Aim. To investigate the effect of the eight plate position in sagittal plane on tibial slope in temporary epiphysiodesis technique applied to the proximal tibia and whether there is a rebound effect after removing the plate. Method. Forty New Zealand rabbits (6 weeks old) were divided into four groups. In all groups, two 1.3 mm mini plates and cortical screws implantation were placed on both medial and lateral side of the proximal epiphysis of the right tibia. In Group 1 and 3, the plates were placed on anterior of the proximal tibial anatomical axis in the sagittal plane, and placed posteriorly in Group 2 and 4. The left tibia was examined as control in all groups. Group 1 and Group 2 were sacrificed after four week-follow-up. In Group 3 and Group 4, the implants were removed four weeks after index surgery and the rabbits were followed four more weeks to investigate the rebound effect. The tibial slope was measured on lateral X-rays every two weeks. Both medial and lateral plateau slopes were evaluated on photos of the dissected tibia. Results. In Group 1, right MTPA (medial tibial plateau angle) and left MTPA, right LTPA (lateral tibial plateau angle) and left LTPA, and right 4wTPPA (the tibial proximal posterior angle at 4th week) and left 4wTPPA values were compared with each other. There was a significant difference in MTPA, LTPA, and 4wTPPA in Group 1 (p: 0.003, 0.006, 0.004). In Group 1, the medial and lateral slope significantly decreased after 4 weeks. There was no significant difference in MTPA, LTP and 4wTPPA measurements in Group 2 (p= 0.719, 0.306, 0.446, respectively). In Group 2, the slope did not change in four weeks. There was a significant difference in MTPA, LTPA, 4wTPPA, and 8wTPPA (tibial proximal posterior angle at 8th week) in Group 3 (p= 0.005, 0.002, <0.001, <0.001, respectively). In Group 3, the slope decreased at 4th week and remained stabile during the next four week-follow up and no rebound effect was observed. There was no significant difference in MTPA, LTPA, 4wTPPA, and 8wTPPA measurements in Group 4 (p= 0.791, 0.116, 0.232, 0.924), respectively. In group 4, slope did not change at 4th week of index surgery and no rebound effect was observed in the next four week-follow up. Conclusion. If eight plates were placed on anterior of lateral proximal tibia axis on both medial and lateral side, the tibial slope would reduce, and remain stabile after implant removal. Care should be taken to place the plates on the line of proximal tibial axis in sagittal plane in temporary epiphysiodesis technique performed due to angular knee deformities. Changing the slope due to plate placement can be used as a secondary gain for patients who will benefit from slope change, such as adolescent ACL surgery
