External fixators are the traditional fixation method of choice for contaminated open fractures. However, patient acceptance is low due to the high profile and therefore physical burden of the constructs. An externalised locking compression plate is a low profile alternative. However, the biomechanical differences have not been assessed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the axial and torsional stiffness of the externalised titanium locking compression plate (ET-LCP), the externalised stainless steel locking compression plate (ESS-LCP) and the unilateral external fixator (UEF). A fracture gap model was created to simulate comminuted mid-shaft tibia fractures using synthetic composite bones. Fifteen constructs were stabilised with ET-LCP, ESS-LCP or UEF (five constructs each). The constructs were loaded under both axial and torsional directions to determine construct stiffness.Objectives
Methods
We investigated a new intramedullary locking
nail that allows the distal interlocking screws to be locked to
the nail. We compared fixation using this new implant with fixation
using either a conventional nail or a locking plate in a laboratory
simulation of an osteoporotic fracture of the distal femur. A total
of 15 human cadaver femora were used to simulate an AO 33-A3 fracture
pattern. Paired specimens compared fixation using either a locking
or non-locking retrograde nail, and using either a locking retrograde
nail or a locking plate. The constructs underwent cyclical loading
to simulate single-leg stance up to 125 000 cycles. Axial and torsional
stiffness and displacement, cycles to failure and modes of failure
were recorded for each specimen. When compared with locking plate
constructs, locking nail constructs had significantly longer mean
fatigue life (75 800 cycles ( The new locking retrograde femoral nail showed better stiffness
and fatigue life than locking plates, and superior fatigue life
to non-locking nails, which may be advantageous in elderly patients. Cite this article:
The use of two implants to manage concomitant ipsilateral femoral
shaft and proximal femoral fractures has been indicated, but no
studies address the relationship of dynamic hip screw (DHS) side
plate screws and the intramedullary nail where failure might occur
after union. This study compares different implant configurations
in order to investigate bridging the gap between the distal DHS
and tip of the intramedullary nail. A total of 29 left synthetic femora were tested in three groups:
1) gapped short nail (GSN); 2) unicortical short nail (USN), differing
from GSN by the use of two unicortical bridging screws; and 3) bicortical
long nail (BLN), with two angled bicortical and one unicortical bridging
screws. With these findings, five matched-pairs of cadaveric femora
were tested in two groups: 1) unicortical long nail (ULN), with
a longer nail than USN and three bridging unicortical screws; and
2) BLN. Specimens were axially loaded to 22.7 kg (50 lb), and internally
rotated 90°/sec until failure.Objectives
Methods