In the management of a
Purpose of study:. The presence of an L5 transverse process fracture is reported in many texts to be a marker of
Severe military pelvic trauma has a high mortality rate with previous work identifying an association between
The management of
Background.
Aims. The best method of treating unstable
Aims: To evaluate need for fast and correct diagnosis of
Exsanguination is the second most common cause
of death in patients who suffer severe trauma. The management of
haemodynamically unstable high-energy pelvic injuries remains controversial,
as there are no universally accepted guidelines to direct surgeons
on the ideal use of pelvic packing or early angio-embolisation.
Additionally, the optimal resuscitation strategy, which prevents
or halts the progression of the trauma-induced coagulopathy, remains
unknown. Although early and aggressive use of blood products in
these patients appears to improve survival, over-enthusiastic resuscitative
measures may not be the safest strategy. . This paper provides an overview of the classification of pelvic
injuries and the current evidence on best-practice management of
high-energy
Introduction: L5/S1 injuries can be associated with
We describe the impact of a targeted performance
improvement programme and the associated performance improvement
interventions, on mortality rates, error rates and process of care
for haemodynamically unstable patients with
Introduction: Patients with complex
Injuries to the lower urinary tract are well recognized following fractures to the pelvic ring. The overall incidence of
Introduction.
Introduction: Displaced fractures of the pelvic ring represents challenge for the trauma surgeon. Patients: From January 1999 to December 2006, the treatment was given to 134 patients (81 males, 53 females, aged 18–73 years) with pelvic ring fracture and dislocation. According to the AO (1988) classification, B type were 95, C type were 39 in cases. Surgical technique: Closed reduction and retention of unstable pelvic injuries (type B and C injuries), in order to restore the form and function of the posterior pelvis by percutaneous iliosacral screw and when is necessary antegrad screw fixation of the anterior pelvic ring osteosynthesis, using conventional fluoroscopy. 134 patients with a posterior
The identification of high-risk factors in patients with fractures of the pelvis at the time of presentation would facilitate investigation and management. In a series of 174 consecutive patients with unstable fractures of the pelvic ring, clinical data were used to calculate the injury severity score (ISS), the triage-revised trauma score (T-RTS), and the Glasgow coma scale (GCS). The morphology of the fracture was classified according to the AO system and that of Burgess et al. The data were analysed using univariate and multivariate methods in order to determine which presenting features were identified with high risk. Univariate analysis showed an association between mortality and an ISS over 25, a T-RTS below eight, age over 65 years, systolic blood pressure under 100 mmHg, a GCS of less than 8, blood transfusion of more than ten units in the first 24 hours and colloid infusion of more than six litres in the first 24 hours. Multivariate analysis showed that age, T-RTS and ISS were independent determinants of mortality. A T-RTS of eight or less identified the cohort of patients at greatest risk (65%). The morphology of the fracture was not predictive of mortality. We recommend the use of the T-RTS in the acute situation in order to identify patients at high risk.
A system for assessment of function after major pelvic injuries is proposed. This numerical system developed from a five-year prospective study of 60 patients. Five factors were assessed and scored: pain, standing, sitting, sexual intercourse and work performance. The total score then gave a clinical grade as excellent, good, fair or poor. The scoring system allows comparison between early and late results and also between various methods of treatment.
We performed a systematic review of the literature
to evaluate the use and interpretation of generic and disease-specific
functional outcome instruments in the reporting of outcome after
the surgical treatment of disruptions of the pelvic ring. A total
of 28 papers met our inclusion criteria, with eight reporting only
generic outcome instruments, 13 reporting only pelvis-specific outcome
instruments, and six reporting both. The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) was
by far the most commonly used generic outcome instrument, used in
12 papers, with widely variable reporting of scores. The pelvis-specific
outcome instruments were used in 19 studies; the Majeed score in
ten, Iowa pelvic score in six, Hannover pelvic score in two and
the Orlando pelvic score in one. Four sets of authors, all testing construct
validity based on correlation with the SF-36, performed psychometric
testing of three pelvis-specific instruments (Majeed, IPS and Orlando
scores). No testing of responsiveness, content validity, criterion
validity, internal consistency or reproducibility was performed. The existing literature in this area is inadequate to inform
surgeons or patients in a meaningful way about the functional outcomes
of these fractures after fixation.
1. A case of fractured pelvis with massive haemorrhage from the right superior gluteal artery and thrombosis of the right ilio-femoral venous system is reported. 2. The treatment included ligature of the artery and extensive thrombectomy. Ten litres of blood were transfused.
Evidence that L5 transverse process fracture indicates pelvic instability is insufficient and controversial. Because of unstable