Introduction. The British Spinal Registry (BSR) is a web-based database commissioned by the British Association of Spine Surgeons (BASS) in the UK. It allows auditing of spinal surgery outcomes, patient's safety and overall experience. The clinical data include patient's demographics which is entered into the Registry by medical staff, as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) that is submitted to the Registry by the patient themselves at different time periods post-operatively. It has the ability to register Device and Implants as well as co-ordinate multicentre research. This study is to identify both the staff and patient compliance regarding to data submissions to the BSR at St. George's Hospital NHS Trust. Methods and Materials. Retrospective analysis of the BSR data for all spinal surgeries that was performed at SGH by the three Complex Spinal Surgery Consultants between 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2018. This study period allowed up to 12 months PROM data analysis. Staff and Patient compliance were analysed separately depend on the data they submitted. Results. 404 (n) spinal surgeries were performed over this two-year period. Surgical demographics: 39.4% (159/404) males and 56.2% (227/404) females, 4.5% (18/404) declined to be added. Age ranging from 6 to 92, mean age was 47.9. Staff compliance was 89.4% for the registration of patient data. Trauma and tumour patients were excluded as they are not required to complete any pre-operative PROMs. For the remaining patients, 35.8% (116/324) completed their baseline pre-operative PROMs. A steady decrease in patient compliance for post-operative PROMS was observed: 29.8% (2 weeks), 24.9% (6 weeks), 21.2% (6 months), 17.1% (12 months), and 16.6% (24 months). Conclusions. We identified a poor patient compliance in both pre-operative and post-operative PROMS. Patient questionnaire fatigue can occur over time which results in falling compliance to PROMS in 12 months and 24 months. Moreover, patients who do not provide an email address are less likely to fill in their PROMS. Satisfactory compliance for staff regarding to BSR utilisation are shown. Staff should aim to achieve a higher level of compliance as this will help to keep a record of all spinal surgeries that are performed and any complications that are encountered in a particular centre. Over the past three years, the BSR had introduced various schemes to drive up utilisation including a Best Practice Tariff in 2019. Part of the tariff will be withheld when staff failure to enter patients onto the Registry. Further research is needed to determine why there is such fall off especially with patient compliance and to elucidate potential measures to improve their compliance

Purpose of Study and Background. Degenerative cervical myelopathy resulting in cord compromise is a progressive condition that results in significant quality of life limitations. Surgical treatment options available are anterior and/or posterior decompression of the affected levels. Patients are counselled pre-operatively that the aim of surgical intervention is to help prevent deterioration of neurology. Anecdotal evidence suggested improvements in both EMS and PROMs in this cohort of patients. A 2-year prospective study tested this hypothesis. Methodology and Results. 67 patients undergoing anterior cervical surgery were followed up to two years. Myelopathic features, radiological cord compression, myelomalacia change and levels of surgery were recorded. Pre/post intervention myelopathy scores/grades, and PROM's were recorded. Paired t-test was performed when comparing pre/post intervention scores and Annova test when comparing results across levels. Our prospective study identified statistically significant improvements in European myelopathy scores and grade and patient reported clinical outcomes in the said population. Conclusions. DCSM patients undergoing anterior surgery demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PROMs and EMS scores and grades. This has been demonstrated irrespective of number of surgical levels. Conflicts of Interest: None. Sources of Funding: None. Previously presented as a poster at Cervical Spine Research Society, Paris 2020-Virtual Meeting

Aims. To determine the value of scoliosis surgery, it is necessary to evaluate outcomes in domains that matter to patients. Since randomized trials on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are scarce, prospective cohort studies with comparable outcome measures are important. To enhance comparison, a core set of patient-related outcome measures is available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of AIS fusion surgery at two-year follow-up using the core outcomes set. Methods. AIS patients were systematically enrolled in an institutional registry. In all, 144 AIS patients aged ≤ 25 years undergoing primary surgery (median age 15 years (interquartile range 14 to 17) were included. Patient-reported (condition-specific and health-related quality of life (QoL); functional status; back and leg pain intensity) and clinician-reported outcomes (complications, revision surgery) were recorded. Changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed using Friedman’s analysis of variance. Clinical relevancy was determined using minimally important changes (Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r), cut-off values for relevant effect on functioning (pain scores) and a patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS; Oswestry Disability Index). Results. At baseline, 65 out of 144 patients (45%) reported numerical rating scale (NRS) back pain scores > 5. All PROMs significantly improved at two-year follow-up. Mean improvements in SRS-22r function (+ 1.2 (SD 0.6)), pain (+ 0.6 (SD 0.8)), and self-image (+ 1.1 (SD 0.7)) domain scores, and the SRS-22r total score (+ 0.5 (SD 0.5)), were clinically relevant. At two-year follow-up, 14 out of 144 patients (10%) reported NRS back pain > 5. Surgical site infections did not occur. Only one patient (0.7%) underwent revision surgery. Conclusion. Relevant improvement in functioning, condition-specific and health-related QoL, self-image, and a relevant decrease in pain is shown at two-year follow-up after fusion surgery for AIS, with few adverse events. Contrary to the general perception that AIS is a largely asymptomatic condition, nearly half of patients report significant preoperative back pain, which reduced to 10% at two-year follow-up. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):265–273

Background. PROMs have become an integral assessment tool of clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction. To date, PROMs for lumbar discectomy are not an NHS requirement, although voluntary collection via the British Spine Registry is encouraged. Despite this, PROMs for day case microdiscectomy is scarcely reported. We present PROMs for day case microdiscectomy at Lancashire Teaching Hospitals. Aims. 1). To review PROMs to quantify leg pain, back pain, EQ5D and ODI scores. 2). Evaluate PROMs data collection compliance. Methods. We studied PROMs data, taken prospectively as part of routine clinical care for all patients who underwent single level day case microdiscectomy between January 2013 to December 2015. PROMs included VAS for back and leg pain, EQ5D and ODI scores. Preoperative PROMs were compared to all available postoperative PROMs at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. Paired student T-tests were used to compare preoperative to postoperative scores. Results. Preoperative PROMs were recorded for 132 patients. Postoperative PROMs were recorded for 48 patients at 3 months, 51 patients at 6 months, 37 patients at 12 months and 15 patients at 24 months. Significant postoperative improvements (p<0.05) were found at all time points for back pain, leg pain, EQ5D and ODI, with the exception EQ5D at 24 months (p = 0.10). Conclusion. There was significant improvement in VAS back and leg scores, as well as ODI scores over 24 months. Further work is needed to improve compliance with postoperative PROMs and to optimise the benefit of these health assessment tools. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Aims. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the correction achieved using a convex pedicle screw technique and a low implant density achieved using periapical concave-sided screws and a high implant density. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcome between the two techniques. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed a series of 51 patients with a thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. There were 26 patients in the convex pedicle screw group who had screws implanted periapically (Group 2) and a control group of 25 patients with bilateral pedicle screws (Group 1). The patients’ charts were reviewed and pre- and postoperative radiographs evaluated. Postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were recorded. Results. The number of implants (14.5 vs 17.1) and the implant density (1.5 vs 1.9) were significantly lower in Group 2 (p < 0.001). Operating time was 27 minutes shorter in Group 2 than in Group 1, with a mean of 217 minutes (SD 50.5; 120 to 346). The duration of surgery per instrumented vertebra was reduced by 19% in Group 2 (p = 0.011). No statistical difference was found in the postoperative Cobb angle, vertebral rotation, the relative correction achieved, or postoperative PROMs. Conclusion. Despite a lower implant density and achieving correction through a convex rod, surgical correction of the Cobb angle and vertebral body rotation was similar in both groups. Periapical pedicle screws and primary correction on the concave side do not seem to be mandatory in order to achieve good surgical results in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. The operating time was shorter in the group with lower implant density. In conclusion, the technique provided good results and has the potential to reduce complications and costs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):536–541

Background to the study:. The use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to measure effectiveness of care, and supporting patient management is being advocated increasingly. PROMs data are often collected using hard copy questionnaires. New technology enables electronic PROM data collection. Purpose of the study:. To identify patient and practitioner perceived opportunities and challenges to implementing electronic PROM data capture as part of the process for developing a PROM phone and online app. Methods:. Interviews were undertaken with patients (N=18), and clinicians (N=46). Patients and clinicians were recruited through practice advertisement, in printed healthcare media, social media, and professional networks. Semi-structured interviews were used. Data were analysed using the Framework approach. Themes, sub-themes, and models were developed from the analysed data. Results:. Patient themes included relevance of data collection, data protection, and confidentiality. Practitioner themes included issues around patient engagement, and relevance to clinical practice. Overall patients were more enthusiastic than clinicians about using PROMs in practice. They welcomed the opportunity to provide feedback, and were prepared to use technology to achieve this. In contrast, clinicians reported concerns that patients would not want to complete PROMs, or may be unable to use electronic devices to achieve this. Other clinicians noted that this was a professional demand and part of reflective practice. Conclusion:. The patients' enthusiasm to contribute data and the clinicians' paternalistic views were contrasting and suggests a greater need for patient centred communication

Introduction. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and psychological aspects of spinal conditions play an important role in its management. Disability benefit in the social welfare system is being closely scrutinized. The PHQ9 and GAD7 are used widely in general practice to aid assessment of depression and anxiety/somatization. To date, their use in the spinal surgery out patient setting has not been assessed. Materials and Method. Over a one-year period the senior author saw 516 new patients. Each patient completed a standard spinal assessment questionnaire consisting of several demographic/aetiological questions and PROMs (VAS back, VAS leg, ODI/NDI, PHQ9 and GAD7). An analysis of these scores was performed. Results. The mean age was 54 years with 237 males and 279 females. The mean VAS Neck/Back was 6.7, VAS Limb 6, ODI/NDI 48, PHQ9 12 and GAD7 8.7. The PHQ9 and GAD7 correlated strongly with the VAS and ODI/NDI scores (r=0.3–0.4, p<0.0001). The PHQ9 correlated strongly with the GAD7 (r=0.83, p<0.0001). 163 patients (31.6%) were receiving disability benefit. Disability benefit was strongly associated with increasing age, VAS, ODI/NDI, PHQ9 and GAD7 scores (p<0.0001). Patients receiving disability benefit have more concerns regarding their pain and worse PROMs. Similar findings were found in the subgroup of 81 patients with chronic degenerative low back pain. Conclusion. The PHQ9 and GAD7 scores appear to correlate well with the standard spinal disability assessment PROMs (VAS and ODI/NDI). Patients receiving disability benefit appear to have worse PROMs including worse measures of depression and anxiety/somatization

Background to the study:. The use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) is being increasingly advocated but data are still being collected using paper systems. This is costly and environmentally challenging. New innovations are required to balance the challenges of capturing PROM data while considering budgets, and access to IT, and patient choice. Purpose of the study:. To develop and test a mobile phone and web app for collecting patient reported outcomes about musculoskeletal symptoms. Methods:. The content of the app was developed following qualitative work with patients and clinicians, and a review of measurement properties of different PROMs. Early versions of the app underwent α- and β-testing to identify issues with functionality. The PROM app was pilot-tested to assess feasibility, responsiveness, and test-retest reliability of the PROMs. The pilot version of the app contained demographic data, the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), the Bournemouth Questionnaire, and Visual Analogue Scale for pain. At follow-up additional questions exploring patient satisfaction and experience of care, plus a transition question were asked. Results:. A total of 517 patient codes were allocated. Completed datasets were gathered from patients (N=92) potentially indicating issues with acceptability and feasibility. Data analysis indicated good completion of questions. The RMDQ appeared to be largely redundant in this patient population and was removed in the final version of the app. Conclusion:. The app performed well when used by participants. Support is required for practitioners and patients to implement this electronic data capture system

Aims

Lumbar disc prolapse is a frequent indication for surgery. The few available long-term follow-up studies focus mainly on repeated surgery for recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to analyze all reasons for additional surgery for patients operated on for a primary lumbar disc prolapse.

Aims

The number of patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy has increased. In many countries, public hospitals have limited capacity. This has resulted in long waiting times for elective treatment and a need for supplementary private healthcare. It is uncertain whether the management of patients and the outcome of treatment are equivalent in public and private hospitals. The aim of this study was to compare the management and patient-reported outcomes among patients who underwent surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy in public and private hospitals in Norway, and to assess whether the effectiveness of the treatment was equivalent.

Aims

To identify the incidence and risk factors for five-year same-site recurrent disc herniation (sRDH) after primary single-level lumbar discectomy. Secondary outcome was the incidence and risk factors for five-year sRDH reoperation.

Aims

Repeated lumbar spine surgery has been associated with inferior clinical outcomes. This study aimed to examine and quantify the impact of this association in a national clinical register cohort.

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of coccygectomy in patients with persistent coccydynia and coccygeal instability.

Background. Low back pain (LBP) is widespread in all populations and is a worldwide health problem, which poses substantial challenges for clinical management. Individuals with LBP may reduce their symptoms by implementing self-managed at-home interventions. The theoretical design of the LumbaCurve™ promotes the principles of a passive gravity-assisted traction (PGAT) stretch of the lumbar and sacral region in order to reduce LBP. This study aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness of the LumbaCurve™ in the management of LBP when compared to a control group of standardised care. Methods. Following a screening form using Red Flags and STarT Back tools, 60 individuals with LBP were recruited to the 4-week intervention. Eligible participants completed a pre-intervention questionnaire and were randomly allocated to either ‘standardised care’ or ‘standardised care PLUS LumbaCurve™’ group. Intervention material was trialled for 4 weeks consecutively, followed by a post-intervention questionnaire. Pre and post assessments applied the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS). Results. Interim results suggested RMDQ values demonstrate a trend toward the classification of ‘definite improvement’ following standardised care plus LumbaCurve™ intervention. When comparing pre/post outcomes alone for the intervention of standardised care plus LumbaCurve™, significant reductions in RMDQ results occurred (p=.014). PROMS results reported a significant decrease (p=.015) in average pain rating when comparing interventions. Conclusion. Initial findings report that through a four week intervention programme, significant improvements in patient reported back pain levels are demonstrated following standardised care plus LumbaCurve™ intervention. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part and has not been previously presented at a national meeting. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: Spark Ventures UK

Aim. To use Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to determine the effectiveness of lumbar spinal surgery at a single UK institution. Methods. Consecutive patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery (discectomies or decompressions) from 1 January 2011 to 13 March 2013 at a UK District General Hospital were assessed. The procedures were performed or supervised by a senior Consultant Orthopaedic spinal surgeon. All patients completed PROM questionnaires before and three months following surgery. These included Visual Analogue Scores (VAS), SF-12, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Roland Morris Low Back Pain Questionnaire (RMQ). Results. A total of 230 patients had surgery. Of these, 189 (82%) completed both pre- and post-operative questionnaires. All PROMs showed improvement: VAS for constant back pain improved from 4.1 to 2.1 and exacerbations of back pain from 5.8 to 2.4. VAS for constant leg pain improved from 6.3 to 1.7 and for exacerbations of leg pain from 8.2 to 1.8. Mean ODI from 47 to 21; RMQ from13 to 5; and SF12-psychological and physical components increased by 7.2 and 12.4, respectively. Those patients with better psychological health pre-operatively, (high SF-12 score, >60 [n=14]) had a reduction in mean score (decrease of 3.2) post-operatively. However, those with poorer psychological health pre-operatively (low SF-12 score, <30 [n=18]) showed a marked improvement in mean score post-operatively (increase of 18.9). Conclusions. These results show that lumbar spinal surgery is safe and effective at a District General Hospital. Baseline psychological scores may help predict psychological outcomes following surgery. This warrants further prospective evaluation. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

Background. Recent studies show massage is effective in reducing back pain and heat and warmth during massage increases an individual's sense of wellbeing. The Ceragem V3 automatic thermal massage bed utilises principles of thermal massage to provide a therapeutic tool for individuals with conditions including diabetes and back pain. Though the brand is well known globally and has much anecdotal evidence, little research has been done on what effect the bed has on individuals with back pain. This study aims to assess subjective experience and function of participants with back pain when using the Ceragem V3. Methods & Results. Thirty-two participants (aged 35.2±9.9 years) with back pain (including sciatica) were recruited after screening using the Red Flags and STarT Back tools. The intervention comprised nine treatment sessions over three successive weeks using an automated thermal massage bed (Ceragem V3, Korea) in automatic mode. Body charts, Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) were used to measure participant pain, stiffness, discomfort and disability levels pre and post intervention. Body chart analysis for pain location showed a significant reduction in reported pain in the thoracic and lumbosacral regions (p<0.01). PROMs showed a significant reduction in the number of days back pain was experienced (p<0.000) and clinically important reductions in back pain, stiffness and discomfort (p<0.000). There was also a significant reduction in RMDQ score (p=0.000). Conclusions. Initial findings demonstrate that through a three week intervention programme, individuals show a significant improvement in back pain, discomfort and stiffness

Aims

The British Spine Registry (BSR) was introduced in May 2012 to be used as a web-based database for spinal surgeries carried out across the UK. Use of this database has been encouraged but not compulsory, which has led to a variable level of engagement in the UK. In 2019 NHS England and NHS Improvement introduced a new Best Practice Tariff (BPT) to encourage input of spinal surgical data on the BSR. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of the spinal BPT on compliance with the recording of surgical data on the BSR.

Aims

Spinal fusion remains the gold standard in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. However, anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is gaining widespread interest, despite the limited data on its efficacy. The aim of our study was to determine the clinical efficacy of AVBT in skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is uncommon in youth and few cases are treated surgically. Very few outcome studies exist for LDH surgery in this age group. Our aim was to explore differences in gender in pre-operative level of disability and outcome of surgery for LDH in patients aged ≤ 20 years using prospectively collected data.

From the national Swedish SweSpine register we identified 180 patients with one-year and 108 with two-year follow-up data ≤ 20 years of age, who between the years 2000 and 2010 had a primary operation for LDH.

Both male and female patients reported pronounced impairment before the operation in all patient reported outcome measures, with female patients experiencing significantly greater back pain, having greater analgesic requirements and reporting significantly inferior scores in EuroQol (EQ-5D-index), EQ-visual analogue scale, most aspects of Short Form-36 and Oswestry Disabilities Index, when compared with male patients. Surgery conferred a statistically significant improvement in all registered parameters, with few gender discrepancies. Quality of life at one year following surgery normalised in both males and females and only eight patients (4.5%) were dissatisfied with the outcome. Virtually all parameters were stable between the one- and two-year follow-up examination.

LDH surgery leads to normal health and a favourable outcome in both male and female patients aged 20 years or younger, who failed to recover after non-operative management.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1675–82.

Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in the scores of patient-reported outcome measures allow clinicians to assess the outcome of intervention from the perspective of the patient. There has been significant variation in their absolute values in previous publications and a lack of consistency in their calculation.

The purpose of this study was first, to establish whether these values, following spinal surgery, vary depending on the surgical intervention and their method of calculation and secondly, to assess whether there is any correlation between the two external anchors most frequently used to calculate the MCID.

We carried out a retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data of adult patients who underwent elective spinal surgery between 1994 and 2009. A total of 244 patients were included. There were 125 men and 119 women with a mean age of 54 years (16 to 84); the mean follow-up was 62 months (6 to 199) The MCID was calculated using three previously published methods.

Our results show that the value of the MCID varies considerably with the operation and its method of calculation. There was good correlation between the two external anchors. The global outcome tool correlated significantly better.

We conclude that consensus needs to be reached on the best method of calculating the MCID. This then needs to be defined for each spinal procedure. Using a blanket value for the MCID for all spinal procedures should be avoided.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:366–71.