Spondylolisthesis is common recognized spine pathology. A lot of studies targeted spondylolisthesis in the recent years, few of which have made a major influential impact on the clinical practice. To the extent our knowledge this is the first study to highlight and analyze the top 100 cited articles on spondylolisthesis through a systematic search strategy used previously in published studies in different medical specialty. The aim of this study is to identify the most cited studies on spondylolisthesis and report their impact in spine field. Thomson Reuters Web of Science-Science Citation Index Expanded was searched using title-specific search “spondylolisthesis”. All studies published in English language between 1900 and 2019 were included with no restrictions. The top 100 cited articles were identified using “Times cited” arranging articles from high to low according to citation count. Further analysis was made to obtain the following items: Article title, author's name and specialty, country of origin, institution, journal of publication, year of publication, citations number, study design. The citation count of the top 100 articles ranged from 69 to 584. All published between 1950 – 2016. Among 20 journals, Spine had the highest number of articles 47, with citation number of 5964 out of 13644. Second ranked was Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery with 16 articles and a total citation of 3187. In respect to the primary author's specialty, Orthopedic surgeons contributed to the majority of top 100 list with 82 articles, Neurosurgery was the second specialty with 10 articles. United states had produced more than half of the list by 59 articles. England was the second country with 7 articles. Surgical management of lumbar spondylolisthesis was the most common discussed topic. This article identifies the top 100 influential papers on spondylolisthesis and recognizes an important aspect of knowledge evolution served by leading researchers as they guide today's clinical decision making in spondylolisthesis

Introduction: The results of the FDA trial for Dynesys stabilisation implied that the procedure was effective as a method of treatment for this condition. However, all the American cases had adjunct decompressive treatment. In this study we report the outcome of the first two years following DYNESYS for Spondylolisthesis in two groups of patients; Dynesys alone and Dynesys with fusion. Method: Fifty five patients had Dynesys for symptomatic Spondylolisthesis which was indicated for surgical treatment. Average age for group 1 was 51 years with range of 36–85 years whereas in group 2, average age was 59 years with range of 31–79 years. Patients were evaluated preoperatively using ODI, SF36, VAS, plain x-ray, MRI scanning & discography. 33 of the patients underwent Dynesys alone (group 1) while 22 underwent dynesys with fusion (group 2). Previous decompression surgery was noted in 10 in group 1 and 8 in group 2. Results: In the first year following Dynesys, both groups did show significant improvement in all the four parameters; VAS (back and leg), ODI and SF36. In group 2 slight deterioration was noted in year 2 and while group 1 continued to improve, Subsequently 3 group 1 patients underwent fusion and 12 required removal/revision of Dynesys (40%). Discussion & Conclusions: Dynesys alone in the treatment of spondylolysthesis resulted in a 45% re-operation rate, and we believe it should not be recommended as an indication

Study design: Long-term retrospective study of the low grade isthmic Spondylolisthesis treated by means of instrumented posterolateral fixation in adults. Objective: To evaluate clinical and functional survival of surgical treatment of the espondylolisthesis after minimum 10 years of follow-up. To study the radiologic behaviour of the fused and the adjacent level. Summary of background: It’s been suggested in many different series that posterolateral instrumented fusion is not always capable to improve the lumbar pain neither to stabilize a vertebral segment if the anterior column is not supported. The need to perform and interbody fusion in the surgical treatment of isthmic spondilolysthesis is still unknown. Material and method: From a total of 42 patients operated by low grade isthmic espondylolisthesis, it’s been obtained a clinic and radiological follow up in 31 patients, 19 females and 12 males. The average age at the moment of surgery was 34.9 years and in the last review was 46.5 years. The average follow up has been 11.8 years. Pain and functional disability was quantified by a visual analogical Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Quality of life was assessed by the SF-36. The preoperative and postoperative percentage of slip and lumbosacral kyphosis was evaluated in serial radiographs at the fused level. The intervertebral disc height and dynamic behaviour was evaluated at the adjacent level. Results: Spondylolisthesis was present at L5 in 24 patients, L4 in 6 patients and at L3 in 1 patient. In the 87% of cases the fusion was one level and the 3% was two levels. The mean (range) anterior slip at postoperative was 21.9%, and 23.1% at the final follow up. The average angle for the lumbosacral kyphosis was 19.4° in the postoperative and 19.5° in the follow up. The Oswestry Disability Index scores average at follow up was 13,6. 75.8% of patients were considered with a minimum disability and 17.2% with a moderate disability. The 67.7% of the patients develop rewarded activities, the 25.6% develop domestic tasks and the 6.45% are in a disability situation. There was no statistically significant difference between the study population SF-36 scores and those of the general population, same age and gender, in any of the eight domains. Conclusions: Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after “in situ” posterolateral instrumented fusion of adult low-grade Spondylolisthesis were satisfactory. This study further confirms that such surgery is appropriate for these selected patients

Spondylolisthesis of the fourth cervical vertebra is reported in a thirty-four-year-old woman. Only one other case at this level has been found in the literature, but others have been recorded of the sixth cervical vertebra

Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) is a common condition with many available treatment options. The Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Instability Classification (DSIC) scheme, based on a systematic review of best available evidence, was proposed by Simmonds et al. in 2015. This classification scheme proposes that the stability of the patient's pathology be determined by a surgeon based on quantitative and qualitative clinical and radiographic parameters. The purpose of the study is to utilise machine learning to classify DLS patients according to the DSIC scheme, offering a novel approach in which an objectively consistent system is employed. The patient data was collected by CSORN between 2015 and 2018 and included 224 DLS surgery cases. The data was cleaned by two methods, firstly, by deleting all patient entries with missing data, and secondly, by imputing the missing data using a maximum likelihood function. Five machine learning algorithms were used: logistic regression, boosted trees, random forests, support vector machines, and decision trees. The models were built using Python-based libraries and trained and tested using sklearn and pandas librairies. The algorithms were trained and tested using the two data sets (deletion and imputation cleaning methods). The matplotlib library was used to graph the ROC curves, including the area under the curve. The machine learning models were all able to predict the DSIC grade. Of all the models, the support vector machine model performed best, achieving an area under the curve score of 0.82. This model achieved an accuracy of 63% and an F1 score of 0.58. Between the two data cleaning methods, the imputation method was better, achieving higher areas under the curve than the deletion method. The accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 scores were similar for both data cleaning methods. The machine learning models were able to effectively predict physician decision making and score patients based on the DSIC scheme. The support vector machine model was able to achieve an area under the curve of 0.82 in comparison to physician classification. Since the data set was relatively small, the results could be improved with training on a larger data set. The use of machine learning models in DLS classification could prove to be an efficient approach to reduce human bias and error. Further efforts are necessary to test the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the DSIC scheme, as well as to determine if the surgeons using the scheme are following DLS treatment recommendations

Spondylolisthesis without a defect in the neural arch, the "pseudo-spondylolisthesis" of Junghanns, usually affects the fourth lumbar vertebra. The essential lesion is an increase in the angle between tile inferior facets and the pedicles which allows subluxation at the inferior joints. The forward displacement averages less than one centimetre. It commonly produces a clinical picture of backache and sciatica, but may present with. a "drop foot," and in unusual instances compression of the cauda euluina may occur. Patients seen in the early stages without signs of nerve root compression are best treated by localised spinal fusion. Late fusion may afford no relief because of secondary changes in the spine, but these patients obtain some benefit from a corset. Laminectomy is indicated for severe symptoms in patients who show signs of nerve root compression; it should be followed by spinal fusion

The prevalence of degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) increases with age. With an ageing population there will be increasing demands for adult deformity surgery, with associated significant financial and complication costs. The prevalence of lytic spondylolisthesis (LS) is 6–8%. Our clinical observation is that it is extremely rare to see LS in the presence of DS and therefore the objective was to formally describe the prevalence of LS in combination with DS to assess the hypothesis that 6–8% of patients with DS should also have LS. If this is not the case it may further our understanding of the pathogenesis of DS, which could aid in future prevention or treatment.

A retrospective review of erect lateral lumbar radiographs demonstrating lumbar spondylolisthesis was performed. Radiographs were identified and analysed on the hospital Synapse Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Search criteria were radiographs requested by primary care and patients aged over 60.

101 patients with spondylolisthesis were identified. 89% were requested for back or leg pain. There were 89 patients with DS (69.7% women) and 12 with LS (83% men). The average age of DS and LS patient was 75 and 70 respectively (not significant). There were no cases found with both DS and LS. This was significantly different to the expected amount of 6% (p=0.03). The level of DS was at L3/4 in 11.2% (n=10), L4/5 in 79.8% (n=71) and L5/S1 in 16.9% (n=15). 2 levels were involved in 7 patients. 94.4% (n=84) demonstrated a Meyerding grade 1 slip and 5.6% (n=5) grade 2 slip. For LS the slipped level was at L5/S1 in all cases. 66.7% (n=8) had a grade 1 slip and 33.3% (n=4) a grade 2 slip.

We found no cases of lytic spondylolisthesis in the presence of degenerative spondylolisthesis. We hypothesis that the presence of spondylolysis or lytic spondylolisthesis may be protective against development of degenerative spondylolisthesis. More work is needed to explore this further.

Instrumented fusion for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) has been challenged recently with high impact trials demonstrating similar changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and less morbidity/cost with laminectomy alone. Randomized trials often fail, however, to evaluate a heterogeneous population of patients. A standardized clinical assessment and management plan (SCAMP) was created as a decision aid for surgeons based on the radiographic stability and clinical presentation of patients. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of those patients who followed the decision aid with respect to fusion/no fusion to those who did not.

Patients were prospectively enrolled from eleven different Canadian institutions and followed from 2015–2019. A degenerative spondylolisthesis instability classification system (DSIC) was created using best available evidence stratifying patients into three different subtypes (1. stable degenerative spondylolisthesis, 2. potentially unstable spondylolisthesis and 3. unstable spondylolisthesis). The decision aid recommends laminectomy alone for group 1 patients, posterolateral fusion with pedicle screws in type 2 patients and pedicle screw and interbody fusion for type 3 patients. One year changes in HRQOL, length of hospital stay (LOS), medication use and surgical time were compared between each group and in context of whether the treatment fell within the decision aid recommendation. Statistics were performed with STATA software.

There were 394 patients initially enrolled and 334 (84.8%) with full one year data available for comparison. There were 95 type 1 (stable), 224 type 2 (potentially unstable) and 75 type 3 (unstable) patients initially classified. Baseline Ostwestry disability index (ODI), EQ-5D, and SF-12 MCS scores were significantly worse for type 3 patients versus type 1 patients. One hundred and eight patients were treated within the recommendations of the DSIC system (108/334, 32.3%). Surgeons performed interbody fusions in 141 patients (42%) rather than follow DSIC recommending a less invasive approach. There were no significant differences EQ-5D, SF-12 PCS/MCS, PHQ-9 or ODI at one year between patient groups. There was a trend towards shorter operating times for those patients following the DSIC system (195 minutes non-followers versus 180 followers, p=0.078) and reduced hospital stay (4.46 days non-followers versus 3.98 followers, p=0.065).

There were no significant clinical differences in outcome at 1 year whether patients underwent decompression alone, decompression/posterolateral fusion or interbody fusion regardless of the stability classification. Surgeons were more likely to perform potentially unnecessary interbody fusions even in those patients with stable or potentially unstable spondylolisthesis. Although not statistically significant, there is some suggestion that following the DSIC system based on best evidence recommendations leads to more judicious/responsible use of hospital resources. Further study is required to determine why surgeons are more likely to choose more invasive, higher rigidity constructs in patients with LDS.

The aim was to evaluate the Intraobserver and Interobserver reliability of Pelvic Incidence as a fundamental parameter of sagittal spino-pelvic balance in patients with spondylolisthesis compared to controls with Idiopathic Adolescent Scoliosis. A blinded test retest study including multi-surgeon assessment of Pelvic Incidence in patients with spondylolisthesis and Idiopathic Adolescent Scoliosis was carried out. We assessed the agreement between the pelvic incidence measurements using the Bland and Altman method and mean differences (95% confidence interval) are reported. Forty patients seen at Starship Children’s Hospital between 1992 – 2003 by two spinal surgeons were retrospectively identified. The main group had 20 patients with spondylolisthesis (Isthmic and/or Dysplastic types) and the control group consisted of 20 patients with Idiopathic Adolescent Scoliosis. Five observers with different levels of experience included the two orthopaedic surgeons, one fellow, one senior trainee and one non-trainee registrar. Prior to the initial test phase, a consensus-building session was carried out. All five observers arrived at a standardised method for measuring the Pelvic Incidence. In the test phase randomly ordered lateral lumbosacral radiographs were independently evaluated by the five observers and pelvic incidence was measured. Assessment of the Pelvic Incidence was repeated one week later in the re-test phase. The radiographs were presented in a randomly pre-assigned order. Bland and Altman plots were constructed and mean differences (95% confidence interval) reported to evaluate the agreement between the Pelvic Incidence measurements among the five independent observers. All analysis was performed on the statistical software package SAS. P-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The spondylolisthesis group had 11 (55%) males and 9 (45%) females with an average age of 14 ± 4.2. 2 patients had high-grade (Meyerding Class III, IV, V) and 16 had low-grade (Meyerding Class I, II) spondylolisthesis. 2 patients were post-reduction of spondylolisthesis. In the Scoliosis group there were 2 (10%) males and 18 (90%) females with an average age of 15 ± 2.9. There was no significant difference between male and females pelvic incidence measurement (60° ± 18.7° vs. 57° ± 14.6°, p=0.540) or age (15 ± 2.9 vs. 14 ± 3.8, p=0.181). There was no difference in pelvic incidence across the Meyerding groups, p=0.257. There was a significant difference between spondylolisthesis and scoliosis pelvic incidence measurements 65° ± 15.6° vs. 51° ± 12.8°, p=0.003. In the . Spondylolisthesis Group. the interobserver reliability between five clinicians, expressed as the mean difference in pelvic incidence measurement was 0.6° (95%CI −0.81, 1.91) and was not significantly different from zero p=0.423. The agreement limits were from −12.8° to 13.9°. The intraobserver reliability of pelvic incidence showed the mean difference ranging from −2.1° to 1.4° (p=0.129 and 0.333 with 95% CI). One had marginal evidence of a significant difference of 3.3° (95% CI 0.05° to 6.55°, p=0.047). In the . Scoliosis Group. the interobserver reliability was 0.3° (95% CI −0.81, 1.49) and was not significantly different from zero p=0.726. The agreement limits were from −11.0° to 11.6°. The intraobserver reliability among four observers ranged from −1.7° to 0.5° (p=0.178 and 0.661). One had a significant difference in readings of 4.1° (95% CI of 0.70° to 7.40°, p= 0.020). Scoliosis patients had a significantly smaller pelvic incidence than spondylolisthesis patients. The interobserver reliability of the pelvic incidence measurement was excellent across both groups. The intraobserver reliability was good with only one observer in each group demonstrating a marginally significant difference. Pelvic incidence is therefore a reliable measurement which can be used as a predictor in progression of spondylolisthesis

Introduction: The nonunion rate is higher and loss of reduction is common after reduction and fusion for the higher grades of spondylolisthesis. This is due to fusion bone base deficiency and lack of anterior column support, and can be addressed by supplementing the posterolateral fusion with a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Materials: All patients had a single disc level degenerative or spondylolytic slip exceeding 25%. Laminectomy and instrumented reduction (VSP or TSRH) was performed. 86 patients underwent posterolateral fusion and 82 underwent the same procedure plus a PLIF (done by tightly impacting bone chips into the disc cavity after a very aggressive discectomy). No fusion cages were used. Results: Presented as No-PLIF vs. PLIF. Age: 56 vs. 52 years. Male/Female: 14:72 vs. 15:67. Cases with pars fx: 44% vs. 56%. Level of slip (L3-4, L4-5, L5-S1): 9, 59, 18 vs. 4, 60, 18. Iatrogenic neurological injury: none vs. none. Deep infection: 1 vs. none. Nonunion: 9.3% vs. 2.4%. Broken screws: 6 vs. 2. Degree of slip (pre-op to post-op to 2 years): 34% to 11% to 20% vs. 38% to 4% to 8%. Patients that lost reduction: 67% vs. 18%. Disc height gained at 2 years: −0.2 mm vs. 2.3 mm. Subjective back pain score: 3.5 vs. 2.0. Greenough LBOS score: 54 vs. 62. Patients very satisfied: 43% vs. 60%. Cases with adjacent level slip: 4 vs. 4. Discussion: Spondylolisthesis is commonly treated with a spinal fusion. The goal of surgery is to eliminate motion between the unstable segments, and mechanically it is preferable that the vertebrae fuse in as near anatomic position as possible. It has been shown that the fusion rate decreases with higher degrees of slip, with the spondylolytic types, and with severely degenerated discs. Pedicle screw instrumentation can increase the fusion rate. Reduction of the slip can often be achieved, but it is common to lose the reduction over the course of 1–2 years if only posterolateral fusion is done. Adding an interbody fusion cage can help restore the disc height and widen the intervertebral foramen, but increases complexity, cost, and may actually decrease bone contact area and compression forces. We have found that in grade II and worse slips, pedicle screw fixation alone is not strong enough to maintain reduction of either vertebral alignment or disc height. Adding a chip PLIF appears safe and effective in increasing the union rate and the disc height, and in maintaining reduction in grade II spondylolisthesis. Clinical results are better, the infection rate is not higher. In our hands, there have been no neurological injuries. This study also raises questions about the role and need for interbody fusion cages

The use of intraoperative navigation and robotic surgery for minimally invasive lumbar fusion has been increasing over the past decade. The aim of this study is to evaluate postoperative clinical outcomes, intraoperative parameters, and accuracy of pedicle screw insertion guided by intraoperative navigation in patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. Patients who underwent posterior lumbar fusion interbody using intraoperative 3D navigation since December 2021 were included. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months. Screw placement accuracy, measured by Gertzbein and Robbins classification, and facet joint infringement, measured by Yson classification, were assessed by intraoperative Cone Beam CT scans performed at the end of instrumentation. Finally, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and screw insertion time were evaluated. This study involved 50 patients with a mean age of 63.7 years. VAS decreased from 65.8±23 to 20±22 (p<.01). ODI decreased from 35.4%±15 to 11.8%±14 (p<.01). An increase of SF-36 from 51.5±14 to 76±13 (p<.01) was demonstrated. The accuracy of “perfect” and “clinically acceptable” pedicle screw fixation was 89.5% and 98.4%, respectively. Regarding facet violation, 96.8% of the screws were at grade 0. Finally, the average screw insertion time was 4.3±2 min, hospital stay was 4.2±0.8 days, operation time was 205±53 min, and blood loss was 169±107 ml. Finally, a statistically significant correlation of operation time with hospital stay, blood loss and placement time per screw was found. We demonstrated excellent results for accuracy of pedicle screw fixation and violation of facet joints. VAS, ODI and SF-36 showed statistically significant improvements from the control at one month after surgery.

Navigation with intraoperative 3D images represents an effective system to improve operative performance in the surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis.

Aims

The aetiologies of common degenerative spine, hip, and knee pathologies are still not completely understood. Mechanical theories have suggested that those diseases are related to sagittal pelvic morphology and spinopelvic-femoral dynamics. The link between the most widely used parameter for sagittal pelvic morphology, pelvic incidence (PI), and the onset of degenerative lumbar, hip, and knee pathologies has not been studied in a large-scale setting.

Aims

To study the associations of lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) with low back pain (LBP), radicular leg pain, and disability.

Introduction

Intraoperative navigation systems for lumbar spine surgery allow to perform preoperative planning and visualize the real-time trajectory of pedicle screws. The aim of this study was to evaluate the deviation from preoperative planning and the correlations between screw deviation and accuracy.

To compare preoperative and postoperative Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) scores in operated Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients with and without concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis.

A retrospective study of a prospective cohort of 464 individuals undergoing AIS surgery between 2008 and 2018 was performed. All patients undergoing surgery for AIS with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. We excluded patients with prior or concomitant surgery for spondylolisthesis. HRQoL scores were measured using the SRS-22 questionnaire. Comparisons were performed between AIS patients with vs. without concomitant spondylolisthesis treated non-surgically.

AIS surgery was performed for 36 patients (15.2 ±2.5 y.o) with concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis, and 428 patients (15.5 ±2.4 y.o) without concomitant spondylolisthesis. The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles. Preoperative and postoperative HRQoL scores were similar between the two groups. HRQoL improved significantly for all domains in both groups, except for pain in patients with spondylolisthesis. There was no need for surgical treatment of the spondylolisthesis and no slip progression during the follow-up duration after AIS surgery.

Patients undergoing surgical treatment of AIS with non-surgical management of a concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis can expect improvement in HRQoL scores, similar to that observed in patients without concomitant spondylolisthesis.

Aims

We compared decompression alone to decompression with fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). The aim was to evaluate if five-year outcomes differed between the groups. The two-year results from the same trial revealed no differences.

Aims

The aims of this study were first, to determine if adding fusion to a decompression of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis decreases the rate of radiological restenosis and/or proximal adjacent level stenosis two years after surgery, and second, to evaluate the change in vertebral slip two years after surgery with and without fusion.

Aims

Symptomatic spinal stenosis is a very common problem, and decompression surgery has been shown to be superior to nonoperative treatment in selected patient groups. However, performing an instrumented fusion in addition to decompression may avoid revision and improve outcomes. The aim of the SpInOuT feasibility study was to establish whether a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) that accounted for the spectrum of pathology contributing to spinal stenosis, including pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and mobile spondylolisthesis, could be conducted.

Abstract

Aims

To compare the efficacy of decompression alone (DA) with i) decompression and fusion (DF) and ii) interspinous process device (IPD) in the treatment of lumbar stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Outcomes of interest were both patient-reported measures of postoperative pain and function, as well as the perioperative measures of blood loss, operation duration, hospital stay, and reoperation.