The outcome following arthroscopic anterior cruciate (ACL) reconstruction is dependant on a combination of surgical and non-surgical factors. Technical error is the commonest cause for graft failure, with poor tunnel placement accounting for over 80% of those errors. A routine audit of femoral and tibial tunnel positions following single bundle hamstring arthroscopic ACL reconstruction identified apparent inconsistent positioning of the tibial tunnel in the sagittal plane. Intra-operative fluoroscopy was therefore introduced (when available) to verify tibial guide wire position prior to tunnel reaming. This paper reports a comparison of tibial interference screw position measured on post-operative radiographs with known tunnel position as shown on intra-operative fluoroscopic images in 20 patients undergoing routine primary ACL reconstruction between January and June 2009. Surgery took a mean of 5 minutes longer when intra-operative fluoroscopy was used. In 3/20 patients, fluoroscopy led to re-positioning of the tibial guide wire prior to tunnel reaming. The mean tibial tunnel position as indicated by the tunnel reamer was 41 +/− 2.7 % of the total plateau depth (range 37% to 47%). The mean position projected from the tibial screw on post operative radiographs was 46 +/− 9.2% (range 38% to 76%). A paired t-test showed a significant difference (p = 0.022) between true tunnel position and tibial screw position. 6/20 patients had post operative screw positions that were > 5% more posterior than the known position of the tibial tunnel. The position of the tunnel should be measured at its mid-point where this is evident. On most early radiographic images, the margins of the tunnel are not clear and therefore a line projected from the centre of the screw is used. This audit demonstrates the potential inaccuracy associated with this

The clinical diagnosis of a partial tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is still subject to debate. Little is known about the contribution of each ACL bundle during the Lachman test. We investigated this using six fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs. Screws were placed in the femora and tibiae as fixed landmarks for digitisation of the bone positions. The femur was secured horizontally in a clamp. A metal hook was screwed to the tibial tubercle and used to apply a load of 150 N directed anteroposteriorly to the tibia to simulate the Lachman test. The knees then received constant axial compression and 3D knee kinematic data were collected by digitising the screw head positions in 30° flexion under each test condition. Measurements of tibial translation and rotation were made, first with the ACL intact, then after sequential cutting of the ACL bundles, and finally after complete division of the ACL. Two-way analysis of variance analysis was performed. During the Lachman test, in all knees and in all test conditions, lateral tibial translation exceeded that on the medial side. With an intact ACL, both anterior and lateral tibial landmarks translated significantly more than those on the medial side (p < 0.001). With sequential division of the ACL bundles, selective cutting of the posterolateral bundle (PLB) did not increase translation of any landmark compared with when the ACL remained intact. Cutting the anteromedial bundle (AMB) resulted in an increased anterior translation of all landmarks. Compared to the intact ACL, when the ACL was fully transected a significant increase in anterior translation of all landmarks occurred (p < 0.001). However, anterior tibial translation was almost identical after AMB or complete ACL division. We found that the AMB confers its most significant contribution to tibial translation during the Lachman test, whereas the PLB has a negligible effect on anterior translation. Section of the PLB had a greater effect on increasing the internal rotation of the tibia than the AMB. However, its contribution of a mean of 2.8° amplitude remains low. The clinical relevance of our investigation suggests that, based on anterior tibial translation only, one cannot distinguish between a full ACL and an isolated AMB tear. Isolated PLB tears cannot be detected solely by the Lachman test, as this bundle probably contributes more resistance to the pivot shift

Objectives

Our aim was to assess the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy in the assessment of the position of the tibial tunnel during reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

We have investigated the benefits of patient specific instrument guides, applied to osteotomies around the knee. Single, dual and triple planar osteotomies were performed on tibias or femurs in 14 subjects. In all patients, a detailed pre-operative plan was prepared based upon full leg standing radiographic and CT scan information. The planned level of the osteotomy and open wedge resection was relayed to the surgery by virtue of a patient specific guide developed from the images. The mean deviation between the planned wedge angle and the executed wedge angle was 0° (-1 to 1, sd 0.71) in the coronal plane and 0.3° (-0.9 to 3, sd 1.14) in the sagittal plane. The mean deviation between the planned hip, knee, ankle angle (HKA) on full leg standing radiograph and the post-operative HKA was 0.3° (-1 to 2, sd 0.75). It is concluded that this is a feasible and valuable concept from the standpoint of pre-operative software based planning, surgical application and geometrical accuracy of outcome.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B, Supple A:153–8.