We hypothesised that the anterior and posterior walls of the body of the first sacral vertebra could be visualised with two different angles of inlet view, owing to the conical shape of the sacrum. Six dry male cadavers with complete pelvic rings and eight dry sacrums with K-wires were used to study the effect of canting (angling the C-arm) the fluoroscope towards the head in 5° increments from 10° to 55°. Fluoroscopic images were taken in each position. Anterior and posterior angles of inclination were measured between the upper sacrum and the vertical line on the lateral view. Three authors separately selected the clearest image for overlapping anterior cortices and the upper sacral canal in the cadaveric models. The dry bone and K-wire models were scored by the authors, being sure to check whether the K-wire was in or out. In the dry bone models the mean score of the relevant inlet position of the anterior or posterior inclination was 8.875 (standard deviation (. sd. ) 0.35), compared with the inlet position of the opposite inclination of –5.75 (. sd. 4.59). We found that two different inlet views should be used separately to evaluate the borders of the body of the sacrum using anterior and posterior inclination angles of the sacrum, during placement of iliosacral screws. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:705–10

Introduction. Malrotation following total knee replacement is directly related to poor outcome. The knowledge of proximal and distal rotational axes and angles of the femur is therefore of high importance. The aim of the study was to determine whether the most used proximal and distal femoral angles; femoral anteversion angle (FAA) and posterior condylar angle (PCA) were different within individuals, between right, left and gender. As well, we studied whether the “inferior condylar angle” is correlated to the PCA and therefore useful in determining the rotation of the distal femur. Material and Methods. From 36 cadavers the femora were obtained and after removing the soft tissue a Computed Tomography (CT) scan was made. Three angles were measured: (i) the FAA between femoral columnar line (FHNL) and posterior condylar line (PCL), (ii) the PCA between anatomical transepicondylar line (TEL) and PCL, (iii) the inferior condylar angle (ICA) between the TEL and inferior condylar line (ICL). Statistical analysis of comparative relationships between the different angles was examined by calculating correlation coefficients and a paired t-test. Results. The mean FAA, PCA and ICA for the whole group were respectively 12.0 degrees (range 0.2–31.6, SD 8.3, 95% CI 9.6–14.4), 4.8 degrees (range 0.9–9.6, SD 2.3, 95% CI 4.1–5.4) and 4.5 degrees (range 0.1–9.8, SD 2.1, 95% CI 3.9–5.1). A strong correlation of the FAA was found within the total group and left versus right (r = 0.82; p = 0.00). A weaker relationship was found for the total group of the PCA measurements (r = 0.59; p = 0.00). When FAA compared to the PCA subdivided in only sexes, there is a weak correlation for the female group (r = 0.54; p = 0.00) Despite the small mean difference of the mean ICA and PCA, there was no correlation between these two angles. Conclusion. Considering the weak correlation of the FAA and PCA within the group but also individuals, the importance of development of more individual approaches for determining the optimal rotation of the components in total knee surgery is essential. As a result, one should be aware that the widely used, current guidelines for knee rotation of 3 degrees of external rotation in placing total knee arthroplasties shows variation between individuals. A more individual approach in total knee arthroplasty seems essential for future knee prosthesis implantations

Introduction. Proper rotational alignment of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) could be achieved using several techniques. The self adjustment methodology allows the alignment of the tibial component under the femoral component after several flexion-extension movements. Our hypothesis was that this technique allowed a posterior tibial component alignment parallel to the femoral component posterior bicondylar axis. The aim of this study was to access this hypothesis using a post-operative CT-scan study. Materials and Methods. This prospective CT-scan study involved 94 TKA. Theses TKA were divided in two groups: group1: 50 knees with a pre-operative genu varum deformity (mean HKA: 172.2°), operated using a medial parapatellar approach, and group 2: 44 knees with a preoperative valgus deformity (mean HKA: 188.7°), operated using a lateral parapatellar approach. Four measures were done on each post-operative CT-scan: angle between anatomical transepicondylar axis and femoral component posterior bicondylar axis (FCPCA), angle between FCPCA and tibial component marginal posterior axis, angle between tibial component marginal posterior axis and bony tibial plateau marginal posterior axis (BTPMPA), angle between transepicondylar axis and tibial component marginal posterior axis. Each measure was repeated, after one month by the same independent observer. Statistical evaluation used non-parametric Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test to compare each group of measures, and intraobserver reproducibility was assessed using ANOVA test, with an error rate of 5%. Results. Intraobserver measurements were reproducible. Mean FCPCA was to 3,1° (SD:1,91) in group 1 and 4,7° (DS: 2,96) in group 2. Tibial component was positioned in external rotation in both groups, in relation to FCPCA: (group 1: mean angle: 0,7° (SD:4,45), group 2: mean angle: 0,9° (SD:4,53)) and in relation to BTPMPA: (group1: mean angle: 6,1° (SD: 5,85); group2: mean angle: 12,5° (SD: 8,6)). There was no statistical difference between these two groups. Tibial component was positioned in internal rotation in relation to anatomical transepicondylar axis: (Group1: mean angle: 1,9° (SD: 4,93); group 2: mean angle: 3° (SD: 4.38)). Discussion. By using the self adjustment technique, tibial component is aligned parallel to the femoral component regardless of the initial frontal deformity and the surgical approach. However, there was a difference in tibial component axis and BTPMPA, between the two groups. This difference should be explained by the difference in morphology of the tibial plateau bone in knee with genu valgum deformity. The self adjustment technique is a reliable method to obtain a proper rotational alignment of the tibial component in TKA