Displaced proximal Humeral fractures at Inverclyde Royal Hospital prior to 2008 were previously treated with the antegrade Acumed Polaris Proximal Humeral, predominantly in 2 part fractures. The Philos plate was introduced in 2008, initially being used to treat select non unions, and then expanded to acute fractures. The aim of this study was to assess time to union and complications in the lower volume District General setting comparing to published outcomes. From February 2008 – January 2011, 20 patients were identified. Age range 49–75 (mean 61.2) years, 8 male; 12 female. Left 9, Right 11 Neers 2 part 35%; 3 35%; 4 30%. 16 (80%) were performed in acute fractures with 4 for non-unions, 3 of which were previous polaris nail fixations. 2 patients were lost to follow up after 6/52 but were progressing well. Union was confirmed radiologically and clinically in all but 2 remaining patients (10%), one of whom suffered a significant complication of plate fracture, the second treated with revision for painful non union. 2 other significant complications were observed: transient axillary nerve palsy and deep infection. Both of these patients recovered with delayed union observed in the infection case (52 weeks). Time to union range was 8–52 weeks (mean 17.1). The literature shows a high failure rate of up to 45% with intramedullary nail fixation and limited predominantly to 2 part fractures with risk of damage to the rotator cuff. This study shows a satisfactory union rate using the Philos of 90% with only 3 (15%) requiring further surgery for non-union, plate fracture and infection. 3 and 4 part fractures composed 65% of case load. Early results indicate satisfactory outcomes compared to current published literature

Proximal humeral shaft fractures are commonly treated with long straight locking plates endangering the radial nerve distally. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence in a human cadaveric bone model of 90°-helical PHILOS plates versus conventional straight PHILOS plates in proximal third comminuted humeral shaft fractures. Eight pairs of humeral cadaveric humeri were instrumented using either a long 90°-helical plate (group1) or a straight long PHILOS plate (group2). An unstable proximal humeral shaft fracture was simulated by means of an osteotomy maintaining a gap of 5cm. All specimens were tested under quasi-static loading in axial compression, internal and external rotation as well as bending in 4 directions. Subsequently, progressively increasing internal rotational loading until failure was applied and interfragmentary movements were monitored by means of optical motion tracking. Flexion/extension deformation (°) in group1 was (2.00±1.77) and (0.88±1.12) in group2, p=0.003. Varus/valgus deformation (°) was (6.14±1.58) in group1 and (6.16±0.73) in group2, p=0.976. Shear (mm) and displacement (°) under torsional load were (1.40±0.63 and 8.96±0.46) in group1 and (1.12±0.61 and 9.02±0.48) in group2, p≥0.390. However, during cyclic testing shear and torsional displacements and torsion were both significantly higher in group 1, p≤0.038. Cycles to catastrophic failure were (9960±1967) in group1 and (9234±1566) in group2, p=0.24. Although 90°-helical plating was associated with improved resistance against varus/valgus deformation, it demonstrated lower resistance to flexion/extension and internal rotation as well as higher flexion/extension, torsional and shear movements compared to straight plates. From a biomechanical perspective, 90°-helical plates performed inferior compared to straight plates and alternative helical plate designs with lower twist should be investigated in future paired cadaveric studies

To date, the fixation of proximal humeral fractures with angular stable locking plates is still insufficient with mechanical failure rates of 18% to 35%. The PHILOS plate (DePuy Synthes, Switzerland) is one of the most used implants. However, this plate has not been demonstrated to be optimal; the closely symmetric plate design and the largely heterogeneous bone mineral density (BMD) distribution of the humeral head suggest that the primary implant stability may be improved by optimizing the screw orientations. Finite element (FE) analysis allows testing of various implant configurations repeatedly to find the optimal design. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether computational optimization of the orientation of the PHILOS plate locking screws using a validated FE methodology can improve the predicted primary implant stability. The FE models of nineteen low-density (humeral head BMD range: 73.5 – 139.5 mg/cm3) left proximal humeri of 10 male and 9 female elderly donors (mean ± SD age: 83 ± 8.8 years) were created from high-resolution peripheral computer tomography images (XtremeCT, Scanco Medical, Switzerland), using a previously developed and validated computational osteosynthesis framework. To simulate an unstable mal-reduced 3-part fracture (AO/OTA 11-B3.2), the samples were virtually osteotomized and fixed with the PHILOS plate, using six proximal screws (rows A, B and E) according to the surgical guide. Three physiological loading modes with forces taken from musculoskeletal models (AnyBody, AnyBody Technology A/S, Denmark) were applied. The FE analyses were performed with Abaqus/Standard (Simulia, USA). The average principal compressive strain was evaluated in cylindrical bone regions around the screw tips; since this parameter was shown to be correlated with the experimental number of cycles to screw cut-out failure (R2 = 0.90). In a parametric analysis, the orientation of each of the six proximal screws was varied by steps of 5 in a 5×5 grid, while keeping the screw head positions constant. Unfeasible configurations were discarded. 5280 simulations were performed by repeating the procedure for each sample and loading case. The best screw configuration was defined as the one achieving the largest overall reduction in peri-screw bone strain in comparison with the PHILOS plate. With the final optimized configuration, the angle of each screw could be improved, exhibiting significantly smaller average bone strain around the screw tips (range of reduction: 0.4% – 38.3%, mean ± SD: 18.49% ± 9.56%). The used simulation approach may help to improve the fixation of complex proximal humerus fractures, especially for the target populations of patients at high risk of failure

We present a novel use for an adult proximal humeral locking plate. In our case an 18-year-old female with cerebral palsy sustained a peri-prosthetic fracture of a blade plate previously inserted for a femoral osteotomy. Treatment was revision using a long proximal humeral locking plate. She had a successful outcome. We present the history and operative management. The female had a history of quadriplegic cerebral palsy, asthma, diabetes mellitus and congenital heart disease. She had a gastrostomy tube for enteral feeding. She was on nutritional supplements, baclofen, Omeprazole and movicol. She is looked after by her parents and requires a wheelchair for mobility. She is unable to communicate. Surgical History: Right adductor tenotomy, aged 11. Femoral Derotation Osteotomy & Dega Acetabular Osteotomy, aged 13. Right distal hamstring and knee capsule release, aged 14. Admitted to A&E (aged 18); unwitnessed fall. Painful, swollen, deformed thigh with crepitus. Xrays demonstrated peri- prosthetic fracture below blade plate. No specific equipment available to revise. Decision made to use PHILOS (Synthes, UK). GA, antibiotics, supine on table. Lateral approach. Plate removed after excising overgrown bone. Reduced and held. 10hole PHILOS applied. Near anatomical reduction. Secure fixation with locking screws proximally away from blade plate defect. Blood loss 800ml. 5 days in hospital. Sequential fracture clinic review. Wound healed well. Fracture healed on Xray at 11 months and discharged. To our knowledge this is the first reported use of a PHILOS plate for this specific fracture. The complexity of this case and underlying neurological disorder deemed long blade plate revision unsuitable. Fracture rates after femoral derotation osteotomies rare. 5/157 and 1/58 in the two largest studies to date. Conservative measures were the main recommendation. We have demonstrated a straightforward method for revision fixation with an excellent outcome. It would be recommended as an alternative to other surgeons in this position

Background. Osteoporotic fracture fixation in the proximal humerus remains a critical challenge. While the biomechanical benefits of screw augmentation with bone cement are established, minimising the cement volume may help control any risk of extravasation and reduce surgical procedure time. Previous experimental studies suggest that it may be sufficient to only augment the screws at the sites of the lowest bone quality. However, adequately testing this hypothesis in vitro is not feasible. Methods. This study systematically evaluated the 64 possible strategies for augmenting six screws in the humeral head through finite element simulations to determine the relative biomechanical benefits of each augmentation strategy. Two subjects with varying levels of local bone mineral density were each modeled with a 2-part and 3-part fracture that was stabilised with a PHILOS plate. The biomechanical fixation was evaluated under physiological loads (muscle and joint reaction forces) that correspond to three different motions: 45 degrees abduction, 45 degrees abduction with 45 degrees internal rotation, and 45 degrees flexion. Results. The higher risk cases (low bone quality or 3-part fracture) exhibited greater peri-implant bone strains and derived greater benefits from screw augmentation. When selecting four screws to augment, the biomechanical benefits ranged from a 25% reduction in bone strain to a 59% reduction in bone strain, depending on the choice of screws. Further, the relative benefits of each augmentation strategy varied between patients and under different loading conditions. Correlations between local bone mineral density and benefits of augmentation were not significant. Conclusions. An optimal augmentation strategy is likely patient-specific and a larger cohort, modeled under a variety of conditions, would be required to elucidate any patient-specific factors (e.g. morphology or bone quality) that may dictate the relative benefits of each augmentation strategy

There is continued concern over complication rates (20–30% of cases) in locked proximal humeral plating. The most common sequelae of this is screw penetration of the humeral head. This is associated with natural settling of the fracture, malreducition in varus, insufficent medial support of the fracture. The proximity of the screws to the articular surface can also be influential on outcome if collapse occurs. Our operative technique is to establish the rotation of the humeral head where the drill appears closest to the articular margin (by sequential xray screening) and subtract from this to avoid intra-articular penetration of the humeral head. 55 Consecutive patients of average age 56.4 years (14.7–86.1), 17 male and 38 females, who underwent PHILOS plating were identified using Bluespier database. Xrays were analysed for fracture pattern, restoration of neck-shaft angle, plate positioning, number and configuration of screws and presence of screw penetration both intra-operatively and at postoperative follow-up. There were 6.07 screws used per head (total 330). There was one intraoperative screw penetration and 3 patients had evidence of screw penetration at follow-up, which required implant removal (total screw penetration rate of 7%). There was one case of AVN. The mean neck shaft angle was 137 degrees (anatomical 135 degrees). Accurate reduction of fractures and placement of screws in the humeral head using image intensifier can act to minimise risk of screw penetration and make some of the complications of locked proximal humeral plating avoidable