Introduction: Many knee outcomes measures have recently been developed and validated. However, most of these are lengthy and too cumbersome to use in a busy sports medicine practice. The purpose of this study was to develop a one-page outcomes form that documents function, activity and patient satisfaction for collection of knee outcomes data in a format that can be analyzed easily so that a surgeon may better assess the outcomes of the therapeutic regimens used. Methods: Validated knee questionnaires were evaluated for their length and ease of scoring. Scores were evaluated for test-retest reliability, floor and ceiling effects, criterion validity, construct validity, and responsiveness to change. In addition, the psychometric properties of a single-item patient satisfaction instrument with outcomes score were studied. Results: The Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale are short in length and provide a validated outcomes measurement tool for several sports medicine procedures. In addition to being validated for ACL, meniscus, and chondral defects, we tested their psychometric properties in patients seeking treatment for osteoarthritis of the knee. The Tegner scale and overall Lysholm score showed acceptable test-retest (ICC = 0.87 and 0.79, respectively) reliability, floor and ceiling effects, criterion validity, construct validity, and responsiveness to change. The standard error of the Lysholm was 6.7 and the minimum detectable change at 95% confidence level (MDC95) was 16. For the Tegner score, the standard error was 0.60 and the MDC95 was 1.2. For the one-item patient satisfaction scale, there was an acceptable floor (4.3%) but a high ceiling (39.4%) effect. There was acceptable criterion validity with significant (p< 0.05) correlations between the satisfaction with surgical outcomes and the validated Group Health of America Consumer Satisfaction Survey. There was acceptable construct validity with all hypotheses demonstrating significance (p< 0.05). Acceptable responsiveness to change was found. Conclusions: The Lysholm score, the Tegner activity scale, and a one-item patient satisfaction with outcomes scale provide a valid one-page knee outcomes measurement form. This simple form allows the collection of knee outcomes data in a busy sports medicine practice to help surgeons better assess the clinical outcomes in their patients

Purpose: Little evidence exists to guide rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). It is unclear how new repair techniques may affect postoperative protocols. Our purpose was to determine current practices of members of the Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA) and the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM.) Our hypothesis was that wide variation would exist in the postoperative rehabilitation following ARCR and that accelerated protocols would commonly be prescribed after double row ARCR. Method: A 28 question web-based survey was sent to all active members of AANA and AOSSM via email addresses listed in the specialty society directory. Non-responders were reminded by 2 additional invitations. Results were tabulated and responses reported as a percentage of respondents. Results: The response rate was 37.7% (797/2112). Most commonly, respondents use a post-operative abduction sling (56.2%) and begin physical therapy within the first 2 weeks (42.1%.) Passive ROM is initiated within 2 weeks (74.1%), active ROM after 6 weeks (55.3%) and strengthening after 6 weeks (64.4%). Unrestricted activities are permitted at 5 months (41.2%.) 85.2% of respondents alter rehabilitation based upon tear size. Protocols were altered based upon tissue quality (86.9%), involvement of subscapularis (68.7%) or biceps tendon (65.2%) but not for workers compensation status (97.1%), smoking (71.5%) or patient age (70.3%.) 81.1% had performed double row rotator cuff repairs; however 95.2% of those do not alter their postoperative protocol based upon repair configuration. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate wide variation among respondents with regards to immobilization, ROM and return to activity. The majority had performed double row ARCR, however 95.2% of these do not alter their postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing double row repair

The Bone & Joint Journal has published several consensus statements in recent years, many of which have positively influenced clinical practice and policy.^1-13 However, even the most valued consensus statements have limitations, and all ultimately represent Level V evidence. Consensus studies add greatest value where higher-order evidence to aid decision making is ambiguous or lacking. In all settings, care must be taken to critically appraise standards of methodology, with particular attention to potential biases that may influence the conclusions which are drawn.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(4):343–346.