The purpose was to determine if the use of cold irrigation fluid in routine knee arthroscopy leads to a reduction in post operative pain. Some surgeons use cooled irrigation fluid in knee arthroscopy in the hope that it may lead to a reduction in post operative pain and swelling. There is currently no evidence for this, although there is some evidence to support the use of cold therapy post operatively in knee surgery.Purpose
Background
There is conflicting evidence about the merits of using mobile bearings at total knee replacement (TKR), partly because most randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have not been adequately powered. A pragmatic multicentre RCT involving 116 surgeons in 34 UK centres was begun in 1999. Within a partial factorial design, 539 patients were randomly allocated to mobile or fixed bearings. The primary outcome measure was the Oxford Knee Score (OKS); secondary measures included SF-12, EQ-5D, costs, cost-effectiveness and need for further surgery.Introduction
Methods
20-70% of patients need blood transfusion postoperatively. There remain safety concerns regarding allogenic blood transfusion. Tranexamic acid (TA) is a synthetic antifibrinolytic agent that has been successfully used to stop bleeding in other specialties. We applied TA topically prior to the wound closure to find out the effect on blood loss as well as need for subsequent blood transfusion. This method of administration is quick, easy, has less systemic side effect and provides a higher concentration at the bleeding site. A double blind randomised controlled trial of 154 patients who underwent unilateral primary cemented total knee replacement. Patients were randomised into tranexamic acid group (1g drug mixed with saline to make up 20mls) or placebo (20ml 0.9% saline). The administration technique and drain protocol was standardised for all patients. Drain output was measured at 24 hours, and both groups compared for need of Blood transfusion. Outcome measures - blood loss, transfusion, complications, Euroqol and Oxford Knee Score.PURPOSE OF STUDY
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To compare minimally invasive (MIS) and standard surgical total knee replacement technique through a prospective, randomised, single-centre, multi-surgeon, controlled trial. Between March 2007 and May 2009, 70 patients undergoing 73 total knee replacements were recruited. 31 operations were randomised to the MIS treatment arm, 42 to the standard control arm. Data were collected for mode of anaesthesia, American Society of Anaesthesiologists' score (ASA), surgical time, Postoperative blood loss within surgical drains, length of stay and complications. Patients underwent surgery via a mini-mid vastus approach or medial parapatella approach (controls). All operations were performedAim
Methods
To evaluate the role of “top up” intra-articular local anaesthetic injection in patients who have had UKR. 43 patients scheduled to have a cemented Oxford UKR were prospectively recruited and randomised. All patients had the same initial anaesthetic regime of general anaesthesia, femoral nerve block and intra-operative intra-articular infiltration. All patients had a multi-holed epidural catheter placed intra-articularly prior to wound closure. Patients had the same operative technique, post operative rehabilitation and rescue analgesia. An independent, blinded observer recorded post-operative pain scores using a visual analogue score every 6 hours and any rescue analgesia. On the morning after surgery, 22 patients, (Group I), received 20 mls of 0.5% bupivicaine through the catheter whilst 21, (Group II), patients had 20 mls of normal saline by the same observer, after which the catheter was removed. No statistical difference was found in pain scores on the day of operation between the groups. However, patients in Group I had a significantly better pain score initially post top up and at 6 hours (2.4 (0-8) vs 5.7 (2-9), p<0.001). This cohort of patients required less rescue analgesia (p<0.001). In addition, Group I had statistically significant higher patient satisfaction outcome scores after the infiltration, (p<0.001).STUDY PURPOSES
METHOD AND RESULTS
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a hyaluronic acid (HA) supplement and a local anaesthetic (Bupivacaine) at providing early and short-term post-operative anagesic control following knee arthroscopy. Patients were randomised to receive either 10mls of 0.5% Bupivacaine or 10mls of HA into the joint immediately after completion of surgery. WOMAC and Tegner-Lysholm scores were obtained at baseline then at 1, 2, and 6-weeks post surgery. VAS pain scores were obtained at baseline; 1 and 24-hours; and 1, 2 and 6 weeks following surgery. 49 patients received intra-articular Bupivacaine and 49 HA. There was no statistical difference in any of the outcome measures (WOMAC, Tegner-Lysholm, VAS pain scores) at any time point between the groups overall. Patients with grade III-IV chondral defects that received HA reported significantly lower VAS pain scores at rest and movement at all time points. Use of Bupivacaine and HA intra-articular injection results in equivalent analgesic control in the immediate post-operative period and first six-weeks following surgery when administered immediately at the end of knee arthroscopy. Utilizing HA following knee arthroscopy does not sacrifice analgesic control and minimises exposure to chondrotoxic agents. Selective use of HA may improve pain-control in those with advanced chondral defects.
Abstract. Introduction. In recent years, CTA has been an effective training adjunct for orthopaedic procedures. ACLR is a complex procedure with a steep learning curve. Aim. To design a multimedia CTA learning tool for ACLR using a modified Delphi methodology. Methodology:. CTA generation: A modified Delphi method was used to generate a list of Technical Steps (TS), Decision Points (DP) and errors/solutions for an ACLR that was approved by an expert consensus amongst four, fellowship-trained knee surgeons. A technical workflow was designed to generate the audio-visual tool. Pilot study: 30 novice trainees were granted access to the CTA tool and then performed the ACLR in a cadaveric simulation workshop. A 5-point Likert scale aimed to qualitatively assess if the CTA was useful to their learning. Results:. CTA generation: 156 TS and 79 DP were included for an ACLR procedure which was divided into 7 phases. The audio-visual component was combined with the written tool to design the final CTA tool. Pilot study: 95% of trainees suggested the CTA tool would be useful before carrying out an ACLR in the operating theatre. They agreed it made their ACLR learning more effective. Conclusion:. We have designed a novel and easily accessible CTA tool to standardise teaching of ACLR surgery. Novice surgeons verify the value of the CTA as an adjunct to their apprenticeship training. Future work: A
Abstract. Introduction. The postoperative inflammatory response may be implicated in the aetiology of patient dissatisfaction following Total Knee Arthroplasty. Robotic-arm assisted TKA has been associated with reduced bone and soft tissue trauma. The objective of this
Abstract. Introduction. Higher than expected rates of tibial loosening with the ATTUNE® total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant has been reported. Component loosening can be associated with the development of radiolucency lines (RLL) and our study aim was to systematically assess the reported rates of these. Methodology. A systematic search was undertaken using the Cochrane methodology in four online databases. Identified studies were assessed and screened against predetermined inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. Results. Nine studies (n=2,727 TKAs) from 6,590 titles met the inclusion criteria: 1
Different methods of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction
have been described for skeletally immature patients before closure
of the growth plates. However, the outcome and complications following
this treatment remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review
was to analyse the outcome and complications of different techniques
which may be used for reconstruction of the ACL in these patients. We performed a systematic review of the literature according
to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
guidelines. This involved a comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline,
CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase and Google Scholar databases using the
following combinations of keywords, “knee”, “anterior cruciate ligament”,
“reconstruction”, “injury”, “children”, “adolescent”, “skeletally
immature”, “open physis” and “surgery”.Aims
Materials and Methods
The optimum cementing technique for the tibial
component in cemented primary total knee replacement (TKR) remains
controversial. The technique of cementing, the volume of cement
and the penetration are largely dependent on the operator, and hence
large variations can occur. Clinical, experimental and computational
studies have been performed, with conflicting results. Early implant
migration is an indication of loosening. Aseptic loosening is the
most common cause of failure in primary TKR and is the product of
several factors. Sufficient penetration of cement has been shown
to increase implant stability. This review discusses the relevant literature regarding all aspects
of the cementing of the tibial component at primary TKR. Cite this article:
Using meta-analysis we compared the survival and clinical outcomes of cemented and uncemented techniques in primary total knee replacement. We reviewed randomised controlled trials and observational studies comparing cemented and uncemented fixation. Our primary outcome was survival of the implant free of aseptic loosening. Our secondary outcome was joint function as measured by the Knee Society score. We identified 15 studies that met our final eligibility criteria. The combined odds ratio for failure of the implant due to aseptic loosening for the uncemented group was 4.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7 to 6.5) (p <
0.0001). Subgroup analysis of data only from randomised controlled trials showed no differences between the groups for odds of aseptic loosening (odds ratio 1.9, 95% CI 0.55 to 6.40, p = 0.314). The weighted mean difference for the Knee Society score was 0.005 (95% CI −0.26 to 0.26) (p = 0.972). There was improved survival of the cemented compared to uncemented implants, with no statistically significant difference in the mean Knee Society score between groups for all pooled data.
