Controversy remains whether the contralateral
hip should be fixed in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital
femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This retrospective study compares the
outcomes and cost of those patients who had prophylactic fixation
with those who did not. Between January 2000 and December 2010 a total of 50 patients
underwent unilateral fixation and 36 had prophylactic fixation of
the contralateral hip. There were 54 males and 32 females with a
mean age of 12.3 years (9 to 16). The rate of a subsequent slip
without prophylactic fixation was 46%. The risk of complications
was greater, the generic health measures (Short Form-12 physical
(p <
0.001) and mental (p = 0.004) summary scores) were worse.
Radiographic cam lesions in patients presenting with unilateral
SCFE were only seen in patients who did not have prophylactic fixation.
Furthermore, prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip was
found to be a cost-effective procedure, with a cost per quality
adjusted life year gained of £1431 at the time of last follow-up. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip is a cost-effective
operation that limits the morbidity from the complications of a
further slip, and the diminished functional outcome associated with
unilateral fixation. Cite this article:
We analysed the incidence of slipped capital
femoral epiphysis (SCFE) in South Australia, investigating possible associations
between an increased incidence of SCFE, the local indigenous population
and the Australian obesity epidemic during the last 20 years. Data
including race, age and gender were collected to obtain a profile
of the South Australian SCFE patient, and were then compared with
epidemiological data for South Australian adolescents. We concluded
that the incidence of both obesity and SCFE is increasing. We also
noted that the median weight of SCFE patients has increased and
the mean age at diagnosis has decreased. Despite weight profiles
comparable with those of the general population, we noted that an
indigenous child was three times more likely to develop SCFE than
a non-indigenous child. As far as we know there is no published
literature on the predisposition of Aboriginal Australians to SCFE.
Fixation by a single screw is considered the current treatment of choice for a slipped capital femoral epiphysis. This approach promotes premature physeal closure. The use of a modified, standard, single, cannulated screw designed to maintain epiphyseal fixation without causing premature closure of the physis was reviewed in ten patients. The nine boys and one girl aged between 10.6 and 12.6 years with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), were markedly skeletally immature (Tanner stage I, bone age 10 to 12.6 years). Clinical and radiological review at a mean follow-up of 44.3 months (36 to 76) showed no difference in the time to physeal closure between the involved and uninvolved side. Measurement of epiphyseal and physeal development showed continued growth and remodelling in all patients. Use of this device provided epiphyseal stability and maintained the capacity for physeal recovery and growth following treatment for both unstable and stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
In an unselected series of 55 cases of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) we observed an incidence of 25% of epiphyseal reduction, mostly unintentional. Reduction indicated physeal instability and was associated with an effusion, detected by sonography on admission, and inability to bear weight. The true prevalence of instability may be higher since an effusion was noted in 33 cases (60%) on the initial sonographic assessment. Serial radiographs showed reduction in 12 (22%), with an average change of 15.1 degrees in the head-neck angle. Serial sonography showed reduction in 7 out of 20 cases (35%), with an average change of 3.7 mm in displacement. In two cases reduction was seen on sonography but not on radiography. Of the hips which showed subsequent reduction, 12 had had a bone scan on admission; three showed initial epiphyseal avascularity but only one progressed to symptomatic avascular necrosis. All stable hips had normal epiphyseal vascularity on the initial bone scan. This indicates the importance of injury from the initial displacement in causing avascular necrosis, rather than effusion, vascular compromise or iatrogenic injury from gentle repositioning. Physeal instability in SCFE is common and should be assessed clinically on admission. It is indicated by joint effusion or inability to bear weight. A slip is very unlikely to be unstable in a child able to bear weight and with no sonographic effusion.
Aims.
The aim of this study was to inform the epidemiology and treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This was an anonymized comprehensive cohort study, with a nested consented cohort, following the the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term study (IDEAL) framework. A total of 143 of 144 hospitals treating SCFE in Great Britain participated over an 18-month period. Patients were cross-checked against national administrative data and potential missing patients were identified. Clinician-reported outcomes were collected until two years. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected for a subset of participants.Aims
Methods
Background:
Fixation techniques used in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) that allow continued growth of the femoral neck, rather than inducing epiphyseal fusion in situ, have the advantage of allowing remodelling of the deformity. The aims of this study were threefold: to assess whether the Free-Gliding (FG) SCFE screw prevents further slip; to establish whether, in practice, it enables lengthening and gliding; and to determine whether the age of the patient influences the extent of glide. All patients with SCFE who underwent fixation using FG SCFE screws after its introduction at our institution, with minimum three years’ follow-up, were reviewed retrospectively as part of ongoing governance. All pre- and postoperative radiographs were evaluated. The demographics of the patients, the grade of slip, the extent of lengthening of the barrel of the screw and the restoration of Klein’s line were recorded. Subanalysis was performed according to sex and age.Aims
Methods
We present our experience of the modified Dunn
procedure in combination with a Ganz surgical dislocation of the hip
to treat patients with severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis
(SCFE). The aim was to prospectively investigate whether this technique
is safe and reproducible. We assessed the degree of reduction, functional
outcome, rate of complications, radiological changes and range of
movement in the hip. There were 28 patients with a mean follow-up
of 38.6 months (24 to 84). The lateral slip angle was corrected
by a mean of 50.9° (95% confidence interval 44.3 to 57.5). The mean
modified Harris hip score at the final follow-up was 89.1 ( Cite this article:
Background.
A. R. Nguyen, J. Ling, B. Gomes, G. Antoniou, L. M. Sutherland, P. J. Cundy.
Purpose.
The modified Dunn procedure has the potential to restore the anatomy in hips with severe slipped capital femoral epiphyses (SCFE). However, there is a risk of developing avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVN). In this paper, we report on clinical outcome, radiological outcome, AVN rate and complications, and the cumulative survivorship at long-term follow-up in patients undergoing the modified Dunn procedure for severe SCFE. We performed a retrospective analysis involving 46 hips in 46 patients treated with a modified Dunn procedure for severe SCFE (slip angle > 60°) between 1999 and 2016. At nine-year-follow-up, 40 hips were available for clinical and radiological examination. Mean preoperative age was 13 years, and 14 hips (30%) presented with unstable slips. Mean preoperative slip angle was 64°. Kaplan–Meier survivorship was calculated.Aims
Patients and Methods