Objectives. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a demanding procedure, with tibial component subsidence or pain from high tibial strain being potential causes of revision. The optimal position in terms of load transfer has not been documented for lateral UKA. Our aim was to determine the effect of tibial component position on proximal tibial strain. Methods. A total of 16 composite tibias were implanted with an Oxford Domed Lateral Partial Knee implant using cutting guides to define tibial slope and resection depth. Four implant positions were assessed: standard (5° posterior slope); 10° posterior slope; 5° reverse tibial slope; and 4 mm increased tibial resection. Using an electrodynamic axial-torsional materials testing machine (Instron 5565), a compressive load of 1.5 kN was applied at 60 N/s on a meniscal bearing via a matching femoral component. Tibial strain beneath the implant was measured using a calibrated Digital Image Correlation system. Results. A 5° increase in tibial component posterior slope resulted in a 53% increase in mean major principal strain in the posterior tibial zone adjacent to the implant (p = 0.003). The highest strains for all implant positions were recorded in the anterior cortex 2 cm to 3 cm distal to the implant. Posteriorly, strain tended to decrease with increasing distance from the implant. Lateral cortical strain showed no significant relationship with implant position. Conclusion. Relatively small changes in implant position and orientation may significantly affect tibial cortical strain. Avoidance of excessive posterior tibial slope may be advisable during lateral UKA. Cite this article: A. M. Ali, S. D. S. Newman, P. A. Hooper, C. M. Davies, J. P. Cobb. The effect of implant position on bone strain following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Model Using Digital Image Correlation. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:522–529. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.68.BJR-2017-0067.R1

Abstract. Objectives. There is renewed interest in bi-unicondylar arthroplasty (Bi-UKA) for patients with medial and lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis, but a spared patellofemoral compartment and functional cruciate ligaments. The bone island between the two tibial components may be at risk of tibial eminence avulsion fracture, compromising function. This finite element analysis compared intraoperative tibial strains for Bi-UKA to isolated medial unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA-M) to assess the risk of avulsion. Methods. A validated model of a large, high bone-quality tibia was prepared for both UKA-M and Bi-UKA. Load totalling 450N was distributed between the two ACL bundles, implant components and collateral ligaments based on experimental and intraoperative measurements with the knee extended and appropriately sized bearings used. 95th percentile maximum principal elastic strain was predicted in the proximal tibia. The effect of overcuts/positioning for the medial implant were studied; the magnitude of these variations was double the standard deviation associated with conventional technique. Results. For all simulations, strains were an order of magnitude lower than that associated with bone fracture. Highest strain occurred in the spine, under the anteromedial ACL attachment, adjacent to transverse overcut of the medial component. Consequently, Bi-UKA had little effect on strain: <10% increases were predicted when compared to UKA-M with equivalent medial cuts/positioning. However, surgical overcutting/positional variation that resulted in loss of anteromedial bone in the spine increased strain. The biggest increase was for lateral translation of the medial component: 44% and 42% for UKA-M and Bi-UKA, respectively. Conclusions. For a large tibia with high bone quality, Bi-UKA with a well-positioned lateral implant had no tangible effect on the risk of tibial eminence avulsion fracture compared to UKA-M. Malpositioning of the medial component that removes bone from the anterior spine could prove problematic for smaller tibiae. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

Mechanical loading during physical activity produces strains within bones. It is thought that these forces provide the stimulus for the adaptation of bone. Tibial strains and rates of strain were measured in vivo in six subjects during running, stationary bicycling, leg presses and stepping and were compared with those of walking, an activity which has been found to have only a minimal effect on bone mass. Running had a statistically significant higher principal tension, compression and shear strain and strain rates than walking. Stationary bicycling had significantly lower tension and shear strains than walking. If bone strains and/or strain rates higher than walking are needed for tibial bone strengthening, then running is an effective strengthening exercise for tibial bone

Aims

Metaphyseal tritanium cones can be used to manage the tibial bone loss commonly encountered at revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Tibial stems provide additional fixation and are generally used in combination with cones. The aim of this study was to examine the role of the stems in the overall stability of tibial implants when metaphyseal cones are used for rTKA.