Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings in total hip arthroplasty (THA)
are commonly used, but concerns exist regarding ceramic fracture.
This study aims to report the risk of revision for fracture of modern
CoC bearings and identify factors that might influence this risk,
using data from the National Joint Registry (NJR) for England, Wales, Northern
Ireland and the Isle of Man. We analysed data on 223 362 bearings from 111 681 primary CoC
THAs and 182 linked revisions for bearing fracture recorded in the
NJR. We used implant codes to identify ceramic bearing composition
and generated Kaplan-Meier estimates for implant survivorship. Logistic
regression analyses were performed for implant size and patient specific
variables to determine any associated risks for revision.Aims
Patients and Methods
We evaluated the short-term functional outcome and prevalence
of bearing-specific generation of audible noise in 301 patients
(336 hips) operated on with fourth generation (Delta) medium diameter
head, ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasties (THAs). There were 191 female (63%) and 110 male patients (37%) with
a mean age of 61 years (29 to 78) and mean follow-up of 2.1 years
(1.3 to 3.4). Patients completed three questionnaires: Oxford Hip
Score (OHS), Research and Development 36-item health survey (RAND-36)
and a noise-specific symptom questionnaire. Plain radiographs were also
analysed. A total of three hips (0.9%) were revised. Aims
Patients and Methods
This systematic review of the literature summarises
the clinical experience with ceramic-on-ceramic hip bearings over
the past 40 years and discusses the concerns that exist in relation
to the bearing combination. Loosening, fracture, liner chipping
on insertion, liner canting and dissociation, edge-loading and squeaking
have all been reported, and the relationship between these issues
and implant design and surgical technique is investigated. New design
concepts are introduced and analysed with respect to previous clinical
experience.
Fracture of a ceramic component in total hip
replacement is a rare but potentially catastrophic complication.
The incidence is likely to increase as the use of ceramics becomes
more widespread. We describe such a case, which illustrates how
inadequate initial management will lead to further morbidity and
require additional surgery. We present the case as a warning that
fracture of a ceramic component should be revised to another ceramic-on-ceramic
articulation in order to minimise the risk of further catastrophic
wear.
We reviewed the literature on the currently available
choices of bearing surface in total hip replacement (THR). We present
a detailed description of the properties of articulating surfaces
review the understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of
existing bearing couples. Recent technological developments in the
field of polyethylene and ceramics have altered the risk of fracture
and the rate of wear, although the use of metal-on-metal bearings has
largely fallen out of favour, owing to concerns about reactions
to metal debris. As expected, all bearing surface combinations have
advantages and disadvantages. A patient-based approach is recommended,
balancing the risks of different options against an individual’s
functional demands. Cite this article:
