Background. Assessment of functional outcome after total hip arthroplasty (THA) often involves subjective patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) whereas analysis of gait allows more objective assessment. The aims of the study were to compare longitudinal changes of WOMAC function score and ambulatory gait analysis after THA, between patients with low and high self-reported levels of physical function. Methods. Patients undergoing primary THA (n=36; m/f=18/18; mean age=63.9; SD=9.8yrs; BMI=26.3 SD=3.5) were divided in a high and low function group, on their preoperative WOMAC function score. Patients were prospectively measured preoperatively and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. WOMAC function scores 0–100) were compared to inertial sensor based ambulatory gait analysis. Results. WOMAC function scores significantly improved in both low and high groups at 3 months postoperatively whereas gait parameters only improved in with a low pre-operative function. Between 3 and 12 months postoperatively, function scores had not significantly further improved whereas several gait parameters significantly improved in the low function group. WOMAC function scores parameters were only moderately correlated (Spearman's r = 0.33–0.51). Discussion. In routine longitudinal assessment of physical function following THA, ambulatory gait analysis can be supplementary to WOMAC. As gait significantly improved during the first 3 months and following 9 months after THA in patients with a low preoperative level of physical function only, assessment of more demanding tasks than gait may be more sensitive to capture functional improvement in patients with high preoperative function. Acknowledgements. This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research programme (RP-PG-0407-10070). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The research team acknowledges the support of the NIHR, through the Comprehensive Clinical Research Network

We sought to determine the relationship between patient preoperative psychological factors and postoperative THA outcomes. We performed an electronic search up to December 2021 using the following terms: “(mental OR psychological OR psychiatric) AND (function OR trait OR state OR predictor OR health) AND (outcome OR success OR recovery OR response) AND total joint arthroplasty)”. Peer-reviewed, English language studies regarding THA outcomes were analyzed for preoperative patient mental health metrics and objective postoperative results regarding pain, functionality and surgical complications. We extracted study data, assessed the risk of bias of included studies, grouped them by outcome measure and performed a GRADE assessment. Seventeen of 702 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Overall, compared to cohorts with a normal psychological status, patients with higher objective measures of preoperative depression and anxiety reported increased postoperative pain, decreased functionality and greater complications following THA. Additionally, participants with lower self-efficacy or somatization were found to have worse functional outcomes. Following surgery, both early and late pain scores remained higher in patients with preoperative depression and anxiety. Preoperative depression and anxiety may negatively impact patient reported postoperative pain, physical function and complications following THA. A meta-analysis was not performed because of the heterogeneity of studies, specifically the use of differing pain scales and measures of physical and psychological function as well as varied follow-up times. Future research could test interventions to treat pre-operative depression or anxiety and explore longitudinal outcomes in THA patients. Surgeons should consider the preoperative psychological status when counseling patients regarding expected surgical outcomes and attempt to treat a patient's depression or anxiety prior to undergoing total hip arthroplasty

Introduction. The heterogeneity of outcomes used in the field of lower limb lengthening surgery (LLLS) affects our ability to synthesize evidence. This hampers robust systematic reviews and treatment recommendations for clinical practice. Ultimately this reduces the impact of research for both patients and healthcare professionals. This scoping review aimed to describe the outcomes and outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) used within the field of LLLS. Method. A systematic literature search of WOS, Scopus, Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library identified all studies reporting outcomes in children and adults after LLLS. All outcomes and OMIs were extracted verbatim. An iterative process was used to group outcome terms under standardized outcome headings categorized using the COMET Taxonomy of Outcomes. Result. Data saturation was achieved in 2020. A total of 142 studies were included between 2024-2020, reporting 2964 verbatim outcomes with 663 standardized outcome terms collapsed into 119 outcome headings (subdomains). A total of 29 patient-reported and 26 clinician-reported outcome instruments were identified. The most commonly reported outcome was “Lengthening amount”, reported in over 72% of the included studies, while “health-related quality of life” was measured in 16% and all life impact outcomes were reported in 19% of the included studies. Conclusion. A large number of peer-reviewed publications are available, demonstrating that significant resources are being devoted to research on LLLS. However, reported outcomes for people with LLLS are heterogeneous, subject to reporting bias, and vary widely in the definitions and measurement tools used to collect them. Outcomes likely to be important to patients, such as quality of life and measures of physical function, have been neglected. This scoping review identifies a need to standardize outcomes and outcome measures reported on patients recovering from lower limb lengthening surgery; this can be addressed by creating a core set of outcomes

Introduction. Following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), patients experience pain relief and report improved physical function and activity. However, there is paucity of evidence that patients are truly more active in daily life after TKA. The aims of this study were: 1) to prospectively measure physical activity with a wearable motion sensor before and after TKA; 2) to compare patient-reported levels of physical activity with objectively assessed levels of physical activity before and after TKA; 3) to investigate whether differences in physical activity after TKA are related to levels of physical function. Methods. 22 patients (age=66.6 ±9.3yrs; m/f= 12/11; BMI= 30.6 ±6.1) undergoing primary TKA (Vanguard, ZimmerBiomet), were measured preoperatively and 1–3 years postoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included KOOS-PS and SQUASH for assessment of perceived physical function and activity resp. Physical activity was assessed during 4 consecutive days in patients” home environments while wearing an accelerometer-based activity monitor (AM) at the thigh. All data were analysed using semi-automated algorithms in Matlab. AM-derived parameters included walking time (s), sitting time (s) standing time (s), sit-to-stand transfers, step count, walking bouts and walking cadence (steps/min). Objective physical function was assessed by motion analysis of gait, sit-to-stand (STS) transfers and block step-up (BS) transfers using a single inertial measurement unit (IMU) worn at the pelvis. IMU-based motion analysis was only performed postoperatively. Statistical comparisons were performed with SPSS and a per-protocol analysis was applied to present the results at follow-up. Results. Data were available for 17 of 22 patients at follow-up. PROMs demonstrated significant improvement of perceived physical function (KOOS-PS=68±21 vs. 34±26; p<0.001) and physical activity (SQUASH=2584 ±1945 vs. 3038 ±2228; p<0.001) following TKA. AM-based parameters of physical activity demonstrated no significant differences between pre- and postoperative quantitative outcomes. Only the qualitative outcome of walking cadence significantly changed after TKA (81.41 ±10.86 (steps/min) vs. 94.24 ±7.20 resp.; p<0.001). There were moderate correlations between self-reported and objectively assessed levels of physical activity after TKA (Pearson”s r=0.36–0.43; p<0.05). Outcomes of physical activity after TKA were moderately correlated to IMU-based functional outcome measures (Pearson”s r = 0.31 – 0.48; p<0.05). Conclusion. 1–3 years after TKA, patients demonstrate improved function. However, the self-perceived higher activity level (+18%) after TKA is not supported by any objective data obtained by wearable motion sensors such as steps, transfers or time-on-feet. This may have implications for general health and requires further investigation into patient communication, expectation management or motivational intervention

Barriers to successful return to previous level of activity following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Recon-struction (ACLR) are multifactorial and recent research suggests that athletic performance deficits persist after completion of the rehabilitation course in a large percentage of patients. Thirty soccer athletes (26.9 ± 5.7 years old, male) with ACL injury were surgically treated with all-inside technique and semitendi-nosus tendon autograft. At 2 years from surgery, they were called back for clinical examination, self-reported psychological scores, and biomechanical outcomes (balance, strength, agility and velocity, and symmetry). Nonparametric statistical tests have been adopted for group comparisons in terms of age, concomitant presence of meniscus tear, injury on dominant leg, presence of knee laxity, presence of varus/valgus, body sides, and return to different levels of sports. Athletes with lower psychological scores showed lesser values in terms of power, resistance and neuromuscular activity as compared to the ones with good psychological scores that showed, instead, better self-reported outcomes (TLKS, CRSQ) and low fear of reinjury (TSK). In the athletes who had a functional deficit in at least one subtest, a safe return to sports could not have been recommended. Our findings confirmed that demographics, physical function, and psychological factors were related to playing the preinjury level sport at mean 2 years after surgery, sup-porting the notion that returning to sport after surgery is multifactorial. A strict qualitative and quantitative assessment of athletes’ status should be performed at different follow-ups after surgery to guarantee a safe and controlled RTP

Introduction and Objective. Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is the leading cause for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although, being considered as the surgery of the century up to 23% of the patients report long-term pain and deficits in physical function and muscle strength may persist after THA. Progressive resistance training (PRT) appear to improve several outcomes moderately in patients with hip OA. Current treatment selection is based on low-level evidence as no randomised controlled trials have compared THA to non-surgical treatment. The primary objective of this trial is to determine the effectiveness of THA followed by standard care compared to 12 weeks of supervised PRT followed by 12 weeks of optional unsupervised PRT, on changes in hip pain and function, in patients with severe hip OA after 6 months. Materials and Methods. This is a protocol for a multicentre, parallel-group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled superiority trial. Patients aged ≥50 years with clinical and radiographic hip OA found eligible for THA by an orthopaedic surgeon will be randomised to THA or PRT (allocation 1:1). The primary outcome will be change in patient-reported hip pain and function, measured using the Oxford Hip Score. Key secondary outcomes will be change in the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, University of California Los Angeles Activity Score, 40-meter fast-paced walk test, 30-second chair stand test, and number of serious adverse events. Results. The trial has been approved by The Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (Project-ID: S-20180158) in February 2019 and registration was performed at . ClinicalTrials.gov. (NCT04070027) in August 2019. Recruitment was initiated on the 2. nd. of September 2019 and the final deadline will be on the 30. th. of June 2021, or when a sample size of 120 patients has been accomplished. Conclusions. The results of the current trial are expected to enable evidence-based recommendations, which may be used to facilitate the shared-decision making process in the discussion of treatment strategy for the individual patient with severe hip OA. All results will be presented in peer-reviewed scientific journals and international conferences

Physical outcome following total knee arthroplasty is variable. Satellite cells are undifferentiated myogenic precursors considered to be muscle stem cells. We hypothesised that; the recovery of muscle strength and physical function following knee arthroplasty would be influenced by the underlying number of muscle satellite cells. 16 patients provided a distal quadriceps muscle biopsy at time of surgery. Satellite cells were identified with a primary mouse antibody for Pax7 – a cytoplasmic protein marker, and the myonuclei with DAPI. Positive cells were identified on the basis of immunofluorescent staining in association with nuclear material, and confirmed by position under the basal lamina. Patient function was assessed using a validated physical assessment protocol, the Aggregated Locomotor Function (ALF) score, muscle strength assessed using the leg extensor power-rig, and clinical outcome assessed with the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) pre-operatively and at 1 year post operatively. Muscle satellite cell content varied amongst the patient group (Positive Staining Index 3.1 to 11.4). Satellite cell content at time of surgery correlated with change in outcomes between pre-operative and 1 year assessments in all assessed parameters (ALF, r = 0.31; muscle power, r = 49; OKS, r = 0.33). Regression analysis employing a forward stepwise selection technique employed satellite cell volume in models of pre-operative to 1 year change for all outcome parameters. Physical function (satellite cell content, patient age and pre-operative ALF score) adjusted R2 = 0.92; Muscle power (pre-operative power and satellite cell content) adjusted R2 = 0.38; Clinical outcome (pre-operative OKS and satellite cell content) adjusted R2 = 0.28. Muscle satellite cell content influences recovery of muscle power and physical function following total knee arthroplasty. Importantly it is also associated with change in clinical scores; suggesting it to be a biomarker for patient outcomes

Summary Statement. This data may help explain the variability in physical function after primary TKR as compared to primary THR. Introduction. Total knee replacement (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) reliably relieve pain, restore function, and ensure mobility in patients with advanced joint arthritis; however these results are not uniform across all patient populations. We compared baseline demographic and symptom profiles in patients from a US national cohort undergoing primary TKR and THR. Methods. Patients undergoing primary TKR and THR between 7/1/2011 and 3/30/2012 were identified from the national research consortium which collects comprehensive data on enrolled patients from 120 surgeons across 23 states. Gathered data includes patient demographics, comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index), operative joint pain severity, physical function (SF-36; Physical Component Score (PCS)), emotional health (SF-36 Mental Component Score (MCS)), and musculoskeletal burden of illness (Hip and Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores; Oswestry Disability Index). Descriptive statistics compared baseline demographic and symptom profiles. Results. Our analysis compared 1362 primary TKR patients and 1013 primary THR patients. US TKR patients were significantly older (66.5 vs. 64.3 years), more obese (BMI 31.7 vs. 29.3), and less educated (p<0.005). TKR patients had higher rates of comorbidities, specifically diabetes, gastrointestinal ulcers, and cerebrovascular disease (p≤0.006). THR patients had significantly worse physical function (PCS 31.6 vs. 33.3), lower back pain (35.6% vs. 30.5% moderate-severe), and operative joint pain, stiffness, and function (p<0.005). Conclusion. US patients undergoing primary TKR are older with more comorbidities, however THR patient baseline functional and musculoskeletal limitations are significantly greater than primary TKR patients

The significance of physical activity (PA) assessment is widely acknowledged as it can aid in the understanding of pathologies. PA of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients has been assessed with varying methods, as it is a disease that is known to impair physical function and activity during daily life. Differences between methods have been described for general outcomes (sport participation or sedentary time), yet failed to describe common activities such as stair locomotion or sit-to-stand (STS) transfers. This study therefore aimed to determine the comparability of various methods to assess daily-life activities in KOA patients. Sixty-one clinically diagnosed KOA patients wore a tri-axial accelerometer (AX3, Axivity, UK) for one week during waking hours. Furthermore, they performed three physical function tests: a 40-m fast-paced walk test (WT), a timed up-and-go test (TUGT) and a 15 stair-climb test (SCT). Patients were also asked to fill out the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), a KOA-specific questionnaire. Patients were slightly overweight (average BMI: 27.3±4.8 kg/m2), 60 (±10) years old and predominantly female (53%). The amount of daily level walking bouts was only weakly correlated with the WT performance, representing patients” walking capacity, (ρ=−0.33, p=0.01). Similarly, level-walking bouts during daily life correlated weakly with self-perceived walking capacity addressed by the KOOS (ρ=−0.36, p=0.01). For stair locomotion, a slightly different trend was seen. A moderate correlation was found (ρ=0.65, p<0.001), between the amount of ascending bouts and the objective functional test performance (SCT). However, the subjective assessment of stair ascending limitations (via the KOOS) correlated only weakly with both the functional test performance and the measured level of activity (ρ=−0.30 and −0.35, resp.). Comparable results were found for descending motions. STS transfers during daily life correlated moderately at best with the time to complete the TUGT (ρ=−0.43, p<0.01) and only weakly with the self-perceived effort of STS transfers (ρ=−0.26, p=0.04). Only weak correlations existed between subjective measures and objective parameters (for both functional tests and daily living activities), indicating that they assess different domains (e.g. self-perceived function vs. actual physical function). Furthermore, when comparing the two objective measures, correlation coefficients increased compared to the subjective methods, yet did not reach strong agreement. These findings suggest that addressing common activities of daily life either subjectively or objectively will result in different patient-related outcomes of a study. Assessment methods should therefore be chosen with caution and compared carefully with other studies

Summary. Cognitive testing scores do not correlate with physical braking performance. Psychological questioning shows patients are more dependent on driving than a control group. Introduction. Returning to driving after surgery is a multifaceted issue. There are the medical aspects to consider- whether the patient is medically fit to drive. The term ‘medically fit to drive’ can encompass a range of issues which fall to doctors to solve, including the psychological and mental wellbeing. Groups whose governance involves patients or driving do not issue sound advice for patients or doctors to follow. Investigation of aspects affecting a driver's ability to control their vehicle in a safe manner could go towards providing an evidence base for guidance to be issued in the future. Methods. A custom force assessment rig was used to gather peak force and reaction time measurements from a group of patients waiting for, or having undergone lower limb surgery. A bespoke questionnaire that investigated patient's attitudes towards returning to driving; their behaviours and concerns was issued. Other mobility questions were also issued to these patients, including the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS). The final tests (Stroop task, tower of Hanoi, and the opposite worlds test [OWT]) were aimed at assessing a patient's neurological function, in an attempt to investigate the effect of post-operative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) on driving ability. These data were compared against a control cohort. Results. No significant differences were observed in the physical results between cohorts. However, significant differences between the control cohort and patient cohort were observed in a number of tests. The tower of Hanoi was the only significantly different neurological test (p=0.027). The Stroop task and OWT were not significantly different (p=0.103, p=0.131 respectively). There were significant differences in many of the psychological and mobility questions posed (reliance on driving [p<0.001], keenness to return [p=0.014], anxiety about being unable to drive [p=0.019], depression at being unable to drive [p=0.011], worries that driving would cause them pain [p<0.001], and confidence in using public transport [p=0.002]). Activity rankings also had a significant difference, with driving becoming a higher priority in the patient group (p=0.002). There were no significant differences between cohorts in physical testing, but LEFS was significantly different (p<0.001). There was no significant correlation between physical testing and neurological function, so we cannot prove nor disprove that neurological deficits affect physical function. Psychological variables and physical function did not correlate, but LEFS was correlated to a number of psychological variables. Conclusions. Due to the insignificance of correlations between neurological function tests and physical function, further work is recommended to conclusively determine whether there is a link or not. Different and/or additional neurological test batteries should be also considered, for example the CANTAB. Future studies should stratify cohorts based on surgical indication. Extension of the psychological research could identify the most popular goals or activities for those returning from surgery, potentially creating targets for the rehabilitation process

Background. To aid recovery, rehabilitation is an important adjunct to surgery. Acknowledging the MRC framework for complex interventions we assessed the evidence-base for components of comprehensive rehabilitation in total hip (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) pathways. Methods. We conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCT) of pre-surgical exercise and education, occupational therapy and post-operative physiotherapy. In feasibility RCTs we explored acceptability of pain self-management and occupational therapy before THR, and physiotherapy after TKR. We searched trial registers for ongoing RCTs. Results. Pre-surgical interventions. Systematic review identified 38 interventions targeting physical function before THR and TKR. Interventions showed functional benefit compared with controls, standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.32 (95% CI 0.20, 0.44; p<0.00001). In 27 studies targeting in-hospital recovery, intervention patients had lower anxiety, SMD 0.38 (95% CI 0.13, 0.63; p=0.003), and earlier mobilisation by 4 hours (95% CI 0.04, 0.30; p=0.009). In 20 studies, interventions targeting long-term recovery showed no benefit for function or pain. We randomised 88 patients into a feasibility RCT of group-based pain self-management. Attendees were highly satisfied but participation was low. Pre-operatively, many patients may perceive that only surgery can treat their symptoms. Occupational therapy. Systematic review identified 7 small RCTs in THR. Function improved in patients receiving occupational therapy, SMD 0.40 (95%CI 0.09, 0.70; p=0.01) but this was not sustained post-surgery. In our feasibility study with 44 patients randomised to pre-operative provision of aids and appliances or usual care, the intervention was delivered successfully and acceptable to participants. We identified no ongoing studies. Post-discharge physiotherapy. Systematic review identified 7 small studies suggesting that physiotherapy after TKR gives functional benefit at 3–4 months, SMD 0.37 (95%CI 0.12, 0.62; p=0.004) but not at later follow up. As noted in a recent review in THR, quality of evidence was limited. Our feasibility study evaluated six weeks of group-based activity-orientated rehabilitation in 46 TKR patients. The programme was well-received and attendance good. A fully-powered RCT is underway. We identified two ongoing studies targeting patients at risk of, or with, poor recovery. Conclusion. The evidence-base for comprehensive rehabilitation in THR and TKR is growing. Pre-surgical interventions may be effective but, in isolation, not acceptable to many patients. Ongoing definitive trials in TKR physiotherapy will guide future care. Well-designed trials of physiotherapy after THR and occupational therapy are needed. Ultimately, rehabilitation interventions throughout THR and TKR pathways may provide optimal care but this will need appropriate evaluation

Total knee replacements (TKR) have been the main choice of treatment for alleviating pain and restoring physical function in advanced degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee. Recently, there has been a rising interest in minimally invasive surgery TKR (MIS-TKR). However, accurate restoration of the knee axis presents a great challenge. Patient-specific-instrumented TKR (PSI-TKR) was thus developed to address the issue. However, the efficacy of this new approach has yet to be determined. The purpose of the current study was thus to measure and compare the 3D kinematics of the MIS-TKR and PSI-TKR in vivo during sit-to-stand using a 3D fluoroscopy technology. Five patients each with MIS-TKR and PSI-TKR participated in the current study with informed written consent. Each subject performed quiet standing to define their own neutral positions and then sit-to-stand while under the surveillance of a bi-planar fluoroscopy system (ALLURA XPER FD, Philips). For the determination of the 3D TKR kinematics, the computer-aided design (CAD) model of the TKR for each subject was obtained from the manufacturer including femoral and tibial components and the plastic insert. At each image frame, the CAD model was registered to the fluoroscopy image via a validated 2D-to-3D registration method. The CAD model of each prosthesis component was embedded with a coordinate system with the origin at the mid-point of the femoral epicondyles, the z-axis directed to the right, the y-axis directed superiorly, and the x-axis directed anteriorly. From the accurately registered poses of the femoral and tibial components, the angles of the TKR were obtained following a z-x-y cardanic rotation sequence, corresponding to flexion/extension, adduction/abduction and internal/external rotation. During sit-to-stand the patterns and magnitudes of the translations were similar between the MIS-TKR and PSI-TKR groups, with posterior translations ranging from 10–20 mm and proximal translations from 29–31mm. Differences in mediolateral translations existed between the groups but the magnitudes were too small to be clinically significant. For angular kinematics, both groups showed close-to-zero abduction/adduction, but the PSI-TKR group rotated externally from an internally rotated position (10° of internal rotation) to the neutral position, while the MIS-TKR group maintained at an externally rotated position of less than 5° during the movement. During sit-to-stand both groups showed similar patterns and magnitudes in the translations but significant differences in the angular kinematics existed between the groups. While the MIS-TKR group maintained at an externally rotated position during the movement, the PSI-TKR group showed external rotations during knee extension, a pattern similar to the screw home mechanism in a normal knee, which may be related to more accurate restoration of the knee axis in the PSI-TKR group. A close-to-normal angular motion may be beneficial for maintaining a normal articular contact pattern, which is helpful for the endurance of the TKR. The current study was the first attempt to quantify the kinematic differences between PSI and non-PSI MIS. Further studies to include more subjects will be needed to confirm the current findings. More detailed analysis of the contact patterns is also needed

Physical functioning in patients undergoing hip surgery is commonly assessed in three ways: patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), performance test, or clinician-administered measure. It is recommended that several types of measures are used concurrently to capture an extended picture of function. Patient fatigue and burden, time, resources and logistical constraints of clinic and research appointments mean that collecting multiple measures is seldom feasible, leading to focus on a limited number of measures, if not a single one. While there is evidence that performance-tests and PROMs do not fully correlate, correlations between PROMs, performance tests and clinician-administrated measures are yet to be evaluated. It is also not known if the associations between function and patient characteristics depend on how function is measured. The aim of our study was to use different measures to assess function in the same group of patients before their hip surgery to determine 1. how well PROMs, performance tests and clinician-administrated measures correlate with one another and 2. Whether these measures are associated with the same patient characteristics. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the pre-operative information of 125 participants listed for hip replacement. The WOMAC function subscale, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and walk-, step- and balance-tests were assessed by questionnaire or during a clinic visit. Participant socio-demographics and medical characteristics were also collected. Correlations between functional measures were investigated with correlation coefficients (r). Regression models were used to test the association between the patient's characteristics and each of the three types of functional measures. None of the correlations between the PROM, clinician-administrated measure and performance tests were very high (r<0.90). The highest correlations were found between the WOMAC-function and the HHS (r=0.7) or the Walk-test (r=0.6), and between the HHS and the walk-test(r=0.7). All the other performance-tests had low correlations with the other measures(r ranging between 0.3 and 0.5). The associations between patient characteristics and functional scores varied by type of measure. Psychological status was associated with the WOMAC function (p-value<0.0001) but not with the other measures. Age was associated with the performance test measures (p-value ranging from ≤0.01 to <0.0001) but not with the WOMAC function. The clinician-administered (HHS) measure was not associated with age or psychological status. When evaluating function prior to hip replacement clinicians and researchers should be aware that each assessment tool captures different aspects of function and that patient characteristics should be taken into account. Psychological status influences the perception of function; patients may be able to do more than they think they can do, and may need encouragement to overcome anxiety. A performance test like a walk-test would provide a more comprehensive assessment of function limitations than a step or balance test, although performance tests are influenced by age. For the most precise description of functional status a combination of measures should be used. Clinicians should supplement their pre-surgery assessment of function with patient-reported measure to include the patient's perspective

End-stage osteoarthritis is characterised by pain and reduced physical function, for which total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is recognised to be a highly effective treatment. Most implants are multi radius in design, though modern kinematic theory suggests a single flexion/extension axis is located in the femur. A recently launched TKA implant (Triathlon, Stryker US), is based on this theory, adopting a single radius of curvature femoral component. It is hypothesised that this design allows better function, and specifically, that it results in enhanced efficiency of the quadriceps group through a longer patello-femoral moment arm. Change in power output was compared between single and multi radius implants as part of a larger ongoing randomised controlled trial to benchmark the new implant. Power output was assessed using a Leg Extensor Power Rig, well validated for use with this population, pre-operatively and at 6, 26 and 52 weeks post-operatively in 101 Triathlon and 82 Kinemax implants. All patients were diagnosed with osteoarthritis, and drawn from a single centre. Output was reported as maximal wattage (W) generated in a single leg extension, and expressed as a proportion of the contralateral limb power output to act as an internal control. The results are shown in the table below. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect of TKA on the quadriceps power output, F = 249.09, p = <0.001 and also a significant interaction of the implant group on the output F = 11.33, p = 0.001. Independent samples t-tests of between group differences at the four assessment periods highlighted greater improvement in the single radius TKA group at all post-operative assessments (p <0.03), see table. The theoretical enhanced quadriceps efficiency conferred by single radius design was found in this study. Power output was significantly greater at all post-operative assessments in the single radius compared to the multi radius group. This difference was particularly relevant at early 6 week and 1 year assessment. Lower limb power output is known to link positively to functional ability. The results support the hypothesis that TKAs with a single radius design have enhanced recovery and better function

Objectives

The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire are patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used for clinical and research purposes. Methodological high-quality clinimetric studies that determine the measurement properties of these PROMs when used in patients with a distal radial fracture are lacking. This study aimed to validate the PRWE and DASH in Dutch patients with a displaced distal radial fracture (DRF).

Objectives

We aimed first to summarise minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) after total hip (THR) or knee replacement (TKR) in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured using the Short-Form 36 (SF-36). Secondly, we aimed to improve the precision of MCID estimates by means of meta-analysis.