Major wound complication risk factors following soft tissue sarcoma resection. Wound-healing complications represent an important source of morbidity in patients treated surgically for soft tissue sarcomas (STS). The purpose of this study was to determine which factors are predictive of major wound complication rates following STS resection, including tumour site, size, grade, and depth, as well as radiotherapy and chemotherapy. We reviewed 256 cases of STS treated surgically between 2000 and 2011. The primary outcome was occurrence of major wound complications post STS resection. Major wound complications were more likely to occur post STS resection with larger tumour diameters (p = 0.001), high grade tumours (p = 0.04), location in the proximal lower extremity (p = 0.01), and use of
For soft tissue sarcoma patients receiving
Myxoid or Myxoid Round Cell liposarcoma (MLS) is a mesenchymal malignancy with adipocyte differentiation accounting for 15–20% of liposarcomas and 5% of all adult soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Like other STS, treatment of MLS is generally by wide surgical resection in conjunction with radiotherapy and this approach is associated with low rates of local recurrence [1]. However, most MLS are located between muscles so wide local excision(WLE) can be quite morbid with adverse functional results. MLS are known to be extremely sensitive to radiotherapy which has led to development of treatment protocols utilizing neoadjuvant radiation. Given the radiosensitivity of MLS, we hypothesize that resection with marginal margins (1mm) does not result in higher rates of local recurrence or disease-free survival if performed following pre-operative radiotherapy. We identified all patients with localized MLS who underwent preoperative radiation and surgical resection between January 2000 and January 2018 from a prospectively collected sarcoma database. We calculated the ellipsoid tumour volume(ETV=h x w x d x ()) at diagnosis and after radiation, and documented the necrosis percentage of the tumour and margin status following resection based on histological analysis [2]. Marginal resection was identified by the operative report describing no or only very minimal resection of muscle surrounding the tumour, and a negative surgical margin 0.1cm/1mm as defined histologically. In comparison, WLE was defined if the operative note described an attempt to remove the tumour with a cuff of surrounding muscle, and the final histology reported a negative margin 0.1cm/1mm which included skeletal muscle. The third group for analysis included patients with positive resection margins. There were 91 patients with MLS of mean age 48 years (range 18–88) with 69% male and 31% female. The mean pre-radiotherapy ETV was 507cm. 3. (16.1cm. 3. to 6961cm. 3. ) and decreased to 361cm. 3. (8.7cm. 3. to 5695cm. 3. ) following radiation, with an average percentage reduction in ETV of −45%(+129%to-99%). Mean patient follow-up was 7.3 years (0.2–18) with no differences between margin groups(p=0.284). Only 10(11%) patients had positive margins, of which 43(47%) underwent marginal resection and 38(42%) WLE. Overall the mean necrosis as measured histologically following preoperative radiation was 69% (range 0–100%) with no differences between the 3 resection groups(p-0.151). Similarly, there was no significant difference in reduction in mean ETV between the three resection groups(p=0.311), there was no significant difference between the three treatment groups in 5-year LR-free survival (p=0.469), metastasis-free survival (p=0.841) or overall survival (p=0.873). Most patients with MLS experienced significant reduction in tumour size and necrosis following preoperative radiation. We found no differences in the risk of local recurrence or survival based on the type of surgical approach for patients with MLS. Based on these results, we conclude that MLS can be safely removed by marginal resection following
The use of endoprosthesis implants is frequent for tumours involving the proximal third of the femur and not amenable to primary arthroplasty or internal fixation. In this population, these implants are preferentially cemented given poor bone quality associated with systemic diseases and treatments. Loosening is a common complication of these implants that have been linked to poor bone quality, type of implants and importantly cementing technique. Thus, these techniques vary between different surgeons and based mainly on previous experience. One of the most successful cementing techniques in the arthroplasty literature is the French paradox. This technique involves removing the cancellous bone of the proximal femoral metaphysis and selects the largest stem to tightly fit the created cavity delineated by cortical bone. Cementing the implant results in a very thin cement layer that fills the inconsistent gaps between the metal and the bone. To our knowledge, no previous report exists in the literature assessing loosening in proximal femur replacement using the French paradox cementing technique. In this study, we sought to examine (1) rates of loosening in proximal femur replacement, and (2) the oncological outcomes including tumour recurrence and implant related complications. A retrospective study of 42 patients underwent proximal femur replacement between 1990 and 2018 at our institution. Of these, 30 patients met our inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers have evaluated the preoperative and the most recent postoperative radiographs using the International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) radiographic scoring system and Gruen classification for femoral stem loosening. Additionally, the acetabulum was evaluated for erosion according to the criteria of Baker et al. The mean age of this cohort was 60.5 (19–80), with 60% being males. The primary origin was metastatic in 17 (56.7%) patients, bone sarcoma in 10 (33.3%) patients and soft tissue sarcoma in 3 (10%) patients. Pathological fractures were present in 11 (36.7%) patients. Seven (23.3%) patients had prior intramedullary nailing.
