Fifty-two patients older than sixty years had undergone multilevel lumbar decompression and fusion with instrumentation and reached a minimum two-year follow up. The relationship between abnormal sagittal plane configuration of the proximal segments and the number of lumbar fusion segments was radiographically analyzed. Group A (L1-L5 or S1) patients had two (20%) proximal vertebral compression fractures and four (40%) focal kyphosis. Group B (L2-L5 or S1) patients had one (6%) proximal vertebral compression fractures, five (33%) retrolisthesis and two (13%) focal kyphosis. Group C (L3-S1) had seven (39%) retrolisthesis. Group D had only one retrolisthesis and two disc height loss. Radiographically analyze the relationship between abnormal sagittal plane configuration of the proximal segments and the number of lumbar fusion segments in patients older than sixty years old. It appears that lumbar fusion up to L1 causes more kyphotic changes and topping off syndrome in the elderly. Fusion L2-L5 or S1 seems having less severe adjacent level degeneration.
We investigated the spinopelvic morphology and
global sagittal balance of patients with a degenerative retrolisthesis
or anterolisthesis. A total of 269 consecutive patients with a degenerative
spondylolisthesis were included in this study. There were 95 men
and 174 women with a mean age of 64.3 years ( A backward slip was found in the upper lumbar levels (mostly
L2 or L3) with an almost equal gender distribution in both the R
and R+A groups. The pelvic incidence and sacral slope of the R group
were significantly lower than those of the A (both p <
0.001)
and R+A groups (both p <
0.001). The lumbar lordosis of the R+A
group was significantly greater than that of the R (p = 0.025) and
A groups (p = 0.014). The C7 plumb line of the R group was located
more posteriorly than that of the A group (p = 0.023), but was no
different from than that of the R+A group (p = 0.422). The location
of C7 plumb line did not differ between the three groups (p = 0.068).
The spinosacral angle of the R group was significantly smaller than
that of the A group (p <
0.001) and R+A group (p <
0.001). Our findings imply that there are two types of degenerative retrolisthesis:
one occurs primarily as a result of degeneration in patients with
low pelvic incidence, and the other occurs secondarily as a compensatory
mechanism in patients with an anterolisthesis and high pelvic incidence. Cite this article: