Introduction

Injury to the syndesmosis is not always clearly demonstrated on radiographs and different tests have been described to assess for injury. In the presence of a significant injury to the syndesmosis, surgical fixation is often indicated and various fixation methods have been described. If the result of surgery is any mal-reduction of the fibula, this may result in ongoing ankle pain. Assessing how well the fibula has been reduced intra-operatively is currently limited to image intensifier views. We have previously developed a simple assessment, which has been shown to give accurate intra-operative demonstration of an injury to the syndesmosis. Our objective was to ascertain if the same test could demonstrate any malreduction of the fibular after repair of a syndesmosis injury.

Introduction. Syndesmosis injuries are significant injuries and require anatomical reduction. However, stabilisation of these injuries with syndesmosis screws carries specific complications and many surgeons advocate a second operation to remove the screw. Primary Tightrope suture fixation has been shown to be an effective treatment for syndesmotic injuries and avoids the need for a second operation. Materials and Methods. A retrospective audit identified patients who were treated for syndesmosis injuries over a two year period. Theatre and clinic costs were obtained to compare the cost of syndesmosis fixation using diastasis screws with the estimated cost of primary syndesmosis fixation using a Tightrope suture. Results. 79 patients received diastasis screw fixation of syndesmosis injuries between January 2007 and January 2009. The mean number of follow up clinic appointments was 3.7 following initial surgery, and 2.2 following diastasis screw removal. Allowing for device, theatre time and clinic appointment costs, and an estimated average of 4 follow up appointments following Tightrope syndesmosis fixation, primary fixation with this device could a saving of 34 theatre slots, 68 outpatient clinic appointments, and £12,138 per year at our hospital. Discussion. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated a reduction in normal tibiotalar external rotation with the presence of a diastasis screw, and there are several published reports of complications when these screws are retained. The Tightrope suture provides reduction of the syndesmosis whilst allowing normal physiological movement at the distal tibiofibular joint and negates the need for a second operation to remove the implant. In addition there may be improvements in foot and ankle scores and a faster return to work when these devices are used compared with traditional screw fixation. Conclusion. In addition to the patient benefits, our audit suggests that there may be significant financial benefits associated with primary syndesmosis fixation with Tightrope sutures

We undertook a retrospective review of 24 arthroscopic procedures in patients with symptomatic ossicles around the malleoli of the ankle. Most of the patients had a history of injury and localised tenderness in the area coinciding with the radiological findings. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast-spoiled gradient-echo MRI was performed and the results compared with the arthroscopic findings. An enhanced signal surrounding soft tissue corresponding to synovial inflammation and impingement was found in 20 patients (83%). The arthroscopic findings correlated well with those of our MRI technique and the sensitivity was estimated to be 91%. At a mean follow-up of 30.5 months (20 to 86) the mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score improved from 74.5 to 93 points (p < 0.001). Overall, the rate of patient satisfaction was 88%.

Our results indicate that symptomatic ossicles of the malleoli respond well to arthroscopic treatment.