Introduction and Objective. Ceramic on Ceramic bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) afford a low friction coefficient, low wear rates and extreme hardness. Significant complications include hip squeak, ceramic fracture and poor polyethylene performance in revision procedures due to imbedding of abrasive microscopic ceramic fragments. We report on the results of this bearing at a minimum of 10 years. Materials and Methods. A single-centre retrospective review of 449 THAs was performed. Primary outcome measures included aseptic revision and all-cause revision rates at a minimum of 10 years post operatively. Evaluation of functionality was performed with WOMAC and SF-36 scores which were performed pre-operatively and at intervals of 6 months, one year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years post operatively. Results. There was a 6.2% (n=28) all-cause and 5.3% (n=24) aseptic revision rate for ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty at minimum of 10 years with a mean time to revision 4.8 years (range 2 months − 11.6 years). Notably, there were 2 revisions for ceramic head fracture, one for ceramic liner fracture, 3 for aseptic loosening and 3 revisions for squeaking. Pain of unknown origin was the most common reason for revision. There was an improvement in postoperative WOMAC scores from a mean of 59.8 (range 15–95) pre-operatively to a mean of 15.6 (range 0–78) at 10 years. Conclusions. This study showed good functional outcomes but high revision rates for CoC THA at a minimum of 10 years. The role for CoC bearings in THA has been called into question in recent years and may continue to decline in popularity, even in younger patients. Further large scale studies are important to assess the long-term outcomes of this bearing surface

Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) can produce articular noise during the normal activities, generating discomfort to the patient. THA noise has to be investigated also as a potential predictor and a clinical sign of prosthetic failure. An observational study has been carried out to characterize the noise in CoC cementless THA, and to analyze the related factors. A total of 46 patients with noisy hip have been enrolled in 38 months, within the follow-up protocol normally applied for the early diagnosis of ceramic liner fracture [1]. Noise recording was based on a high-quality audible recorder (mod. LS 3, Olympus, Japan) and a portable ultrasonic transducer (mod USB AE 1ch, PAC, USA). The sensors for noise recording were applied to the hip of the patient during a sequence of repeatable motorial activities (forward and backward walking, squat, sit in a chair, flexion and extension of the leg). Sessions were also video-recorded to associate the noise emission to the specific movements. Each noise event was initially identified by the operator and therefore classified by comparison to the spectral characteristics (duration, intensity and frequency) of the main noise types. Number and spectral characteristics of noise events were obtained and correlated to the factors describing the clinical status of the patient, the surgical approach, the prosthetic device implanted. The study investigated also the noise as a sign of implant failure, by comparison with the total number of implants failed in the cohort during the study. We observed three types of noise with the main spectral characteristics in agreement to the literature: clicking, squeaking and popping. Among the identified types of noise, squeaking showed the longest duration and the highest amplitude. The 63% of hip presented the emission of just one type of noise, while the remaining a mix of types. The movement with the highest presence of noise was walking, followed by squat. Correlation was found between the noise type and the dimension of the ceramic head (p<0.001), with the sizes of 32 mm more affected by squeaking that the smaller one. Squeaking appeared before during the follow-up than the other types of noise. The 35% (16/46) of the noisy hips were revised during the study. Among the revised hips, the 81% (13/16) were affected by impingement and/or severe damage of the prosthetic components. The antiversion of the cup (p=0.008), the presence of debris in the synovial fluid (p=0.021) and the average frequency of squeaking (p=0.006) were significant predictors for the revision, but it has to be mentioned that the squeaking data was obtained on a small subset of revised patients. Ultrasonic analysis did not show significant correlations. The study presented and validated an experimental procedure to analyze noisy hips in clinical trials. Noise is confirmed to be a significant parameter in the follow-up evaluation of ceramic THA

The link between squeaking and ceramic on ceramic (CoC) bearings has been widely reported in orthopaedic literature and is described as a hard bearing phenomenon. We aim to look at the incidence of noise in CoC bearings compared to Metal on Polyethylene (MoP) bearing, which have yet to be linked to squeaking. We developed a noise characterizing hip questionnaire and sent that along with the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) to 1000 patients; 3:2 ratio of CoC to MoP. 282 CoC patients and 227 MoP patients returned the questions: 509 patients in total. Our patient database provided details on femoral head size and the acetabular inclination angle, for each respondent. 47 (17%) of the CoC hip patients reported noise compared to 19 (8%) of the MoP hip patients (P=0.054). 9 CoC patients and 4 MoP patients reported squeaking, while clicking was the most frequent answer in both groups. 27% patients with noise reported avoiding recreational activities because of it. Patient's with noisy hips scored on average, 5 points worse in the OHS (CoC: P = 0.04 and MoP: P = 0.007) and were on average 5 years younger (CoC: P<0.001 and MoP: P=0.007). No correlation was found between noisy hips and femoral head size or inclination angle. The squeaking hip phenomenon is not exclusive to hard bearing THA. Noise from patient's hips may have social implications and this should be highlighted when consenting a patient for either of these hip procedures. In both implants, we showed there to be a correlation between noise production and a lower OHS. However, longer follow up studies are needed to link noise to a poorly functioning implant

Aluminia ceramic on ceramic (COC) bearing surfaces have been used for 35 years in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Studies report 85% survival at a minimum follow-up of 18.5 years. Nonetheless, an audible noise is a finding associated with COC bearings with incidence rates of 2–10%. This study aims to determine the prevalence of noise and evaluate its effect on patients. All patients who had a COC THA from August 2003 to December 2010 were contacted and asked to complete a standardised questionnaire. This asked about the presence and characteristics of a noise and if associated with activities, pain and whether this phenomenon should be mentioned preoperatively. Four consultant surgeons performed 282 consecutive primary COC THAs in 258 patients. (Male=122, Female=136 mean age 68.5; age range 28–88). In all cases, the same brand of ceramic acetabular component and stems were implanted. 11.0% had a noise, of which 5.5% had a squeak. Pain was experienced in 38.7% of patients in hips that made a noise. There was no trauma and one dislocation in this group. In this study, 85% of noises occur during weight-bearing although no patients have reduced daily activities as a result of the noises. Of all the patients, 55.0% stated they would have preferred to have known about a noisy hip possibility before consenting but none would have refused consent. Squeaking has not been a problem here despite the prevalence being higher than most in the literature. The authors recommend that squeaking should be discussed preoperatively. A checklist for Orthopaedic Trainees is being drafted to enable trainees to counsel patients appropriately, allowing patients a better opportunity to give informed consent

This was a retrospective study of registry data from a National Orthopaedic Hospital for all THRs with 10-year follow-up data. Inclusion criteria were all THRs with a minimum of 10-year follow-up data. All metal-on-metal (MoM) THRs and MoM resurfacings were excluded from the analysis due to the high rate of revision associated with these bearings. Univariate and multivariate analyses controlling for confounding variables were performed to compare outcomes. A total of 1,697 THRs were performed in 1,553 patients. The four significant predictors for revision were fixation type (p<0.01), surface bearing type (p<0.01), age (P<0.05) and head size (p<0.05). Gender, BMI and approach had no effect on revision rates. The lowest 10-year all-cause revision rates were seen in cemented THRs at 1.7%. Ceramic-on-poly bearings had the lowest revision rate at only 1.2%. Metal-on-poly bearings had a 1.7% revision rate. Ceramic on ceramic bearings had a 7.1% revision rate with 1 revision for squeak and 1 revision for ceramic head fracture. The causes for revision in order of decreasing frequency were as follows: Infection (n=13, 0.7%), dislocation (n=7, 0.4%), periprosthetic fracture (n=3, 0.2%) and aseptic loosening (n=2, 0.1%). There were 2 re-revisions at 10 years in total. The smaller 22.225mm head sizes had a significantly lower revision rate than other head sizes (p<0.05). Ceramic-on-poly bearings, cemented fixation and smaller head sizes perform better in the experience of this registry. However, with multivariate analysis, these differences were shown to be insignificant

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiographical results in patients younger than 30 years who underwent cementless third generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Methods. Forty one patients (55 hips) who underwent total hip arthroplasty with third generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearings for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with a minimum 4-year follow-up were included in this study. There were 26 men and 15 women who had a mean age of 26 years (range, 16 to 29 years). The average duration of follow-up was 6 years (range, 4 to 7 years). All surgeries were done by a single hip surgeon and third generation ceramic-on-ceramic articulations were used. Securefit (Stryker) acetabular components were used in 46 hips and Duraloc (Depuy) in 9 hips. Accolade (Stryker) femoral stems were used in 33 hips, cone prosthesis (Zimmer) in 18 hips and CLS (Zimmer) in 4 hips. Functional results were measured by Harris hip (HHS) and WOMAC scores. Radiographic evaluation was assessed for loosening and osteolysis according to Gruen and Delee and Charnley criteria. Results. The average HHS improved from 53 points (range, 24 to 59 points) pre-operatively to 95 points (range, 88 to 100 points) at last follow-up. WOMAC scores improved from 72 points (range, 50 to 98 points) to 25 points (range, 21 to 37 points). Thirty nine patients (51 hips) continued their normal occupation. There was no aseptic loosening, osteolysis, and no prosthesis had been revised. There was one patient who complained of continuous squeaking and two patients with Brooker grade I heterotopic ossification. There were no other major complications such as ceramic fracture. Conclusion. Total hip arthroplasty with third generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearings for osteonecrosis of the femoral head especially in active and young patients resulted in satisfactory clinical and radiological results at minimum 4 year follow-up. If long-term follow-up shows excellent results, then the age limit for total hip arthroplasty might be lowered

Objectives

Our study aimed to examine not only the incidence but also the impact of noise from two types of total hip replacement articulations: ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene.