Introduction. In 2011 the Scottish Government published national MRSA screening requirements. A comparison of Orthopaedic and ENT elective surgery intended to juxtapose a specialty known to take MRSA screening seriously with one that has little clinical concern with regards MRSA infection. ENT surgery parallels Orthopaedics in using implants and there potentially being MRSA colonisation at or close to the site of surgery. In Orthopaedics MRSA infection is infrequent, but implant infection with antibiotic resistant bacteria has a particularly poor prognosis. In ENT MRSA infection is rare and colonisation does not influence patient care. Aims. An evaluation of MRSA screening practice for elective Orthopaedics and ENT surgery at Gartnavel General Hospital with regards strategy and implementation. Method. Review of 342 consecutive elective ENT patients and 325 Orthopaedic patients attending for inpatient or day case surgery. The reference standards were the regional and national guidelines on MRSA screening. Results. Overall screening rates were 145 (42%) of 342 ENT patients and 270 (83%) of 326 Orthopaedic patients. 100% of Orthopaedic patients admitted (154) were screened, in compliance with both regional and national policy. 91 (70%) of 130 ENT patients admitted were screened for MRSA, and no risk assessment was carried out, which was not in compliance with either regional or national policy. Discussion. Orthopaedic surgery has an established and reliable practice of screening elective inpatient cases, and when identified MRSA colonisation results in a change in patient management. ENT surgery should have established a similar practice according to existing local guidelines. The Government consider ENT a lower risk speciality for MRSA, but still require as a minimum a documented MRSA risk assessment process

The Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) was developed in 2007 as a predictor of 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery following a neck of femur fracture. The National Hip Fracture Database is the standard used which calculated their own score using national data. The NHF score for 30-day mortality was calculated for 50 patients presenting with a fractured neck femur injury between January 2020 to March 2020. A score <5 was classified as low risk and >/=5 as high risk. Aim was to assess the accuracy in calculating the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score against the National Hip Fracture Database. To explore whether it should it be routinely included during initial assessment to aid clinical management?. There was an increase in the number of mortalities observed in patients who belonged to the high-risk group (>=5) compared to the low risk group. COVID-19 positive patients had worse outcomes with average 30-day mortality of 6.78 compared to the average of 6.06. GEH NHF score per month showed significant accuracy against the NHFD scores. The identification of high-risk groups from their NHF score can allow for targeted optimisations and elucidation of risk factors easily gathered at the point of hospitalisation. The NHFS is a valuable tool and useful predictor to stratify the risk of 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality after hip fracture surgery. Inclusion of the score should be considered as mandatory Trust policy for neck of femur fracture patients to aid clinical management and improve patient safety overall

There has been a significant increase in waiting times for elective surgical procedures in orthopaedic surgery as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. As per the hospital policy, patients awaiting elective surgery for more than 52 weeks were offered a consultant-led harm review. The aim of this study was to objectively assess the impact of this service on the field of foot and ankle surgery. The data from harm review clinics at a District General Hospital related to patients waiting to undergo elective foot and ankle procedures in the year 2021 (wait time of more than 52 weeks) were assessed. Clinical data points like change in diagnosis, need for further investigations, and patients being taken off the waiting list were reviewed. The effect of the waiting time on patients’ mental health and their perception of the service was assessed as well. A total of 72 patients awaiting foot and ankle procedures for more than 52 weeks were assessed as a part of the harm review service. It was noted that 25% of patients found that their symptoms had worsened while 66.1% perceived them to be unchanged. Twelve patients (16.9%) were sent for updated investigations. Twenty-one patients (29.5%) were taken off the waiting lists for various reasons with the most common one being other pressing health concerns; 9% of patients affirmed that the wait for surgery had a significant negative impact on their mental health. This study concludes that the harm review service is a useful programme as it helps guide changes in the diagnosis and clinical picture. The service is found to be valuable by most patients, and its impact on the service specialities and multiple centres could be further assessed to draw broad conclusions

The National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) is a clinically led web based audit used to inform national policy guidelines. The aim of this audit was to establish the accuracy of completion of NHFD v13.0 theatre collection sheets, identify common pitfalls and areas of good practice, whilst raising awareness of the importance of accuracy of this data and the manner in which it reflects performance of CAH Trauma & Orthopaedic unit in relation to national guidelines. Our aim was to improve completion up to >80% by the operating surgeon and improve overall accuracy. The methodology within both cycles of the audit were identical. It involved reviewing the NHFD V13.0 completed by the operating surgeon and cross-checking their accuracy against clinical notes, operation notes, imaging, anaesthetic charts and A&E admission assessment. Following completion of cycle 1 these results were presented, and education surrounding V13.0 was provided, at the monthly trust audit meeting. At this point we introduced a sticker onto the pre-operative checklist for Hip fractures. This included time of admission and reason for delay. We then completed a re-audit. Cycle-1 included 25 operations, 56% (n=14) had a completed V13.0 form. Of these 21% (n=3) were deemed to be 100% accurate. Cycle-2 included 31 operations (between April – June 21) 81% (n=25) had a completed intra-operative from and showed an increase in accuracy to 56% (n=14). Through raising awareness, education and our interventions we have seen a significant improvement in the completion and accuracy of v13.0. Although 100% accuracy was not achieved its clear that education and intervention will improve compliance over time. Through the interventions that we have implemented we have shown that it is possible to improve completion and accuracy of the NHFD V13.0 theatre collection sheet locally and feel this could be implemented nationally

It is known that the gait dynamics of elderly substantially differs from that of young people. However, it has not been well studied how this age-related gait dynamics affects the knee biomechanics, e.g., cartilage mechanical response. In this study, we investigated how aging affects knee biomechanics in a female population using subject-specific computational models. Two female subjects (ages of 23 and 69) with no musculoskeletal disorders were recruited. Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy Review Board approved the study. Participants walked at a self-selected speed (SWS), 110% of SWS, and 120% of SWS on 10 m flat ground. Three-dimensional marker trajectories and ground reaction forces (Motion Analysis, USA), and lower limbs’ muscle activities were measured (EMG, Noraxon USA). Knee cartilage and menisci geometries were obtained from subjects’ magnetic resonance images (3T, GE Health Care). An EMG-assisted musculoskeletal finite element modeling workflow was used to estimate knee cartilage tissue mechanics in walking trials. Knee cartilage and menisci were modeled using a transversely isotropic poroviscoelastic material model. Walking speed in SWS, 110%, and 120% of SWS were 1.38 m/s, 1.51 m/s, and 1.65 m/s for the young, and 1.21 m/s, 1.34 m/s and 1.46 m/s for the elderly, respectively. The maximum tensile stress in the elderly tibial cartilage was ~25%, ~33%, and ~32% lower than the young at SWS, 110%, and 120% of SWS, respectively. These preliminary results suggest that the cartilage in the elderly may not have enough stimulation even at 20% increases in walking speed, which may be one reason for tissue degeneration. To enhance these findings, further study with more subjects and different genders will investigate how age-related gait dynamics affects knee biomechanics. Acknowledgments: Australian NHMRC Ideas Grant (APP2001734), KITECH (JE220006)

Introduction and Objective. The coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic, first identified in China in December 2019, halted daily living with mandatory lockdowns imposed in Israel in March 2020. This halt induced a sedentary lifestyle for most citizens as well as a decreased physical activity time. These are both common risk factors for the development of low back pain (LBP) which is considered a major global medical and economical challenge effecting almost 1 in 3 people and a leading cause of Emergency Department (ED) visits. It is hypothesized that prevalence of minor LBP episodes during the first total lockdown should have increased compared to previous times. However, due to “Covid-19 fear” we expect a decrease in ED visits. We also speculate that rate of visits due to serious spinal illness (causing either immediate hospitalization or spinal surgery within 30-days of presentation) did not change. Materials and Methods. Retrospective study based on patients visiting the ED in Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center During the first pandemic stage in 2020 compared to parallel periods in 2018 and 2019 due to LBP. Results. During the first lockdown period on March 11th-April 21st, only 171 patients attended the ED due to non-traumatic LBP compared to more than 330 patients in the corresponding time during the years 2018 and 2019. This represents a statistically significant drop of 52.5% (p-value < 0.01) and 48.7% (p-value < 0.01) in LBP ED visits during the first pandemic lockdown of 2020 compared to 2019 and 2018, respectively. Additionally, there was no significant drop in immediate hospitalization or spine surgeries within 30 days following the ED visit (p-value >0.10 for all analysis types). Conclusions. “Covid-19 fear” was probably the main reason for patients with an LBP episode to stay at home during the Covid-19 massive outbreak. Since no significant change was shown in the more severe cases, it seems that the minor LBP patients were able to contain the episode outside hospital walls. This presents an opportunity for clinicians and policy decisions makers to learn and find ways to improve our care of back pain in the community and to reduce unnecessary burden on EDs and the healthcare system

Musculoskeletal diseases are leading causes of disability, morbidity and economic loss across the globe today. Yet for much of the world's population access to cheap, safe and effective intervention is lacking, while others choose not to accept best practice and best evidence, or significantly more expensive treatment. Great advances have been made in some diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, but the cost of many new treatments is unaffordable, and individuals, insurance and governments struggle to, or cannot fund it. Anchor bias and politics determines national policies and research funding, often favouring other illnesses while musculoskeletal disorders lack the support proportional to their frequency and impact. This is not appreciated by policy makers and governments, and the consequences of lack of care or poor-quality care. The need has never been greater for a treatment for osteoarthritis, the most common disease in the world; but the search for a cure needs funding, and if discovered, who will pay for it?

Background and Aims. Many orthopaedic patients admitted to hospital who require urgent surgery are also on Warfarin. Patients with an INR>2 have an increased risk of bleeding complications during surgery; however delay to surgery due to a high INR has both clinical and financial implications. This audit evaluates whether the appropriate management for correction of INR is employed as per local guidelines and, if not, whether this results in significant delay to operative treatment. Methods. A retrospective and prospective audit was performed analysing all Orthopaedic trauma admissions admitted to University Hospital Aintree in a 5 month period. Only those solely on warfarin, who were not acutely bleeding and required surgery in <24 hours were included. Results. A sample of 17 patients was obtained of which only 35.3% had correct INR reversal as per local guidelines. Errors that occurred included 81.1% not being given further Vitamin K at reassessment, 18.2% given too much Vitamin K, 9.1% given too little Vitamin K, 18.2% given Octaplex incorrectly and 9.1% not given Octaplex when indicated. Only 1 patient had a delay to their surgery directly resulting from incorrect INR reversal (total time to surgery − 33 hours 45 minutes). Conclusion. Better education for clinical staff on the local policy for INR reversal in patients requiring urgent orthopaedic surgery is needed. Local policy guidelines have since been redesigned in light of these results and a completion audit cycle has been performed showing significant improvement with 50% of the patient sample given correct INR reversal

This talk will initially give a brief overview of the motivations behind open access publishing and explain the practicalities of the different business models from an author's point of view. The talk will then discuss open access policy, particularly in Europe, and how the publishing landscape is constantly changing, with new initiatives and mandates being introduced all the time. Innovation in peer review such as transparent peer review and registered reports will be outlined and evaluated with examples from the BMC journals portfolio. The talk will then explain some of the funding options available to authors for open access publishing, and introduce the Springer Nature funding support service, which is available to anyone wishing to find out their options. Finally, the importance of data sharing will be discussed, as will the relatively new area of open access books

Current Department of Health guidelines state that medical personnel should be ‘bare below the elbows’. Critics of this policy have raised concerns over the impact of these dress regulations on the portrayed image and professionalism of doctors. However, the importance of the doctor's appearance in relation to other professional attributes is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the opinion of patients and their relatives on the importance of appearance and the style of clothing worn by orthopaedic doctors. The secondary aim was to establish how patients would prefer orthopaedic doctors to be dressed. The study consisted of the administration of a survey questionnaire to 427 subjects attending the orthopaedic outpatient clinics in four hospitals across Scotland. Subjects were asked about the importance or otherwise of various aspects of the doctors’ appearance and responded using a modified Likert 5-point scale. Subjects’ rank preferences for four different styles of doctors’ clothing were also determined. The study was appropriately powered to identify a 0.5 difference in mean rank values with 0.90 power at a = 0.05. The majority of respondents felt doctors’ appearance was important but not as important as compassion, politeness and knowledge. Only 50% felt that the style of doctors clothing mattered; what proved more important was an impression of cleanliness and good personal hygiene. In terms of how patients would prefer doctors to dress in clinic, the most popular choice proved to be the smart casual style of dress, which conforms with the ‘bare below the elbows’ dress code policy. Indeed, the smart casual clothing style was the highest ranked choice irrespective of patient age, gender, regional or socioeconomic background

Administration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) reduces the risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. The optimal type of antibiotic used, and duration of prophylaxis are subject to debate. We compared the risk of revision surgery for PJI in the first year following THA and TKA by AP regimen. A national survey collecting information on hospital-level AP regimen policy was conducted across the Netherlands and linked to data from the LROI arthroplasty registry for 2011–2015. PJI status was defined using the surgical indication reported at revision by surgeons in the registry form. Restricted cubic splines Poisson model adjusted for hospital clustering were used to conduct the comparisons on 130,712 THAs and 111,467 TKAs performed across 99 institutions. These included 399 THAs and 303 TKAs revised for an indication of PJI. Multiple shot of Cefazolin (MCZ), of cefuroxime (MCX) and single shot of Cefazolin (SCZ) were respectively administrated to 87%, 4% and 9% of patients. For THA, the rates of revision for PJI were respectively 31/10,000 person-years 95%CI[28, 35], 39[25, 59] and 23[15, 34] in the groups which received MCZ, MCX and SCZ; respectively, the rates for TKA were 27[24, 31], 40[24, 62] and 24[16, 36]. No evidence of difference between AP regimens was found in the unadjusted and adjusted model (age, gender, BMI and ASA grade). Further work is advocated to confirm whether there is an association between AP regimen collected at patient-level and the risk of subsequent revision for PJI

The World Health Organisation (WHO) Surgical Safety checklist is an evidence-based tool shown to reduce surgery-related morbidity and mortality. Despite audits showing 96% checklist compliance, our hospital had 3 surgical never events in 10 months, 2 of which were in orthopaedics. By March 2018, the authors aimed to achieve 100% compliance with all 5 sections of the WHO Five Steps to Safer Surgery bundle for all surgical patients. Additionally, the authors aimed to assess the impact of the quality of bundle delivery on preventable errors related to human factors. Quantitative assessment involved direct observations of compliance in theatres. Qualitative data in the form of rich, descriptive observations of events and discussions held during checklist delivery was analysed thematically. Interventions included trust-wide policy changes, awareness sessions, introduction of briefing and debrief proformas and documented prosthesis checks. For elective surgeries, checklist compliance increased to 100% in 4 of 5 sections of the bundle. The incidence of reported preventable critical incidents decreased from 6.7% to 2.4%. A chi-squared test of independence demonstrated a significant relationship between the implementation of changes and completion of the checklist, X2 (1, N = 1019) = 25.69, p < 0.0001. Thematic analysis identified leadership, accountability, engagement, empowerment, communication, and teamwork as factors promoting effective checklist use. Our findings highlight the benefits of a qualitative approach to auditing checklists. Exploring the role of human factors and promoting staff awareness and engagement improves checklist compliance and enhances its effectiveness in reducing surgery-related adverse outcomes

Background. In 2009, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) produced the guidance: Low back pain: early management of persistent non-specific low back pain aimed at general practitioners (GPs), consultants, and manual therapists in order to ensure all involved in the care of this complex and often debilitating condition are aware of the options most likely to yield a positive outcome. Two years since the publication of the clinical guidance, services have had ample time to adapt and overcome early teething issues in order to deliver these guidelines. Methods. A retrospective audit was carried out at an out-patient physiotherapy department. One-hundred notes were randomly selected from those who meet the NICE criteria, i.e. non-specific low back pain for six weeks to 12 months in duration. A questionnaire was developed to target National Health Service (NHS) musculoskeletal physiotherapists using electronic media, mail shot and professional networking (clinical interest) groups within the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP). Sixty-one completed questionnaires were returned detailing the barriers for implementation. The results show that 75% of patients received NICE recommended care, and they improved by numerical rating scale (NRS) −3.89, while those who did not, improved by NRS −1.24 producing a significant difference of 2.654 (95% Confidence Interval 1.008–4.300), p≤0.002. The main perceived barriers were too few follow-up slots, local policy, managerial demands, and inadequate training. Conclusions. The conclusions are that while three-quarters of patients are receiving and benefiting from NICE recommended care, many practitioners feel departmental policy and procedures reduce compliance. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. Poster funding via the University of Leicester. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or in part; nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Introduction. Carriers of Staphylococcus aureus, both methicillin sensitive (MSSA) and methicillin resistant (MRSA), have an increased risk for health-care associated infections. Despite WHO recommendations there is currently no national screening and eradication policy for the detection of MSSA in the UK or USA. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of current standard MRSA eradication therapies in the context of S. aureus decolonisation prior to joint replacement surgery. Methods. Pre-operative PCR nasal screening was performed in 273 Orthopaedic patients awaiting joint replacement surgery. In all 100 patients were positive for S. aureus and enrolled into the study. All enrolled patients received and were instructed to administer the decolonisation regimen for five days. Prior to commencement of the eradication therapy swabs of the anterior nares, throat, and perineum were taken for culture. Further culture swabs were taken at; 48–96 hours after completion of the five-day eradication regimen, at hospital admission for surgery, and at hospital discharge. Patients were followed up for six weeks post-surgery. Following completion of the five-day course patients were asked to provide feedback on their experience using Likert rating scales. The primary outcome of this study was S. aureus clearance 48–96 hours post-completion of eradication therapy. Results. At 48–96 hours post-completion there was S. aureus clearance from: the anterior nares 93.8% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 79.2–99.2%), throat 65.6% (95% CI 46.8–81.4%), and groin 87.5% (95%CI 71–96.5). Mean compliance with nasal mupirocin was 98.2% (standard deviation ±5.2). There was no statistically significant recolonisation effect between completion of eradication therapy and the day of surgery (P>0.05) at a median time of 9.5 days (Interquartile range 6–13 days) at all sites. Discussion and Conclusion. Current MRSA decolonisation regimens are well-tolerated and effective for S. aureus decolonisation for the anterior nares and groin. The decolonisation effect is preserved for up to 10 days following completion

Intervention is rare following minimally displaced radial head fractures or positive elbow ‘fat pad’ signs. A pilot study (n=20) found no patient required active treatment after discharge following their first fracture clinic visit. We therefore initiated routine discharge from A&E with an advice sheet, and an ‘open-door policy’ if patients failed to progress. 51 patients were managed by A&E according to this protocol over a six-month period. A standardised assessment of symptoms, satisfaction and functional limitation was completed for 24 patients by phone; average time to follow-up 4.2 months (range 2–9 months). Fourteen (58.4%) reported no pain. The 10 patients (41.6%) with on-going pain reported a median visual analogue score (VAS 0–10) of 0.7 (0–4) at rest, 0.25 (0–4) at night, 3.0 (0–10) carrying heavy objects and 2.75 (0–10) during repetitive movement. 4 of 24 (16.7%) reported minor functional impairment. 3 of 24 (12.5%) patients requested orthopaedic review, but all were satisfied with outcome, seeking reassurance and discharged without any intervention. 3 of 24 (12.5%) were unhappy with their progress, but all had suffered from chronic pain or psychological conditions predating their injury. When offered further review, none of these patients accepted. 22 (91%) were satisfied with their treatment and 23 (95.8%) returned to work and hobbies. This data suggests routine discharge from A&E with advice does not compromise care, as no intervention is usually required beyond advice. These findings have obvious positive clinical and financial implications in streamlining clinical workload

Whilst the SIGN Guidelines state that the use of prophylactic antibiotics in surgery unequivocally reduces major morbidity, reduces hospital costs and is likely to decrease overall consumption of antibiotics they state the chosen antibiotics must reflect local, disease-specific information about the common pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Growing healthcare concern regarding the rates of Clostridium Difficile (C. Diff) within the hospital setting have led to rationalised and better streamlined prescribing practice within the NHS. In NHS Lanarkshire this led to revised guidelines for prophylactic antibiotic use in Orthopaedics in 2010. Routine use of 3. rd. generation Cephalosporin has been replaced by Flucloxacillin 1g and Gentamicin 1mg/kg. Anecdotally the surgeons within our department were concerned that they were recognising more post-operative renal impairment than before 2010. Our study took 902 consecutive cases treated surgically with either Total Hip Replacement, Total Knee Replacement, Dynamic Hip Screw for fracture and Hemiarthroplasty for fracture since the introduction of the new antibiotic policy. We compared this with a similar number of cases treated with the same operations pre-2010. We looked at the pre admission Urea & Electrolystes compared with immediate post-operative results and applied the definition of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) as defined by the Acute Kidney Injury Network. A. A rapid time course (less than 48 hours) and B. Reduction of kidney function either as an absolute increase in serum creatinine of ≥26.4μmol/l (≥0.3 mg/dl) or a percentage increase in serum creatinine of ≥50%. Based on this definition we found an increased rate of AKI of 13.7% after the introduction of the use of Gentamicin from 9.8% before its routine use. We wish to highlight that the routine widespread use of Gentamicin may be increasing the rate of acute renal dysfunction seen in Orthopaedic patients undergoing major surgery

Our unit has pursued a policy of using donor nerves from the same limb for grafting. Nerves which have already been affected by the primary injury are selected where possible, thus avoiding any new sensory deficit. Methods. 36 of the 41 brachial plexus repairs were available for outcome data collected prospectively over 2 years. Over a nine year period, donor nerves used for the 41 brachial plexus repairs included the lateral cutaneous nerve of the forearm, superficial radial, medial cutaneous of the forearm, ulnar and sural nerves. Patients were grouped into having injured nerve grafts only (A), injured and uninjured nerve grafts (B) and uninjured nerve grafts. The repaired brachial plexus nerves were assessed by measuring the MRC grading of the power of movement of the muscle innervated by that nerve (i.e. elbow flexion for musculocutaneous nerve). These were graded as good (MRC grading 3 or better), fair (MRC grade 1 or 2), or poor (MRC 0). Results. The greatest success for nerve grafting was elbow flexion with good results in 22 out of 27 assessments. Using Mann-Whitney test, Group A had significantly better results (p=0.025) than group C. However, ignoring the poorer results of shoulder abduction there was no significant difference between all 3 groups of patients. Conclusion. Using injured nerve grafts taken distal to the lesion in the brachial plexus is as effective as using nerve material from an uninjured limb

Prophylactic antibiotics administered prior to joint arthroplasty have become standard practice. Due to concern over the risk that 2nd generation cephalosporins posed to the elderly, as regards clostridium difficile associated infections the antimicrobial management team in our unit changed the protocol for prophylactic antibiotics. As of 1st September 2009, flucloxacillin and gentamicin were preferred over cefuroxime as the first choice of prophylactic antibiotic. However, it was noted that postoperatively patients were experiencing a decrease in renal function. One hundred patients who underwent a total hip replacement following the policy change were randomly selected from the departmental joint arthroplasty database. This group was age and sex matched to 100 patients undergoing their surgery prior to the change. Data was collected on renal function, length of stay, antibiotic and age. Any change in renal function was categorised using the RIFLE criteria. Exclusion secondary to variations from protocol or treatment for femoral neck fractures resulted in a total number of 156 patients with 78 in each arm. The average age for both groups was 64 years. Non-parametric analysis of preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine concentrations and Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) demonstrated a significant difference between the two groups, showing that GFR decreased (p=0.041) and serum creatinine concentration increased (p=0.037) in the cohort receiving gentamicin. Classing the impaired renal function as: risk, injury or failure (RIFLE criteria) demonstrated a statistically significant difference for any criterion positive (p=0.016) but no significant difference for the specific RIFLE groups (p=0.068). Acknowledging the small numbers and potential confounders for renal impairment, this study was able to show a difference in renal function for patients receiving gentamicin over cefuroxime as prophylaxis for joint arthroplasty

Many orthopaedic procedures require implants to be trialled before definitive implantation. Where this is required, the trials are provided in a set with the instrumentation. The most common scenario this is seen in during elective joint replacements. In Scotland (2007) the Scottish Executive (. http://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/cmo/CMO(2006)13.pdf. ) recommended and implemented individually packed orthopaedic implants for all orthopaedic sets. The premise for this was to reduce the risk of CJD contamination and fatigue of implants due to constant reprocessing from corrosion. During many trauma procedures determining the correct length of plate or size of implant can be challenging. Trials of trauma implants is no longer common place. Many implants are stored in closed and sealed boxes, preventing the surgeon looking at the implant prior to opening and contaminating the device. As a result many implants are incorrectly opened and either need reprocessed or destroyed due to infection control policy, thus implicating a cost to the NHS. With even the simplest implants costing several hundreds of pounds, this cost is a very significant waste in resources that could be deployed else where. My project was to develop a method to produce in department accurate, cheap and disposable trials for implants often used in trauma, where the original manufacturer do not offer the option of a trial off the shelf. The process had to not involve contaminating or destroying the original implant in the production of a trial. Several implants which are commonly used within Glasgow Royal Infirmary and do not have trials were identified. These implants were then CT scanned within their sealed and sterile packaging without contamination. Digital 3D surface renders of the models were created using free open source software (OsiriX, MeshLab, NetFabb). These models were then processed in to a suitable format for 3D printing using laser sintering via a cloud 3D printing bureau (. Shapeways.com. ). The implants were produced in polyamide PA220 material or in 316L stainless steel. These materials could be serialized using gamma irradiation or ethylene oxide gas. The steel models were suitable for autoclaving in the local CSSU. The implants produced were accurate facsimiles of the original implant with dimensions within 0.7mm. The implants were cost effective, an example being a rim mesh was reproduced in polyamide PA220 plastic for £3.50 and in 316L stainless steel for £15. The models were produced within 10 days of scanning. The stainless steel trials were durable and suitable for reprocessing and resterilisation. The production of durable, low cost and functional implant trials all completed in department was successful. The cost of production of each implant is so low that it would be offset if just one incorrect implant was opened during a single procedure. With some of the implants tested, the trials would have paid for themselves 100 times. This is a simple and cost saving technique that would help reduce department funding and aid patient care