We reviewed 75 patients (57 men and 18 women), who had undergone tension-band laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (42 patients) or compression myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (33 patients) and had been followed for more than ten years. Clinical and functional results were estimated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score. The rate of recovery and the level of postoperative axial neck pain were also recorded. The pre- and post-operative alignment of the cervical spine (Ishihara curve index indicating lordosis of the cervical spine) and the range of movement (ROM) of the cervical spine were also measured. The mean rate of recovery of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at final follow-up was 52.1% (. sd. 24.6) and significant axial pain was reported by 19 patients (25.3%). Axial pain was reported more frequently in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament than in those with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (p = 0.027). A kyphotic deformity was not seen post-operatively in any patient. The mean ROM decreased post-operatively from 32.8° (. sd. 12.3) to 16.2° (. sd. 12.3) (p < 0.001). The mean ROM ratio was 46.9% (. sd. 28.1) for all the patients. The mean ROM ratio was lower in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament than in those with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (p < 0.001). Compared to those with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament had less ROM and more post-operative axial neck pain

Aims

The optimal procedure for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of anterior cervical ossified posterior longitudinal ligament en bloc resection (ACOE) with posterior laminectomy and fusion with bone graft and internal fixation (PTLF) for the surgical management of patients with this condition.

Aims. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the Mobi-C implant in cervical disc degeneration, a randomised study was conducted, comparing the Mobi-C prosthesis arthroplasty with anterior cervical disc fusion (ACDF) in patients with single level cervical spondylosis. Patients and Methods. From January 2008 to July 2009, 99 patients were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups, those having a Mobi-C implant (n = 51; 30 men, 21 women) and those undergoing ACDF (n = 48; 28 men, 20 women).The patients were followed up for five years, with the primary outcomes being the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, visual analogue scale for pain and the incidence of further surgery. The secondary outcomes were the Neck Disability Index and range of movement (ROM) of the treated segment. Results. The incidence of further surgery was found to be statistically significant between the two groups (p = 0.49), with seven ACDF patients requiring further surgery and only one Mobi-C patient requiring re-operation. There were significant differences (p < 0.001) between the two groups in the ROM of the treated segment. However, both Mobi-C surgery and ACDF surgery were effective in improving the patient’s clinical symptoms. Take home message: Mobi-C implant surgery is a safe alternative to ACDF surgery in cervical disc degeneration. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:829–3

Background. We present the results of a single centre, prospective study to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior cervical decompression and replacement (ACDR) using the NuNec(tm) Cervical Arthroplasty System (Pioneer Surgical Technology, Marquette, Mich., USA). Methodology and Results. 36 patients with radiculopathy/myelopathy, who failed to respond to conservative measures, were included. Pain and function were evaluated by Visual Analogue score for Neck pain (VAS-NP) and Arm pain (VAS-AP), Neck disability index (NDI) and SF-36 questionnaires. Radiological assessments include assessing overall range of movement (ROM) and at functional segment unit (FSU). Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS 16.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Appropriate parametric (A paired t-test) and non parametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) were used to assess the statistical significance (p<0.05). The average age at operation was 51 years (range 35 - 77years). 8 patients received ACDR at one-level, 15 had 2-level surgery, 12 had 3-level surgery and 1 had a 4-level surgery. At the time of final follow-up (Mean 14.25 months, Range 12- 22.5 months) the mean NDI improved from 49.35; to 33.78 (p< 0.001). There statistically significant improvement note in VAS-NP (Post-op3.65, Pre-op:8.16, p<0.001), VAS-AP (Post-op:3.12, Pre-op:7.32, p<0.001) and SF-36BP (pre-op:29.15, post-op:37.18, p<0.002). The overall global ROM movement was preserved (pre-op:46.80±10.52, post-op:45.04±11.53) and an improvement in ROM at FSU was observed (pre-op:16.60±8.50, post-op:20.22±12.22) at final follow–up. Conclusion. Our results of ACDR using the NuNec(tm) disc show statistically significant improvement in the outcome measures that are comparable to other types of ACDR. In addition, preservation of global cervical spine ROM and improvement in FSU ROM was observed despite single or multiple levels ACDR. Furthermore, NuNec(tm) ACDR gives excellent quality MR image during post-operative period. In our preliminary results, we report that NuNec(tm) ACDR device is safe, effective and has added design benefits

Statement of Purpose. It is well known that individuals with a history of low back pain (hLBP) exhibit altered movement patterns that are caused by changes in neuromuscular control. Postural disturbance provides an effective method for creating these differentiable movement patterns. This study has explored the response of the lower limb and spine to a translational perturbation similar to that experienced on public transport in healthy volunteers and those with hLBP. Methods. Healthy volunteers (n=16) and subjects with hLBP (n=10) were subjected to 31 identical postural disturbances at varying time intervals while standing atop a moving platform. Skeletal kinematics and muscle activation were recorded using a 10-camera Vicon system (Oxford, UK) and Myon electromyography (EMG) at the trunk (lumbar, lower thoracic, and upper thoracic segments), pelvis, thigh, calf, and foot. Joint angles were calculated using Body Builder (Vicon) and a unilateral seven-segment custom model. Results. Examination of the total range of joint motion (RoM) exhibited during the trial demonstrated similar RoM at the knee and hip (p=0.90 and 0.97 respectively), but less RoM for the hLBP group at the ankle and lumbar spine (p=0.21 and 0.38, respectively). EMG signals revealed higher muscle activation of the lower limbs from the hLBP cohort compared to healthy controls, yet greater activation at the gluteal and oblique muscles in the control group. Conclusions. In the presently small cohorts, trends demonstrate that differences in postural strategies exist between the healthy and hLBP cohorts, yet further testing of LBP patients will further clarify targets for rehabilitation

Purpose of the study. To compare safety and efficacy of cervical disc replacement (CRD) in single and multilevel DDD. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Methods. 249 patients were enrolled. 171 patients were treated at 1-level, 41 treated at 2 levels and 2 patients were treated at 3 levels. Implant was also used adjacent to a fusion with a cage in 35 patients. The diagnosis was cervical degenerative disc disease between C3 and C7 with symptomatic DH. Population was 106 male 143 female, average age 46 (25-71). Clinical assessment included VAS scores for arm and neck pain and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Range of motion (ROM) from flexion/extension lateral view were measured. Results. Of all NDI scores recorded, 86,50 % demonstrated at least 15 points improvement at two years follow up from pre-op scores. 85,1% of VAS arm Pain scores demonstrated an improvement by = 2 points from pre-op scores and 50,8% for VAS neck Pain scores. The breakdown by levels and adjacent to an interbody cage shown that 80% of reported NDI scores demonstrated at least a 15 point improvement post operatively for two level disc replacement. 82,4% demonstrated a greater than 2 points improvement in VAS arm pain and 53,3% for VAS neck pain. For patients that received both implant and an interbody cage, 72,7% demonstrated a greater than 2 point improvement in VAS arm pain and 41,7% for VAS neck pain. Three (1,8%) cases of subsidence and 4 cases of implant loosening/displacement due to inappropriate sizing were reported. Available radiographic findings show on average a ROM of 8,2 ° at 2 years and an overall change in cervical lordosis of 5° from pre-op. Conclusion. Clinical outcomes demonstrated a significant improvement for both the total population (n=249) and for the single level total disc replacement population (n=171). Given these outstanding results single and multilevel TDR with this implant can be considered to be safe. No significant difference was observed between single and multilevel TDR groups regarding clinical, functional and radiological results. Follow up for this series need however to be extended for up to 5 years at least. The role of this implant in multilevel cases as well as in cases to a fused level still need further evaluation although these preliminary results are encouraging

This prospective multicentre study was undertaken to determine segmental movement, disc height and sagittal alignment after total disc replacement (TDR) in the lumbosacral spine and to assess the correlation of biomechanical properties to clinical outcomes.

A total of 173 patients with degenerative disc disease and low back pain for more than one year were randomised to receive either TDR or multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR). Segmental movement in the sagittal plane and disc height were measured using distortion compensated roentgen analysis (DCRA) comparing radiographs in active flexion and extension. Correlation analysis between the range of movement or disc height and patient-reported outcomes was performed in both groups. After two years, no significant change in movement in the sagittal plane was found in segments with TDR or between the two treatment groups. It remained the same or increased slightly in untreated segments in the TDR group and in this group there was a significant increase in disc height in the operated segments. There was no correlation between segmental movement or disc height and patient-reported outcomes in either group.

In this study, insertion of an intervertebral disc prosthesis TDR did not increase movement in the sagittal plane and segmental movement did not correlate with patient-reported outcomes. This suggests that in the lumbar spine the movement preserving properties of TDR are not major determinants of clinical outcomes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:81–9.

This study evaluates factors related to myelopathic symptoms in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). A total of 87 patients with OPLL were included. Of these, 53 (Group I) had no symptoms or presented with neck pain and radiculopathy and 34 (Group II) had myelopathic symptoms. Gender, age, and history of trauma were evaluated in the two groups. The range of movement of the cervical spine was measured using plain radiographs. The number of involved segments, type of OPLL, and maximal compression ratio were analysed using CT and signal change in the spinal cord was evaluated using MRI.

The patients’ age was found to be significant (p = 0.001). No difference was found between gender and the range of movement in the two groups. The maximum compression of the spinal canal showed a difference (p = 0.03). The signal change of the spinal cord was different between the two groups. In patients with OPLL of the cervical spine, myelopathic symptoms are not related to the range of movement or the number of involved segments.

Few studies have examined the order in which a spinal osteotomy and total hip replacement (THR) are to be performed for patients with ankylosing spondylitis. We have retrospectively reviewed 28 consecutive patients with ankylosing spondylitis who underwent both a spinal osteotomy and a THR from September 2004 to November 2012. In the cohort 22 patients had a spinal osteotomy before a THR (group 1), and six patients had a THR before a spinal osteotomy (group 2). The mean duration of follow-up was 3.5 years (2 to 9). The spinal sagittal Cobb angle of the vertebral osteotomy segment was corrected from a pre-operative kyphosis angle of 32.4 (SD 15.5°) to a post-operative lordosis 29.6 (SD 11.2°) (p < 0.001). Significant improvements in pain, function and range of movement were observed following THR. In group 2, two of six patients had an early anterior dislocation. The spinal osteotomy was performed two weeks after the THR. At follow-up, no hip has required revision in either group. Although this non-comparative study only involved a small number of patients, given our experience, we believe a spinal osteotomy should be performed prior to a THR, unless the deformity is so severe that the procedure cannot be performed.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:360–5.

Objectives

To evaluate the neck strength of school-aged rugby players, and to define the relationship with proxy physical measures with a view to predicting neck strength.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether concerns about the release of metal ions in metal-on-metal total hip replacements (THR) should be extended to patients with metal-bearing total disc replacements (TDR).

Cobalt and chromium levels in whole blood and serum were measured in ten patients with a single-level TDR after a mean follow-up of 34.5 months (13 to 61) using inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry. These metal ion levels were compared with pre-operative control levels in 81 patients and with metal ion levels 12 months after metal-on-metal THR (n = 21) and resurfacing hip replacement (n = 36). Flexion-extension radiographs were used to verify movement of the TDR.

Cobalt levels in whole blood and serum were significantly lower in the TDR group than in either the THR (p = 0.007) or the resurfacing group (p < 0.001). Both chromium levels were also significantly lower after TDR versus hip resurfacing (p < 0.001), whereas compared with THR this difference was only significant for serum levels (p = 0.008). All metal ion levels in the THR and resurfacing groups were significantly higher than in the control group (p < 0.001). In the TDR group only cobalt in whole blood appeared to be significantly higher (p < 0.001). The median range of movement of the TDR was 15.5° (10° to 22°).

These results suggest that there is minimal cause for concern about high metal ion concentrations after TDR, as the levels appear to be only moderately elevated. However, spinal surgeons using a metal-on-metal TDR should still be aware of concerns expressed in the hip replacement literature about toxicity from elevated metal ion levels, and inform their patients appropriately.