had an unsatisfactory surgical outcome in the low PCS group and 16 (32.6%) in the high PCS group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.539). . Pre-operative catastrophising did not always result in a poor outcome 12 months after surgery, which indicates that this could moderate the efficacy of surgery for LSS. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1546–54

Purpose. The treatment of C2 fractures with collar, halo or surgery can all be justified depending on the patient. In our unit, primary treatment is with a halo: in a previous study presented at BASS we found an 85% fusion rate. In a follow on study, we wished to assess the outcome in those patients who underwent surgical treatment. Methods. The discharge logbook was examined retrospectively to identify patients who had posterior instrumentation for C2 fractures from 2008-2010 inclusive. Discharge summaries, clinic letters and radiology images/reports from PACS were analysed to obtain data regarding primary treatment, outcome, necessity for delayed treatment and radiological evidence of union. Results. Seven patients were identified who had surgery for C2 fracture. All 7 patients were treated with C1 and C2 lateral mass screws. In two of these patients additional lateral mass screws were inserted at C3. Due to patient preference, three of the seven patients underwent operative fixation without prior treatment in a halo. All three patients had evidence of bony union at the fracture site on subsequent radiological follow up. The remaining four patients were initially treated in a halo and had delayed surgery. After surgery two of these four patients had radiological evidence of bony union at the fracture site, one remained non-united and one patient has not yet been fully assessed. Conclusions. In this small series, operative fixation for C2 fracture lead to bony union at the fracture site in 5 out of 6 cases where full follow up was available. Interestingly, bony union at the fracture site may be an achievable objective even when surgery has been delayed or is not the primary treatment

Introduction. It is becoming increasingly more accepted that Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) should be used to assess surgical interventions. We report on a pilot study of a generic database with complete pre and post-operative data sets in a UK hospital. Method. 19 cases undergoing lumbar surgery in our institution were prospectively reviewed between January and August 2010. Pre and post–operative data assessing pain, back pain specific function, generic health, work disability and patient satisfaction were collected using a core outcome measures index, EuroQol EQ-5D and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Details of surgery and assessment of treatment outcome by the operating surgeon was also assessed. Results. There were 11 males and 8 females. 8 cases were coded as disc herniation, and 11 as spinal stenosis. Levels involved included L3/4 (4), L4/5 (8) and L5/S1 (6). ASA status was 1 (4/19), 2 (12/19) and 3 (3/19). The median operation time for all operations was between 1-2 hours and blood loss was under 500ml for all cases. Complications recorded were one dural tear and one wound infection. Post operatively the COMI score improved from 8.7 to 7 overall (p=0.028) and the leg pain score improved from 8 to 7 overall (p=0.009). The EQ-5D improved from 0.09 to 0.36. The ODI improved from 60 to 40 (p=0.03). Patients reported being satisfied in 73% of cases and the surgeon reported a good or excellent result in 65% of cases. Conclusion. The Spine Tango is an effective and user friendly tool for data collection. Data entry and extraction is easy. It is security enhanced and no Patient identifiable data (PID) is transferred outside the host institution. Data retrieval can be done online with clear-cut graphs and data tables or by downloading data and importing into a statistical package for more complex, analyses

Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of spinal instrumentation in haemodialyzed patients with native pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Spinal instrumentation in these patients can be dangerous due to rates of complications and mortality, and biofilm formation on the instrumentation. Patients and Methods. A total of 134 haemodialyzed patients aged more than 50 years who underwent surgical treatment for pyogenic spondylodiscitis were included in the study. Their mean age was 66.4 years (50 to 83); 66 were male (49.3%) and 68 were female (50.7%). They were divided into two groups according to whether spinal instrumentation was used or not. Propensity score matching was used to attenuate the potential selection bias. The outcome of treatment was compared between these two groups. Results. A total of 89 patients (66.4%) underwent non-instrumented surgery and 45 (33.5%) underwent instrumented surgery. There were no significant differences in the rates of postoperative complications, except for an increased rate of wound problems in the instrumented group, which was found in the unmatched cohorts (p = 0.034). There were no significant differences in the rate of recurrent infections (p = 0.328 for the unmatched cohort; p = 0.269 for the matched cohort) and mortality rate, including in-hospital (p = 0.713 for the unmatched cohort; p = 0.738 for the matched cohort) and one-year rates (p = 0.363 for the unmatched cohort; p = 0.787 for the matched cohort), between the groups. However, the interval between the initial diagnosis and the first recurrence was significantly longer in the instrumented group (p = 0.008 for the unmatched cohort; p = 0.032 for the matched cohort). Conclusion. Instrumented surgery for haemodialyzed patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis showed similar outcomes, including recurrence and mortality, to non-instrumented surgery, despite the instrumented group having more severe neurological deficit, a larger number of involved levels, and increased kyphotic angle

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) on the risk of re-operation at an adjacent level.

Purpose of study and background. The primary aim of the study was to test the feasibility of conducting a full RCT with economic analysis and help to inform the provision of physiotherapy in a specific sub-group of patients with sciatica. Methods. 60 patients waiting for primary, unilateral, single level, lumbar micro-discectomy surgery were recruited and randomised into two groups. The intervention group received a new spinal physiotherapy regimen. Primary outcome measure was the number of patients who did not require surgery at the time of consent clinic. Secondary measures were the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EQ5DL, taken at recruitment, 1 week before surgery and 2 weeks and 3 months after surgery. Results. 1 week before surgery, 3 patients of 30 (10.0%) in the non-physiotherapy group and 5 out of 29 (17.2%) in the physiotherapy group did not require surgery translating into a difference of −7.2% (95%CI-25.7% to 11.1%) in favour of the physiotherapy group but not statistically significant. All the secondary outcome measures demonstrated that patients in the physiotherapy group had a greater improvement but this was not statistically significant due to the small trial numbers. Conclusion. This study informs the feasibility of planning of a large RCT with regard to recruitment, adherence to treatment and outcome measures. The observational data shows that physiotherapy can have a positive impact on these patients with sciatica which diminishes with time. These results provide a framework for further studies. This paper presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme (Grant Reference Number PB-PG-0110-21158). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health

Purpose. Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are vulnerable to cervical spine injury following relatively minor trauma. The authors present a retrospective review to determine the characteristics, treatment and outcome following cervical spine injury in these patients. Methods. Retrospective analysis of case notes and images of patients with AS admitted to the Spinal Injury Unit over a 10-year period. Results. Thirty-nine patients were identified. Records were available for 31 patients at the time of this analysis. The median age was 62 years (range 37-84). The male:female ratio was 7:1. Mechanisms of injury included falls (72%) and RTAs (7%), while 14% were unable to recall an injury. Alcohol was involved in 20% of the cases. Fracture through an ankylosed disc in the mid to low cervical spine was the commonest injury. Concomitant non-contiguous bony injury was seen in 2 patients. More than half (55%) were Grade E on ASIA impairment scale (AIS), while 14% were Grade A and 31% Grade D. Two patients required skull traction. Most patients were successfully treated by external immobilisation. Halo crown and jacket was the most common orthosis used. Twelve patients underwent surgical stabilisation. The mean duration of external immobilisation in the non-surgical group was 13 weeks (range 10-32), whereas following surgery it was 6 weeks (range 2-8). Adequate radiological evidence of fusion was seen in all 22 patients for whom this information was available at a median of 22 weeks (range 12-32). Patients with AIS Grade A and E were unchanged at discharge, while 4 patients in AIS Grade D improved to E. Conclusion. External immobilisation with halo in an effective first-line therapy in achieving fusion and stability. Surgical stabilisation can be reserved as a second-line treatment

Purpose. Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are vulnerable to cervical spine injury following relatively minor trauma. The authors present a retrospective review to determine the characteristics, treatment and outcome following cervical spine injury in these patients. Methods. Retrospective analysis of case notes and images of patients with AS admitted to the Spinal Injury Unit over a 10-year period. Results. Thirty-nine patients were identified. Records were available for 31 patients at the time of this analysis. The median age was 62 years (range 37-84). The male:female ratio was 7:1. Mechanisms of injury included falls (72%) and RTAs (7%), while 14% were unable to recall an injury. Alcohol was involved in 20% of the cases. Fracture through an ankylosed disc in the mid to low cervical spine was the commonest injury. Concomitant non-contiguous bony injury was seen in 2 patients. More than half (55%) were Grade E on ASIA impairment scale (AIS), while 14% were Grade A and 31% Grade D. Two patients required skull traction. Most patients were successfully treated by external immobilisation. Halo crown and jacket was the most common orthosis used. Twelve patients underwent surgical stabilisation. The mean duration of external immobilisation in the non-surgical group was 13 weeks (range 10-32), whereas following surgery it was 6 weeks (range 2-8). Adequate radiological evidence of fusion was seen in all 22 patients for whom this information was available at a median of 22 weeks (range 12-32). Patients with AIS Grade A and E were unchanged at discharge, while 4 patients in AIS Grade D improved to E. Conclusion. External immobilisation with halo in an effective first-line therapy in achieving fusion and stability. Surgical stabilisation can be reserved as a second-line treatment

A combination of hemivertebrae and diastematomyelia is rare. We have identified 12 such patients seen during a period of 11 years in the orthopaedic, spinal and neurosurgical units in Nottingham and analysed their treatment and outcome