Subscapularis repair and integrity after a primary total shoulder arthroplasty is critical for successful outcomes. One should be familiar with the 3 basic takedown and repair techniques commonly utilised. Subscapularis repair after reverse shoulder arthroplasty is not as critical and in some cases may be detrimental to return of external rotation strength and motion. Subscapularis tenotomy: The tendon is incised approximately 1 cm from the lesser tuberosity and an oblique incision is created from proximal lateral to distal medial stopping at the sentinel vessels. A combination of tendon-to-tendon figure of 8 sutures. Lesser tuberosity osteotomy: This approach is helpful not only in obtaining a bone-to-bone healing, but also in the exposure. Osteotomies range from a fleck of bone in patients with minimal deformity, to a C-shaped osteotomy including part of the head which facilitates exposure of the posterior glenoid. Despite an ability to document radiographic healing of the lesser tuberosity fragment, this technique does not prevent fatty infiltration of the subscapularis. Subscapularis Peel: This repair requires tendon healing to bone and probably incomplete, in most cases, reconstitution of a normal enthesis. External rotation can be gained by recessing the subscapularis insertion medially with the arm in external rotation. While bone-to-tendon sutures are the gold standard, augmentation of the sutures using a prosthesis as the anchor has led to the development of prostheses with multiple holes. Dual row repair of the tendon, however, may lead to medial rupture

Background. Long term success of any shoulder joint reconstruction procedure involving subscapularis attachment take down is dictated by the way one chooses to release and repair/reconstruct the subscapularis insertion. There are several methods that were reported in the literature without any preset guidelines which are easily reproducible. Methods. 5 specimens of fresh cadaver shoulder joints dissected and the subscapularis footprint insertion involving the tendon and muscle exposed. We intend to preserve subscapularis tendon footprint along with the lesser tuberosity by performing the footprint osteotomy fashioned step wise in the following manner. Results. It has two vertical components (sagittal and coronal plane osteotomies) and one horizontal component (distal osteotomy at musculo tendinous junction level). Figure 1: demonstrating the three step cuts in the dry bone of proximal humerus with three different ostetomes to mark the plain of osteotomies in the lesser tuberosity. Step-1: Medial wall ridge of the inter-tubercular sulcus serves as landmark for sagittal component. The depth of sagittal component is just 5 – 10mm and its length extending from articular margin proximally and distally up to musculo tendinous junction, measuring approximately 15–20mm. Step-2: Coronal plane osteotomy is in line with and parallel to undersurface of subscapularis tendon adjacent to the articular margin and connecting sagittal component and measured 10–15mm approximately. Figure 2: demonstrating the two cuts / osteotomies to mark the sagittal and coronal components of the subscapularis foot print osteotomy in the lesser tuberosity of a fresh cadaver. Step-3: The horizontal component (distal osteotomy at musculo tendinous junction level is 5–10 mm in width, connects the two vertical components, thus completing the footprint osteotomy. Discussion. Subscapularis reattachment plays a pivotal role in the shoulder joint reconstruction procedures especially total joint arthroplasty. Subscapularis take down either by tenotomy or by periosteal elevation from lesser tuberosity followed by repair carries a risk of retraction and poor healing and early failure. Footprint osteotomy as a thin sliver of cortical bone instead of these above described three steps with the attached tendon carries a risk of fragmentation of the bone sliver along with lack of rotation control on the repair. The necessity for doing such a three step osteotomy procedure which results in a wedge shaped bone tendon foot print construct, we believe is of paramount importance for a successful reconstruction. Figure 3: demonstrating the marking sutures passed into the bone tendon construct comprising of lesser tuberosity and subscapularis for effective foot print reconstruction in a fresh cadaver. Conclusions. This three step footprint osteotomy of the Subscapularis tendon offers a stable construct which is easy to reproduce with better healing potential. For figures, please contact authors directly

The deltopectoral approach is a common approach for Shoulder joint replacements where a normal subscapularis tendon is divided. Despite meticulous attention to the subscapular repair, suboptimal return of function was found on clinical examination in 92% of patients (Miller S L: Journal of Shoulder & Elbow Surgery. 12(1): 29–34, February 2003). Therefore the aim was to study the integrity of the Subscapularis tendon in patients with Shoulder joint Replacements both clinical and ultrasound examination. Methods: A cohort of 25 subjects who had undergone Copeland Shoulder replacements through deltopectoral approach were included. All patients had same technique of tendon-to-tendon repair and postoperative rehabilitation. After ethics committee approval subjects were evaluated prospectively with Lift off test, Belly press test and the Constant score. Average follow-up was 29.6 months. An experienced Radiologist performed the Ultrasound examination. Results: Ultrasound examination showed 8 % (2 of 25) had full thickness rupture of subscapularis with 44% (11 of 25) showed mild to moderate atrophy of subscapularis muscle and 12%(3 of 25) severe atrophy. 20%(5 of 25) had Lift off test and Belly press test positive. 40%(10 of 25) had either or both of these tests positive. 60%(15 of 25) had clinical or radiological evidence of reduced function (Fisher exact test, P < 0.01). Constant score are 37.5 with full thickness tears compared to 59.4 with intact subsapularis tendon. Conclusion: Subscapularis tendon function following shoulder replacement had received poor attention. It is deficient in over 60% of patients with joint replacement through Deltopectoral approach with tendon-to-tendon repair. We therefore conclude for this study that alternative techniques of subscapularis tendon repair or alternative approaches to the shoulder joint need to be considered to improve the functional outcome in these patients

Introduction. Supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears (Massive Rotator Cuff Tear- MRCT) cause compensatory activation of the teres minor (TM) and subscapularis (SubS) to maintain humeral head alignment. This study measures force changes in TM and SubS using a dynamic shoulder testing setup. We hypothesize that combining superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) and lower trapezius tendon (LTT) transfer will correct rotator cuff forces. Methods. Eight fresh-frozen human shoulder specimens from donors aged 55-75 (mean = 63.75 years), balanced for gender, averaging 219.5 lbs, were used. Rotator cuff and deltoid tendons were connected to force sensors through a pulley system, with the deltoid linked to a servohydraulic motor for dynamic force measurement. The system allowed unrestricted humeral abduction from 0 to 90 degrees. Results. Teres Minor (TM):. -. Control: 7.43 N (SD = 1.66). -. SS tear: 5.46 N (SD = 1.45). -. MRCT: 3.94 N (SD = 1.43). -. LTT post-MRCT: 5.85 N (SD = 1.13). -. SCR post-MRCT: 4.68 N (SD = 0.71). -. Combined LTT+SCR: 6.43 N (SD = 1.24). -. TM force reduction: 26.51% post-SS tear, 46.97% from intact to MRCT, 63.20% increase with LTT+SCR. Subscapularis (SubS):. -. Control: -0.73 N (SD = 0.43). -. SS tear: -0.46 N (SD = 0.36), 36.99% increase. -. MRCT: 0.96 N (SD = 0.47), 31.51% increase. -. LTT post-MRCT: -0.32 N (SD = 0.47), 66.67% reduction. -. SCR post-MRCT: -0.28 N (SD = 0.16), 70.83% reduction. -. Combined LTT+SCR: -0.66 N (SD = 0.32), 31.25% reduction. Non-parametric Friedman's ANOVA showed overall statistical significance for TM (P = 1.083×10. -6. ) and SubS (P = 4.77×10. -4. ). Conclusion. The cadaveric model assesses rotator cuff compensations, showing significant TM force reductions following rotator cuff tears and improvements with LTT and SCR, particularly when combined. SubS exhibited negative force during normal abduction but compensated during MRCT, returning to normal values post-LTT and SCR

Aim. Two different techniques to release subscapularis during total shoulder replacement (TSR) have been described (tenotomy and osteotomy) with no consensus as to which is superior. In this study we review the clinical outcomes of a sequential series of patients in whom a TSR for primary osteoarthritis had been performed using either technique at our institution. Subscapularis function was tested using a new graded belly press test, a modification of the traditional belly press test which is described for the first time here. Methods. All patients who underwent surgery at our institution between January 2002 and January 2010 and met the eligibility criteria, were included for analysis. Subscapularis function was assessed post-operatively using a range of functional assessments including; a graded belly press test, lift off test, and an assessment of each patient's range of movement. Results. A total of 36 shoulders in 36 patients were included, ten underwent subscapularis tenotomy and 26 underwent osteotomy of the lesser tuberosity. Patients who had undergone osteotomy of the lesser tuberosity had a more favourable outcome overall. They demonstrated a significantly better grade (grade 1) of the belly press test compared with the tenotomy group (p=0.026) and a trend towards a better range of movement although no statistical significance was shown. All patients (osteotomy and tenotomy) with a grade 1 belly press test had a better clinical outcome with data demonstrating statistical significance. Conclusion. Our results indicate that in this single surgeon sequential series of patients who underwent osteotomy of the lesser tuberosity during TSR for OA had a better functional outcome than those who underwent subscapularis tenotomy. While our modification of the belly press test may require further validation we would suggest it may be a more useful indicator of subscapularis function in future studies

Subscapularis function following Total shoulder joint replacement has been a concern in recent literature. It has been postulated that lesser tuberosity osteotomy approach may have better Subscapularis function than transtendonous approach. To assess whether lesser tuberosity osteotomy vs. subscapularis tenotomy is better for post-operative function of subscapularis in total shoulder replacements done by a single surgeon in a District general hospital. 117 shoulder replacements performed by the senior author (TH) at Waikato district general hospital between years January 2002 to January 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. Revision replacement, inverse shoulder replacement & acute traumatic hemiarthroplasty were excluded. Patients with previous rotator cuff problems, previous surgery to subscapularis, rheumatoid arthritis and post-trauma sequelae were also excluded from the study. Inclusion criteria were normal subscapularis function and intact subscapularis on MRI pre-operatively. 41 shoulders were eligible to participate in study of which 1 pt died (bilateral TSR), 1 pt unfit to participate due to cervical disc problems. Of remaining 38 shoulders 11 shoulders had transtendonous and 27 shoulders had lesser tuberosity osteotomy approach. 37 shoulders were reviewed clinically for range of motion of the shoulder and subscapularis strength. Range of motion and subscapularis strength was significantly higher in the osteotomy group. All osteotomies were united on axillary radiograph. Lesser tuberosity osteotomy approach result in better subscapularis function than transtendonous approach

Introduction & Background. Clinical outcome after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) can be influenced by technical and implant-related factors, so the purpose of this study was to investigate whether individualizing humeral retroversion and subscapularis repair affect the clinical outcomes after RTSA. Material & Method. Authors retrospectively analyzed the prospectively collected data from 80 patients who underwent RTSA from January 2007 to January 2015 using same implant (Biomet Comprehensive. ®. Reverse Shoulder System, Warsaw, Indiana). The mean follow up was 23.3 ± 1.7 (range, 12 ∼ 70) months. The retroversion of humeral component was decided according to native version estimated using shoulder CT in Group I (n=52), and fixed in 20° retroversion in Group II (n=28). Group I was subdivided into Group Ia (n=21, mean 19.3°), less than 20° of retroversion, and Group Ib (n=31, mean 31.9°), more than 20°. Intraoperative tenotomized subscapularis was repaired in 40 patients in Group I, and could not be repaired due to massive tear including subscapularis in remaining 12 patients. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with range of motion (ROM) and several clinical outcome scores. Results. Group I showed significantly better ROM and clinical scores compared to Group II at the final follow up (all p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in ROM and clinical scores between Group Ia and Ib. Group Ia showed better ROM and pain VAS than Group II (all p < 0.05), and Group Ib also demonstrated significantly better ROM and clinical outcome scores than Group II (all p < 0.05). With respect to subscapularis repair, there were no differences in ROM and clinical scores between two groups. No complications such as infection or dislocation were detected according to subscapularis repair. Conclusion. Individualizing humeral retroversion can obtain superior clinical outcomes than fixed 20° retroversion. Subscapularis repair would not be essential for the better clinical outcome in patients with the lateralized RTSA

Introduction:. The subscapularis muscle experiences significant strain as it accommodates common movements of the shoulder. Little is known about what happens with this obligatory strain once the subscapularis insertion is disrupted and repaired in the course of shoulder arthroplasty. Subscapularis failure is a serious known complication after shoulder arthroplasty. It is not known what the effect of increasing the thickness of the shoulder head will have on subscapularis strain. It is our hypothesis that the use of large or expanded humeral heads during shoulder replacement will cause increased tension in the repaired subscapularis. The primary purpose of this study was to identify the optimal manner to perform a passive range of motion (PROM) program without invoking a significant increase in strain in the repaired subscapularis. The secondary purpose was to determine the impact of varying the thickness of the humeral head on subscapularis strain using the same PROM protocol. Methods:. Eight fresh-frozen, forequarter cadaver (four female, four male) specimens were obtained following IRB approval. An extended deltopectoral incision was performed so that the subscapularis insertion site could be well visualized. PROM exercises with the following motions were evaluated: external rotation, abduction, flexion and scaption. An optical motion analysis system was used to measure strain in the subscapularis. The same measurement protocol was repeated after performing a subscapularis osteotomy and after placement of an anatomic hemiarthroplasty of three different thicknesses (short, tall, expanded). Results:. A decrease in joint laxity (less strain but more tension on the subscapularis) was observed in abduction, external rotation, and forward flexion, following implantation of the shoulder arthroplasty components. For abduction and forward flexion, we observed a trend of decreasing laxity with increasing humeral head component thickness. For external rotation, all components displayed a similar reduction in joint laxity. With the short humeral head, strain was similar to native joint with passive scaption and flexion but not with external rotation or abduction. Discussion:. The PROM that tends to minimize tension on the subscapularis is forward flexion and scaption whereas external rotation and abduction will stress the subscapularis repair. Therefore passive forward flexion or scaption do not need to be limited but clearly external rotation should have passive limits and abduction should probably be avoided. The subscapularis muscle is under greater preload tension after shoulder joint arthroplasty. Even the short head size humeral component demonstrated decreased laxity compared to the intact joint. This suggests that even the shortest head size available may not be anatomical and perhaps a thinner humeral head size would be more representative of the normal anatomy

In diagnosis and repair of partial subscapularis tendon tears, we used a simplified arthroscopic direct technique. We used the anterosuperior arthroscopic portal to visualise the subscapularis tendon insertion, while probing and repairing from the adjacent anterior portal. Three anatomical dissections were done to define the insertion of the subscapularis tendon at the lesser tuberosity. While viewing from the anterosuperior portal, we repaired the subscapularis tendon with one or two suture anchors, inserted into the lesser tuberosity from the anterior portal. Suture management was via the standard posterior portal. From the anterior portal, a tendon-penetrating grasping device passed the sutures through the displaced subscapularis tendon. The arthroscopic knots were tied from the anterior portal. Associated with the first 10 subscapularis repairs were six complete and four partial thickness supraspinatus/infraspinatus tears. There were no isolated subscapularis tears. Three patients had associated biceps lesions. Subscapularis tears are often associated with supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon tears. Direct anterosuperior viewing and anterior probing enables the surgeon to see and repair ‘hidden’ tears

In this retrospective study postoperative subscapularis (SSC) function was measured with an electronic force measurement plate (FMP) and clinical scores and correlated with SSC-muscle cross sectional area on defined MRI-sequences.

82 patients with subscapularis tears (34 isolated SSC tears and 48 combined SSC/SSP tears) were followed up at a mean of 38 (24–72) months after tendon reconstruction with the Constant score (CS) and clinical SSC-tests (Napoleon test, Lift off test). SSC-muscle function was assessed in the belly-press- and the lift off position using a custom made electronic FMP (force in Newton). SSC muscle strength values were compared with the contra-lateral side. SSC-muscle atrophy (muscle cross sectional area in mm²) was measured on standardised sagittal MRI-planes and compared with a healthy matched control group (CG) (Mann-Whitney-U-Test).

The mean CS improved from 51p to 81p in isolated tears (group 1) and from an average 47 p to 78 p in combined tears (group 2) (each p< 0.01). Overall 85% of the patients rated their result as good or excellent. Positive and intermediate postop. Napoleon tests were still present in 30% in group 1 and in 25% in group 2. Mean postoperative SSC-muscle strength in the belly-press position averaged 64 N (contralatera sidel-CL: 86 N) in group 1 and 81 N (CL: 91 N) in group 2. Lift-off test strength averaged 36 N (CL: 69 N) in group 1 and 50 N (CL: 63 N) in group 2 (each p< 0.05). Postoperative MRI revealed a significant reduced SSC muscle cross sectional area for the operated side compared with the CG (group 1: SSC: 1974 mm²; CG 2980 mm² p< 0,05; group 2: SSC: 1829 mm²; CG 2406 mm² − SSP: 570 mm²; CG 812 mm² each p< 0,05).

Despite good clinical results after reconstruction of isolated and combined subscapularis tears a marked subscapularis strength deficit remains that is not reflected in the Constant Score, but can be detected with the new measurement device. Additionally a subscapularis muscle atrophy remains in the postoperative course that cannot be reversed by surgery.

Purpose: We examined the long-term effect of the Latarjet-Patte procedure on subscapularis function and trophicity. Material and methods: The series included 102 patients (106 shoulders) reviewed at a mean follow-up of 7.5 years. The subscapularis was opened by dissection along the direction of the fibres in 27 shoulders (group I) and via inverted-L tenotomy in 69 (group II). Duplay and Rowe scores were used to assess clinical outcome. Subscapularis function was measured with the hand-back distance and the Gerber lift-off test in comparison with a control group composed of healthy subjects in order to account for limb dominance. Computed tomography was used to measure fatty degeneration and muscle atrophy. Results: The Duplay and Rowe scores gave 76.4% and 87.7% satisfactory results. The Duplay score was 89.9/100 in group I and 82.1 in group II (p = 0.02). The hand-back distance and muscle force as judged by the lift-off test were statistically different between the dominant and non-dominant sides (p = 0.001). Loss of muscle force was greater for dominant sides in the operated shoulders. The mobility score, the lift-off test, and the hand-back distance were significantly altered in group II patients. Fatty degeneration of the sub-scapularis was greater on the operated side (0.76 vs 0.054) (p = 0.001). It increased with age at surgery and at review (p = 0.0001), for dominant shoulders in group II (1.18 vs 0.12). It affected the Duplay score (p = 0.006), the hand-back distance, and the lift-off test (p = 0.01). Fatty degeneration was greater than 2 in 66% of the shoulders with a poor outcome and persistent apprehension in 35.3%. Subscapular atrophy was greater on the operated side (0.91 vs 1.17) (p = 0.0001) and was statistically correlated with fatty degeneration, the Duplay score, the lift-off test, and the hand-back distance. It was greater in group II (0.71) than in group I (0.2). Discussion: Recovery of muscle force is better for dominant shoulders. Muscle trophicity and function are influenced by subscapular tenotomy that leads to significant loss of internal rotation force, atrophy, and fatty degeneration affecting final long-term outcome. Conclusion: We recommend discission of the subscapularis for coracoid bone block procedures

Currently, the consensus regarding subscapularis tendon repair during a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is to do so if it is possible. Repair is thought to decrease the risk of dislocation and improve internal rotation but may also increase stiffness and improvement in internal rotation may be of subclinical benefit. Aim is to retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of rTSA, with or without a subscapularis tendon repair.

We completed a retrospective review of 51 participants (25 without and 26 with subscapularis repair) who received rTSR by a single-surgeon using a single-implant. Three patient reported outcome measures (PROM) were assessed pre-operatively and post-operative at twelve months, as well as range of movement (ROM) and plain radiographs. Statistical analysis utilized unpaired t tests for parametric variables and Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric variables.

External Rotation ROM pre-operatively was the only variable with a significance difference (p=0.02) with the subscapularis tendon repaired group having a greater range. Pre- and post-operative abduction (p=0.72 & 0.58), forward flexion (p=0.67 & 0.34), ASES (p=0.0.06 & 0.78), Oxford (p=0.0.27 & 0.73) and post-operative external rotation (p=0.17)

Greater external rotation ROM pre-operatively may be indicative of the ability to repair the subscapularis tendon intra-operatively. However, repair does not seem to improve clinical outcome at 12 months.

There was no difference of the PROMs and AROMs between the subscapularis repaired and not repaired groups for any of the variables at the pre-operative or 12 month post operative with the exception of the external rotation ROM pre-operatively. We can conclude that from PROM or AROM perspective there is no difference if the tendon is repaired or not in a rTSR and indeed the patients without the repair may have improved outcomes at 12 months.

Shoulder arthroplasty procedures continue to increase in prevalence, and controversy still remains about the optimal method to manage the subscapularis. Scalise et al. performed an analysis of 20 osteotomies and 15 tenotomy procedures, and found the tenotomy group had a higher rate of abnormal subscapularis tendons on ultrasound examination. There was one tendon rupture in the subscapularis tenotomy group and no ruptures in the osteotomy group. Jandhyala et al. retrospectively examined 26 lesser tuberosity osteotomies and 10 subscapularis tenotomies for arthroplasty, and their study demonstrated a significant improvement in the belly press test for the osteotomy group. Lapner et al. performed a randomised controlled trial assigning patient to either a lesser tuberosity osteotomy or a subscapularis peel procedure. They evaluated 36 osteotomies and 37 subscapularis peels. The outcomes evaluated were Dynamometer internal rotation strength, the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS) score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and in a subsequent paper they evaluated the healing rates and Goutallier grade. Their studies illustrated no difference in the internal rotation strength between groups. Both groups significantly improved WOOS and ASES scores post-operatively, but the difference was not significant between groups. Goutallier grade increased significantly in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the groups. Overall, the different approaches have not demonstrated a meaningful clinical difference. Further studies are needed to help understand issues leading to subscapularis complications after arthroplasty.

The results of arthroscopic repair of tears of the sub-scapularis tendon in nine men and six women, ranging in age from 53 to 73 years, were followed up at a mean of 14 months (6 to 24). Three were complete tears, six 50%-tears and six 30%-tears. In seven patients there were associated tears of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons, which were repaired arthroscopically during the same procedure.

In each case the subscapularis tear was identified. In most patients a biceps tenotomy was necessary. The subscapularis footprint was prepared and the tendon was repaired using one or two anchors, each with two sutures, depending on the size of the tear. The mean pre-operative and postoperative Constant scores were 48 and 88 respectively.

In most patients, power returned to almost normal and pain was almost completely relieved. Arthroscopic subscapularis repair is a relatively new procedure and seems to give good results.

PURPOSE

We performed an anatomical study to clarify humeral insertions of coracohumeral ligament (CHL) and superior glenohumeral ligament (SGHL) and their relationship with subscapularis tendon. The purpose of our study was to explain the « Comma Sign » observed in retracted subscapularis tears treated by arthroscopy.

Healing of the subscapularis, documented by ultrasound, following total shoulder arthroplasty was examined in thirty shoulders. All had marked improvement in pain, SST, and ASES scores. Four subscapularis tears were identified but only one patient had a positive abdominal compression test, 7/26 patients had a positive compression test despite an intact cuff, and 4/7 patients had a significant internal rotation contracture. The abdominal compression test was not accurate in detecting sub-scapularis tears. There was a significant false positive rate, which may be related to a lack of internal rotation. Overall, the outcome was excellent and not related to the status of the subscapularis.

Very little information is available on healing of the subscapularis after shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to document the subscapularis healing rate and relate it to post-operative function and the abdominal compression test.

Thirty consecutive shoulders (twenty-three patients) s/p total shoulder replacement had standardized pre- and post-operative examinations including quantitative strength assessment and specific subscapularis testing. Ultrasound (validated for postop accuracy) was performed to document tendon healing.

All thirty shoulders had marked improvements in pain, SST, and ASES scores. Four subscapularis tears were identified but only one patient had a positive abdominal compression test. Seven out of twenty-six patients had a positive compression test despite an intact cuff. Four of seven patients had a significant internal rotation contracture. Neither the status of the subscapularis nor a positive compression test appeared to affect outcome.

Although specific subscapularis tests are often positive, only a small percentage of subscapularis tendons appear to retear after shoulder arthroplasty. The abdominal compression test is not accurate in detecting subscapularis tears post arthroplasty. There is a significant false positive rate, which may be related to a lack of internal rotation. However, overall outcome of shoulder arthroplasty was excellent and did not appear to be dependant on the status of the subscapularis.

Introduction: Glenohumeral arthritis secondary to chronic cuff deficiency not only leads to serious compromise in shoulder function but also poses a surgical challenge. There is no consensus regarding management of this problem although different arthroplasty options have been tried with variable results. We present our experience with managing this difficult problem using a shoulder resurfacing and subscapularis Z-plasty in order to improve shoulder movements, pain and function.

Patient and Methods: This study was conducted on 30-patients with rotator cuff arthropathy operated by a single surgeon at a district general hospital. There were 21 female and 9 male patients with mean age 73 years (range 62–85 years). The average duration of symptoms prior to treatment was 5.45 years (range 2–15 years). Twenty patients had uncemented shoulder resurfacing while remaining ten patients had cemented resurfacing procedure. The mean follow-up was 21 months (range 36–18 months). The patients were assessed at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months postoperatively with European Society for shoulder and Elbow Surgery Score (ESSES) and radiograph at each visit.

Results: The ESSES score significantly improved from a mean of 47.5 preoperatively to 77.5 postoperatively, with most improvement being in subjective scoring (pain and ADL) followed by improvement in external rotation and forward flexion movement due to lengthening of subscapularis by Z-plasty. The VAS score for pain improved from average 7.4 preoperatively to 0.9 at 6 months postoperatively. On subjective scoring most patients reported good to excellent result at 6 months following surgery. There was no difference in outcome scores between cemented and uncemented resurfacing groups. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were encountered.

Our early results with shoulder resurfacing in management of rotator cuff arthropathy are encouraging. This bone conserving surgery may serve as an alternative to major procedures like reverse shoulder arthroplasty in selected group of patients.

Introduction: We have devised a new technique of lesser tuberosity osteotomy with double row fixation of the subscapularis using suture anchors.

Aim: To evaluate the biomechanical properties of this novel technique against two established methods of subscapularis repair including tendon to tendon and transosseous repairs.

Method: Matched pairs of human cadaveric shoulders were allocated into 3 groups. Group 1 consisted of the double row technique with incision of the subscapularis along the bicipital groove with a lesser tuberosity osteotomy. A double loaded suture anchor was placed along the medial border of the osteotomy site and sutures were passed through subscapularis medial to the bone island in a horizontal mattress manner. A second anchor was inserted along the lateral border of the osteotomy site and the two sutures were tied onto the subscapularis holding sutures. In group 2, the subscapularis was divided 1cm medial to the bicipital groove and repaired with tendon to tendon suturing. In group 3, the subscapularis was repaired to the cut humeral neck through transosseous tunnels. The cyclic elongation, load to failure, displacement and mode of failure were analysed.

Results: All specimens in Group 1 and 40% of Group 2 and 3 passed the cyclic loading test. The ultimate tensile strength in Group 1 was found to be 2.8 times that of Group 2 and 2.4 times that of Group 3 (p< 0.05). Simple suturing failed by suture cutting out of soft tissue and tranosseous repair failed by a combination of the suture cutting out through bone and soft tissue.

Conclusion: This novel technique is simple to perform and biomechanically stronger than established methods of repair. A stronger fixation may allow early mobilization without the risk of tendon rupture and is much less likely to loosen with gap formation and subsequent fibrous tissue interposition. Additional advantages include bone to bone healing without violation of the subscapularis tendon.

Purpose

Controversy exists regarding the optimal technique of subscapularis mobilization during shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this multicentre randomized double-blind study was to compare the functional outcomes and healing rates of the lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) to the subscapularis tenotomy (ST).

Introduction and Aims: Isolated rupture of the subscapularis tendon is an uncommon condition that has generally been treated by early surgical repair. However, very little information is available regarding functional outcome following surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient reported outcome following surgical repair with a minimum follow-up of 12 months.

Method: Thirteen consecutive patients underwent arthroscopy followed by open surgical repair of an isolated traumatic rupture of the subscapularis tendon. A deltopectoral approach was used in all cases with repair of the tendon using suture anchors. Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon was carried out in all patients because of instability or rupture. Standardised pre- and post-operative examinations were performed which included goniometric measurements of range of motion and an assessment of subscapularis function and strength. The ASES Shoulder Assessment Form was completed both pre-operatively and at final review.

Results: All patients reported significant pain and functional limitations pre-operatively, with an average pain score of 7/10 and ASES score of 41.2. Limitation of active arm elevation and clinical evidence of sub-scapularis rupture was present in all but one patient. At an average follow-up of 18 months all patients were satisfied and would undergo the procedure again. The average ASES score improved to 91.9, with all patients reporting minimal or no pain. All patients regained overhead elevation and external rotation to within 10 degrees of the other side. Internal rotation and subscapularis function improved in all patients. There were no complications.

Conclusion: Early surgical repair of isolated tears of the subscapularis tendon provides excellent pain relief and reliable restoration of shoulder function and strength. Patient satisfaction is high and the average ASES score can be significantly improved. Associated abnormalities of the long head of biceps tendon are common and should be addressed at the time of surgery.