Aims. The COVID-19 pandemic presents an unprecedented burden on global healthcare systems, and existing infrastructures must adapt and evolve to meet the challenge. With health systems reliant on the health of their workforce, the importance of protection against disease transmission in healthcare workers (HCWs) is clear. This study collated responses from several countries, provided by clinicians familiar with practice in each location, to identify areas of best practice and policy so as to build consensus of those measures that might reduce the risk of transmission of COVID-19 to HCWs at work. Methods. A cross-sectional descriptive survey was designed with ten open and closed questions and sent to a representative sample. The sample was selected on a convenience basis of 27 senior surgeons, members of an international surgical society, who were all frontline workers in the COVID-19 pandemic. This study was reported according to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) checklist. Results. Responses were received by all 27 surgeons from 22 countries across six continents. A number of the study respondents reported COVID-19-related infection and mortality in HCWs in their countries. Differing areas of practice and policy were identified and organized into themes including the specification of units receiving COVID-19 patients, availability and usage of personal protective equipment (PPE), other measures to reduce staff exposure, and communicating with and supporting HCWs. Areas more specific to surgery also identified some variation in practice and policy in relation to visitors to the hospital, the outpatient department, and in the operating room for both non-urgent and emergency care. Conclusion. COVID-19 presents a disproportionate risk to HCWs, potentially resulting in a diminished health system capacity, and consequently an impairment to population health. Implementation of these recommendations at an international level could provide a framework to reduce this burden

Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty is very successful although the clinical assessment and rated outcome does not always match the patients reported satisfaction. One reason for patient dissatisfaction is less than desired range of motion. Poor postoperative motion inhibits many functional activities and may create a perception of dysfunction. Early in the postoperative period when patients are having trouble regaining motion (usually 6–8 weeks), manipulation under anesthesia can be used to advance range of motion by manually lysing adhesions. Comorbidities have been used as predictors for outcome in total knee arthroplasty in population health studies. Likewise, predicting which patients are most susceptible to early postoperative stiffness/manipulation would be valuable for patient education and to predict outcome. Methods. Prospectively collected data was retrieved from the hospital's MARCQI database (Michigan Arthroplasty Collaborative Quality Initiative) for the years 2014–2018. There were 3098 primary total knees performed during the study period and 139 manipulations (4.44%). The registry specifically abstracts patients’ preoperative comorbidities, operative data, and 90-day postoperative complications. Results. There were 2118 Cruciate Retaining/Cruciate Stabilized knees (105 MUA), 801 Posterior Stabilized (33), and 41 Total Stabilized/Hinge (1), 2160 knees were cemented (91) and 799 uncemented (48). No differences were found between the manipulation and non-manipulation groups for gender, race, alcohol consumption, bleeding disorders, history of DVT or PE, Diabetes, or use of pre-op narcotics or anti-coagulents. Patients undergoing manipulation were younger (67.2 vs. 63.8, p= 0.00001), had a lower BMI (32.6 vs. 30.9 p= 0.0007), and were more likely to be non or former (quit) smokers. There were no differences noted for the constraint of the component (cr/ps), or whether the implants were cemented or uncemented (35% vs. 27%, p= 0.064). Conclusions. Understanding the risk for postoperative stiffness and the potential for manipulation is helpful in the preoperative period for patient education and outcome prediction. Assessing comorbidities and patient characteristics may help avoid the need for manipulations postoperatively. This patient cohort may be biased since the manipulations were not based on predetermined criteria. The cohort represents patients whose range of motion was poor enough to cause the surgeon to perform the procedure. The findings do however highlight a patient pool that was surprisingly at risk: younger, thinner, nonsmokers regardless the implant design or use of cement

Introduction. Reducing readmissions after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is challenging. Pre-operative risk stratification and optimization pre surgical care may be helpful in reducing readmission rates after primary TJA. Assessment of the predictive value of individual modifiable risk factors without a tool to properly stratify patients may not be helpful to the surgical community to reduce the risk of readmission. We developed a scoring system: Readmission Risk Assessment Tool (RRAT) as part of a Perioperative Orthopaedic Surgical Home model that allows for risk stratification in patients undergoing elective primary TJA at our institution. We analyzed the relationship between the RRAT score and readmission following primary hip or knee arthroplasty. Methods. The RRAT, which is scored incrementally based on the number and severity of modifiable comorbidities was used to generate readmission scores for a cohort of 207 readmitted and 2 cohorts of 234 (random and age-matched) non-readmitted patients each. Regression analysis was performed to assess the strength of association between individual risk factors, RRAT score and readmissions. We also calculated the odds and odds ratio (OR) at each level of RRAT score to identify patients with relatively higher risk of readmission. Results. There were 207(2.08%) 30-day readmissions in 9,930 patients over a 6-year period (2008 to 2013). Surgical site infection was the most common cause of readmission (93 cases, 45%). The median RRAT scores were 3 (IQR: 1, 4) and 1 (IQR: 0, 2) for readmitted group and non-readmitted group respectively. The RRAT score was significantly associated with readmission with odds ratio between 1.5 and 1.9 under various model assumptions. A RRAT score of 3 or higher resulted in higher odds of readmission. Discussion and Conclusion. Population health management, cost-effective care and optimization of outcomes to maximize value are the new maxims for healthcare delivery in the United States. The RRAT has a significant association with readmission following joint arthroplasty and could potentially be a clinically meaningfully tool for risk mitigation

International and national predictions from the late 1990s warned of alarming increases in hip fracture incidence due to an ageing population globally. Our study aimed to describe contemporary, population-based longitudinal trends in outcomes and epidemiology of hip fracture patients in a tertiary referral trauma centre. A retrospective review was performed of all patients aged 65 years and over with a diagnosis of fractured neck of femur (AO classification 31 group A and B) admitted to the John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales between 1st January 2002 and 30th December 2009. Datawas collated and cross referenced from several databases (Prospective Long Bone Fracture Database, Operating Theatre Database and the Hospital Coding Unit). Mortality data was obtained via linkage with the Cardiac and Stroke Outcomes Unit, Planning and Performance, Division of Population Health. Main outcome measures were 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, length of stay. The JHH admitted (427 ± 20/year, range: 391–455) patients with hip fractures over the 9 year study period. The number of admissions per year increased over the study period (p = 0.002), with no change in the age-standardised incidence (p = 0.1). The average age (83.5 ± 0.2) and average percentage female (73.7%) did not change. There was an overall trend to decreased 30-day mortality from 12.4% in 2002 to 7% in 2009 (p = 0.05). The factors that were associated with increased mortality were age (p < 0.0001), male gender (p = 0.0004), time to operating theatre (p = 0.0428) and length of stay (p < 0.0001). In accordance with national and international projections on increased incidence of geriatric hip fractures, the incidence of fractured neck of femur in our institution increased from 2002–2009, reflecting our ageing population. 30-day mortality improved and longer length of stay corresponded with increased 30-day mortality