Introduction. Multiple ACL revisions represent an extremely demanding surgery, due to the presence of enlarged or malpositioned tunnels, hardware, injuries to the secondary stabilizers and difficulties in retrieving autologous tendons. An anatomical ACL reconstruction is not always possible. We analyzed the results in a series of patients operated with over the top reconstruction (OTTR) and lateral extra-articular plasty to the Gerdy's tubercle (LP) using Achilles (AT) or tibialis posterior tendon (TPT) allografts. Methods. From 2002 to 2008, twenty-four male athletes with a mean age of 30.8 years were operated. 20 of the patients had two, while four patients had three previous reconstructions. IKDC score and KT evaluation were used at a mean 3.3 years follow-up (2–7 years). Results. The mean IKDC subjective score at follow-up was 81.3. The IKDC objective score rated A or B in 84% of the patients. Of the 20 good results, 17 patients resumed sport activity at the pre-injury level. KT side-to-side difference averaged 3.5 mm in the TPT, versus 3.2 mm in the AT group. No significant differences were noted between the AT and TPT group. Conclusions. Multiple ACL revision surgery is a salvage procedure, with average good results, but not equivalent to primary ACL reconstruction. Patients should be advised that a return to sports may not be feasible. OTTR+LP is an established technique that permits to overcome difficult anatomical situations, with cortical fixation providing good immediate stability and avoiding tunnel fixation and bone grafting. Long tendon grafts as AT and TPT are needed

Introduction. Numerous types of graft can be used for revision of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The goal of our studies was to analyze mid term outcomes of revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions conducted by means of ipsilateral bone -patellar tendon -bone (B-PT-B) transplant. Materials and methods. We conducted a retrospective study on a consecutive series of 44 patients. All patients were operated on by the same senior surgeon in our institution between 2003 and 2009. All patients had undergone a first ACL reconstruction with B-PT-B transplant. They all had ACL revision under arthroscopic assistance and by means of ipsilateral B-PT-B transplant after a minimum of 18 months after primary surgery. At time of ACL revision, the mean patients age was 28 years (range, 17–49 years). The average postoperative follow up after revision was 55 months (range, 12–88 months). We had no patient lost to follow up. All patients were evaluated by an independent observer using IKDC scoring system and KT 2000. Results. The postoperative IKDC score averaged 78.2 (range, 41,4–97,7). 10 patients (22.7%) had their knee graded A, 25 patients (56.8%) grade B, 8 patients (18.2%) grade C and one patient (2.3%) grade D. The post operative maxi manual differential KT 2000 averaged 1,52 mm (range, −1mm/12mm). The identified aetiologies for poor clinical outcomes were menisectomy in the first ACL reconstruction (p<0.01) and articular cartilage lesions (ICRS grade III and IV) found during ACL revision. In most cases, return to sport activities was achieved but not at the same level. We had no specific complication after second harvesting of the patellar tendon. Discussion. The type of graft used in revision of ACL reconstructions is a controversy. In the literature, many studies reported the results of revision of ACL reconstructions but with poor methodology and few data for every type of graft. In our study, we found clinical results comparable to those classically reported in the literature. Clinical evaluation showed good control of the laxity and no specific patellar tendon complication. Conclusion. The clinical results of revision of ACL reconstructions is lower than in primary surgery. We did not noticed specific patellar tendon complication after second harvesting of BPTB transplant. The revision of ACL reconstruction with ipsilateral BPTB transplant showed good clinical results and good control of the anteroposterior laxity