Aims. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of revision for distal femoral arthroplasty (DFA) performed as a primary procedure for native knee fractures using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry (AOANJRR). Methods. Data from the AOANJRR were obtained for DFA performed as primary procedures for native knee fractures from 1 September 1999 to 31 December 2020. Pathological fractures and revision for failed internal fixation were excluded. The five prostheses identified were the Global Modular Arthroplasty System, the Modular Arthroplasty System, the Modular Universal Tumour And Revision System, the Orthopaedic Salvage System, and the Segmental System. Patient demographic data (age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade) were obtained, where available. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival were used to determine the rate of revision, and the reasons for revision and mortality data were examined. Results. The AOANJRR identified 153 primary DFAs performed for native knee fractures in 151 patients during the study period, with 63.3% of these (n = 97) performed within the last five years. The median follow-up was 2.1 years (interquartile range 0.8 to 4.4). The patient population was 84.8% female (n = 128), with a mean age of 76.1 years (SD 11.9). The cumulative percent revision rate at three years was 10%. The most common reason for revision was loosening, followed by infection. Patient survival at one year was 87.5%, decreasing to 72.8% at three years postoperatively. Conclusion. The use of DFA to treat native knee fractures is increasing, with 63.3% of cases performed within the last five years. While long-term data are not available, the results of this study suggest that DFA may be a reasonable option for elderly patients with native knee fractures where fixation is not feasible, or for whom prolonged non-weightbearing may be detrimental. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):894–901

The use of Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) remains controversial due to the increased revision rate in female patients. We compared the outcomes of BHR in female patients to an age matched total hip arthroplasty(THA) cohort. We reviewed the pain, function and total Harris Hip Scores(HHS), and Kaplan-Meir survivorship for BHR and THA cohorts from a prospective regional arthroplasty database. There were 234 patients in each cohort, with mean age of 51 years. The BHR cohort had significantly better function and total HHS at all points of the 5-year study, but not for the post-operative pain score. The 5-year revision rate for the BHR cohort was significantly higher than the THA cohort (6.8% vs 3.4%, p=0.001). The main reason for revision in the BHR cohort was aseptic loosening (n=8), followed by metallosis (n=3). The 5-year Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 92.6% (95% CI±1.7%) and 96.4% (95% CI±1.3%) for the BHR and THA cohort (p=0.001). BHR can give significantly better functional outcomes than THA. The vast majority of female patients were happy with BHR and did not need further surgery at the 5-year stage. This is somewhat at odds with the recent reputation of the procedure. The 10-year result of the same cohort is warranted to provide further data. Our study is not a recommendation to still offer BHR to female patients, but rather to inject a note of realism into the debate. There are implications for future implant development in that these results do validate resurfacing as a functionally valuable option for active patients

Introduction. Infection after total hip arthroplasty is a severe complication. Controversies still exist as to the use of cemented or uncemented implants in the revision of infected THAs. Based on the data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR) we have studied this topic. Material and Methods. During the period 2002–2008 45.724 primary THAs were reported to NAR. Out of these 459 were revised due to infection (1,0%). The survival of the revisions with uncemented prostheses were compared to revisions with cemented prostheses with antibiotic loaded cement and to cemented prostheses with plain cement. Only prostheses with the same fixation both in acetabulum and in femur were included in the study. Cox-estimated survival and relative revision risks were calculated with adjustments for differences among groups in gender, type of surgical procedure, type of prosthesis, and age at revision. Results. 92 (23%) of all the revisions were performed with uncemented prostheses, 286 (71%) with cemented prostheses with antibiotic loaded cement, and 25 (6%) with plain cement. Compared to uncemented prostheses and with all reasons for revision as endpoint in the Cox-analyses, prostheses fixed with antibiotic loaded cement had 3.0 (1.4–6.3) times increased risk for re-revision (p=0.004) and prostheses with plain cement 1.9 (0.4–9.3) times increased risk (p=0.44). With infection as endpoint, prostheses with antibiotic loaded cement had 2.8 (1.2–6.4) times increased risk for re-revision (p=0.02) and prostheses with plain cement 2.6 (0.5–13.7) times increased (p=0.26). 77% of the re-revisions (48 of 60) were performed due to infection. Conclusion. Data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Registry indicate that uncemented prostheses should be used in the revision of infected total arthroplasties

Introduction. Oxidized zirconium (OxZr) is used as a ceramic surface for femoral components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to investigate its performance by examining retrieved femoral components and their corresponding PE inserts in matched comparison with conventional chrome/cobalt/molybdenum alloy (CrCoMo). Methods. 11 retrieved posterior stabilized (PS) TKA with an OxZr femoral component were included. From a cohort of 56 retrieved TKA with CrCoMo femoral components, pairs were matched according to duration of implantation, patient age, reason for revision, and BMI. The retrieved tibial polyethylene (PE) inserts were analyzed for wear using the Hood classification. Femoral components were optically viewed at 8–32x magnification and screened for scratching, pitting, delamination, and striation. Profilometry was performed to measure surface roughness of the OxZr components using a non-contact white light profiler. Results. The prostheses were in situ for a mean of 18.5±10.6 (OxZr) and 19.5±14.3 (CrCoMo) months (p=0.41). None of these cases were revised for problems directly related to the use of OxZr. There was one reaction to the implant in the CrCoMo group. The average wear of the tibial PE inserts was significantly lower with OxZr components (41.5±16.8 vs. 60.1±22.0, p=0.01). The average wear score in the visual analysis of the femoral components was significantly lower for the OxZr (1.6±1.3 vs. 9.5±0.6, p=0.005). Discussion and Conclusion. Femoral components made of OxZr are less sensitive to in vivo wear damage than those of CrCoMo. PE inlays show significantly less in vivo wear damage in combination with an OxZr femoral component

Background. A number of studies have reported on the early failure of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. However, less evidence is available regarding the outcome following revision of failed unicompartmental knee prostheses to total knee arthroplasty. The aims of this study were to determine the time to failure for the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and to assess the short-term outcome following revision surgery. Methods. Details of consecutive patients undergoing revision of an Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to a total knee arthroplasty at our centre between January 2000 and December 2009 were collected prospectively. Data was collected on patient demographics, indication for revision surgery, and time to revision from the index procedure. Clinical and radiological outcome following revision arthroplasty was also assessed. Results. During the study period 22 (4.5%) of 494 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasties were revised to a total knee arthroplasty. Mean age at the time of revision surgery was 61.8 yr and 13 (59%) patients were male. Mean time to revision surgery from the primary procedure was 3.0 yr (range 0.6–6.2 yr). The commonest reasons for revision were aseptic loosening of the femoral (n=9) or tibial component (n=2), and undiagnosed (n=5) or patellofemoral pain (n=2). All patients were revised to a cemented total knee arthroplasty with most not requiring bone grafts. During follow-up (range 0.5–4.5 yr) no further surgery was performed in the 22 patients. In addition, there were no major postoperative complications and no evidence of radiological failure. Discussion. The present study demonstrates most failures of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty occur within three to four years following the index procedure and are due to aseptic component loosening. These findings are consistent with other published reports regarding the early failure of this particular prosthesis. The short-term outcome following revision surgery appears to be good, however longer follow-up periods are required to determine if these good results continue

Aims

There is no consensus on the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Hemiarthroplasty has been widely used in patients when non-surgical treatment is not possible. There is, despite extensive use, limited information about the long-term outcome. Our primary aim was to report ten-year patient-reported outcome after hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. The secondary aims were to report the cumulative revision rate and risk factors for an inferior patient-reported outcome.

Despite proven advantages, pulsatile lavage seems to be used infrequently during preparation in cemented total knee arthroplasty. This remains irritating, as the technique has been suggested to improve radiological survival in cemented TKA, where aseptic loosening of the tibial component represents the main reason for revision. Furthermore, there may be a potential improvement of fixation strength for the tibial tray achieved by increased cement penetration. In this study, the influence of pulsed lavage on mechanical stability of the tibial component and bone cement penetration was analyzed in a cadaveric setting. Six pairs of cadaveric, proximal tibia specimen underwent computed tomography (CT) for assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) and exclusion of osseous lesions. Following surgical preparation, in one side of a pair, the tibial surface was irrigated using 1800ml normal saline and pulsatile lavage, while in the other side syringe lavage using the identical amount of fluid was applied. After careful drying, bone cement was hand-pressurized on the bone surface, tibial components were inserted and impacted in an identical way. After curing of cement, specimen underwent a postimplantation CT analysis). Cement distrubution was then assessed using a three-dimenionsional visualization software. Trabecular bone, cement and implant were segmented based on an automatic thresholding algorithm, which had been validated in a previous study. This allowed to determine median cement penetration for the entire cemented area. Furthermore, fixation strength of the tibial trays was determined by a vertical pull-out test using a servohydraulic material testing machine. Testing was performed under displacement control at a rate of 0,5mm/sec until implant failure. Data was described by median and range. Results were compared by a Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test with a type 1 error probability of 5 %. Median pull-out forces in the pulsed lavage group were 1275N (range 864–1391) and 568N (range 243–683) in the syringe lavage group (p=0.031). Cement penetration was likewise increased (p=0.031) in the pulsed lavage group (1.32mm; range 0.86–1.94), when compared to the syringe irrigated group (0.79mm; range 0.51–1.66). Failure occurred in the pulsatile lavage group at the implant-cement interface and in the syringe lavage group at the bone-cement interface, which indicates the weakness of the latter. Altogether, improved mechanical stability of the tibial implant and likewise increased bone cement interdigitation could be demonstrated in the current study, when pulsed lavage is implemented. Enhanced fixation strength was suggested being a key to improved survival of the implant. If this is the case, pulsatile lavage should be considered being a mandatory preparation step when cementing tibial components in TKA

Introduction. Orthopaedic surgeons are frequently asked to perform a revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients over 80 years of age. Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes after revision THA in patients 80 years or older and compare them to a cohort of patients less than 80 years of age. Methods. We reviewed all revision THAs performed in our institution from 3/1996 to 12/2008. We compared intra- and post-operative complications (medical and orthopaedic), mortality, clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between the two age groups. Peri-operative information and complications were collected prospectively, and clinical outcome data were obtained both pro- and retrospectively. The Merle d'Aubigné score, Harris Hip score, general health (SF-12) and patient satisfaction (visual analog scale) were assessed. Results. Overall, 325 revision THAs were included, 84 (25.8%) in patients 80 years and 241 in patients <80 years. In both groups the reason for revision was aseptic loosening in 62% of the patients (mean interval primary THA - revision 142 vs. 97 months). The older group was more often revised for periprosthetic fractures and recurrent dislocation. Mean follow-up time was 4.3 years. Mortality (80 vs. <80 years) was 6% vs. 0% 3 months postoperative, 9.5% vs. 1.2% 1 year postoperative, and 31% vs. 8.3% 5 years postoperative. 3 (3.6%) re-revisions were performed in patients 80 years compared to 24 (10%) in the younger group. Postoperative medical complications developed in 22.6% compared to 6.6% in the younger group. There were one infection and 13 dislocations in patients 80 years vs. 12 infections and 22 dislocations in the other group. The Merle d'Aubigné score improved from 9.6 to 13.7 (p=0.001) in patients 80 years or older vs. 10.3 to 14.3 (p<0.001), and the Harris Hip score at last follow-up was 74.2 vs. 78.5. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the older group (8.4 vs. 7.5, mean difference 0.9, 95% CI 0.2;1.8). Conclusion. Revision THA in patients over 80 years was associated with substantial clinical improvement, and patient satisfaction was greater than among the younger group. However, the medical complication rate and the 3-months-mortality were substantially higher

Introduction. Large diameter metal on metal cups have been used in total hip arthroplasty advocating superior results with respect to dislocation rates, range of motion and long term survival. The Durom cup used as part of the Durom hip resurfacing system has been incriminated with poor short term results sometimes correlated to incorrect positioning of either the femoral or acetabular component. Our objective was to evaluate short term results of the Durom cup used in conjunction with standard stems. Methods. We prospectively followed all patients with a large diameter metal-on-metal articulation (Durom) and a standard stem operated upon between 9/2004 and 9/2008. Patients were seen at follow-up for a clinical (Harris hip score=HHS, UCLA scale and patient satisfaction), radiographic and questionnaire assessment. Results. 89 primary THAs in 80 patients (74% men) with a mean age of 52 (±12) years were included. Main diagnoses were primary osteoarthritis in 47% and aseptic necrosis in 35%. An uncemented stem was used in 79%. Overall, 80 THAs were controlled at a mean follow-up of 39 months (range 16–67 months), 4 patients were lost to follow-up and 5 patients refused or were unable to attend the visit. However, none of the 5 underwent revision. Overall, 8 THAs (8/85, 9.4%) were revised in mean 28 months (range 8–60) after the operation. One additional patient was awaiting revision for aseptic loosening of both cup and stem. The reasons for revision were aseptic loosening in three cases, presence of a granuloma (histological diagnosis of ALVAL) in three, deep infection in one and impingement in one case. Radiographic analysis revealed linear (n=2) and focal (n=3) osteolysis as well as early cup migration (n=2). In 5 revised patients no radiographic changes were found. 56 (70%) of the 80 patients with follow-up had a HHS between 80 and 100. Among those who were not revised, the mean HHS improved from 55.2 to 88.4 (mean increase 33.2, 95% CI 27.7; 38.7). The mean activity level (UCLA scale) at follow-up was 6.4 (±1.8). Overall, mild to severe pain was reported in 14 cases and occasional pain in 22. Groin pain was present in 18 patients (22.5%), 7 of them belonged to the revised group. 61 (76.3%) of the 80 patients with follow-up were satisfied. Mean patient satisfaction on the VAS scale among those who were not revised was 9.0 (±1.3). Conclusion. This study confirms the increased short-term revision rate of the large diameter metal-on-metal couple (Durom) reported by others. In all revision cases the retrieved cups showed no osteo-integration and were removed easily. The operative indication for revision was based upon groin pain and patient dissatisfaction. Radiographic signs of implant loosening were not always present even though in all revised cases except for one the cup was found loose

Aims

There is a lack of long-term data for minimally invasive acromioclavicular (AC) joint repair. Furthermore, it is not clear if good early clinical results can be maintained over time. The purpose of this study was to report long-term results of minimally invasive AC joint reconstruction (MINAR) and compare it to corresponding short-term data.

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe implant and patient-reported outcome in patients with a unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) treated with a bone-anchored, transcutaneous prosthesis.

Aims

To evaluate the outcomes of cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) following a fracture of the acetabulum, with evaluation of risk factors and comparison with a patient group with no history of fracture.

Injuries to the limb are the most frequent cause of permanent disability following combat wounds. We reviewed the medical records of 450 soldiers to determine the type of upper limb nerve injuries sustained, the rate of remaining motor and sensory deficits at final follow-up, and the type of Army disability ratings granted. Of 189 soldiers with an injury of the upper limb, 70 had nerve-related trauma. There were 62 men and eight women with a mean age of 25 years (18 to 49). Disabilities due to nerve injuries were associated with loss of function, neuropathic pain or both. The mean nerve-related disability was 26% (0% to 70%), accounting for over one-half of this cohort’s cumulative disability. Patients injured in an explosion had higher disability ratings than those injured by gunshot. The ulnar nerve was most commonly injured, but most disability was associated with radial nerve trauma. In terms of the final outcome, at military discharge 59 subjects (84%) experienced persistent weakness, 48 (69%) had a persistent sensory deficit and 17 (24%) experienced chronic pain from scar-related or neuropathic pain. Nerve injury was the cause of frequent and substantial disability in our cohort of wounded soldiers.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:254–8.

United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines recommend the use of total hip replacement (THR) for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in cognitively intact patients, who were independently mobile prior to the injury. This study aimed to analyse the risk factors associated with revision of the implant and mortality following THR, and to quantify risk. National Joint Registry data recording a THR performed for acute fracture of the femoral neck between 2003 and 2010 were analysed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the extent to which risk of revision was related to specific covariates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse factors affecting peri-operative mortality (< 90 days). A total of 4323 procedures were studied. There were 80 patients who had undergone revision surgery at the time of censoring (five-year revision rate 3.25%, 95% confidence interval 2.44 to 4.07) and 137 patients (3.2%) patients died within 90 days. After adjusting for patient and surgeon characteristics, an increased risk of revision was associated with the use of cementless prostheses compared with cemented (hazard ratio (HR) 1.33, p = 0.021). Revision was independent of bearing surface and head size. The risk of mortality within 90 days was significantly increased with higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (grade 3: odds ratio (OR) 4.04, p < 0.001; grade 4/5: OR 20.26, p < 0.001; both compared with grades 1/2) and older age (≥ 75 years: OR 1.65, p = 0.025), but reduced over the study period (9% relative risk reduction per year).

THR is a good option in patients aged < 75 years and with ASA 1/2. Cementation of the femoral component does not adversely affect peri-operative mortality but improves survival of the implant in the mid-term when compared with cementless femoral components. There are no benefits of using head sizes > 28 mm or bearings other than metal-on-polyethylene. More research is required to determine the benefits of THR over hemiarthroplasty in older patients and those with ASA grades > 2.