Introduction. Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) can be managed through a variety of different surgical approaches from closed reduction to simple tenotomies of the adductors and through to osteotomies of the femur and pelvis. The rate of redislocation following open reduction for the treatment of DDH may be affected by the number of intraoperative surgeons. Materials and methods. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 109 patients who underwent open reduction with or without bony osteotomies as a primary intervention between 2013 and 2023. We measured the number of redislocations and number of operating surgeons (either 1 or 2 operating surgeons) to assess for any correlation. 109 patients were identified and corresponded to 121 primary hip operations, the mean age at operation was 82.2 months (range 6 to 739 months). During the 10-year period 7 hip redislocations were identified. Results. Of the 7 redislocated hips, the rate of redislocation was found to be higher in patients who had undergone surgery via a single surgeon (5 redislocations) compared to the dual surgeon cohort (2 redislocations), though this did not reach statistical significance. Redislocation was more common in female patients and right laterality 7.2% and 8.7% respectively, though this again did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions. We conclude that a single surgeon approach, female gender and right laterality are potential risk factors for redislocation following open reduction. Further investigation utilising a larger sample size would be required to appropriately explore these potential risk factors further

To determine in skeletally mature patients with a traumatic, first-time, patellar dislocation, the effect of early MPFL reconstruction versus rehabilitation on the rate of recurrent patellar dislocations and functional outcomes. Three online databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed were searched from database inception (1946, 1974, 1966 respectively), to August 20th, 2021, for literature addressing the management of patients sustaining acute first-time patellar dislocations. Data on redislocation rates, functional outcomes using the Kujala score, and complication rates were recorded. A meta-analysis was used to pool the mean postoperative kujala score as well as calculate the proportion of patients sustaining redislocation episodes using a random effects model. A risk of bias assessment was performed for all included studies using the MINORS and Detsky scores. Overall, there were a total of 22 studies and 1705 patients included in this review. The pooled mean redislocation rate in 18 studies comprising 1409 patients in the rehabilitation group was 31% (95% CI 25%-36%, I2 = 65%). Moreover, the pooled mean redislocation rate in five studies comprising 318 patients undergoing early MPFL reconstruction was 7% (95% CI 2%-17%, I2 = 70%). The pooled mean postoperative Kujala anterior knee pain score in three studies comprising 67 patients in the reconstructive group was 91 (95% CI 84-97, I2 = 86%), compared to a score of 81 (95% CI 78-85, I2 = 78%) in 7 studies comprising 332 patients in the rehabilitation group. The reoperation rate was 9.0% in 936 patients in the rehabilitation group and 2.2% in 322 patients in the reconstruction group. Management of acute first-time patellar dislocations with MPFL reconstruction resulted in a lower rate of redislocation and a higher Kujala score, as well as noninferiority with respect to complication rates compared to nonoperative treatment. The paucity of high-level evidence warrants further investigation in this topic in the form of well-designed and high-powered RCTs to determine the optimal management option in these patients

MPFL reconstruction has demonstrated a very high success rate with improved patella stability, physical function, and patient-reported outcomes. However technical error and a lack of consideration of anatomic risk factors have been shown to contribute to failure after MPFL reconstruction. Previous research has also reported a complication rate of 26% following surgery. The purposes of this study were to determine the re-dislocation rate, type and number of complications, and most common additional surgical procedures following MPFL reconstruction. Patients with symptomatic recurrent patellofemoral instability underwent an MPFL reconstruction (n = 268) and were assessed with a mean follow-up of 31.5 months (minimally 24-months). Concomitant procedures were performed in addition to the MPFL reconstruction in order to address significant anatomic or biomechanical characteristics. Failure of the patellofemoral stabilization procedure was defined as post-operative re-dislocation of the patella. Rates of complications and re-procedures were assessed for all patients. The re-dislocation rate following MPFL reconstruction was 5.6% (15/268). There were no patella fractures. A total of 49/268 patients (18.3%) returned to the operating room for additional procedures following surgery. The most common reason for additonal surgery was removal of symptomatic tibial tubercle osteotomy hardware in 24/268 patients (8.9%). A further 9.3% of patients underwent addtional surgery including revision MPFL reconstruction: with trochleoplasty 8/268 (3.0%), with tibial tubercule osteotomy 4/286 (1.5%) and with femoral derotation osteotomy 3/268 (1.1%); manipulation under anaesthesia for reduced knee range of motion 4/268 (1.5%); knee arthroscopy for pain 8/268 (3.0%); and cartilage restoration procedures 3/268 (1.1%). There was 1 case of wound debridement for surgical incision infection. MPFL reconstruction using an a la carte approach to surgical selection demonstrated a post-operative redislocation rate of 5.6%. The rate of complications following surgical stabilization was low, with the most common reason for additional surgery being removal of hardware

Treatment of recurrent dislocation: approximately: 1/3 of failures (probably higher in the absence of a clear curable cause). In the US: most popular treatment option: constrained liners with high redislocation and loosening rates in most reports. Several interfaces leading to various modes of failures. In Europe: dual mobility cups (or tripolar unconstrained): first design Gilles Bousquet 1976 (Saint Etienne, France), consisting of a metal shell with a highly polished inner surface articulating with a mobile polyethylene insert (large articulation). The femoral head is captured into the polyethylene (small articulation) using a snap fit type mechanism leading to a large effective unconstrained head inside the metal cup. With dual mobility, most of the movements occur in the small articulation therefore limiting wear from the large polyethylene on metal articulation. Contemporary designs include: CoCr metal cup for improved friction, outer shell coated with titanium and hydroxyapatite, possible use of screws to enhance primary stability (revision), cemented version in case of major bone defect requiring bone reconstruction. Increased stability obtained through an ultra-large diameter effective femoral head increasing the jumping distance. Dual mobility in revision for recurrent dislocation provided hip stability in more than 94% of the cases with less than 3% presenting redislocation up to 13-year follow-up. A series from the UK concerning 115 revisions including 29 revisions for recurrent dislocation reported 2% dislocation in the global series and 7% re-dislocation in patients revised for instability. A recent report of the Swedish hip arthroplasty register including 228 patients revised for recurrent dislocation showed 99% survival with revision for dislocation as the endpoint and 93% with revision for any reason as the endpoint. One specific complication of dual mobility sockets: intra-prosthetic dislocation (ie: dislocation at the small articulation): often asymptomatic or slight discomfort, eccentration of the neck on AP radiograph, related to wear and fatigue of the polyethylene rim at the capturing are through aggressive stem neck to mobile polyethylene insert contact (3rd articulation). Risk factors include: large and aggressive femoral neck design implants, small head/neck ratio, skirted heads, major fibrosis and periprosthetic ossifications. Current (over ?) use in France: 30% of primary THA, 60% in revision THA. Proposed (reasonable) indications: primary THA at high risk for dislocation, revision THA for instability and/or in case of abductors deficiency, Undisputed indication: recurrent dislocation

Abduction braces are commonly prescribed following the closed reduction of a dislocated prosthetic hip joint. Their use is controversial with limited evidence to support their use. We have conducted a retrospective review of dislocations in primary total hip replacements over a nine year period and report redislocation rates in patients braced, compared to those who were not. 67 patients were identified. 69% of those patients who were braced had a subsequent dislocation. Likewise 69% of those who did not receive a brace re-dislocated. 33% of patients that were braced dislocated whilst wearing the brace. Bracing was associated with patient discomfort, sleep disturbance, skin irritation and breakdown. Small femoral head size, monoblock femoral components and poor biomechanical reconstruction was prevalent amongst dislocators. Abduction bracing following closed reduction of a total hip replacement is costly(e950), does not prevent redislocation and may be the cause of considerable morbidity to the patient

Fully constrained liners are used to treat recurrent dislocations or patients at high risk after total hip replacements. However, they can cause significant morbidities including recurrent dislocations, infections, aseptic loosening and fractures. We examine long term results of 111 patients with tripolar constrained components to assess their redislocation and failure rate. The purpose of this study was to assess survivorship, complications and functional outcomes at a minimum 10 years after the constrained tripolar liners used in our institute. We retrospectively identified 111 patients who had 113 revision tripolar constrained liners between 1998 and 2008. Eighty-nine were revised due to recurrent dislocations, 11 for pseudotumor with dysfunctional abductors, and 13 for periprosthetic infection with loss of soft tissue stabilizers. All patients had revision hip arthroplasty before the constrained liner was used: 13 after the first revision, 17 after the second, 38 after the third, and 45 had more than 3 revisions. We extracted demographics, implant data, rate of dislocations and incidence of other complications. Kaplan Meier curves were used to assess dislocation and failure for any reason. WOMAC was used to assess quality of life. At 10 years, the survival free of dislocation was 95.6% (95%CI 90- 98), and at 20 years to 90.6% (95% CI 81- 95.5). Eight patients (7.1%) had dislocations of their constrained liners: 1 patient had simultaneous periprosthetic infection identified at the time of open reduction, and 1 patient sustained stem fracture 3 months prior to the liner dislocation. At 10 years, the survival to any further surgery was 89.4% (95% CI 82–93.8), and at 20 years, this was 82.5 (95% CI 71.9–89.3). Five patients (4.4%) had deep infection: 4 of these had excision arthroplasty due to failure to control infection, while 1 patient was treated successfully with debridement, exchange of mobile components and intravenous antibiotics. Two patients (1.8%) had dissociated rings that required change of liner, ring and head. Two patients (1.8%) had periprosthetic femoral fractures that were treated by revision stems and exchange of constrained liners. The mean WOMAC functional and pain scores were 66.2 and 75.9 of 100, respectively. Constrained tripolar liners in our institute provided favourable results in the long term for recurrent dislocation hip arthroplasty with dysfunctional hip stabilizers. Infection in these patients can prove to be difficult to treat due to their poor soft tissue conditions from repeated surgeries. Comparing long terms results from other types of constrained liners is essential to evaluate these salvage liners

Background:. A shoulder dislocation is defined as chronic when it has been unreduced for more than one week. Chronic anterior shoulder dislocations are commonly encountered in Kwazulu-Natal for various reasons. Different surgical options exist to treat chronic anterior shoulder dislocations. However the outcome of surgically treated chronic shoulder dislocations has not been favourable in all studies. Methods:. We report on a combined case series of chronic anterior shoulder dislocations previously treated at Edendale Hospital (EDH), Pietermaritzburg and Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital (IALCH), Durban. Patients were identified retrospectively using departmental databases and their case files were retrieved. Patient demographics, duration of dislocation, mechanism of injury and reason for delayed treatment were recorded. When available, X-rays, CT scans and MRI scans were retrieved to identify associated bony and soft tissue pathology. Surgical outcome was assessed using range of movement (ROM), change in pain severity, patient satisfaction, as well as Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OIS) and Rowe and Zarins score. Post-operative complications including redislocations were also identified. Results:. Twenty-six patients with chronic anterior shoulder dislocations were surgically treated. The average duration of dislocation was 9 months (range 2 weeks to 7 years). The most common reason for chronicity was delayed presentation to clinic or hospital (9 patients). A Hill Sachs lesion was present in 20 patients, and a pseudo-glenoid was often encountered in dislocations present for more than 4 weeks (14 of 23 patients). Three supraspinatus ruptures and 4 biceps tears were encountered while neurological injury was uncommon (2 patients). Surgical treatment included open reduction (1 patient), open reduction and Latarjet (15 patients), hemi-arthroplasty (2 patients), hemi-arthroplasty and Latarjet (3 patients) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (5 patients). Eighteen patients were available for follow-up. Most patients (16 out of 18 patients) were satisfied with their outcome. This was due to improvement in pain. Regardless of the type of surgery done, post-operative range of motion and surgical outcome scores were generally poor. Two patients were unsatisfied, due to redislocations. Conclusion:. Surgical treatment of chronic anterior shoulder dislocations resulted in satisfactory pain relief but marginal improvement in range of motion and overall shoulder function

The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the outcome following arthroscopic Bankart repair using two types of suture anchors, absorbable and non-absorbable. Patients with a diagnosis of recurrent traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder, seen between April 2000 and June 2003 in a single unit, were considered for inclusion in the study. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively using a subjective patient related outcome measurement tool (Oxford instability score), a visual analogue scale for pain and instability (VAS Pain and VAS instability) and a quality of life questionnaire (SF-12). The incidence of recurrent instability and the level of sporting ability were recorded. Patients were randomised to undergo surgical repair with either non-absorbable or absorbable anchors. 130 patients were included in the study. 6 patients were lost to follow-up and 124 patients (95%) completed the study. Both types of anchors were highly effective. There were no differences in the rate of recurrence or any of the scores between the two. Four patients in the non-absorbable group and 3 in the absorbable group experienced further episodes of dislocation after a traumatic event. The rate of redislocation in the whole series was therefore, 5.6%. In addition, 4 patients, all of them in the absorbable group (4%) described ongoing symptoms of instability but no true dislocations. 85% of the patients have returned to their previous level of sporting activity. There are no differences in the outcome of Arthroscopic Bankart repair using either absorbable or non-absorbable anchors. Both are highly effective, showing a redislocation rate of 5.6%

There are a multitude of studies internationally that have considered the rates of redislocation of shoulders, where, after first time anterior dislocation, initial management has consisted of an internal rotation sling immobiliser or no immobility. The majority of these have indicated poor results. This is in comparison with recurrence rates of dislocation, post shoulder stabilisation (arthroscopic or open), after first time anterior dislocation, which have demonstrated excellent results. The question remains, is there a non-operative alternative that will give similarly good results for these patients. A selection criteria was set up for use of the external rotation brace for first time anterior dislocators. Thirty-five patients were used that fit the criteria and were able to be followed over time. A physiotherapy program was initiated at the two-week stage in combination with clinic reviews. We encouraged use of the brace for six weeks in total, with removal only for hygiene purposes. At two years, post first time anterior dislocation, patients were reviewed clinically and a quick DASH score performed. Any recurrence of dislocation was recorded and an MRI was also undertaken to show residual injury. The compliance with the brace and physiotherapy program were excellent, with only one reported redislocation, during this period, in the 31 patients that were followed up. The majority of patients were functioning at predislocation levels at review and no one had required surgical intervention for instability. Quick-Dash results were also very good, with a vast majority scoring less than 2/100 level of disability. Conclusion. The external rotation brace with a Physiotherapy program is an excellent alternative to early shoulder stabilisation for first time anterior dislocators

Optimal management of acute patellar dislocation is still a topic of debate. Although, conventionally it has been managed by non-operative measures, recent literature recommends operative treatment to prevent re-dislocations. Our study recommends that results of non-operative measures comparable to that of operative management. Our study is the retrospective with 46 consecutive patients (47 knees) of first time patellar dislocation managed between 2012 and 2014. The study methodology highlighted upon the etiology, mechanism of injury and other characteristics of first time dislocations and also analysed outcomes of conservative management including re-dislocation rates. The duration of follow up ranged from 1 to 4 years. Average age at first-time dislocation was 23 years (Range 10–62 years). Male:Female ratio was 30:17. Twisting injury was the commonest cause. 1 patient required open reduction but all others relocated spontaneously or had successful closed reduction. Medial Patello-Femoral Ligament injury was frequent associated feature. 11 knees (24%) re-dislocated during follow up. Age was the significant risk factor for re-dislocations. All patients with re-dislocation were less than 30 years old. Maximum redislocations happened between 6 months to 1 year after index dislocation. Skeletal abnormality was the commonest pathology in re-dislocators. Only 4 patients (8.6%) finally required surgical intervention. One patient had persistent knee pain as a complication. Conservative management of primary patellar dislocation is successful in majority of patients. Surgery should be reserved for the carefully selected patients with specific indications

Objective. The purpose of this study was to compare outcome of arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder using knotted and knotless anchors and two rehabilitation regimes. Method. This is a retrospective study of 58 patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder stabilization over a five year period (2005–2009). There were two groups of patients. In group A stabilization was performed using absorbable anchors with a knotted technique using No.1 PDS suture. This group had an early mobilization regime. In group B a knotless anchor technique was used with PEEK anchors and nonabsorbable sutures. The patients in this group were immobilised in a sling for 6 weeks. There were a total of 58 patients, 37 in group A and 21 in group B. The mean age of patients undergoing the procedure was 35.7. There were a total of 23 males and 14 females in group A and 15 males and 6 females in group B. The number of dislocations prior to surgery ranged from 0 to multiple times a day. Patients had a mean follow up of 5 years (three to seven years - 2005 to 2009) and subjective shoulder function was evaluated using Oxford instability score and self-assessment questionnaire. Results. The Shoulder scores showed improvement in both groups and there were no significant differences in redislocation rates and patient satisfaction scores with 20 patients in group A and 11 patients in group B going back to sporting activities. Conclusion. Since there were no significant differences in shoulder scores in both groups our conclusion was that secure fixation was what mattered irrespective of the type of anchor used or the physiotherapy regimen

Purpose of the study. This study aims to evaluate the use of closed reduction of hips with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and medial open reduction of these hips as a subsection of closed reduced hips. Methods. The study was a retrospective analysis of treatment of 30 children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). These children were taken from a consecutive series of children treated over a period from June 2000 to 2011 with closed reduction by a single surgeon. The ages at the time of diagnosis were between 1 day and 13 months (mean 5.25 weeks). Included in this series are 7 patients treated with medial open reduction, all done with the Ludloff approach. Follow up of these patients was from 8 months to 12 years (mean 5 years). All patients needing secondary procedures were noted. The X- rays were evaluated for percentage acetabulum cover in patients over the age of 8 and improvement of the acetabular index in all these patients. Results. 4 children needed secondary procedures. 1 child of the closed reduction group developed avascular necrosis of the femoral head that was treated with a Salter osteotomy and a further 2 needed secondary open reductions after redislocation following initial closed reduction. One child with bilateral open medial reductions had a Salter osteotomy 6 years after the initial treatment was done. 26 of the children had good outcomes with improvement of the acetabular angles, percentage acetabular cover and pain free independent ambulation. The average acetabular index improved from 37.5° to 23.3°. Conclusion. Closed reduction of DDH hips is a good treatment modality. Early treatment allows for acetabular and femoral development. There are minimal secondary procedures necessary after closed reduction, and open medial reduction does not increase the complication rate. NO DISCLOSURES

Neglected traumatic dislocation of hip in children is very rare and most of the studies are too small to draw a conclusion. There is no consensus on timing for closed VS open reductions and post reduction care. The aim of our prospective study was to analyse and characterise the short term treatment outcome of treating 20 such cases in children (<12 years). All had posterior dislocation without any associated fractures (Thompson & Epstein type 1) sustained during typical childhood play activities and/or a fall from a height less than 10 feet. All attended the hospital between 1-52 weeks of injury. Closed reductions under GA were performed in 12 cases which were less than 3 weeks old, followed by hip immobilisation for 3 weeks and PWB mobilisation for 3 weeks. 8 hips (> 3 weeks old) had open reductions as none of them could be reduced by skeletal tractions and were allowed for FWB mobilisation after 9 weeks. Functional result (Garrett et al) at 2 years follow-up showed a complete range of motion in 18 children while the remaining two had 80% of normal hip movements with no deformity. All the hips showed varying degrees of avascular necrosis, with preservation of joint space on radiographs (Ficat & Arlet stage 1-3). There were no redislocations. We suggest that closed (for <3 weeks old dislocation) and open (for >3 weeks old dislocations) reductions are satisfactory treatment for traumatic neglected hip dislocations in children

Anatomic reduction (subcapital re-alignment osteotomy) via surgical hip dislocation – increasingly popular. While the reported AVN rates are very low, experiences seem to differ greatly between centres. We present our early experience with the first 29 primary cases and a modified fixation technique. We modified the fixation from threaded Steinman pins to cannulated 6.5mm fully-threaded screws: retrograde guidewire placement before reduction of the head ensured an even spread in the femoral neck and head. The mean PSA (posterior slip angle) at presentation (between 12/2008 and 01/2011) was overall 68° (45–90°). 59% (17/29) were stable slips (mean PSA 68°), and 41% (12/29) were unstable slips unable to mobilise (mean PSA 67°). The vascularity of the femoral head was assessed postoperatively with a bone scan including tomography. The slip angle was corrected to a mean PSA of 5.8° (7° anteversion to 25° PSA). We encountered no complications related to our modified fixation technique. All cases with a well vascularised femoral head on the post-operative bone scan (15/17 stable slips and 8/12 unstable slips) healed with excellent short term results. Both stable slips with decreased vascularity on bone scan (2/17, 12%) had been longstanding severe slips with retrospectively suspected partial closure of the physis, which has been described as a factor for increased risk of avascular necrosis (AVN). One of these cases was complicated by a posterior redislocation due to acetabular deficiency. In the unstable group, 4/12 cases (33%) had avascular heads intra-operatively and cold postoperative bone scans, 3 have progressed to AVN and collapse. Anatomic reduction while sparing the blood supply of the femoral head is a promising concept with excellent short term results in most stable and many unstable SCFE cases. Extra vigilance for closed/closing physes in longstanding severe cases seems advisable. Regardless of treatment, some unstable cases inevitably go on to AVN

Introduction. The elbow is the second most common site of non prosthetic joint dislocation. Simple elbow dislocation alone contributes to 11-28% of all elbow injuries. Post-reduction treatment methods include traditional plaster of Paris (POP) immobilisation followed by physiotherapy, sling application followed by early mobilisation and rapid motion. The aim of the study was to evaluate the final outcome and cost-effectiveness of the pop and the sling groups. Study Design. Retrospective cohort study. Methods. We reviewed 42 simple elbow dislocations treated between 1998-2003. 20 patients in POP group and 22 patients in the sling group were assessed at a minimum follow-up of two years. The data collected consisted of age, gender, duration of immobilisation, length of physiotherapy, and return to work. All were assessed using MEPI (Mayo Elbow Performance Index) score and Quick DASH questionnaire. The final outcome was graded as excellent, good, fair and poor. Results. The final functional outcome in the POP group was 10 excellent, 3 good, 4 fair and 3 poor. In the sling group, we had 19 excellent, 1 good and 2 fair results. The mean MEPI scores in the POP and sling group were 89.2 and 98.2 respectively (p<0.05). The mean quick DASH scores in the POP and sling group were 12.8 and 2.7 respectively (p<0.05). The final functional outcome is directly dependent on the length of immobilisation (R=0.91). The mean time to return to work in POP group and sling groups was 6.6 and 3.2 weeks respectively (p<.001). Conclusion. Sling and early mobilisation is a safe and cost-effective method of treatment for simple elbow dislocation. The length of physiotherapy and time taken to return to work were significantly shorter in the sling group. Early mobilisation did not result in redislocation or late instability. The final outcome of the sling and early mobilisation group was significantly better than POP immobilisation group