Aims

As an alternative to external fixators, intramedullary lengthening nails (ILNs) can be employed for distraction osteogenesis. While previous studies have demonstrated that typical complications of external devices, such as soft-tissue tethering, and pin site infection can be avoided with ILNs, there is a lack of studies that exclusively investigated tibial distraction osteogenesis with motorized ILNs inserted via an antegrade approach.

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to compare the results and complications of tibial lengthening over an intramedullary nail with treatment using the traditional Ilizarov method. Methods. In this matched case study, 16 adult patients underwent 19 tibial lengthening over nails (LON) procedures. For the matched case group, 17 patients who underwent 19 Ilizarov tibial lengthenings were retrospectively matched to the LON group. Results. The mean external fixation time for the LON group was 2.6 months and for the matched case group was 7.6 months. The mean lengthening amounts for the LON and the matched case groups were 5.2 cm and 4.9 cm, respectively. The radiographic consolidation time in the LON group was 6.6 months and in the matched case group 7.6 months. Using a clinical and radiographic outcome score that was designed for this study, the outcome was determined to be excellent in 17 and good in two patients for the LON group. The outcome was excellent in 14 and good in five patients in the matched case group. The LON group had increased blood loss and increased cost. The LON group had four deep infections; the matched case group did not have any deep infections. Conclusions. The outcomes in the LON group were comparable with the outcomes in the matched case group. The LON group had a shorter external fixation time but experienced increased blood loss, increased cost, and four cases of deep infection. The advantage of reducing external fixation treatment time may outweigh these disadvantages in patients who have a healthy soft-tissue envelope. Cite this article: J. E. Herzenberg. Tibial lengthening over intramedullary nails: A matched case comparison with Ilizarov tibial lengthening. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:1–10. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.51.2000577

Aims. We wished to examine the effectiveness of tibial lengthening using a two ring Ilizarov frame in skeletally immature patients. This is a potentially biomechanically unstable construct which risks the loss of axial control. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 24 boys and 26 girls, with a mean age of 8.6 years (4 to 14), who underwent 52 tibial lengthening procedures with a mean follow-up of 4.3 years (4.0 to 16.9). Tibial alignment was measured before and after treatment using joint orientation lines from the knee and a calculation of the oblique plane axis. Results. The mean percentage length gain was 20% (13 to 31) with a mean bone-healing index (BHI) of 34 days per centimetre (20 to 54). Age at surgery and location of the osteotomy site showed a strong relationship as the location of the osteotomy migrated more proximally with age. However, no significant correlation was found between BHI and the position of the osteotomy. The coronal and sagittal joint orientation of the lengthened tibias were within the normal range in 67% and 92% of cases, respectively. The oblique plane angulation calculation revealed a statistically significant change pre- to post-operatively in both magnitude (p < 0.05) and direction (p < 0.01), but without clinical consequence. The majority of complications were minor (n = 40 in 27 patients; 1.48 complications per segment lengthened) with no residual disability reported. Conclusion. Two-ring tibial lengthening is effective in maintaining segmental alignment, efficient in callous production and relatively comfortable for the patient with few significant complications. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1276–82

We compared the complications and outcome of tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov method with and without the use of a supplementary intramedullary nail. In a retrospective case-matched series assembled from 176 patients with tibial lengthening, we matched 52 patients (26 pairs, group A with nail and group B without) according to the following criteria in order of importance: 1) difference in amount of lengthening (± 2 cm); 2) percentage difference in lengthening (± 5%); 3) difference in patient’s age (± seven years); 4) aetiology of the shortening, and 5) level of difficulty in obtaining the correction. The outcome was evaluated using the external fixator index, the healing index and an outcome score according to the criteria of Paley. It was found that some complications were specific to group A or B respectively, but others were common to both groups. The outcome was generally better in lengthenings with a nail, although there was a higher incidence of rectifiable equinus deformity in these patients

Limb lengthening is used to correct leg length discrepancy and to increase stature. The reported frequency of peripheral nerve complications varies from 5% to 30%, but is probably underestimated. Damage may be direct or be caused by overstretching of the nerves. We have used electrophysiological tests to evaluate five patients during bilateral tibial lengthening by the Ilizarov method. Results after 24 to 107 days of lengthening showed electromyographic evidence of partial muscle denervation in all 10 limbs, with reduced motor conduction velocities in two tibial nerves and three common peroneal nerves. The sensory conduction velocity in the sural nerve was always unchanged. A clear relationship was shown between the amount of tibial lengthening and the degree of electrophysiological abnormality. Our results suggest that subclinical nerve damage is a very frequent complication of tibial lengthening

Twenty-four patients treated for tibial shortening secondary to poliomyelitis were reviewed at least 20 years after operation. All subjects were active and only one expressed doubt about the value of tibial lengthening, considering the period of hospitalisation to have been a significant drawback. Approximately five centimetres were added to the length of the treated tibiae. Only one of the nine patients with lengthening of over five centimetres was able to walk at a rate of more than five kilometres per hour, compared with seven of the remaining 15 whose tibiae had been lengthened five centimetres or less

Aims. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess and investigate the safety and efficacy of using a distal tibial osteotomy compared to proximal osteotomy for limb lengthening in children. Methods. In this study, there were 59 consecutive tibial lengthening and deformity corrections in 57 children using a circular frame. All were performed or supervised by the senior author between January 2013 and June 2019. A total of 25 who underwent a distal tibial osteotomy were analyzed and compared to a group of 34 who had a standard proximal tibial osteotomy. For each patient, the primary diagnosis, time in frame, complications, and lengthening achieved were recorded. From these data, the frame index was calculated (days/cm) and analyzed. Results. All patients ended their treatment with successful lengthening and deformity correction. The frame index for proximal versus distal osteotomies showed no significant difference, with a mean 48.5 days/cm (30 to 85) and 48.9 days/cm (28 to 81), respectively (p = 0.896). In the proximal osteotomy group, two patients suffered complications (one refracture after frame removal and one failure of regenerate maturation with subsequent valgus deformity) compared to zero in the distal osteotomy group. Two patients in each group sustained obstacles that required intervention (one necessitated guided growth, one fibula lengthening, and two required change of wires). There was a similar number of problems (pin-site infections) in each group. Conclusion. Our data show that distal tibial osteotomies can be safely employed in limb lengthening for children using a circular frame, which has implications in planning a surgical strategy; for example, when treating a tibia with shortening and distal deformity, a second osteotomy for proximal lengthening is not required. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1273–1278

The regenerative potential of bone is enormous, and it is possible to lengthen limbs by bone distraction. However, there remains a major risk of fracture after lengthening the bone. Previous studies have described how the pixel value ratio may be used for determining the time for frame removal. The aim of this study was to investigate the intrarater and the interrater reliability of pixel value scores from radiographs in tibial lengthening prior to frame removal. Moreover, the study aimed to determine the overall number of X- rays obtained during circular frame treatment. Retrospective study. Patients treated with tibial lengthening by a circular frame at Aalborg University Hospital from January 1st 2000 to December 31st 2017 and a minimum of 12 months after frame removal were included. The bone was divided in proximal-, regenerate- and distal bone zone. These 3 zones were in AP x-ray divided in an anterior and posterior zone and in sagittal X-ray medial and lateral zone producing 6 zones in which the pixel value was measured. Pixel value ratio was calculated as: (Proximal pixel value+Distal pixel value)/2/Regenerate pixel value. Interrater correlations were calculated from measurements obtained by an orthopaedic registrar and an orthopaedic specialist. Intrarater correlation was calculated from repeated measurements obtained by an orthopaedic specialist. Mean duration of circular frame treatment was: 6 (+-3) months. Median number of x-ray controls during frame treatment were: 9 (+-4). Out of 90 tibial lengthening it was only possible to measure pixel value in all six areas of interest on 20 lengthening prior to frame removal. Major reasons for inability to obtain measurements were metal hardware crossing the areas of bone interest on x-rays. The mean (95 % confidence intervals) pixel ratios values were: 1) lateral: 0.96 (0.93–1.00); 2) medial: 0.95 (0.92–0.99); 3) anterior: 0.94 (0.90–0.97); 4) posterior: 0.96 (0.93–0.99). The mean (95 % confidence intervals) inter ratter ICC estimates were: 1) lateral: 0.8 (0.5–0.9); 2) medial: 0.8 (0.4–0.9); 3) anterior: 0.4 (−0.5–0.8); 4) posterior: 0.6 (0.1–0.9). The mean (95 % confidence intervals) intra ratter ICC estimates were: 1) lateral: 1.0 (0.9–1.0); 2) medial: 1.0 (1.0–1.0); 3) anterior: 0.9 (0.9–1.0); 4) posterior: 1.0 (1.0–1.0). Out of the 20 lengthening examined one fracture occurred in the bone regenerate after frame removal. Prospective studies are warranted to determine whether the pixel value ratio can be used as an indicator for frame removal

Introduction. Sheffield Children's Hospital specialises in limb lengthening for children. Soft tissue contracture and loss of range of motion at the knee and ankle are common complications. This review aims to look at therapeutic techniques used by the therapy team to manage these issues. Materials & Methods. A retrospective case review of therapy notes was performed of femoral and tibial lengthening's over the last 3 years. Included were children having long bone lengthening with an iIntramedullary nail, circular frame or mono-lateral rail. Patients excluded were any external fixators crossing the knee/ankle joints. Results. 20 tibial and 25 femoral lengthening's met the inclusion criteria. Pathologies included, complex fractures, limb deficiency, post septic necrosis and other congenital conditions leading to growth disturbance. All patients had issues with loss of motion at some point during the lengthening process. The knee and foot/ankle were equally affected. Numerous risk factors were identified across the cohort. Treatment provided included splinting, serial casting, bolt on shoes, exercise therapy, electrical muscle stimulation and passive stretching. Conclusions. Loss of motion in lower limb joints was common. Patients at higher risk were those with abnormal anatomy, larger target lengthening's, poor compliance or lack of access to local services. Therapy played a significant role in managing joint motion during treatment. However, limitations were noted. No one treatment option gave preferential outcomes, selection of treatment needed to be patient specific. Future research should look at guidelines to aid timely input and avoid secondary complications

Abstract. Congenital posteromedial bowing of tibia (CPMBT) progresses with decreasing deformity and increasing shortening. Lengthening in CPMBT has not been studied extensively. Our series compares duration and complications of lengthening in younger vs older children. Methods. 28 tibial lengthenings (23 patients) by a single surgeon, divided into two equal groups of 14 segments: group-A ≤ 5 years, Group-B > 5 years. Lengthening was done in all with external fixators. We measured preoperative (bo) and postoperative (po) deformities, initial limb length discrepancy (LLD), LLD at maturity (LLDm), % LLD, amount of lengthening (AmtL) and %L, external fixator duration (EFD) and external fixator index (EFI). We graded complications by Lascombes' criteria, results by ASAMI Bone score. Results. Mean age was 8.8 ± 7.1 years. Follow-up was 7.9 years. Group-A had significantly greater preoperative deformities. LLD was similar in both. Expected LLD at maturity (LLDM) using the multiplier method was greater than previously reported (group-A: 4.4 – 9.5 cm; group-B: 2.5 – 9.7 cm).%L was 24% in group-A and 15.7% in group-B (p=0.002). EFD and EFI were lesser in group-A than group-B. Lascombes' triple contract was fulfilled in 11/14 lengthenings in group-A vs. 3/14 in group-B. ASAMI bone score was good and excellent in both groups. Conclusions. In our large series of CPMBT lenghtenings, we found younger children presenting with large deformities and LLDm could be safely lengthened with lesser EFD and complications than older children

Introduction. Congenital posteromedial bowing of tibia (CPMBT) is characterized by a decreasing deformity and an increasing limb shortening. Our series compares the duration and complications of lengthening in younger vs older children. Materials and Methods. We studied 28 tibial lengthenings in 23 patients, divided into two equal groups of 14 segments: group-A ≤5 years (preschool) and Group-B >5 years. We measured preoperative (bo) and postoperative (po) sagittal, coronal, and oblique plane deformities, limb length discrepancy (LLD), amount of lengthening (AmtL), percentage lengthening (%L), external fixator duration (EFD) and external fixator index (EFI). Complications were graded by Lascombes’ criteria, results by ASAMI Bone score. Results. Mean age= 8.8 ± 7.1 years; mean follow-up= 7.9 years. Group-A had significantly greater bo-sagittal, coronal, and oblique plane deformities. LLD (3.4 cm in group-A vs. 4.1 cm in group-B) was similar in both. LLD at maturity (LLD. M. ) by multiplier method ranged 4.4–9.5 cm in group-A and 2.5–9.7 cm in group-B. Though AmtL (3.5 cm and 4.1 cm) was similar in both, %L was 24% in group-A and 15.7% in group-B (p=0.002). EFD (116.6 days) and EFI (33.7 days/cm) were lesser in group-A vs group-B (200.3 days, p=0.001; 50.2 days/cm, p=0.01). Lascombes’ criteria were fulfilled in 11/14 lengthenings in group-A vs. 3/14 in group-B. ASAMI bone score was good and excellent in both groups (p=0.44). Conclusions. Younger children with large deformities and LLD. M. could be safely lengthened with lesser external fixator duration and complications than in older children

Aims. Double-level lengthening, bone transport, and bifocal compression-distraction are commonly undertaken using Ilizarov or other fixators. We performed double-level fixator-assisted nailing, mainly for the correction of deformity and lengthening in the same segment, using a straight intramedullary nail to reduce the time in a fixator. Patients and Methods. A total of 23 patients underwent this surgery, involving 27 segments (23 femora and four tibiae), over a period of ten years. The most common indication was polio in ten segments and rickets in eight; 20 nails were inserted retrograde and seven antegrade. A total of 15 lengthenings were performed in 11 femora and four tibiae, and 12 double-level corrections of deformity without lengthening were performed in the femur. The mean follow-up was 4.9 years (1.1 to 11.4). Four patients with polio had tibial lengthening with arthrodesis of the ankle. We compared the length of time in a fixator and the external fixation index (EFI) with a control group of 27 patients (27 segments) who had double-level procedures with external fixation. The groups were matched for the gain in length, age, and level of difficulty score. Results. The mean gain in length was statistically similar in the two groups: 3.9 cm (1.5 to 9.0) in the study group and 4.2 cm (3.4 to 5.0) in the control group (p = 0.350). The mean time in a fixator was significantly less in the study group compared with the control group: 8.6 weeks (2.0 to 22.8) versus 30.2 weeks (25.0 to 35.4; p < 0.001). The mean EFI was significantly lower in the study group compared with the control group: 17.7 days/cm (10.6 to 35.6) versus 73.4 days/cm (44.5 to 102.3; p < 0.001). The ASAMI (Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov) bone score was excellent in 22, good in four, and fair in one. The ASAMI functional score was excellent in 20 and good in seven. There were no infections, superficial or deep. Conclusion. Double-level osteotomies or two procedures using a custom-made straight nail and external fixation can be used to correct deformities or to treat nonunion or malunion and may be combined with arthrodesis of the ankle with lengthening. It is a reasonably safe procedure that allows accurate and cost-effective treatment with a relatively short time in a fixator

Introduction. A clinical case of catastrophic ring failure in a 13 year old autistic overweight patient during treatment for tibial lengthening and deformity using a Taylor Spatial Frame is reported. Ring failure was noted during the later stages of bone healing and the frame was removed. The clinical outcome was not affected by the catastrophic ring failure. The photograph of the deformed ring is presented below:. Materials and Methods. The patient's notes and X-rays were reviewed and a macroscopic examination of the deformed ring was performed. Mechanical tests of different Taylor Spatial frame constructs were performed in an attempt to simulate the deformity that was clinically observed. Different constructs of TSF of different ring sizes were fixed to polyurethane cylinders simulating bone, were mechanically tested to failure and load/deflection curves were produced. Results. Macroscopically the ring looked otherwise normal. Gradual mechanical compression tests of Taylor Spatial frame constructs showed that ring deformation increased by increasing the ring diameter and by using jointed rather than full joints without a ring. The ring deformation observed clinically was reproduced at the lab by applying high loads on frame constructs composed of large diameter jointed rings not rigidly fixed to bone. Conclusions. Taylor Spatial frame ring failure during treatment is a serious complication that has not been described in the literature. Possible causes are discussed. Clinicians are advised to use the smaller possible diameter rings. Where large diameter rings are required, these rings should preferably be not jointed. Half rings when used should be carefully and securely joined together by the operating surgeon in order to make a complete ring. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. To determine the advantages and risks of plating after lengthening (PAL) of tibia in children and adolescents. Materials and Methods. 35 consecutive tibial lengthenings were done for limb length discrepancy (LLD) in 26 patients. Gradual lengthening by an external fixator from a tibial (usually diaphyseal) osteotomy was followed by internal fixation with a lateral tibial submuscular plate. The mean age at the time of the lengthening was 10.3 years (4.8 – 16.8 years). The aetiology for LLD was congenital in 21, acquired in 3, and developmental in 2 patients. The mean follow-up was 4.3 years (8 months – 9.9 years). Results. The mean lengthening was 5cm (3–8.6cm) or 19.1% (10.8 – 35.2%) of the initial length of tibia. It took 78.8 days to reach the target length at a lengthening rate of 0.75mm/day. The mean time to plate substitution after cessation of lengthening was 24.7days/109 days after osteotomy. This led to an average external fixation index (EFI) of 23.1days/cm. Optimisation of this technique by judicious estimation of timing of plate substitution would reduce the EFI. Consolidation was recorded at 192 days after osteotomy. Bone healing index (BHI) was 39.8days/cm and was age dependent: <12 year olds = 37.5 days/cm; 12 years = 44.7 days/cm. Using the estimated consolidation time if treatment was solely by external fixator, calculated by tripling the time taken to reach target length after osteotomy, the BHI in this series would have been 52.9 days/cm (p < 0.001). Knee flexion recovery to > 90 degrees was noted at 153.5 days after plating. One greenstick fracture occurred 116 days after plate insertion, 1 tibial shaft fracture occurred 315 days post removal of plate - both following injury and were treated conservatively. Six episodes of sepsis, 5 superficial and 1 deep were treated with antibiotic suppression. The plates were removed from 28 tibiae, 437.4 days after insertion. Conclusions. Plating after lengthening not only reduces the fixator time but appears to achieve consolidation faster than if treatment was by external fixation alone. This facilitates early recovery of joint motion and limb function

Objectives. The Precice nail is the latest intramedullary lengthening nail with excellent early outcomes. Implant complications have led to modification of the nail design. The aim of this study was to perform a retrieval study of Precice nails following lower-limb lengthening and to assess macroscopical and microscopical changes to the implants and evaluate differences following design modification, with the aim of identifying potential surgical, implant, and patient risk factors. Methods. A total of 15 nails were retrieved from 13 patients following lower-limb lengthening. Macroscopical and microscopical surface damage to the nails were identified. Further analysis included radiology and micro-CT prior to sectioning. The internal mechanism was then analyzed with scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy to identify corrosion. Results. Seven male and three female patients underwent 12 femoral lengthenings. Three female patients underwent tibial lengthening. All patients obtained the desired length with no implant failure. Surface degradation was noted on the telescopic part of every nail design, less on the latest implants. Microscopical analysis confirmed fretting and pitting corrosion. Following sectioning, black debris was noted in all implants. The early designs were found to have fractured actuator pins and the pin and bearings showed evidence of corrosive debris. The latest designs showed evidence of biological deposits suggestive of fluid ingress within the nail but no corrosion. Conclusion. This study confirms less internal corrosion following modification, but evidence of titanium debris remains. We recommend no change to current clinical practice. However, potential reuse of the Precice nail, for secondary limb lengthening in the same patient, should be undertaken with caution. Cite this article: V. C. Panagiotopoulou, K. Davda, H. S. Hothi, J. Henckel, A. Cerquiglini, W. D. Goodier, J. Skinner, A. Hart, P. R. Calder. A retrieval analysis of the Precice intramedullary limb lengthening system. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:476–484. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.77.BJR-2017-0359.R1

Background: Tibial valgus, a known complication of leg lengthening by external fixation, has been related to stability of the bonefixator system and, in particular to pin loosening. Hydroxyapatite coating has been reported to enhance the quality of the bone-pin interface. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of axial deformity between tibial lengthening procedures with hydroxyapatite-coated and non-coated external-fixation pins. Methods: A prospective trial was conducted on 34 symmetrical tibial lengthenings in 17 pathologically-short patients. For each pair of bones, one side to be lengthened with hydroxyapatite-coated pins and the other with standard uncoated pins were randomly selected. The bone angle in the frontal plane was measured before the operation and at the end of the fixation period. The difference was calculated and compared between lengthenings performed with coated and uncoated pins. Results: Mean deviation into valgus of the tibiae was 6.5° with hydroxyapatite-coated pins and 12.5° with uncoated pins (p=0.023). Other factors previously related to valgus deformity did not significantly differ between groups. Conclusions: Tibial lengthenings performed with hydroxyapatite-coated external-fixation pins are less prone to axial deviation in the frontal plane than those without it

We looked at the outcome of management of 16 patients (19 limb segments) with congenital fibular hemimelia treated in our unit over a 24-year period from 1978 to 2001. Eight boys and eight girls, all with associated musculoskeletal abnormalities in the lower limbs, were presented for management at or before the age of six months. On four patients no surgery was performed. In the other 12, orthopaedic management was completed during the skeletal growth period. Primary amputations (one below-knee, one Syme and one Boyd) were performed on three patients and prostheses fitted in early childhood. Three patients with bilateral fibular hemimelia were treated initially with a Gruca ankle reconstruction procedure. Using the Ilizarov technique, we performed tibial lengthening procedures on nine patients. At the latest follow-up, the three patients who had amputations were functioning well and had no complications. The nine patients in whom tibial lengthening was the main reconstructive procedure suffered numerous complications and all needed further corrective surgery or footwear alterations. None required or requested late amputation because of poor function or cosmesis. Analysing results by parameters such as restriction of activity, pain, complication rate, treatment costs, hospital and clinic visits, periods of absence from school, and patient satisfaction, we found notably better results among patients who underwent early primary amputation than among those who underwent tibial lengthening. This needs to be kept in mind when advising parents of the most appropriate course of management of their child’s disorder

Aim: To review the results of tibial lengthening and deformities correction in children using the Sheffield Ring Fixator. Materials and methods: We have reviewed, retrospectively, 25 patients (average 12.2 years old) who underwent predominantly lengthening of the tibia using the Sheffield Ring fixator. The average follow up was 25.7 months. For logistic regression analysis the patients were binary coded into two groups: those with a good outcome (BHI< 45 days/cm) and those with a poor outcome (BHI> 45 days/cm). Various factors which may influence the out come were then analysed. Results: The most common indication for tibial lengthening in our series was for fibular hemimelia in 6 patients and achondroplasia in 4 and growth arrest secondary to trauma in 3. The mean lengthening of 48.1 mm (25–76). The mean accuracy of lengthening achieved was 85%. 11 patients had foot plate extension, and 5 had cross knee extension for unstable knee. 10 patients had bifocal osteotomy, and 8 patients had spontaneous SLR for femoral lengthening or correction. The mean bone healing index was 49 days/cm (20–95). The mean maximum correction in any one plane was 150 (3–40), the site of the osteotomy was mainly metaphyseal at an average of 25% of the tibial length. There were 5 grade II complications, 9 grades I complications and one type III complication. Thirteen patients had grade I pin site infection, three had grade II and 12 had no pin site problems. A moderately strong relationship was identified between the BHI and a number of variables such as complications, maximum correction and pin site infection grade. The analysis of the factors which may influence the BHI suggested a correlation between increasing angular correction and poor out come BHI. Conclusion: In tibial lengthening in children there is a correlation between increasing angular correction and poor out come BHI

We report the results of intramedullary leg lengthening conducted between 2002 and 2009 using the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor in 69 unilateral lengthenings involving 58 femora and 11 tibiae. We identified difficulties that occurred during the treatment and assessed whether they were specifically due to the implant or independent of it. Paley’s classification for evaluating problems, obstacles and complications with external fixators was adopted, and implant-specific difficulties were continuously noted. There were seven failures requiring premature removal of the device, in four due to nail breakage and three for other reasons, and five unsuccessful outcomes after completion of the lengthening. In all, 116 difficulties were noted in 45 patients, with only 24 having problem-free courses. In addition to the difficulties arising from the use of external fixators, there were almost the same number again of implant-specific difficulties. Nevertheless, successful femoral lengthening was achieved in 52 of the 58 patients (90%). However, successful tibial lengthening was only achieved in five of 11 patients (45%)

Introduction: Although distraction osteogenesis techniques have been used clinically for the treatment of many skeletal conditions with great success over the last 2 decades, one-step larger extent tibial lengthening (> 5 cm) still remains a clinical challenge. In which tension unbalance of bone and soft-tissue may occur, and complications such as foot drop, ankle and knee dysfunction, cartilage injure and secondary osteoarthritis were common. We have designed and manufactured a new lengthener, which allows bone and soft tissue to be lengthened in synchronism, and ankle joint remain in functional position and may move freely during lengthening. Methods: A dynamic cross joint apparatus at ankle level was added to a classic Ilizarov circular four-ring lengthener, the apparatus is consisted of a half ring, two dynamic junctions and an elastic (spring) device. In application pins were inserted into distant and proximal segment of the tibia, also through calcanues, the external fixator with the trans-joint device was then applied. Total 296 patients (age 6–46, average 21), 466 legs, were treated with this new lengthener, among them were 55 cases of infantile paralysis, 38 cases of post-trauma bone defects, 33 cases with congenital dysplasia and 170 cases of chordrodysplasia, rickets, dwarf and short stature (height < 148cm). Unilateral tibia lengthening was performed in 126 legs and bilateral tibia lengthening was performed in 340 legs. Results: Average lengthening for lower limb discrepancy cases was 6.8 cm (2–8cm), and 8.8 cm (8–18cm) for dwarf and short stature. Patients can stand straight and walk during the lengthening. Average movement of ankle joint remained at 10 degree in all cases and x-ray confirmed that average ankle joint space was 2.2 mm (1–4mm). There was no foot drop and ankle joint deformity seen, and in 98% cases ankle joint function fully recovered within 1.5 years after lengthening (6–8 months). Common complications were pinhole infection (25 cases) and broken pin (8 cases). If total lengthening was over 10cm, 70% cases developed slight ankle joint stiffness that would gradually recover after physiotherapy. Severe complications occurred in 5 cases (1%), including nonunion 1 case, mal-union 1 case, bone deformity 1 case and re-fracture 2 cases. All of those cases were cured with satisfactory clinical outcome. Discussion: The challenge of larger range tibial lengthening is mainly the soft tissue complications, such as foot drop, varus and valgus deformity of ankle joint and loss of ankle function. Prolonged soft tissue traction around the ankle joint may lead to increasing cartilage compression, cartilage damage and partial or permanent loss of joint function. Our dynamic lengthener would allow synchronized lengthening of triceps, Achilles tendon and prosterior tibia muscle with tibia, maintain ankle joint space and free ankle movement. This device was simple and easy to apply, with no need of additional Achilles tendon lengthening. Our clinical study has demonstrated that this device drastically reduced the rate of soft tissue complication. This device makes larger extent tibial lengthening (> 5cm) safer and realistic in clinical practice