Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:

Moderate to severe hallux valgus is conventionally treated by proximal metatarsal osteotomy. Several recent studies have shown that the indications for distal metatarsal osteotomy with a distal soft-tissue procedure could be extended to include moderate to severe hallux valgus. The purpose of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to compare the outcome of proximal and distal Chevron osteotomy in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral correction of moderate to severe hallux valgus. The original study cohort consisted of 50 female patients (100 feet). Of these, four (8 feet) were excluded for lack of adequate follow-up, leaving 46 female patients (92 feet) in the study. The mean age of the patients was 53.8 years (30.1 to 62.1) and the mean duration of follow-up 40.2 months (24.1 to 80.5). After randomisation, patients underwent a proximal Chevron osteotomy on one foot and a distal Chevron osteotomy on the other. At follow-up, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux metatarsophalangeal interphalangeal (MTP-IP) score, patient satisfaction, post-operative complications, hallux valgus angle, first-second intermetatarsal angle, and tibial sesamoid position were similar in each group. Both procedures gave similar good clinical and radiological outcomes. This study suggests that distal Chevron osteotomy with a distal soft-tissue procedure is as effective and reliable a means of correcting moderate to severe hallux valgus as proximal Chevron osteotomy with a distal soft-tissue procedure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:202–7


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 63 - 63
1 Dec 2020
Debnath A Dalal S Setia P Guro R Kotwal RS Chandratreya AP
Full Access

Introduction. Recurrent patellar dislocation is often reported in bilateral knees in young active individuals. The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) tear is the attributable cause behind many of them and warrants reconstruction of the ligament to stabilize the patellofemoral joint. Besides, trochleoplasty and Fulkerson's osteotomy are some other procedures that are performed to treat this problem. This study aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes in a cohort of patients with single-stage bilateral realignment procedures vs staged procedures. Methods. It was a retrospective matched cohort study with prospectively collected data. A total of 36 patients (mean age-26.9 years, range 13 years to 47 years) with recurrent patellar dislocations, who underwent a surgical correction in both the knees, were divided into two matched groups (age, sex, follow-up, and type of procedure). Among them, 18 patients had surgeries in one knee done at least six months later than the other knee. The remaining 18 patients had surgical interventions for both knees done in a single stage. Lysholm, Kujala, Tegner, and subjective knee scores of both groups were compared and analyzed. The rate of complications and return to the theatre were noted in both groups. Results. With a mean follow-up of 7.3 years (2.0 years to 12.3 years), there was a significant improvement in PROMS observed in both the groups (p<0.05). No significant difference could be found between the two groups in terms of the Lysholm, Kujala, and subjective knee scores (p> 0.05). The rate of complication and the re-operation rate was comparable in both the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion. The outcomes of staged vs simultaneous surgeries for bilateral patellofemoral instability are comparable. Our results indicate that simultaneous bilateral surgical correction is safe. This can potentially be an option to reduce the surgical cost and perioperative morbidity. However, careful selection of cases, choice of the patient, and the scope of rehabilitation facilities are some of the other factors that should be considered


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 26 - 26
1 Jul 2014
O'Neill B Burke N Moore D Kelly P
Full Access

The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of four children with genu valgum secondary to Hurler Syndrome treated with circular external fixators (frames) for angular correction. We retrospectively reviewed the medical and radiographic records of four children with Hurler Syndrome and genu valgum treated with frames. Three children had simultaneous bilateral tibial corrections. The fourth child had unilateral femoral correction. The mean age of the children was 14 years at application of frame. Mean duration of frame was 113 days for the tibial frames, and the femoral frame remained in-situ for 150 days. Correction was assessed clinically, and radiologically with x-rays and CT scannograms, with excellent results in all four cases. The complexities of each individual case necessitated specific and individualised treatment for each child. Complications included further deformities arising in treated and un-treated long-bones both during and after application of frame. Prior to the introduction of bone marrow transplantation, the average life expectancy of children with Hurler Syndrome was seven years. With bone marrow transplantation, affected children are now living much longer, and many develop characteristic long bone deformities in their lower limbs. These deformities are progressive and can be multifocal and polyostotic. Managament can be extremely challenging, and prior reports of management with hemiepiphysiodesis with staples and 8-plates have been mixed. We believe that this is the first series of circular frame lower limb reconstruction in children with Hurler Syndrome. The flexibility and adaptability of frames confers a unique advantage in the management of these complex deformities


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 3 | Pages 15 - 16
1 Jun 2015

The June 2015 Foot & Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Syndesmosis and outcomes in ankle fracture; Ankle arthrodesis or arthroplasty: a complications-based analysis; Crosslinked polyethylene and ankle arthroplasty; Reducing screw removal in calcaneal osteotomies; Revisiting infection control policies; Chevron osteotomy: proximal or distal?; Ankle distraction for osteoarthritis