Introduction. Revision type arthroplasties for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis is an effective and secure procedure. It has different indications, but the most relevant is the revision of a failured primary arthroplasty. In our study, we reviewed the results of another indication, the implantation of a revision type arthroplasty as a primary procedure in cases of severe deformities. Objectives. To assess the radiological, clinical and functional situation and the quality of life of those patients in whom a revision knee arthroplasty had been implanted in the past years. Materials and Methods. We did a retrospective study of 108 knee arthroplasties (80% women) implanted between 1999 and 2005 with a mean follow up of 7.8 years. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 75 years old (60–87). The most frequent indication for a revision type arthroplasty was an important valgum deformity osteoarthritis. We assess the functional and clinical situation using the Knee Society Score, both clinical and functional; the radiological situation using the Knee Society Roentgenographic evaluation and the quality of life using the Short Form 12 (SF12). We have analyzed the survivorship rate of our arthroplasties as well. Results. We could contact 75 patients. 20 had died in the past years without any new surgeries in the knee; we could not contact 13 patients due to lost of follow up. The survivalship rate of the arthroplasties is 91% at the time of follow up. In the cases of severe valgum or varum malalignment, a phisiological valgum angle (5.47°) was achieved in all of the patients. 77.4% of the patients declared themselves as satisfied or very satisfied in the last follow up. The results of the KSS-Clinical were excellent or good in 87.1% of the patients while in the KSS- Functional was 77.5%. The mean SF12 score was 20.68 out of 60 points. Conclusions. The clinical and functional results are overall good or very good, as well as the quality of life, in those patients in which a revision arthroplasty had been implanted instead of a conventional primary arthroplasty, when it was correctly indicated. So a revision type arthroplasty should be considered for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in cases of severe bone deformities or severe malalignment

Aims

The modified Radiological Union Scale for Tibia (mRUST) fractures score was developed in order to assess progress to union and define a numerical assessment of fracture healing of metadiaphyseal fractures. This score has been shown to be valuable in predicting radiological union; however, there is no information on the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of this index for various cut-off scores. The aim of this study is to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and cut-off points of the mRUST score for the diagnosis of metadiaphyseal fractures healing.