Aims. Patients undergoing limb reconstruction surgery often face a challenging and lengthy process to complete their treatment journey. The majority of existing outcome measures do not adequately capture the patient-reported outcomes relevant to this patient group in a single measure. Following a previous systematic review, the Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score (SLRS) was designed with the intent to address this need for an effective instrument to measure patient-reported outcomes in limb reconstruction patients. We aim to assess the face validity of this score in a pilot study. Methods. The SLRS was designed following structured interviews with several groups including patients who have undergone limb reconstruction surgery, limb reconstruction surgeons, specialist nurses, and physiotherapists. This has subsequently undergone further adjustment for language and clarity. The score was then trialled on ten patients who had undergone limb reconstruction surgery, with subsequent structured questioning to understand the perceived suitability of the score. Results. Ten patients completed the score and the subsequent structured interview. Considering the tool as a whole, 100% of respondents felt the score to be comprehensible, relevant, and comprehensive regarding the areas that were important to a patient undergoing limb reconstruction surgery. For individual questions, on a five-point Likert scale, importance/relevance was reported as a mean of 4.78 (4.3 to 5.0), with ability to understand rated as 4.92 (4.7 to 5.0) suggesting high levels of relevance and comprehension. Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level was calculated as 5.2 (10 to 11 years old). Conclusion. The current SLRS has been shown to have acceptable scores from a patient sample regarding relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness. This suggests face validity, however further testing required and is ongoing in a larger cohort of patients to determine the reliability, responsiveness, precision, and criterion validity of the score in this patient group. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):705–709

The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have partnered to advance international patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collection and reporting standards for hip and knee arthroplasty. This project is part of the OECD's Patient-Reported Indicator Survey (PaRIS) initiative, which aims to address the need for internationally comparable patient-reported outcome and experience measures in order to better monitor health system performance and drive continuous improvement. PROMs are in varying stages of implementation across OECD health systems, with differences in collection and reporting practices across existing programs. CIHI and the OECD are leading an international working group for PROMs in hip and knee replacement surgery in order to build consensus on PROMs data collection standards and develop indicators for international reporting. Working group members include patient representatives, clinicians, national arthroplasty registries, the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR), experts in PROMs measurement, and government representatives of several OECD member countries. Activities of the working group focus on two main priorities: 1) Use existing PROMs programs to maximize pilot comparable reporting in OECD's Health at a Glance 2019 report, and 2) Advance new PROMs standards and data collection to maximize comparable reporting beyond Health at a Glance 2019. An environmental scan of PROMs in hip and knee arthroplasty found that a number of countries are collecting this data, however, there are variations in survey instruments as well as administration and reporting methods within and across countries. As part of priority 1, the working group has achieved consensus on a number of aspects around pilot reporting. The project is compiling data from existing PROMs programs in order to report results in the Health at a Glance 2019 publication. For priority 2, the most notable challenge is establishing an agreement across countries on common survey tools, as well as a minimum data set that works for all, given the disparities of existing collection across countries. Many international programs lack the flexibility to change PROMs tools or collections methods, and have concerns regarding the break in trend for PROMs data within their own countries if they were to change methods. The project is exploring the use of crosswalks and other opportunities for comparable reporting, such as the use of single-item anchor questions. To date, the working group continues to develop consensus on international standards for PROMs collection and reporting. Results of the international consensus building and work to date will be shared. PROMs incorporate the patient's perspective into the delivery of treatments and care – such as hip and knee arthroplasty – that aim to improve a patient's quality of life. Alignment of standards in PROMs collection across countries will make comparable data available for reporting, in order to inform quality improvement initiatives within health systems to provide better care for patients. CIHI and the OECD will continue to work with member countries to develop international data collection and reporting standards for PROMs, and encourage the adoption of common approaches across countries

Increased collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) in registries enables international comparison of patient-centered outcomes after knee and hip replacement. We aimed to investigate 1) variations in PROM improvement, 2) the possible confounding factor of BMI, and 3) differences in comorbidity distributions between registries. Registries affiliated with the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) or OECD membership countries were invited to report aggregate EQ-5D, OKS, OHS, HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS values. Eligible patients underwent primary total, unilateral knee or hip replacement for osteoarthritis within three years and had completed PROMs preoperatively and either 6 or 12 months postoperatively, excluding patients with subsequent revisions. For each PROM cohort, Chi-square tests were performed for BMI distributions across registries and 12 predefined PROM strata (male/female, age 20-64/65-74/>75, high or low preoperative PROM scores). Comorbidity distributions were reported for available comorbidity indexes. Thirteen registries from 9 countries contributed data, n~130000 knee (range 140 to 79848) and n~113000 hip (range 137 to 85281). Mean EQ-5D index values (10 registries) ranged from 0.53 to 0.71 (knee) and 0.50 to 0.70 (hips) preoperatively and 0.78 to 0.85 (knee) and 0.83 to 0.87 (hip) postoperatively. Mean OKS (6 registries) ranged from 19.3 to 23.6 preoperatively and 36.2 to 41.2 postoperatively. Mean OHS (7 registries) ranged from 18.0 to 23.2 preoperatively and 39.8 to 44.2 postoperatively. Four registries reported KOOS-PS and three reported HOOS-PS. Proportions of patients with BMI >30 ranged from 35 to 62% (10 knee registries) and 16 to 43% (11 hip registries). For both knee and hip registries, distributions of patients across six BMI categories differed significantly among registries (p30 were for patients in the youngest age groups (20 to 64 and 65 to 74 years) with the lowest baseline scores. Additionally, females with lowest preoperative PROM scores had highest BMI. These findings were echoed for the OHS and OKS cohorts. Proportions of patients with ASA scores ≥3 ranged from 7 to 42% (9 knee registries) and 6 to 35% (8 hip registries). PROM-score improvement varies between international registries, which may be partially explained by differences in age, sex and preoperative scores. BMI and comorbidity may be relevant to adjust for

Introduction. LIMB-Q Kids is a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for children with Lower limb differences (LLDs). The objective is to conduct an international field test study. Materials & Methods. A mixed method multiphase approach was used to develop LIMB-Q Kids. In phase one, a systematic review was conducted to identify concepts from existing PROMs used in research with children with LLDs. A preliminary conceptual framework derived from the systematic review informed an international qualitative study. The data from qualitative interviews were used to form the LIMB-Q Kids, which was further refined through multiple rounds of cognitive debriefing interviews with children. Input was obtained from parents and healthcare professionals from Australia, Canada, Ethiopia, India, UK, and the USA. LIMB-Q Kids was translated and culturally adapted into multiple languages. Results. The final field-test version consists of 11 scales (159 items) that measure appearance, physical function, symptoms (hip, knee, ankle, foot, and leg), leg-related distress, and school, social and psychological function. This version was rigorously translated into Danish and German. Translations that are in progress include Arabic, Finnish, Hindi, Swahili, Portuguese, Spanish, and Luganda. An international field-test study is underway in nine countries (15 sites with a target recruitment of 150 participants per country). At the time of abstract submission, 190 patients from seven sites have completed LIMB-Q Kids. The UK collaborative has worked on language adaption for the UK and is currently validating the score across five paediatric limb reconstruction units. Conclusions. No internationally applicable PROM exists for children with LLDs. We present the current progress in developing and validating such a score. Data from the international field-test study will be used to reduce items and perform psychometric testing of LIMB-Q Kids. The rigorous translation and cultural adaption process will provide versions of LIMB-Q Kids in different languages. Once completed, the LIMB-Q Kids will provide a common metric for outcome assessment for children with lower limb differences internationally

Introduction. There are concerns that patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) currently used for adults requiring, undergoing or after undergoing lower limb reconstruction (LLR) are not adequately capturing the range of experiences important to these patients. The ‘Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Lower Limb Reconstruction’ (PROLLIT) study developed a conceptual framework of outcomes identified as important and relevant by adult LLR patients. This review explored whether existing PROMs address these outcomes, and exhibit content validity in this population. Materials & Methods. A range of key PROMs was selected (n=32). Systematic and hand-searches were employed to find studies assessing content validity of these PROMs in the adult LLR population, along with PROM content and development information. A systematic review of content validity of the measures was carried out following ‘COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments’ (COSMIN) guidance, alongside conceptual mapping of the content of the PROMs against the PROLLIT conceptual framework. Results. The searches uncovered very few content validity studies assessing the PROMs when applied in adult LLR patients. The COSMIN review found that these measures lacked content validity when applied in this population. The conceptual mapping found that PROMs did not capture all concepts identified as important and relevant in the PROLLIT framework. Conclusions. Existing PROMs applied in the adult LLR population lack content validity and fail to adequately capture relevant outcomes for this patient group. There is a need for a new, dedicated PROM designed for adult LLR patients

In light of recent regulatory initiatives, medical devices now require additional clinical evidence to prove their safety and efficacy. At the same time, patients' own assessment of their devices' function and performance has gained in importance. The collection of these data allows for a more comprehensive picture of clinical outcomes and complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These trends have led researchers to search for new methods of acquiring, interpreting and disseminating patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs). The current study assesses the feasibility of a digital platform for collecting PROMs that was recently adapted for TKA patients. It sought to determine patient engagement, survey completion rates, and satisfaction with this platform. Eighty-two patients (mean age, 63.7 years, 59% females) scheduled for TKA were enrolled from one US and six UK sites between January 12, 2018 and April 30, 2018. Patients were supplied with a mobile application (app) that collects a variety of PROMs, including four domains based on the Patient-Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS™): physical function, depression, pain interference and pain behavior. The platform electronically administers questionnaires using computer-adaptive tests (CATs), which reduce the burden on patients by tailoring follow-up questions to account for their previous answers. Satisfaction with the app was assessed in subset of patients who evaluated its ease-of-use (n=45), likelihood that they would recommend it to family/friends (n=35), and whether they successfully used the information it provided during their recovery (n=31). These scores were taken on a 1 to 10 (worst to best) scale. Patients demonstrated regular engagement with the platform, with 73% using the app at least once a week. Weekly engagement remained high throughout the seven-week post-operative period (Figure 1). There was a 69% completion rate of all PROMIS™ CAT surveys during the study. The four PROMIS™ CAT domains had similar survey completion rates (Figure 2). The subset of patients queried regarding their satisfaction with the app gave it favorable mean scores for ease-of-use (8.8), likelihood to recommend to a family member or friend (8.1), and their success at using its information to improve their recovery (7.4). Initial results support this digital platform's potential for successfully and efficiently collecting large volumes of PROMs. Patients reported high levels of engagement and satisfaction. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Surgical outcome analysis has shifted from surgeon- to patient-reported outcome measures (PROM). High rates of dissatisfaction (13–20%) in PROM after TKA have persisted despite significant advances in pain-management, implant design and introduction of newer surgical techniques. The NAVIO robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) was introduced in May 2017 as an integrative approach to planning, execution and evaluation in TKA surgery. The goal of this study was to assess differences PROM scores between conventional instrumented TKA (CI-TKA) and RA-TKA. Methods. Starting in December 2016, prospective data collection of PROM's was initiated in a single-surgeon total joint arthroplasty registry. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected for all patients pre-operatively, at three months and at one year post-operatively. In Group A, from December 2016 through May 2017, patients were treated with CI-TKA instrumentation. In Group B, from June 2017 through December 2018, surgery was performed with the NAVIO RA-TKA technique. The Journey II total knee prosthesis was used for all cases. Peri-operative management was consistent for all patients in both groups. Results. A total of 625 patients were available for analysis. 270 RA-TKA and 355 CI-TKA. The results showed a trend toward higher scores for RA-TKA for KOOS overall (p-value = 0.20) and subspecialty scores at 1-year postop, especially for pain and quality of life (p-value = 0.13) and pain (p-value = 0.12). Discussion/Conclusion. In this preliminary study, patients undergoing RA-TKA demonstrated a trend toward higher PROM scores, especially in the categories of Quality of Life and Pain, when compared to CI-TKA. Due to the limited sample size, weighted 1.3:1 for CI-TKA, statistical significance was not shown. Because of the short timeframe available since the introduction of RA-TKA, further data collection and analysis will be necessary to re-assess statistically power in this comparison

Over 500 supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHF) are treated at our institution each year. Our standard post-operative pathway includes a 3-week visit for splint removal, wire removal, and radiographs. Subsequent follow-up occurs at 12 weeks for a clinical examination. In an effort to minimize unnecessary follow-up visits, we investigated whether photographs and/or patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores could identify patients who do not need routine 3-month in-person follow-up. At the 3-month visit, 248 SCHF patients (mean 6.2 yrs; 0.75-11yrs) had bilateral elbow motion (ROM) and carrying angles measured; and photographs documenting frontal and sagittal alignment of both injured and uninjured upper extremities, in both maximum elbow flexion and extension. Two independent assessors made the same measurements off the clinical photographs to compare these with the clinical measurements. Two PROMs: Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ: 0 best to 14 worst) and QuickDASH (0 best to 100 worst) were completed at the 3-month visit. Inter-rater reliability of the photograph measurements was excellent (Kappa: 0.88-0.93), but weakly concordant with clinical measurements (carrying angle Kappa=0.51;max flexion Kappa=0.68;max extension Kappa=0.64). SAQ moderately correlated with QuickDASH (Kappa=0.59) and performed better at identifying patients with abnormalities. SAQ score ≥ 4 identified patients meeting 3-month follow-up criteria, with sensitivity: 36.1%; specificity: 96.8% and negative-predictive-value (NPV): 87%. We did not find that photographs were reliable. Although SAQ-score has high NPV, a more sensitive fracture-specific PROM is needed to identify patients who do not need a 3-month follow-up visit

The aim of this study was to determine the floor and ceiling effects for both the QuickDASH and PRWE following a fracture of the distal radius. Secondary aims were to determine the degree to which patients with a floor or ceiling effect felt that their wrist was ‘normal’, and if there were patient factors associated with achieving a floor or ceiling effect. A retrospective cohort study of patients sustaining a distal radius fracture and managed at the study centre during a single year was undertaken. Outcome measures included the QuickDASH, the PRWE, EuroQol-5 Dimension-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), and the normal wrist score. There were 526 patients with a mean age of 65yrs (20–95) and 421 (77%) were female. Most patients were managed non-operatively (73%, n=385). The mean follow-up was 4.8yrs (4.3–5.5). A ceiling effect was observed for both the QuickDASH (22.3%) and PRWE (28.5%). When defined to be within the minimum clinical important difference of the best available score, the ceiling effect increased to 62.8% for the QuickDASH and 60% for the PRWE. Patients that achieved a ceiling score for the QuickDASH and PRWE subjectively felt their wrist was only 91% and 92% normal, respectively. On logistic regression analysis, a dominant hand injury and better health-related quality of life were the common factors associated with achieving a ceiling score for both the QuickDASH and PRWE (all p<0.05). The QuickDASH and PRWE demonstrate ceiling effects when used to assess the outcome of fractures of the distal radius. Patients achieving ceiling scores did not consider their wrist to be ‘normal’. Future patient-reported outcome assessment tools for fractures of the distal radius should aim to limit the ceiling effect, especially for individuals or groups that are more likely to achieve a ceiling score

Purpose. Despite total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful surgical procedure with end-stage knee osteoarthritis, approximately 20% of the patients who underwent primary TKA were still dissatisfied with the outcome. Thereby, numerous literatures have confirmed the relationship between soft tissue balancing and clinical result to improve this pressing issue. Recently, there has been an increased research interest in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after TKA. However, there is little agreement on the association between soft tissue balancing and PROMs. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative soft tissue balancing affected PROMs after primary TKA. We hypothesized that soft tissue balancing would be a predictive factor for postoperative PROMs at one-year post-surgery. Patients and Methods. The study included 20 knees treated for a varus osteoarthritic deformity using a cruciate-retaining TKA (Scorpio NRG) with a polyethylene insert thickness of 8 mm retrospectively. Following the osteotomy using the measured resection technique, the extension gap was measured with a femoral trial by using an electric tensor. This instrument could estimate the soft tissue balance applying continuous distraction force simultaneously from 0 to 40 lbf with an accuracy of the 0.1 lbf. We evaluated the association between a distraction force required for an extension gap of 8 mm, and the following potentially affected factors at one year postoperatively: knee flexion angle using a protractor with one degree increments; radiographic parameters of component alignment, namely the femoral and tibial component medial angle; and the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM). This is a disease-specific and self-administered questionnaire, reflecting the specificity of the Japanese cultural lifestyle, consisting of 25 items scored from 0 to 100 points, with 100 points being worst. Outcomes. The median knee flexion angle was 130 degrees with the femoral and tibial component of 97 and 89 degrees, respectively. For an extension gap of 8 mm, a verified value of a distraction force did not demonstrate a correlation with, knee flexion angle (p = 0.29) or with the femoral (p = 0.20), and tibial component position (p = 0.09). The median JKOM totaled 20 points across 4 domains: pain and stiffness, condition in daily life, general activities, and health conditions with 5, 8, 2.5, and 2 points respectively. There was significant correlation between a required force and the JKOM (r. s. = 0.53, p = 0.02), and notably the domain of health conditions exhibited the highest coefficient of determination (r. s. = 0.54, p = 0.01). Discussion. This study highlights that distraction force for an extension gap of 8 mm is an independent variable in component position or knee flexion angle. We found that soft tissue balancing could influence short term postoperative PROMs. Our results will contribute to a better understanding of outcomes after TKA. This is a particularly critical issue as feasible strategies to avoid a persistent joint stiffness would improve long-term function after TKA and patient satisfaction

One in five patients remain unsatisfied due to ongoing pain and impaired mobility following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is important if surgeons can pre-operatively identify which patients may be at risk for poor outcomes after TKA. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is an association between pre-operative measures and post-operative outcomes in patients who underwent TKA.

This study included 28 patients (female = 12 / male = 16, age = 63.6 ± 6.9, BMI = 29.9 ± 7.4 kg/m2) with knee osteoarthritis who were scheduled to undergo TKA. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon (GD), and a subvastus approach was performed for all patients. Patients visited the gait lab within one-month of surgery and 12 months following surgery. At the gait lab, patients completed the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), a timed up and go (TUG), and walking task. Variables of interest included the five KOOS sub-scores (symptoms, pain, activities of daily living, sport & recreation, and quality of life), completion time for the TUG, walking speed, and peak knee biomechanics variables (flexion angle, abduction moment, power absorption). A Pearson's product-moment correlation was run to assess the relationship between pre-operative measures and post-operative outcomes in the TKA patients.

Preliminary analyses showed the relationship to be linear with all variables normally distributed, as assessed by Shapiro-Wilk's test (p > .05), and there were no outliers. There were no statistically significant correlations between any of the pre-operative KOOS sub-scores and any of the post-operative biomechanical outcomes. Pre-operative TUG time had a statistically significant, moderate positive correlation with post-operative peak knee abduction moments [r(14) = .597, p < .001] and peak knee power absorption [r(14) = .498, p = .007], with pre-operative TUG time explaining 36% of the variability in peak knee abduction moment and 25% of the variability in peak knee power absorption. Pre-operative walking speed had a statistically significant, moderate negative correlation with post-operative peak knee abduction moments [r(14) = -.558, p = .002] and peak knee power absorption [r(14) = -.548, p = .003], with pre-operative walking speed explaining 31% of the variability in peak knee abduction moment and 30% of the variability in peak knee power absorption.

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), such as the KOOS, do indicate the TKA is generally successful at relieving pain and show an overall improvement. However, their pre-operative values do not correlate with any biomechanical indicators of post-operative success, such as peak knee abduction moment and knee power. Shorter pre-operative TUG times and faster pre-operative walking speeds were correlated with improved post-operative biomechanical outcomes. These are simple tasks surgeons can implement into their clinics to evaluate their patients. Future research should expand these findings to a larger sample size and to determine if other factors, such as surgical approach or implant design, improves patient outcomes.

Introduction

Open fractures are complex injuries associated with substantial morbidity. These injuries are associated with harm to both physical and emotional health as well as preclusion of work, social, and leisure activities. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and health related quality of life are critical indicators of successful rehabilitation following open fracture treatment. This study aimed to measure the PROMs for patients with open lower limb fractures and investigate the relationship with injury severity.

In the United Kingdom's National Joint Registry 2018 Annual Report, the combination of a POLARSTEM hip stem and R3 acetabular component has the lowest revision rate of any total hip arthroplasty (THA) construct combination at 7 years. Although revision rates remain a crucial measure of an implant combination's performance, there is increasingly more attention being given to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which often reflect the endpoints that patients’ themselves consider of paramount importance in choosing to undergo THA. Therefore, the current analysis was undertaken to better understand the PROMs-based performance of this combination. Bespoke implant reports were requested for the POLARSTEM/R3 combination with OXINIUM™ heads and highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) bearing. Reports used data from the National Health Service PROMs programme, which collected the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), EQ-5D and EQ-VAS. Health gain scores, calculated as differences between preoperative and 6-month post-operative scores, were adjusted to account for any differences in patient demographics between comparative groups. The mean OHS adjusted health gain score for the construct combination was 22.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.4 – 23.1; n = 1799 patients) compared to 21.2 (95% CI: 21.2 – 21.3; n = 111,055). For EQ-5D, the scores were 0.462 (95% CI: 0.451 – 0.473; n = 1685) for the construct and 0.434 (95% CI: 0.433 – 0.436; n = 102,448) for the class average. For EQ-VAS, the construct had adjusted scores of 14.2 (95% CI: 13.4 – 14.9; n = 1605) compared to the class average of 11.4 (95% CI: 11.3 – 11.5; n = 98,610). There were also more patients who rated their satisfaction as ‘excellent’ in the specific construct group. Comparisons were statistically significant in all cases (p < 0.001). In conclusion, in addition to excellent mid-term survivorship, the POLARSTEM/R3 construct combination has demonstrated superior PROMs that may improve patient outcomes

Background:. Hip arthroplasty is very successful in order to alleviate pain and improve health-related quality of life. Health-care costs are constantly growing and the burden of patients with hip disease has increased dramatically. Careful consideration of the patients'need and expectations include not only the proper indication for surgery but also choice of method. Hip resurfacing (HRA) has been popularized during the last decade, being bone conservative, capable to restore the anatomical hip center and lower the risk of dislocation. Some HRA-designs have proven good long-term survival rate while others have shown an unacceptable high amount of loosening and been recalled. Yet, for a selected group of patients HRA may be advantageous to THA regarding health-related quality of life. A fundamental prerequisite understanding today's and tomorrow's request on hip arthroplasty is to measure outcomes from patients' perspectives. In this pilot study we compared the patient-reported outcome measures after hip resurfacing with THA using validated general and hip disease specific instruments. Methods:. A questionnaire was sent to 108 randomly selected patients (72% male) of a cohort of 259 patients (Charnley A+B) who had had uni- or bilateral (two stages) HRA for a period of at least six months. Maximal follow-up time was 7 years. Mean age was 50.2 years (males) and 46.2 years (females) respectively. Patients were reporting EQ-5D and self assessed health-quality (0–100%). In addition, a minor group randomly selected, reported their activity that was graded according to UCLA-activity score. As preoperative EQ-5D baseline, a matched group of 40 patients from the hospital's database scheduled for HRA served. Results:. 92 of 108 questionnaires with EQ-5D and self assessed health quality were complete. The mean postoperative EQ-5D was 0.89 (0.30 preoperative) and self assessed health quality being 59.3% (15–100) preoperatively was 80.2% (40–100) postoperatively. UCLA- activity score was 7.2 (4–9) postoperative. Of the whole group of 259 patients, three patients suffered from nerve palsy (two transient), two early cupmigrations (revised), one psoas-impingement and one AVN with cervical fracture (both revised), one deep infection, one ALTR and one dislocation (high-energy trauma). Conclusion:. Traditional outcome measures often fail to describe outcome from the patients' perspectives. This pilot study, with its limitations, shows that patients' health-related quality of life, as measured with EQ-5D after HRA is comparable to or better than that of THA. Patients with HRA in general seem to reach high activity level. However, adverse reactions to metal debris are escalating and with HRA compared to proven THA-designs the risk of complications, e.g., early loosening, especially in females, is higher. For men, no significant difference in survival rate is reported for HRA compared to THA. Yet, HRA should be considered in subgroups of patients (younger, active men), in order to gain high patient satisfaction

It has been reported that 60-85% of patients who undergo PAO have concomitant intraarticular pathology that cannot be addressed with PAO alone. Currently, there are limited diagnostic tools to determine which patients would benefit from hip arthroscopy at the time of PAO to address intra-articular pathology. This study aims to see if preoperative PROMs scores measured by IHOT-33 scores have predictive value in whether intra-articular pathology is addressed during PAO + scope. The secondary aim is to see how often surgeons at high-volume hip preservation centers address intra-articular pathology if a scope is performed during the same anesthesia event.

A randomized, prospective Multicenter trial was performed on patients who underwent PAO and hip arthroscopy to treat hip dysplasia from 2019 to 2020. Preoperative PROMs and intraoperative findings and procedures were recorded and analyzed. A total of 75 patients, 84% Female, and 16% male, with an average age of 27 years old, were included in the study. Patients were randomized to have PAO alone 34 patients vs. PAO + arthroscopy 41 patients during the same anesthesia event. The procedures performed, including types of labral procedures and chondroplasty procedures, were recorded. Additionally, a two-sided student T-test was used to evaluate the difference in means of preoperative IHOT score among patients for whom a labral procedure was performed versus no labral procedure.

A total of 82% of patients had an intra-articular procedure performed at the time of hip arthroscopy. 68% of patients who had PAO + arthroscopy had a labral procedure performed. The most common labral procedure was a labral refixation which was performed in 78% of patients who had a labral procedure performed. Femoral head-neck junction chondroplasty was performed in 51% of patients who had an intra-articular procedure performed. The mean IHOT score was 29.3 in patients who had a labral procedure performed and 33.63 in those who did not have a labral procedure performed P- value=0.24.

Our findings demonstrate preoperative IHOT-33 scores were not predictive in determining whether intra-articular labral pathology was addressed at the time of surgery. Additionally, we found that if labral pathology was addressed, labral refixation was the most common repair performed. This study also provides valuable information on what procedures high-volume hip preservation centers are performing when performing PAO + arthroscopy.

Introduction

By utilising the inherent variability achievable with circular frames, surgeons can manage a wide spectrum of complex injuries, and can deal with deformity at multiple levels, in multiple planes. The aim of this study was to assess functional outcomes utilising patients reported outcome measures (PROMs) of patients being treated with circular (Ilizarov) frame fixation for complex lower limb injuries and assess these results in conjunction with the observed postoperative alignment of the patients’ limbs.

Introduction. The global rapid growth of the aging population has some likelihood to create a serious crisis on health-care and economy at an unprecedented pace. To extend Healthy Life Expectancy (HALE) in a number of countries, it is desired more than ever to investigate characteristic and prognosis of numerous diseases. This enlightenment and recent studies on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) will drive the increasing interest in the quality of life among the world. The demand for primary THAs by 2030 would rise up to 174% in USA. It is expected that the number of the elderly will surge significantly in the future, thus more septuagenarian and octogenarian are undergoing THA. Moreover, HALE of Japanese female near the age of 75 years, followed to Singapore, is still increasing. Therefore, concerns exist about the PROMs of performing THA in this age-group worldwide. Nevertheless almost the well-established procedure, little agreement has been reached to the elderly. We aimed to clarify the mid-term PROMs after THA over 75-year old. Methods. Between 2005 and 2013, we performed 720 consecutive primary cemented THAs through a direct lateral approach. Of these, 503 female patients (655 hips) underwent THA for treatment of osteoarthritis, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years, were retrospectively enrolled into the study. We excluded 191 patients (252 hips) aged less than 65-year at the time of surgery and 58 patients (60) because of post-traumatic arthritis or previous surgery (37), or lack of data (23). Thus, 343 hips remained eligible for our study, contributed by 254 patients. We investigated Quality-adjusted life year (QALY), EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level scale (EQ-5D) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip-Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ, which was a disease-specific and self-administered questionnaire, reflecting the specificity of the Japanese cultural lifestyle) in patients aged 75 years or older (154 hips, Group-E) compared with those aged 65 to 74 years (189 hips, Group-C) retrospectively. We evaluated the association between patients aged 75 years or older and the following potential risk factors, using logistic regression analysis: age, number of vertebral fractures (VFs), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant for the Mann-Whitney U test. Results. At a mean follow-up duration of 7.2 years, QALY, EQ-5D and JHEQ for the domain of patient satisfaction were significantly greater for Group-E than Group-C; however, there were no significant differences in JHEQ for pain, movement and mental-health between groups. On multivariate analysis, the age (odds ratio [OR] 2.48, p < .01 for EQ-5D; OR .32, p < .01 for JHEQ satisfaction), VFs (OR 1.63, p < .01 for satisfaction) and ASA-PS (OR .64, p = .31 for EQ-5D) were independent predictive risk factors for patients aged 75-year or older. Conclusions. Based on mid-term follow-up of PROMs study, we suggest that cemented THA can lead to the extension of HALE towards the super aged society and our results can be applied to a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study related frailty

Pathologies such as Scapho-Lunate Advanced Collapse (SLAC), Scaphoid Non-union Advanced Collapse (SNAC) and Kienbock's disease can lead to arthritis in the wrist. Depending on the articular surfaces that are involved, motion preserving surgical procedures can be performed. Proximal Row Carpectomy (PRC) and Four Corner Fusion (4CF) are tried and tested surgical options. However, prospective studies comparing the two methods looking at sufficient sample sizes are limited in the literature.

The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the early results of PRC vs 4CF performed in a single centre.

Patients with wrist arthritis were prospectively enrolled (2015 to 2021) in a single centre in Vancouver, Canada. Thirty-six patients and a total of 39 wrists underwent either a PRC (n=18) or 4CF (n=21) according to pre-operative clinical, radiographical, and intra-operative assessment. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores were obtained preoperatively, as well as at six months and one year post operatively. Secondary outcomes were range of motion (ROM) of the wrist, grip strength, reoperation and complication rates. Statistical significance was set at p=0.05

Respectively for PRC and 4CF, the average PRWE scores at baseline were 61.64 (SD=19.62) and 63.67 (SD=20.85). There was significant improvement at the six-month mark to 38.81 (SD=22.95) (p=0.031) and 41.33 (SD=26.61) (p=0.007), then further improvement at the 12month mark to 33.11 (SD=23.42) (p=0.007) and 36.29 (SD=27.25) (p=0.002).

There was no statistical difference between the two groups at any time point.

Regarding ROM, statistical difference was seen in pronation for the PRC group at the 6month mark from an average of 72.18 deg to 61.56 deg and in flexion at the 12 month mark from 47.89 deg to 33.50 deg. All other parameters did not show statistically significant difference post operatively.

For ROM of the 4CF group, only flexion at the 12month mark showed statistically significant change from an average of 48.81 deg to 38.03 deg.

There was no statistical difference in pre-operative ROM between the two groups.

One patient in the 4CF group required a revision for delayed union, and three patients ended up with ulnar sided wrist pain.

Patients undergoing PRC and 4CF showed significant improvement in post operative PRWE scores, this reflects existing literature. For 4CF care must be taken to minimise ulnar sided wrist pain by relatively shortening the unar sided carpal column mass.

ROM analysis showed that patients lost some wrist flexion ROM post-operatively at the 12month mark with both PRC and 4CF. However, other ROM parameters were unchanged

Frailty has been shown to be a risk predictor for peri-operative adverse events (AEs) in patients undergoing various type of spine surgery. However, its relationship with Patient Related Outcome Measures (PROMS) remains unknown. The primary objective of this study was to determine the impact of frailty on PROMS in patients undergoing surgery for thoraco-lumbar degenerative conditions. The secondary objective was to determine the association between frailty and baseline PROMS.

This is a retrospective study of a prospective cohort of patients >55 years old who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2018. Patient data and PROMS (EQ-5D, SF-12, ODI, back and leg pain NRS) were extracted from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registry for a single academic centre. Frailty was retrospectively calculated using the modified frailty index (mFI) and patient were classified as frail, pre-frail and non-frail. Patient characteristics and outcomes were analyzed using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and Chi square or Fisher's exact test for proportions. A generalized estimating equations (GEEs) regression model was used to assess the association between patients' baseline frailty status and PROMs measures at three and 12 months.

293 patients were included with a mean age of 67 ± 7 years. Twenty-two percent of the patients (n= 65) were frail, 59 % (n=172) were pre-frail and 19% (n=56) were non-frail. At baseline, the three groups had similar PROMS, except for the PCS which was worse in the frail group (mean difference [95% CI], −4.9 [−8.6;-1.1], p= 0.0083). The improvement in the EQ-5D, PCS, MCS, ODI, back and leg pain NRS scores was not significantly different between the three groups (p> 0.05). The was no difference in the evolution of the PROMS at three and 12 months between the three groups (p> 0.05).

Although frailty is a known predictor of AEs, it does not predict worse PROMS after spine surgery in that population. At baseline, non-frail, pre-frail and frail patients have similar PROMS.

Introduction

Patients undergoing limb reconstruction surgery often face a challenging and often lengthy process to complete their treatment journey. The majority of existing outcome measures do not adequately capture the patient reported outcomes relevant to this patient group in a single measure. Following a previous systematic review, the Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score (SLRS) was designed with the intent to address this need for an effective instrument to measure patient reported outcomes in limb reconstruction patients.