Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 63 - 63
1 Dec 2020
Debnath A Dalal S Setia P Guro R Kotwal RS Chandratreya AP
Full Access

Introduction. Recurrent patellar dislocation is often reported in bilateral knees in young active individuals. The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) tear is the attributable cause behind many of them and warrants reconstruction of the ligament to stabilize the patellofemoral joint. Besides, trochleoplasty and Fulkerson's osteotomy are some other procedures that are performed to treat this problem. This study aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes in a cohort of patients with single-stage bilateral realignment procedures vs staged procedures. Methods. It was a retrospective matched cohort study with prospectively collected data. A total of 36 patients (mean age-26.9 years, range 13 years to 47 years) with recurrent patellar dislocations, who underwent a surgical correction in both the knees, were divided into two matched groups (age, sex, follow-up, and type of procedure). Among them, 18 patients had surgeries in one knee done at least six months later than the other knee. The remaining 18 patients had surgical interventions for both knees done in a single stage. Lysholm, Kujala, Tegner, and subjective knee scores of both groups were compared and analyzed. The rate of complications and return to the theatre were noted in both groups. Results. With a mean follow-up of 7.3 years (2.0 years to 12.3 years), there was a significant improvement in PROMS observed in both the groups (p<0.05). No significant difference could be found between the two groups in terms of the Lysholm, Kujala, and subjective knee scores (p> 0.05). The rate of complication and the re-operation rate was comparable in both the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion. The outcomes of staged vs simultaneous surgeries for bilateral patellofemoral instability are comparable. Our results indicate that simultaneous bilateral surgical correction is safe. This can potentially be an option to reduce the surgical cost and perioperative morbidity. However, careful selection of cases, choice of the patient, and the scope of rehabilitation facilities are some of the other factors that should be considered