Limb length deficiency, secondary to trauma or infection, is a common reason for referral to our tertiary service. After experiencing troubles with the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD), we changed implant to the magnet operated Precice nail. We evaluated the safety and reliability of this novel device and compared it to our early ISKD results. To minimise variables, we selected femurs only. In total, we reviewed medical and radiographic records of 20 cases (8 ISKD, 12 Precise) from 2010–2015. At each postoperative visit, the accuracy and precision of distraction and complications were recorded. Accuracy reflected how close the measured lengthening was to the prescribed distraction at each postoperative visit. Precision reflected how close the repeated measurements were to each other over the course of total lengthening period. No patients were lost to follow-up (1–3.5 years). With the Precice nail (2012–2015), 11/12 were male and 10/12 were caused by trauma. The mean age was 34. Mean total lengthening was 38mm (range, 29–53mm), with an accuracy of 98percnt; and precision of 92percnt;. All patients achieved target lengthening at a rate of 1mm lengthening per day. In one case, the Precice nail fractured and this was revised successfully. With the ISKD group (2010–2012), 8/8 had complications (magnet jamming, nail breakage, equinus contractures and claw toes), with 25percnt; achieving accurate lengthening and precision of 38percnt;. Our results so far have justified our change in implant choice and, in our experience, support the Precice nail as being safe and precise

Background:. External fixators are not as well tolerated around the femur when compared to the tibia. Lengthening with an intramedullary device is therefore attractive. Method:. We reviewed all cases of femoral lengthening performed at our unit from 2007 to 2014. Cases of non-unions, concurrent deformities, congenital limb deficiencies and lengthening with an unstable hip were excluded. This left 33 cases for review. Healing index, implant tolerance and complications were compared. Results and Discussion:. In 20 cases the Precice lengthening nail was used and in 13 cases the LRS external fixator system. The desired length was achieved in all cases in the Precice group and in 12 of 13 cases in the LRS group. The Precice group had a more rapid return to full weight bearing. The mean healing index was 31.3 days/cm in the Precice and 47.1 days/cm in the LRS group. There was an increased incidence of complications with LRS lengthening, including pin site infections and regenerate deformity. Implant tolerance and the patients' perception of the cosmetic result were better with the Precice treatment. Conclusion:. We conclude excellent functional results with fewer complications and greater patient satisfaction in femoral lengthening with a Precice intramedullary nail

Introduction. The Precice nail is the latest intramedullary lengthening nail with excellent early outcomes. Implant complications have led to modification of the nail design. The aim of this study was to perform a retrieval study of Precice nails following lower limb lengthening. To assess macroscopic and microscopic changes to the implants and assess differences following design modification, with identification of potential surgical, implant and patient risk factors. Method. 15 nails were retrieved from 13 patients following lower limb lengthening. Macroscopic and microscopic surface damage to the nails were identified. Further analysis included radiology and micro-CT prior to sectioning. The internal mechanism was then analysed with Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy to identify corrosion. Results. 7 male and 3 females underwent 12 femoral lengthenings, 9 antegrade and 3 retrograde. 3 females underwent tibial lengthening. All patients obtained the desired length with no implant failure and full regenerate consolidation. Surface degradation was noted on the telescopic part of every nail design, less on the latest implants. Microscopic analysis confirmed fretting and pitting corrosion. Following sectioning black debris was noted in all implants. The early designs were found to have fractured actuator pins and the pin and bearings had evidence of corrosive debris. The latest designs had evidence of biological deposits suggestive of fluid ingress within the nail. Conclusion. This study suggests fluid ingress occurs with every generation of Precice nail despite modifications. The presence of biological fluid could be an early warning sign of potential corrosion. This in theory could lead to actuator pin fracture and implant failure. The clinical relevance is the potential re-use of a “dormant” nail in patients requiring secondary limb segment lengthening. Retraction of the nail in-situ and re-use for further lengthening requires careful consent for potential implant failure

Introduction. Muscle stiffness and joint contractures are common complications of limb lengthening. Authors have demonstrated less permanent soft tissue complications with intramedullary lengthening than external fixation. Our aim was to evaluate the joint response following intramedullary femoral lengthening and need for physiotherapy and alteration to rate/rhythm of lengthening. Method. A retrospective review of documentation for all femoral Precice nails in our centre inserted between 2012 and 2017. This involved 98 nails (68 antegrade, 30 retrograde) in 88 patients (59 males, 29 females) with a mean age of 32 years (range 12–69 yrs). We excluded cases where there was no documentation regarding Range of Movement (ROM). Bilateral lengthenings were recorded as separate cases. This left 50 antegrade, 16 retrograde cases with hip ROM data and 55 antegrade, 26 retrograde cases with Knee ROM data. Results. Hip. In the antegrade group 20 cases (39%) developed no stiffness throughout treatment. ROM decreased in 61% (n=30) of cases and the median length at which this occurred was 3cm. Where a retrograde nail was inserted 62.5% of cases (n=10) maintained normal range of motion. The median length at which ROM decreased was 3.25cm, this occurred in 6 cases (37.5%). . Knee. Where the antegrade nail was inserted, 22 cases (40%) did not develop stiffness. There was reduced ROM in 33 cases (60%), occurring at a median distance of 2cm. The median distance at which reduced ROM occurred with the retrograde nails was 1.5cm, this occurred in 23 cases (88.5%). 3 cases did not develop stiffness. All cases regained full ROM. Conclusion. Although there was no permanent loss, Joint Stiffness still occurs with intramedullary limb lengthening and there remains the need for regular physiotherapy. There are no data from other institutions for comparison. Rehabilitation guidelines and a proforma to accurately monitor patients ROM throughout treatment have been developed

Background:. Leg length discrepancy related to absence of the femoral head with proximal migration of the femur presents a treatment dilemma. Late sequelae of neonatal hip sepsis and chronic hip dislocation due to developmental dysplasia are the most common causes. Traditional teaching dictates that the hip is stabilised prior to limb lengthening. Reconstructive options alter the shape of the proximal femur which complicates future surgery. Methods:. We retrospectively reviewed 3 cases of femoral lengthening with an ‘unstable’ hip without prior stabilization. The aetiology was neonatal hip sepsis in 2 cases and chronic hip dislocation due to developmental dysplasia in 1 case. Lengthening was performed with the use of a retrograde Precice lengthening nail. Results and Discussion:. The desired length (range 5.5 to 6cm) was achieved in all patients without migration of the proximal femur. In all cases patient satisfaction was high with the lengthening and the ability to abort shoe raises. There was an improvement in gait pattern in all patients. Conclusion:. Femoral lengthening is possible without prior stabilisation of the hip in so called ‘unstable’ hip situations. The proximal femoral anatomy is not further altered and future salvage procedures such as a total hip replacement are not compromised