Our aim was to determine whether children with buckle fractures of the distal radius could be managed at home after initial hospital treatment. There were 87 patients in the trial: 40 had their short-arm backslab removed at home three weeks after the initial injury, and 47 followed normal practice by attending the fracture clinic after three weeks for removal of the backslab. Clinical examination six weeks after the injury showed no significant difference in deformity of the wrist, tenderness, range of movement and satisfaction between the two groups. Fourteen (33%) of the hospital group compared with five (14%) (p = 0.04) of those managed in the community stated that they had problems with the care of their child’s fracture. It was found that both groups, given a choice, would prefer to remove their child’s backslab at home (p < 0.001). Our findings show that it is clinically safe to manage children with buckle fractures within the community

Aims

The aim of this trial was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a soft bandage and immediate discharge, compared with rigid immobilization, in children aged four to 15 years with a torus fracture of the distal radius.

The February 2023 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup. 360. looks at: Trends in management of paediatric distal radius buckle fractures; Pelvic osteotomy in patients with previous sacral-alar-iliac fixation; Sacral-alar-iliac fixation in patients with previous pelvic osteotomy; Idiopathic toe walking: an update on natural history, diagnosis, and treatment; A prediction model for treatment decisions in distal radial physeal injuries: a multicentre retrospective study; Angular deformities after percutaneous epiphysiodesis for leg length discrepancy; MRI assessment of anterior coverage is predictive of future radiological coverage; Predictive scoring for recurrent patellar instability after a first-time patellar dislocation

Aims. Torus fractures of the distal radius are the most common fractures in children. The NICE non-complex fracture guidelines recently concluded that bandaging was probably the optimal treatment for these injuries. However, across the UK current treatment varies widely due to a lack of evidence underpinning the guidelines. The Forearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) trial evaluates the effect of a soft bandage and immediate discharge compared with rigid immobilization. Methods. FORCE is a multicentre, parallel group randomized controlled equivalence trial. The primary outcome is the Wong-Baker FACES pain score at three days after randomization and the primary analysis of this outcome will use a multivariate linear regression model to compare the two groups. Secondary outcomes are measured at one and seven days, and three and six-weeks post-randomization and include the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity limb score, EuroQoL EQ-5D-Y, analgesia use, school absence, complications, and healthcare resource use. The planned statistical and health economic analyses for this trial are described here. The FORCE trial protocol has been published separately. Conclusion. This paper provides details of the planned analyses for this trial, and will reduce the risks of outcome reporting bias and data driven results. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:205–213

Aims. Torus fractures are the most common childhood fracture, accounting for 500,000 UK emergency attendances per year. UK treatment varies widely due to lack of scientific evidence. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled equivalence trial of ‘the offer of a soft bandage and immediate discharge’ versus ‘rigid immobilization and follow-up as per the protocol of the treating centre’ in the treatment of torus fractures . Methods. Children aged four to 15-years-old inclusive who have sustained a torus/buckle fracture of the distal radius with/without an injury to the ulna are eligible to take part. Baseline pain as measured by the Wong Baker FACES pain scale, function using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper limb, and quality of life (QoL) assessed with the EuroQol EQ-5D-Y will be collected. Each patient will be randomly allocated (1:1, stratified by centre and age group (four to seven years and ≥ eight years) to either a regimen of the offer of a soft bandage and immediate discharge or rigid immobilization and follow-up as per the protocol of the treating centre. Results. At day one, three, and seven, data on pain, function, QoL, immobilization, and analgesia will be collected. Three and six weeks after injury, the main outcomes plus data on complications, resource use, and school absence will be collected. The primary outcome is the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale at three days post-randomization. All data will be obtained through electronic questionnaires completed by the participants and/or parents/guardian. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:214–221

The use of a forearm cast for paediatric buckle fractures of the distal radius is widespread practice. These fractures do not displace and follow-up in Fracture Clinic is only for cast removal. This may mean missed school for the child, or work for parents. Modern materials allow a robust lightweight back-slab to be used for protection of these stable, though painful, injuries. Unlike a plaster of Paris backslab, Prelude? (Smith and Nephew) is removed by unwrapping the outer bandage. Parents can do this at home. We prospectively studied 41 consecutive children aged 12 or less with buckle fractures of the distal radius, presenting to Fracture Clinic. After the diagnosis of isolated buckle fracture was confirmed, a Prelude? cast was applied. Parents were given a full explanation and written instructions, which were also sent to the GP. Telephone follow-up was carried out at 3–4 weeks. Forty of forty-one parents expressed satisfaction with both the treatment and the instructions. The parents of one patient misunderstood the instructions, re-presented to fracture clinic and were dissatisfied for this reason. With modern casting materials and adequate instructions at Fracture Clinic, routine follow-up of patients with buckle fractures is unnecessary. Resource savings can be made in this way with no compromise to patient care and increased patient/ parent satisfaction

To assess patient/parent satisfaction with treatment of radial Forearm Buckle Fractures without the necessity of fracture clinic visits. A+E staff were provided with definitions and suitable example X-Rays of radial forearm buckle fractures. The A+E staff were asked to mark the films with a green dot for Radiological review if the patient was included in the study, and these films were seen within 24 hours by a consultant radiologist. Over a three month period all patients with radial forearm buckle fractures seen in A+E were treated with an Alder Hey splint rather than plaster, they were then given a fracture clinic appointment for three weeks later. At this visit the medical staff completed a proforma with the following information, appropriateness of the diagnosis, side, bone/cortex involved, degree of angulation as well as the mode of injury. The patients and their parents were asked whether they were happy with the level of support that the splint gave and whether they would have been happy to remove the splint without visiting the fracture clinic. 72 (86.7%) had suffered low energy injuries, 5 (6%) high energy injuries, 5 (6%) did not attend their clinic appointment. 65 of 78 (83%) of parents and 65 of 72 (90%) of patients felt that the level of provided support was adequate (6 patients too young to answer). 58 of 78 (74%) of parents and 53 of 72 (74%) of patients would have been happy to make the decision to remove the splint themselves (6 patients too young to answer). 5 (6%) of the diagnoses were deemed to be inappropriate, of these 2 were picked up in radiology review and sent to clinic and 3 were soft tissue injuries. We feel that the results show that the majority of patients with radial forearm buckle fractures (appropriate guidelines available to A+E staff) do not need to be seen in the fracture clinic, as long as their X-Rays are reviewed and any inappropriately diagnosed fractures sent to clinic. This has significant implications both for fracture clinic workload and also financially for hospitals

Ten RCTs published between 2000 and 2013 support treating distal radius buckle fractures and other low-risk distal radius fractures with a removable splint and with no orthopaedic follow-up. Application of this evidence has been shown to be variable and suboptimal resulting in unnecessary costs to a strained healthcare system. The Canadian evidence on this topic has been generated by subspecialist physicians working in paediatric hospitals. It is unclear what factors affect the dissemination of this information. We investigated the association of hospital type and physician type with the application of best-evidence treatment for low-risk distal radius fractures in children with the goal of improving our understanding of evidence diffusion in Ontario for this common injury. We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study using linked health care administrative data. We identified all children aged 2–14 treated in Ontario emergency departments from 2003–2015 with distal radius fractures with no reduction and no operation within a six week period. We excluded refractures and children with comorbidities. We evaluated the followup received – orthopaedic, general practitioner, or none. We examined the data for trends over time. Multivariable log binomial regression was used to quantify associations between hospital and physician type and best-evidence treatment. We adjusted for patient-related variables including age, sex, rural or urban location, and socioeconomic status. 70,801 fractures were analyzed. Best-evidence treatment was more likely to occur in a small (RR 1.86, 95%CI 1.72–2.01), paediatric (RR 1.16, 95%CI 1.07–1.26), or community (RR 1.13, 95%CI 1.06–1.20) hospital compared with treatment in a teaching hospital. Best-evidence treatment was more likely if initial management was by a paediatrician with additional emergency medicine training (RR 1.73, 95%CI 1.56–1.92) or paediatrician (RR 1.22, 95%CI 1.11–1.34). Paediatric and teaching hospitals have improved their use of best-evidence over time while other hospital types have stagnated or deteriorated. Paediatricians, paediatricians with additional emergency medicine training, and emergency medicine residency trained physicians have improved their use of best-evidence over time, while other physician types have stagnated or deteriorated. Overall, only 20% of patients received best-evidence treatment and 70% had orthopaedic follow-up. Significant over-utilization of resources for low-risk distal radius fractures continues decades after the first randomized trials showed it to be unnecessary. Physician type and hospital rurality are most strongly associated with best-evidence treatment. Physician types involved in generating, presenting, and publishing best-evidence for this fracture type are successfully implementing it, while others have failed to change their practices. Rural hospitals are excellent resource stewards by necessity, but are deteriorating over time. Our results strongly indicate the need for targeted implementation strategies to explicitly apply clinical evidence in clinical practice Canada-wide, with the goal of providing more cost-effective care for common children's fractures

Background: The epidemiology of fracture in children has been reported in detail by other authors. The most common mechanism in their study was a fall in or around the house onto an outstretched hand causing a fracture of the distal radius and ulna. These injuries accounted for 35.8% of all fractures in this age group and the annual incidence was estimated to be 16 per 1000 children in the UK. The controversial issues in the management of distal radius fracture involve what constitutes a degree of fracture displacement and angulation likely to be compensated by remodelling with growth over time, indications for fracture stabilisation with wires or other invasive methods compared with plaster casting alone, details of the position of the arm during immobilisation in a cast, and whether the cast should immobilise the wrist alone or both, the wrist and the elbow. The management of buckle fractures of the distal radius is relatively uncontroversial, involving splintage for symptomatic relief from pain. Some authors have advocated removable wrist supports, with discontinuation of splintage at the parents’ discretion. We performed a systematic review of all areas of the management of distal radius metaphyseal fractures in children. Growth plate injuries were not included for analysis. Methods: Any randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials which compared types of immobilisation and the use of wire fixation for distal radius fractures in children were included. Types of outcome measures:. Radiological deformity. Effect of cast index. Complications of k-wiring. Remanipulation rates. Compliance with splintage. Cost of various forms of splintage. Effect of intact ulna. Upper limb function while immobilised. Wrist and elbow ROM. 10 studies complied with the inclusion criteria and were analysed using Review Manager software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. Summary of Results:. Regarding displaced metaphyseal fractures:. K wire fixation reduces redisplacement. There is no proven increase in complications with k wires. Intact ulna favours redisplacement. Long casts do not reduce displacement. Short casts allow better early function. Regarding stable compression fractures:. Removable splints are not associated with displacement. Patients prefer removable splints for buckle fractures. Removable splints cause less discomfort and allow better early function

We present a complete audit cycle of Emergency Department (ED) management of paediatric buckle fractures of the distal radius at Derriford Hospital. Local hospital management guidelines state that the limb should be supported in a wrist splint for 3 weeks following injury and, provided parents are adequately educated, no formal follow-up is required. Auditable standards were obtained from the local guidance. An initial audit cycle of 54 cases identified shortcomings in compliance with guidelines. These included: Inappropriate immobilisation in 34 (63%) cases, omission of written advice in 35 (65%) cases and arrangement of unnecessary follow-up in 31 (57%) cases. Following circulation of the results, ‘aide-memoir’ icons were added to the emergency department computer coding system, teaching sessions for emergency department staff were organised and new paediatric specific wrist splints were introduced. A re-audit of 33 patients evaluated the effect of the changes. This demonstrated a 27% improvement in correct wrist support usage (27/33, 82%) and 25% fewer unnecessary referrals to fracture clinic (27/33, 82%). Staff training and provision of appropriate wrist splints were crucial to improving the adherence to guidance. This resulted in standardisation of care, fewer unnecessary appointments for patients and cost savings to the hospital trust

Softcast is an attractive alternative to POP for unstable forearm fractures, providing a comfortable, water-resistant splint that can be removed without a plaster saw. Unreinforced Softcast has, however, only been recommended for buckle fractures. A laboratory study was undertaken to compare standardised POP, Softcast and reinforced Softcast splints at clinically relevant endpoints. The load at clinical failure of a 6-wrap Softcast forearm splint was 504N in bending, 202N in kinking, and 11Nm in torsion (equalling 30.4%, 26% and 42.2% of the equivalent values for a circumferential 4-wrap POP). Softcast was however stronger in all modes than a fibreglass-reinforced Softcast splint, such has been recommended for acute fractures. Furthermore, the load to failure in all modes exceeds that which can be exerted by body weight in many paediatric patients. Softcast demonstrated complete recovery of its original shape on unloading, and was 4% lighter than POP. A 6-wrap Softcast splint provides adequate mechanical stability and protection for paediatric patients up to 20kg, not engaged in high-risk activities. The primary risk is not of fracture angulation and loss of position, but temporary indentation of the splint, causing discomfort or pain. Considering its ease of removal, Softcast may be preferable for younger paediatric patients

Forearm fractures are a common paediatric injury. This study was aimed to describe the epidemiological of paediatric forearm fractures in the urban population of Glasgow. We reviewed of all the forearm fracture treated by the orthopaedic service in Yorkhill Children's Hospital in 2008. Datum gathered from case notes and radiographs using the prospective orthopaedic database to identify patients with forearm fractures. The age, sex, side and type of fracture, the timing and mechanism of the injury and treatment were documented for the 436 fractures. Census data were used to derive absolute age-specific incidences. Distinction was made between torus and other types of fractures. Torus fractures require no specific orthopaedic treatment and were segregated out. For the remaining 314 fractures, the age and sex distribution, seasonal variation of fractures and treatments for each type of fracture were examined. The incidence of forearm fractures in our population is 411 fractures per 100,000 population per year. An increased number of fractures occurred during the months of May and August. A fall from less than one metre was the commonest mechanism of injury, sporting injuries were the second commonest with football the most common sport associated. This study identifies some features which are in good agreement with studies from elsewhere in Britain, such as incidence and seasonality. However, there are also interesting differences – such as the Glasgow peak incidence for forearm fractures being at age 8, with a marked decline by 12 years. Furthermore, our findings have been extended to consideration of type of intervention, and likelihood of successful treatment

The December 2022 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Immobilization of torus fractures of the wrist in children (FORCE): a randomized controlled equivalence trial in the UK; Minimally invasive method in treatment of idiopathic congenital vertical talus: recurrence is uncommon; “You’re O.K. Anaesthesia”: closed reduction of displaced paediatric forearm and wrist fractures in the office without anaesthesia; Trunk range of motion and patient outcomes after anterior vertebral body tethering versus posterior spinal fusion: comparison using computerized 3D motion capture technology; Selective dorsal rhizotomy for individuals with spastic cerebral palsy; Scheuermann’s kyphosis and posterior spinal fusion; All-pedicle-screw constructs in skeletally immature patients with severe idiopathic early-onset scoliosis; Proximal femoral screw hemiepiphysiodesis in children with cerebral palsy.

Aims: To show that the treatment of buckle fractures in children in a soft bandage, rather than a plaster cast, is an effective and safe method of treatment. Methods: In order to determine the difference between the two groups it was decided to compare the range of movement at three weeks. Power calculations were performed. This gave a required sample size of 23 for each group. The project was submitted for ethical approval in July 1999. Patients enter the trial after parents agree and sign the consent form. Allocation to either plaster or bandage is random and parents draw previously sealed envelopes themselves. Patients are seen each week and measurements taken of their range of movement. Results: Thirty seven patients have completed the study. 17 have been allocated to bandage the rest to cast. Those in bandage show an excellent range of movement at the þrst week with no reported problems on their questionnaires. One patient has transferred from bandage to plaster at the request of the parents. Conclusion: Results suggest a positive result for treatment in bandage with no reported adverse effects and, a highly desirable result for the patient. We would hope to suggest a change in treatment policy for such fractures

In 2000 our emergency department implemented a new management for the treatment of isolated, apex volar distal radial fractures involving immobilisation with a wrist splint, written information for carers and no planned follow up. Next day x-ray review acted as a safety net for misdiagnosed or less stable fractures. This has now been validated with a retrospective review of treatment for distal radial # within the ED. Patients were identified through the Emergency department’s electronic discharge record. Over a 9 month period 260 patients were identified with metaphyseal distal radial and/or ulna injuries to which a non orthopaedic junior doctor might be expected to apply the Buckle Fracture Algorithm. Of these 161 had isolated distal radial fractures suitable for treatment with a wrist splint. 118 were correctly identified and treated in the ED. 43 patients were sent to # clinic, of these 11 patients were discharged at the 1st visit, however 3 had 3 or more visits and 2 children had additional x-rays. Over this period 9 children were given splints inappropriately according to the protocol, most of these had stable injuries on reviewing the x-rays, 3 were identified and recalled for a cast. None of the children with injuries outside the protocol who were not recalled had an unplanned return with complications. Taking into account only those children who were correctly managed from the ED the estimated annual cost savings to the NHS for this hospital for this period is £40,784, compared to standard treatment before introduction of this protocol. If all children had been treated according to protocol the estimated cost savings would be £56096/yr

Objectives: To show that the treatment of buckle fracture in children in a soft bandage, rather than a plaster cast, is an effective and safe method of treatment, with an earlier return to normal function. Methods: In order to determine the difference between the two groups it was decided to compare the range of movement at three weeks. Power calculations were performed using the minimum difference for a two-sample t-test method and assuming a non-central distribution. The calculation was performed on Minitab release version 12.1 Assuming a required difference of 5 degrees and a standard deviation of 5 degrees also with a required power of 0.9(90%) this gave a required sample size of 23 for each group i.e a total of 46 patients. Guidelines for the parents, consent forms, doctor and nurse protocols, a guidance poster for the A& E, treatment profiles for each patient and a questionnaire for parents were written. The project was submitted for ethical approval in July 1999 and granted at the end of that month. Patients enter the trial after parents agree and sign the consent form. Allocation to either plaster or bandage is random and parents draw previously sealed envelopes themselves. Those allocated to bandage are seen each week and measurements taken of their range of movement. Results: Thirty seven patients have completed the study. 17 have been allocated to bandage the rest to cast. Those in bandage show an excellent range of movement at the first week with no reported problems on their questionnaires. One patient has transferred from bandage to plaster at the request of the parents. Problems encountered have been compliance of those in bandage to return for follow up after two weeks and, ensuring all patients enter the trial and attend the right clinic. Conclusion: Results suggest a positive result for treatment in bandage with no reported adverse effects and, a highly desirable result for the patient. We would hope to suggest a change in treatment policy for such fractures

Aims

This study sought to estimate the clinical outcomes and describe the nationwide variation in practice, as part of the feasibility workup for a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended randomized clinical trial to determine the optimal treatment of torus fractures of the distal radius in children.

Aims

This observational study examines the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic upon the paediatric trauma burden of a district general hospital. We aim to compare the nature and volume of the paediatric trauma during the first 2020 UK lockdown period with the same period in 2019.