Abstract. Introduction. In general the life expectancy of population is improving. This is causing to increase case load of peri-prosthesis fractures after joint replacements. We present our results of peri-prosthesis fracture around hip managed by revision arthroplasty. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 24 consecutive patients of periprosthetic hip fracture treated with a revision arthroplasty at Major Trauma Centre between February 2021 and January 2022. Results. 12 male and 12 female patients, average age 78 years. 3 fractures around BHR prosthesis, 2 type A, 15 type B and 3 of type C (Vancouver). The surgery was done in an average 6 days after injury (range 1–14). 6 patients died in follow up, 1 patient contracted infection, 2 developed LLD and 1 patient had multiple dislocations. 6 patients had revision using endo-prosthesis. Advanced age with peri-prosthesis fracture has increased risk of mortality (average age 84.5 years). Conclusion. Endo-prosthesis replacement had higher risk of dislocation, infection and mortality. Overall patients do well after a revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip fracture. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Around 1% of total hip replacements are follow by prosthetic joint infection (PJI). There is uncertainty about best treatment method for PJI, and the most recent high quality systematic reviews in unselected patients indicates that re-infection rates following one-stage and two-stage revision arthroplasty are relatively similar. In the absence of evidence randomised controlled trials will help to identify the most clinically and cost-effective treatment for PJI. Before such trials are conducted, there is a need to establish reasons for current practice and to identify whether trials are feasible. This study aimed to deliver research that would inform trial design. Specifically, we aimed to characterise consultant orthopaedic surgeons' decisions about performing either one-stage or two-stage exchange arthroplasty for patients with PJI after hip replacement and to identify whether a randomised trial comparing one-stage with two-stage revision would be possible. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 consultant surgeons from 5 high-volume National Health Service (NHS) orthopaedic departments in the UK. Surgeons were sampled on the basis that they perform revision surgery for PJI after hip arthroplasty and final sample size was justified on the basis of thematic saturation. Surgeons were interviewed face-to-face (n=2) or via telephone (n=10). The interview study took place before design of a multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial comparing patient and clinical outcomes after one-stage or two-stage revision arthroplasty. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised and analysed using a thematic approach, with 25% of transcripts independently double-coded. Results: There is no standard surgical response to the treatment of PJI and surgeons manage a complex balance of factors when choosing a surgical strategy. These include multiple patient-related factors, their own knowledge and expertise, available infrastructure and the infecting organism. Surgeons questioned whether evidence supports the emergence of two-stage revision as a method. They described the use of loosely cemented articulating spacers as a way of managing uncertainty about best treatment method. All surgeons were supportive of a randomised trial to compare one-stage and two-stage revision surgery for PJI after hip replacement. Surgeons reported that they would put patients forward for randomisation when there was uncertainty about best treatment. Surgeons highlighted the need for evidence to support their choice of revision. Some surgeons now use revision methods that can better address both clinical outcomes and patients' quality of life, such as loosely cemented articulating spacers. Surgeons thought that a randomised controlled trial comparing one-stage and two-stage exchange joint replacement is needed and that randomisation would be feasible. The next stage of the work was to design a multi-centre randomised controlled trial, this has been achieved and the trial is now ongoing in the UK

We reviewed 194 revision arthroplasties of the hip and knee performed over a ten-year period. The results of intraoperative Gram staining were available in 169 (87%). Thirty-two were found to be infected (11 hips and 21 knees) and 137 had no evidence of infection. Intraoperative Gram staining was negative in all 169 cases. The method therefore had a sensitivity of 0% for detecting infection. We conclude that the absence of organisms on intraoperative Gram staining during revision arthroplasty does not confirm the absence of infection

Previous research has shown an increase in chromosomal aberrations in patients with worn implants. The type of aberration depended on the type of metal alloy in the prosthesis. We have investigated the metal-specific difference in the level of DNA damage (DNA stand breaks and alkali labile sites) induced by culturing human fibroblasts in synovial fluid retrieved at revision arthroplasty. All six samples from revision cobalt-chromium metal-on-metal and four of six samples from cobalt-chromium metal-on-polyethylene prostheses caused DNA damage. By contrast, none of six samples from revision stainless-steel metal-on-polyethylene prostheses caused significant damage. Samples of cobalt-chromium alloy left to corrode in phosphate-buffered saline also caused DNA damage and this depended on a synergistic effect between the cobalt and chromium ions. Our results further emphasise that epidemiological studies of orthopaedic implants should take account of the type of metal alloy used

The long-term biological effects of wear debris are unknown. We have investigated whether there is any evidence of cumulative mutagenic damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients undergoing revision arthroplasty of predominantly metal-on-plastic total hip replacements compared with those at primary arthroplasty. There was a threefold increase in aneuploidy and a twofold increase in chromosomal translocations which could not be explained by the confounding variables of smoking, gender, age and diagnostic radiographs. In the patients with TiVaAl prostheses there was a fivefold increase in aneuploidy but no increase in chromosomal translocations. By contrast, in patients with cobalt-chrome prostheses there was a 2.5-fold increase in aneuploidy and a 3.5-fold increase in chromosomal translocations. In six patients with stainless-steel prostheses there was no increase in either aneuploidy or chromosomal translocations. Our results suggest that future epidemiological studies of the putative long-term risks of joint replacement should take into account the type of alloy used in the prosthesis

In severe cases of total knee & hip arthroplasty, where off-the-shelf implants are not suitable (i.e., in cases with extended bone defects or periprosthetic fractures), 3D-printed custom-made knee & hip revision implants out of titanium or cobalt-chromium alloy represent one of the few remaining clinical treatment options. Design verification and validation of such custom-made implants is very challenging. Therefore, a methodology was developed to support surgeons and engineers in their decision on whether a developed design is suitable for the specific case. A novel method for the pre-clinical testing of 3D-printed custom-made knee implants has been established, which relies on the biomechanical test and finite element analysis (FEA) of a comparable clinically established reference implant. The method comprises different steps, such as identification of the main potential failure mechanism, reproduction of the biomechanical test of the reference implant via FEA, identification of the maximum value of the corresponding FEA quantity of interest at the required load level, definition of this value as the acceptance criterion for the FEA of the custom-made implant, reproduction of the biomechanical test with the custom-made implant via FEA, decision making for realization or re-design based on the acceptance criterion is fulfilled or not. Exemplary cases of custom-made knee & hip implants were evaluated with this new methodology. The FEA acceptance criterion derived from the reference implants was fulfilled in both custom-made implants and subsequent biomechanical tests verified the FEA results. The suggested method allows a quantitative evaluation of the biomechanical properties of custom-made knee & hip implant without performing physical bench testing. This represents an important contribution to achieve a sustainable patient treatment in complex revision total knee & hip arthroplasty with custom-made 3D printed implants in a safe and timely manner.

We reviewed histologically the incidence and pathogenesis of the deposition of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) crystals in the pseudocapsule, femoral and acetabular membranes and periprosthetic tissue at revision of 789 cases of failed total hip replacement. In 13, periprosthetic tissues were found to have deposits of CPPD crystals in areas of cartilaginous metaplasia; four also showed evidence of localised deposition of amyloid. None of the patients had a history of chondrocalcinosis in the hip or other joints. Cartilaginous metaplasia and other changes in periprosthetic tissues may predispose to the deposition of CPPD and associated localised amyloid.

Revision knee arthroplasty is a complex procedure with the number and cost of knee revision procedures performed per year expected to rise. Few studies have examined adverse events following revision arthroplasty. The objective of this study was to determine rates of serious adverse events in patients undergoing revision knee arthroplasty with consideration of the indication for revision (urgent versus elective indications) and to compare these with primary arthroplasty and re-revision arthroplasty. Patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty were identified in the UK Hospital Episode Statistics. Subsequent revision and re-revision arthroplasty procedures in the same patients and same knee were identified. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality and a logistic regression model was used to investigate factors associated with 90-day mortality and secondary adverse outcomes including infection (undergoing surgery), pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, stroke. Urgent indications for revision arthroplasty were defined as infection or fracture, and all other indications were included in the elective indications cohort. 939,021 primary knee arthroplasty cases were included of which 40,854 underwent subsequent revision arthroplasty, and 9,100 underwent re-revision arthroplasty. Revision surgery for elective indications was associated with a 90-day rate of mortality of 0.44% (135/30,826; 95% CI 0.37-0.52) which was comparable to primary knee arthroplasty (0.46%; 4,292/939,021; 95% CI 0.44-0.47). Revision arthroplasty for infection, however, was associated with a much higher mortality of 2.04% (184/9037; 95% CI 1.75-2.35; odds ratio [OR] 3.54; 95% CI 2.81-4.46), as was revision for periprosthetic fracture at 5.25% (52/991; 95% CI 3.94-6.82; OR 6.23; 95% CI 4.39-8.85). Higher rates of pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and stroke were also observed in the infection and fracture cohort. These findings highlight the burden of complications associated with revision knee arthroplasty. They will inform shared decision-making for patients considering revision knee arthroplasty for elective indications. Patients presenting with infection of a knee arthroplasty or a periprosthetic fracture are at very high risk of adverse events. It is important that acute hospital services and tertiary referral centres caring for these patients are appropriately supported to ensure appropriate urgency and an anticipation for increased care requirements

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is an uncommon but serious complication of hip replacement. Over 1,000 operations are performed annually in the United Kingdom for PJI following hip replacement, using either one- or two-stage revision arthroplasty. It is unclear which is preferred by patients and which has the best long-term outcome. This qualitative study aims to describe patient experiences of treatment and recovery following one- and two-stage revision arthroplasty for PJI within the context of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing these two approaches. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 patients undergoing one- or two-stage revision treatment for PJI as part of a UK multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Patients were recruited from 12 participating National Health Service (NHS) Orthopaedic Departments and were interviewed 2–4 months after their first revision surgery and again approximately 18 months later. Final sample size was justified on the basis of thematic saturation. All patients consented to the interview being audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised and analysed using an inductive thematic approach. Ethical approval was provided by NRES Committee South-West Frenchay, 14/SW/116. Patients in both the one- and two-stage treatment groups described prolonged hospital stays, with burdensome antibiotics and brief physiotherapy treatment. However, following discharge home and during recovery, participants undergoing two-stage revision with an ‘empty hip' or with a spacer reported being physically restricted in almost every aspect of their daily life, resulting in inactivity and confinement to home. Mobility aids were not sufficiently available through the health service for these patients. A key difference is that those with a spacer reported more pain than those without. Approximately one year following their second-stage revision, participants described being more independent and active, but two directly attributed muscle weakness to the lengthy period without a hip and described resulting falls or dislocations that had complicated their recovery. In contrast, those undergoing one-stage revision and CUMARS appeared to be more alike, reporting better mobility, functionality and independence, although still limited. Participants in these groups also reported minimal or no pain following their revision. A key difference between CUMARS and one-stage revision was the uncertainty of whether a second operation was necessary, which participants described as “hanging over them”, while those in the two-stage empty hip or spacer group described a more positive anticipation of a second definitive operation as it marked an end to what was described as a detachment from life. Our findings highlight the differences between patient experiences of recovery following revision arthroplasty, and how this is influenced by the surgical approach and presence or lack of spacers. An understanding of lived experiences following one- and two-stage surgical interventions will complement knowledge about the clinical effectiveness of these different types of revision surgery

Extensor mechanism and abductor reconstructions in total joint arthroplasty are problematic. Growing tendon into a metallic implant would have great reconstructive advantages. With the introduction of porous metal implants, it was hoped that tendons could be directly attached to implants. However, the effects of the porous metal structure on tissue growth and pore penetration is unknown. In this rat model, we investigated the effect of pore size on tendon repair fixation using printed titanium implants with differing pore sizes. There were four groups of six Sprague Dawley rats (n = 28) plus control (n=4). Implants had pore sizes of 400µm (n=8), 700µm (n=8), and 1000µm (n=8). An Achilles tendon defect was created, and the implant positioned and sutured between the cut ends. Harvest occurred at 12-weeks. Half the specimens underwent tensile load to failure testing, the other half fixed and processed for hard tissue analysis. Average load to failure was 72.6N for controls (SD 10.04), 29.95N for 400µm (SD 17.95), 55.08N for 700µm (SD 13.47), and 63.08N for 1000µm (SD 1.87). The load to failure was generally better in the larger pore sizes. Histological evaluation showed that there was fibrous tendon tissue within and around the implant material, with collagen fibers organized in bundles. This increases as the pore diameter increases. Printing titanium implants allows for precise determination of pore size and structure. Our results showed that tendon repair utilizing implants with 700µm and 1000µm pores exhibited similar load to failure as controls. Using a defined pore structure at the attachment points of tendons to implants may allow predictable tendon to implant reconstruction at the time of revision arthroplasty

Infected non-unions of proximal femoral fractures are difficult to treat. If debridement and revision fixation is unsuccessful, staged revision arthroplasty may be required. Non-viable tissue must be resected, coupled with the introduction of an antibiotic-eluting temporary spacer prior to definitive reconstruction. Definitive tissue microbiological diagnosis and targeted antibiotic therapy are required. In cases of significant proximal femoral bone loss, spacing options are limited. We present a case of a bisphosphonate-induced subtrochanteric fracture that progressed to infected non-union. Despite multiple washouts and two revision fixations, the infection remained active with an unfavourable antibiogram. The patient required staged revision arthroplasty including a proximal femoral resection. To enable better function by maintaining leg length and offset, a custom-made antibiotic-eluting articulating temporary spacer, the Cement-a-TAN, was fabricated. Using a trochanteric entry cephalocondylar nail as a scaffold, bone cement was moulded in order to fashion an anatomical, patient-specific, proximal femoral spacer. Following resolution of the infection, the Cement-a-TAN was removed and a proximal femoral arthroplasty was successfully performed. Cement-a-TAN is an excellent temporary spacing technique in staged proximal femoral replacement for infected non-union of the proximal femur where there has been significant bone loss. It preserves mobility and maintains leg length, offset and periarticular soft-tissue tension

Patients report similar or better pain and function before revision hip arthroplasty than before primary arthroplasty but poorer outcomes after revision surgery. The trajectory of post-operative recovery during the first 12 months and any differences by type of surgery have received little attention. We explored the trajectories of change in pain and function after revision hip arthroplasty to 12-months post-operatively and compared them with those observed after primary hip arthroplasty. We conducted a single-centre UK cohort study of patients undergoing primary (n = 80) or revision (n = 43) hip arthroplasty. WOMAC pain and function scores and 20-metres walking time were collected pre-operatively, at 3 and 12-months post-operatively. Multilevel regression models were used to chart and compare the trajectories of post-operative change (0–3 months and 3–12 months) between the types of surgery. Patients undergoing primary arthroplasty had a total hip replacement (n=74) or hip resurfacing (n=6). Osteoarthritis was the indication for surgery in 92% of primary cases. Patients undergoing revision arthroplasty had revision of a total hip arthroplasty (n=37), hemiarthroplasty (n=2) or hip resurfacing (n=4). The most common indication for revision arthroplasty was aseptic loosening (n=29); the remaining indications were pain (n=4), aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion (n=4) or other reasons (n=6). Primary (87%) and revision arthroplasties (98%) were mostly commonly performed via a posterior surgical approach. The improvements in pain and function following revision arthroplasty occurred within the first 3-months following operation (WOMAC-pain, p<0.0001; WOMAC-function, p<0.0001; timed 20-metres walk, p<0.0001) with no evidence of further change beyond this initial period (p>0.05). While the pattern of recovery after revision arthroplasty was similar to that observed after primary arthroplasty, improvements in the first 3-months were smaller after revision compared to primary arthroplasty (p<0.0001). Patients listed for revision surgery reported lower pre-operative pain levels (p=0.03) but similar post-operative levels (p=0.268) compared to those undergoing primary surgery. At 12-months post-operation patients who underwent a revision arthroplasty had not reached the same level of function achieved by those who underwent primary arthroplasty (WOMAC-function p=0.015; Time walk p=0.004). Patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty should be informed that the majority of their improvement will occur in the first 3-months following surgery and that the expected improvement will be less marked than that experienced following primary surgery. More research is now required to 1.) identify whether specific in-patient and post-discharge rehabilitation tailored towards patients undergoing revision arthroplasty would improve or achieve equivalent outcomes to primary surgery and 2.) whether patients who are achieving limited improvements at 3-months post-operative would benefit from more intensive rehabilitation. This will become all the more important with the increasing volume of revision surgery and the high expectations of patients who aspire to a disease-free and active life

Introduction and Objective. The surgical strategy for acetabular component revision is determined by available host bone stock. Acetabular bone deficiencies vary from cavitary or segmental defects to complete discontinuity. For segmental acetabular defects with more than 50% of the graft supporting the cup it is recommended the application of reinforcement ring or ilioischial antiprotrusio devices. Acetabular reconstruction with the use of the antiprotrusion cage (APC) and allografts represents a reliable procedure to manage severe periprosthetic deficiencies with highly successful long-term outcomes in revision arthroplasty. Objective. We present our experience, results, critical issues and technical innovations aimed at improving survival rates of antiprotrusio cages. Materials and Methods. From 2004 to 2019 we performed 69 revisions of the acetabulum using defrosted morcellized bone graft and the Burch Schneider anti-protrusion cage. The approach was direct lateral in 25 cases, direct anterior in 44. Patients were re-evaluated with standard radiography and clinical examination. Results. Eight patients died from causes not related to surgery, and two patients were not available for follow up. Five patients were reviewed for, respectively, non-osseointegration of the ring, post-traumatic loosening with rupture of the screws preceded by the appearance of supero-medial radiolucency, post-traumatic rupture of the distal flange, post-traumatic rupture of the cemented polyethylene-ceramic insert, and dislocation treated with new dual-mobility insert. Among these cases, the first three did not show macroscopic signs of osseointegration of the ring, and the only areas of stability were represented by the bone-cement contact at the holes in the ring. Although radiographic studies have shown fast remodeling of the bone graft and the implant survival range from 70% to 100% in the 10-year follow up, the actual osseointegration of the ring has yet to be clarified. To improve osseointegration of the currently available APC whose metal surface in contact with the bone is sandblasted, we combined the main features of the APC design long validated by surgical experience with the 3D-Metal Technology for high porosity of the external surface already applied to and validated with the press fit cups. The new APC design is produced with the 3D-Metal technology using Titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V ELI) that Improves fatigue resistance, primary stability and favorable environment for bone graft ingrowth. We preview the results of the first cases with short-term follow up. Conclusions. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morcellized bone graft and APC is a current and reliable surgical technique that allows the restoration of bone loss with a high survival rate of the implant in the medium to long term. The new 3D Metal Cage is designed to offer high friction for the initial stability. The high porosity of the 3D Metal structure creates a favorable environment for bone growth, thus providing valid secondary fixation reproducing the results achieved with the 3D metal press fit cup

Ruling out an infection in one-stage knee and hip revisions for presumed aseptic failure by conventional tissue cultures takes up to 14 days. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a quick test (4–5 hours) for detecting infections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the negative predictive value of an automated multiplex PCR for the detection of microorganisms in synovial fluid obtained intraoperatively in unsuspected knee and hip revisions. The NPV of the multiplex PCR U-ITI system of synovial fluid compared to tissue cultures of knee and hip revisions was 95.7% and 92.5%, respectively. Cultures required several days for growth whereas the automated mPCR U-ITI system provided results within five hours. The multiplex PCR U-ITI system is a quick and reliable test in ruling out infection in presumed aseptic knee and hip revisions. With this test the number of unsuspected infected revisions can be lowered and antibiotic overtreatment as well as undertreatment after one-stage revision arthroplasty can be avoided. This directly results in a reduction in length of hospital stay, hospital costs and possible antibiotic resistance development

Pre-operative anaemia can present in up to 30% of elective arthroplasty patients. The presence of anaemia increases the risk of requiring blood transfusion post-operatively as well as acts as an independent risk factor for poor outcome such as prosthetic joint infection. Recent international consensus on this topic has recommended a specific care pathway for screening patients with pre-operative anaemia using a simple bedside Heaemacue finger-prick test to detect in a simple and cost-effective manner, and then allow treatment of preoperative anaemia. This pathway was therefore incorporated in our trust. This was a retrospective study done at a single tertiary-referral arthroplasty centre. Our data collection included the Heamacue test results and formal haemoglobin levels if they were performed as well as compliance and costs of each of the tests for patients listed for an elective shoulder, hip and knee arthroplasty between September and December 2018. Medical records and demographics were also collected for these patients for subgroup analysis. Our exclusion criteria comprised patients listed for revision arthroplasty surgery. 87 patients were included in this study. Our compliance rate was 15%. The mean difference between a Haemacue test and a formal FBC result was only 17.6g/L suggesting that it has a reasonably high accuracy. With regards to costs, we found that a Haemacue test costs £2, compared to £7.50 for a full blood count and Haematinics combined. This gave an overall cost saving of £5.50 per patient. Extrapolation of this date locally for 2017 at our hospital, where 1575 primary joint arthroplasties were done, a cost saving of £8,662.5 could have been achieved. Within the UK using data extrapolated from the National Joint Registry a total of £1,102,205.5 (1,221,894 Euros) could have been saved. The use of a single, Haemacue test to screen for pre-operative anaemia in elective arthroplasty patients is more cost effective compared to a formal full count and haematinics tests. However, we found that compliance with the care pathway is variable due to system limitations. This may be addressed through implementing changes to our electronic system in which patients are booked for surgery. We also noted a significant cost reduction if this pathway were to be used Nation-wide. Thus, we encourage other centres to consider the use of the Haemacue test pre-operatively in elective arthroplasty instead of formal full blood counts at the time of decision to treat with arthroplasty; this allows sufficient time for correction of pre-operative anaemia thus improving patient outcomes from arthroplasty

Successful treatment of periprosthetic joint infection involves surgical intervention and identification of infecting organisms to enable targeted antibiotic therapy. Current guidelines recommend intra-operative culture sampling to include at least 4 tissue samples and for each sample to be taken with a separate instrument. We aimed to review current revision arthroplasty practice for Greater Glasgow, specifically comparing intra-operative sampling technique for infected revision cases with these guidelines. We reviewed the clinical notes of all patients undergoing lower limb revision arthroplasty procedures in Greater Glasgow Hospitals (WIG, GRI, SGH) from July 2013 to August 2014. Demographics of all cases were collected. For revision procedures performed for infection we recorded details of intraoperative samples taken (number, type and sampling technique) and time for samples to reach the laboratory. Results of microbiology cultures were reviewed. Two hundred and fifty five revision arthroplasty procedures (152 hips, 103 knees) were performed in the 12 month study period. Of these 57 (22%) were infected cases (28 hips, 29 knees). These cases were treated by 14 arthroplasty surgeons with a median number of 3 infected cases managed per surgeon (range 1–11). 58% of cases had the recommended number of tissue samples taken. The median number of microbiology samples collected was 4 (range 1–14). Most procedures (91%) had no documentation of whether separate instruments were used for sampling. Number of tissue samples taken (≥4, p=0.01), time to lab (<24 hours, p=0.03) were significantly associated with positive culture results. In Greater Glasgow, a large number of surgeons manage infected arthroplasty cases with variability in intra-operative sampling techniques. Sample collection adheres to guideline recommendations in 58% cases. Adhering to guideline standards increases the likelihood of positive tissue cultures. Implementation of a standardised approach to intra-operative sampling for infected cases may improve patient management

We compared the peripheral blood and periprosthetic tissues of 53 patients at revision arthroplasty with those of 30 patients at primary arthroplasty to determine whether there is a systemic difference in lymphocytes in patients with worn hip implants. The absolute number and relative proportion of lymphocytes bearing CD2, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD16, CD19, HLA-DR, kappa and lambda antigens were compared with the levels of IL-1β, IL-6 and PGE. 2. in the pseudosynovial membrane as well as with a semiquantitative estimate of metal and polyethylene particles, necrosis and chronic inflammation and the total concentration of metals within the periprosthetic tissues. There was a significant increase in the relative proportion of CD2-positive T-cells and CD16-positive natural killer cells in the peripheral blood at revision arthroplasty compared with primary arthroplasty and an increased proportion of CD8-positive T-cells and a decreased ratio of CD4 to CD8 (helper inducer/suppressor cytotoxic cells). Three control patients, who went on to have revision surgery, had values at primary arthroplasty which were similar to those of patients at the time of revision surgery. These differences did not correlate with the local concentration of metal, plastic or cement or inflammatory response or the type of prosthesis. An inverse correlation was noted between the necrosis in the periprosthetic tissue and both the local production of IL-6 and the absolute numbers of T-cells in peripheral blood. We conclude that there may be several cell-mediated systemic immune responses to aseptic loosening, at least one of which may be directly related to events in the periprosthetic tissues. We cannot exclude the possibility that the changes in the proportion of CD8-positive cells reflected a predisposition, rather than a reaction, to loosening of the implant

Background. Trabecular metal (TM) cones are designed to fill up major bone defects in total knee arthroplasty. Tibial components can be implanted in combination with a stem, but it is unclear if this is necessary after reconstruction with a TM cone. Implanting a stem may give extra stability, but may also have negative side-effects. Aim of this study was to investigate stability and strain distribution of a tibial plateau reconstruction with a TM cone while the tibal component is implanted with and without a stem, and whether prosthetic stability was influenced by bone mineral density (BMD). Methods. Tibial revision arthroplasties were performed after reconstruction of an AORI 2B bone defect with TM cones. Plateaus were implanted in seven pairs of cadaveric tibiae; of each pair, one was implanted with and the other without stem. All specimens were loaded to one bodyweight alternating between the medial and lateral tibia plateau. Implant-bone micro motions, bone strains, BMD and correlations were measured and/or calculated. Results. Tibial components without a stem showed only more varus tilt (difference in median 0.14 degrees (P<0.05), but this was not considered clinically relevant. Strain distribution did not differ. BMD had only an effect on the anterior/posterior tilt ρ:-0.72 (P<0.01). Conclusions. Tibial components, with or without a stem, which are implanted after reconstruction of major bone defects using TM cones produce very similar biomechanical conditions in terms of stability and strain distribution. Additional stem extension of the tibial component may not be required after reconstruction of major bone defects using TM cones. Level of evidence. IIb. Disclosures. The department of Orthopaedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen has received direct funding from the Anna Fonds (Oegstgeest, NL). Zimmer (Warsaw, IN, USA) has provided the instrumentation and tools for this study. The department of Orthopaedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen receives research institutional support from InSpine (Schiedam, NL) and Stryker (Kalamazoo, Mich. USA). One of the authors (ALB) will be and has been paid as a consultant by Zimmer (Warsaw, IN, USA) for purposes of education and training in knee arthroplasty

Increased failure rates due to metallic wear particle-associated adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR) is a significant clinical problem in resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. Histological analysis and particle characterization are important elements for understanding the biological mechanisms of the reaction and different histological subtypes may have unique needs for longitudinal clinical follow-up and complication rates after revision arthroplasty. Consecutive patients (N=285 cases) presenting with ALTR from three major hip implant classes, metal-on-metal resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty (THA) and non-metal-on-metal THA with dual modular neck were identified from our prospective Osteolysis Tissue Database and Repository and 53 cases were selected for wear particle nano-analysis. Conventional histology: Tissue samples taken from multiple regions around the hip with extensive sampling performed at macroscopic examination were examined by light microscopy. Particle analysis: Tissue samples selected after frozen section evaluation for cellularity and particle content were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), backscatter scanning electron microscopy (BSEM), BSEM-energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) element mapping examination, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), TEM-EDS element mapping, and X-ray diffraction spectrometry (XRD) examination. ALTR encompasses three main histological patterns: 1) macrophage predominant, 2) mixed lymphocytic and macrophagic, and 3) predominant sarcoid-like granulomas. Duration of implantation and composition of periprosthetic cellular infiltrates was significantly different among the three implant types examined. Distinct differences in the size, shape, and element composition of the metallic particulate material were detected in each implant class, with correlation of the severity of the adverse reaction with element complexity of the particles. ALTR encompasses a diverse range of histological patterns, which are reflective of both the implant configuration independent of manufacturer and clinical features such as duration of implantation. Distinct differences in the metallic particulate material can contribute to explain the histological features of the ALTR and variability of performance of the implants. ALTR exhibits different histological patterns and is dependent on the characteristics of the wear particulate material of each implant class and host immunological reaction