It has been suggested that extracorporeal shockwave
therapy is a safe and effective treatment for pain relief from recalcitrant
plantar fasciopathy (PF). However, the changes in gait and associated
biomechanical parameters have not been well characterised. We recruited
12 female patients with recalcitrant PF who had a mean age of 59
years (50 to 70) and mean body mass index of 25 kg/m2 (22
to 30). The patients reported a mean duration of symptoms of 9.3
months (6 to 15). Shockwave therapy consisting of 1500 impulses
(energy flux density 0.26 mJ/mm2) was applied for three
sessions, each three weeks apart. A pain visual analogue scale (VAS)
rating, plantar pressure assessment and motion analysis were carried
out before and nine weeks after first shock wave therapy. It was demonstrated
that patients increased their walking velocity and cadence as well
indicating a decrease in pain after shockwave therapy. In the symptomatic
foot, the peak contact pressure over the forefoot increased and
the contact area over the digits decreased. The total foot impulse
also decreased as did stance duration. The duration the centre of
pressure remained in the hindfoot increased in the symptomatic foot
after shockwave therapy. The differences in centre of pressure trajectory
at baseline decreased at final follow-up. In conclusion, shockwave
therapy not only decreased the pain VAS rating but also improved
the gait parameters of the symptomatic foot in PF patients. Cite this article:
Introduction. Plantar heel pain, or
Heel pain is very prevalent. Pain, especially after a period of rest, is the main symptom. Reduced ability to walk long distances and inability to participate in exercise and sport are other complaints. Plantar heel pain is most commonly caused by plantar fasciitis. Whilst only the recalcitrant cases reach secondary care, this can still be a significant workload. In the Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, we see approximately 200 cases of recalcitrant heel pain each year. The vast majority of cases never come to hospital and are managed in primary care (1500/yr in podiatry alone). Effective primary treatments should reduce the number of long-term sufferers. Recalcitrant cases of plantar fasciitis often have atypical symptoms. Radiological imaging is extremely useful in clarifying the diagnosis. Ultrasound is our preferred modality. There is a spectrum of pathology that affects the plantar fascia, and this is less well classified than for the achilles tendon, where the distinction between insertional tendinopathy and tendinopathy of the main body of the tendon is helpful in guiding treatment. The evidence for many forms of treatment for plantar fasciitis is weak. Currently, the use of formal calf stretching programs is widely considered to be the best first-line treatment. There are additional benefits with stretches to the fascia itself. The mechanism by which these stretches help is not well established. Calf contracture is, however, associated with a variety of clinical problems in the foot and ankle. This is especially true for isolated gastrocnemius contracture. There is also laboratory evidence that increased plantar fascia strain is seen with increased calf muscle tension. Surgery to release a gastrocnemius contracture improves biomechanics and has been used in refractory cases of heel pain with good effect. Radial extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is the latest version of this non-invasive treatment. Results in our centre are encouraging. For selected cases of atypical
Introduction.
The October 2023 Sports Roundup360 looks at: Extensor mechanism disruption in the treatment of dislocated and multiligament knee injuries; Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with injection of stem cells; Corticosteroid injection plus exercise or exercise alone as adjuvants for patients with plantar fasciitis?; Generalized joint hypermobility and a second ACL injury?; The VISA-A ((sedentary) questionnaire for Achilles tendinopathy?.
A local injection may be used as an early option in the treatment of Morton’s neuroma, and can be performed using various medications. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of injections of hyaluronic acid compared with corticosteroid in the treatment of this condition. A total of 91 patients were assessed for this trial, of whom 45 were subsequently included and randomized into two groups. One patient was lost to follow-up, leaving 22 patients (24 feet) in each group. The patients in the hyaluronic acid group were treated with three ultrasound-guided injections (one per week) of hyaluronic acid (Osteonil Plus). Those in the corticosteroid group were treated with three ultrasound-guided injections (also one per week) of triamcinolone (Triancil). The patients were evaluated before treatment and at one, three, six, and 12 months after treatment. The primary outcome measure was the visual analogue scale for pain (VAS). Secondary outcome measures included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and complications.Aims
Methods