Introduction: There has been an introduction of short femoral stems with the aim of conserving bone. We present the short term results of short metaphyseal cement-less stem(Proxima. ®. , Depuy). Material and methods: 25 patients in age group (25–40yrs), 15 males,10 females were implanted with a short metaphyseal cementless stem (Proxima. ®. , Depuy) and cementless acetabular cup. The average follow up was 2.3 years (1.4–2.5 yrs). Clinical evaluation using Harris Hip Score, Radiological evaluation and Bone Mineral Density were evaluated at 2weeks, 6 months, 12 months and yearly thereafter. a new zonal method suitable for short stem was used for radiological evaluation. Results: The mean Harris Hip score improved from 44 to 95 at final follow up. There was no evidence of any radiolucent lines or osteolysis around the stems. All the stems showed evidence of osseointegration at one year follow up. There was no decrease in bone mineral density around the stems. Discussion: The Short Metaphyseal cementless femoral stem is a bone conserving as well as bone preserving option for young patients especially in those in whom surface replacement is not an option

25 patients in age group (25–40yrs), 15 males, 10 females were implanted with a short metaphyseal cementless stem (‘Proxima’®, Depuy) and cementless acetabular cup. The average follow up was 2.3 years (1.4–2.5 yrs). Clinical evaluation using Harris Hip Score, Radiological evaluation and Bone Mineral Density were evaluated at 2weeks, 6 months, 12 months and yearly thereafter. a new zonal method suitable for short stem was used for radiological evaluation. The mean Harris Hip score improved from 44 to 95 at final follow up. There was no evidence of any radiolucent lines or osteolysis around the stems. All the stems showed evidence of osseointegration at one year follow up. There was no decrease in bone mineral density around the stems. The Short Metaphyseal cementless femoral stem is a bone conserving as well as bone preserving option for young patients especially in those in whom surface replacement is not an option

Interestingly, recent studies have shown promising outcomes in elderly. To the best of our knowledge there are no reports available assessing sequential bone remodelling around DCPD (dicalcium phosphate dehydrate) coated short metaphyseal loading stem using serial radiography. Hence we report the unique patterns of bone remodelling in patients 70 years and older and whether these patterns were different from those seen in younger patients. A total of 41 consecutive primary hip arthroplasties were performed in patients with averaged age of 78.3 years using short stem. The presence and patterns of radiolucent lines, radio-opaque lines, calcar rounding, proximal bone resorption, spot welds, cortical hypertrophy, and intramedullary bone formation around the distal tip were assessed at serial radiography up to averaged follow up of 24.5 months. In early stage of stability, the radio-opaque line appeared in lateral aspect of stem which might means the tension force of stem. On the contrary to this findings, the medial side of stem mainly showed the spot welds due to compression on calcar support. The sequential radiographic bone remodelling in 70 years and older showed the different pattern from those of 30 to 50 year-old. Formation of new endosteal trabeculation (spot welds) were seen only in 55.6% of stems among the elderly study group where as all patients showed spot welds in the younger group. Calcar resorption was often observed in younger group but the degree of calcar resorption was less. The other findings in elderly patients was not different compared to those of younger patients

This was a randomised controlled trial studying the safety of a new short metaphyseal fixation (SMF) stem. We hypothesised that it would have similar early clinical results and micromovement to those of a standard-length tapered Synergy metaphyseal fixation stem. Using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) we compared the two stems in 43 patients. A short metaphyseal fixation stem was used in 22 patients and a Synergy stem in 21 patients. No difference was found in the clinical outcomes pre- or post-operatively between groups. RSA showed no significant differences two years post-operatively in mean micromovement between the two stems (except for varus/valgus tilt at p = 0.05) (subsidence 0.94 mm (. sd.  1.71) vs 0.32 mm (. sd. 0.45), p = 0.66; rotation 0.96° (. sd. 1.49) vs 1.41° (. sd. 2.95), p = 0.88; and total migration 1.09 mm (. sd. 1.74) vs 0.73 mm (. sd. 0.72), p = 0.51). A few stems (four SMF and three Synergy) had initial migration > 1.0 mm but stabilised by three to six months, with the exception of one SMF stem which required revision three years post-operatively. For most stems, total micromovement was very low at two years (subsidence < 0.5 mm, rotation < 1.0°, total migration < 0.5 mm), which was consistent with osseous ingrowth. The small sample makes it difficult to confirm the universal applicability of or elucidate the potential contraindications to the use of this particular new design of stem. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:595–602

Purpose. Traditional total knee arthoplasty techniques have involved implantation of diaphyseal stems to aid in fixation expecially when using constrained polyethylene inserts. While the debate over cemented vs uncemented stems continues, the actual use of stems is considered routine. The authors' experience with cemented stemmed knee revisions in older patients with osteoporotic bone has been favorable. Our younger patients with press-fit stems from varying manufacturers have been plagued with a relatively high incidence of component loosening and stem tip pain in the tibia and occasionally thigh. We report the early results of the first 20 total knee revisions using press-fit metaphyseal filling sleeved stemless implants with constrained bearings. Methods. Twenty three patients with failed primary or revision total knees were assigned to receive stemless sleeved revision knee designs using the DePuy MBT/TC3 system. Reasons for revision included loosening, implant fracture, stiffness, instability, and stem pain. Twenty patients (ages ranging from 42–73) were successfully reconstructed without stems. Six knees with significant uncontained cavitary defects were included. Three patients with unexpectedly osteoporotic metaphyseal bone were revised with cemented stemmed implants and excluded. All cases used cement for initial fixation on the cut bone surface and fully constrained mobile bearing inserts. Results. Follow up ranged from six months to three years. All patients had radiographic evidence of well fixed stable implants on most recent examination. All four cases of revision for “end of stem pain” had complete resolution of symptoms within two weeks of revision surgery. Long leg anterior posterior mechanical alignment x-rays measured within two degrees of neutral in all cases. Knee Society Scores improved an average of 34 points. Clinical results for revision for stiffness had the lowest final scores post operatively. Conclusion. Stemmed total knee arthroplasty revision implants with or without cement are considered the standard for most revision reconstructions. Recently, primary total hip replacements using newer short metaphyseal stems have shown promising early clinical results. This case series of twenty total knee revisions using stemless press-fit metaphyseal sleeves shows similarly favorable outcomes. The complications of stemmed implants such as stem tip pain and difficulty of cemented stem removal can be avoided successfully in non-osteporotic bone reconstructions. With stable bony ingrowth visible on early post-operatyive radiographs, long term stable fixation even with constrained bearings is expected. Longer follow up will be needed to validate this technique for routine use

Aims: determine risk factors associated with component loosening so that measures can be implemented to improve component durability. Methods: The þrst 300 patients with Wright Medical Conserve Plusª metal-on-metal hip resurfacings were analyzed radiographically for radiolucencies and failed components were analyzed histologically after the components were sectioned. The group average age was 48 years, 75% were male, and most were operated for OA. At an average of 3 years, 7 hips required revision for femoral loosening, none for acetabular loosening. These included 4 of the þrst 100 cases, 1 in the 2nd 100, 2 in the 3rd 100. Radiographic lucencies were found in 9 of the 1st 100, and 3 in each of the of the 2nd and third 100. Results: The etiology of femoral loosening was found to be multifac-torial and risk factors included: substandard bone preparation, presence of large cysts or bone defects, cement technique, and patient activity. The short metaphyseal stem serves as a useful Ç barometer È for þxation and impending loosening. Conclusions: Femoral loosening can be minimized by better patient selection and by excellent bone preparation and cement technique. Patients with compromised bone stock may still be successfully resurfaced if the extent of the defects is not excessive and/or the stem is cemented in

The purpose of the present study was to identify risk factors for femoral loosening and neck fracture for Conserve+ metal-on-metal hybrid surface atrhroplasty. The first 500 hips (of over 700 implanted by the senior author) in 436 patients were reviewed. Mean age was 48.6 with 74% of males patients. 16 hips were converted to THR secondary to aseptic failure on the femoral side (11 femoral component loosenings and 5 femoral neck fractures). 14 hips showed radiolucencies around the short metaphyseal stem at last follow-up. A retrieval analysis was performed and analyzed specimens compared with the intra operative photos of the prepared femoral head and the post-op X-rays. The cause of neck fractures is multifactorial. Risk factors include: uncovered reamed bone, leaving the component proud, notching the neck, impingement, osteopenia and cysts, and trauma. Avoidance of technical deficiencies and proper patient selection can eliminate neck fractures. Loosening is also multifactorial. Risk factors for loosening included: cysts > 1 cm, small femoral head size, female gender, early cases (before improved acrylic fixation including femoral suctioning measures were instituted) and reduced stem shaft angle. Meticulous initial preparation of the femoral bone surfaces, drying with suctioning, and maximizing the fixation area are critical when the fixation area is small, especially with osteopenia and cystic degeneration. These techniques have dramatically diminished the incidence of loosening and radiolucencies. Cementing the femoral metaphyseal stem is a meaningful technical improvement towards the prevention of early femoral failure in patients with risk factors