Abstract. Introduction. Challenges in surgical training have led to the exploration of technologies such as augmented reality (AR), which present novel approaches to teaching orthopaedic procedures to medical students. The aim of this double-blinded randomised-controlled trial was to compare the validity and training effect of AR to traditional teaching on medical students’ understanding of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methodology. Twenty medical students from 7 UK universities were randomised equally to either intervention or control groups. The control received a consultant-led teaching session and the intervention received training via Microsoft HoloLens, where surgeons were able to project virtual information over physical objects. Participants completed written knowledge and practical exams which were assessed by 2 orthopaedic consultants. Training superiority was established via 4 quantitative outcome measures: OSATS scores, a checklist of TKA-specific steps, procedural time, and written exam scores. Qualitative feedback was evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale. Results. AR training was superior in teaching basic technical proficiency and understanding of TKA, with the intervention group significantly outperforming the control group in 3 metrics [OSATS (38.6%, p=0.021), checklist (33%, p=0.011) and written exam (54.5%, p=0.001)]. Procedural time was equivalent between cohorts (p=0.082). AR was rated as significantly more enjoyable (p=0.044), realistic (p=0.003), easy to understand (p=0.040), and proficient in teaching (p=0.02). Conclusion. In this adequately powered, double-blinded randomised-controlled trial, AR training demonstrated substantially improved translational
Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all TKAs. Although the complexity of these procedures is well recognized, few investigators have evaluated the cost and value-added with the implementation of a dedicated revision arthroplasty service. The aim of the present study is to compare and contrast surgeon productivity in several differing models of activity. All patients that underwent primary or revision TKA from January 2016 to June 2018 were included as the primary source of data. All rTKA patients were categorized by the number of components revised (e.g. liner exchange, two or more components). Three models were used to assess the potential surgical productivity of a dedicated rTKA service : 1) work relative value unit (RVU) Aims
Materials and Methods
Seven stiff total knee arthroplasties are presented
to illustrate the roles of: 1) manipulation under general anesthesia;
2) multiple concurrent diagnoses in addition to stiffness; 3) extra-articular
pathology; 4) pain as part of the stiffness triad (pain and limits
to flexion or extension); 5) component internal rotation; 6) multifactorial
etiology; and 7) surgical exposure in this challenging clinical
problem.
