The optimal procedure for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of anterior cervical ossified posterior longitudinal ligament en bloc resection (ACOE) with posterior laminectomy and fusion with bone graft and internal fixation (PTLF) for the surgical management of patients with this condition. Between July 2017 and July 2019, 40 patients with cervical OPLL were equally randomized to undergo surgery with an ACOE or a PTLF. The clinical and radiological results were compared between the two groups.Aims
Methods
C5 nerve root palsy is a rare and potentially
debilitating complication of cervical spine surgery. Currently,
however, there are no guidelines to help surgeons to prevent or
treat this complication. We carried out a systematic review of the literature to identify
the causes of this complication and options for its prevention and
treatment. Searches of PubMed, Embase and Medline yielded 60 articles
for inclusion, most of which addressed C5 palsy as a complication
of surgery. Although many possible causes were given, most authors supported
posterior migration of the spinal cord with tethering of the nerve
root as being the most likely. Early detection and prevention of a C5 nerve root palsy using
neurophysiological monitoring and variations in surgical technique
show promise by allowing surgeons to minimise or prevent the incidence
of C5 palsy. Conservative treatment is the current treatment of
choice; most patients make a full recovery within two years. Cite this article:
We evaluated the efficacy of anterior fusion alone compared with combined anterior and posterior fusion for the treatment of degenerative cervical kyphosis. Anterior fusion alone was undertaken in 15 patients (group A) and combined anterior and posterior fusion was carried out in a further 15 (group B). The degree and maintenance of the angle of correction, the incidence of graft subsidence, degeneration at adjacent levels and the rate of fusion were assessed radiologically and clinically and the rate of complications recorded. The mean angle of correction in group B was significantly higher than in group A (p = 0.0009). The mean visual analogue scale and the neck disability index in group B was better than in group A (p = 0.043, 0.0006). The mean operation time and the blood loss in B were greater than in group A (p <
0.0001, 0.037). Pseudarthrosis, subsidence of the cage, and problems related to the hardware were more prevalent in group A than in group B (p = 0.034, 0.025, 0.013). Although the combined procedure resulted in a longer operating time and greater blood loss than with anterior fusion alone, our results suggest that for the treatment of degenerative cervical kyphosis the combined approach leads to better maintenance of sagittal alignment, a higher rate of fusion, a lower incidence of complications and a better clinical outcome.
