Failure of cephalomedullary fixation for proximal femur fractures is an uncommon event associated with significant morbidity to the patient and cost to the healthcare system. This institution changed nailing system from the PFNA (DePuy Synthes) to InterTan (Smith and Nephew) in February 2020. To assess for non-inferiority, a retrospective review was performed on 247 patients treated for unstable proximal femur fractures (AO 31 A2; A3). Patients were identified through manual review of fluoroscopic images. Stable fracture patterns were excluded (AO 31 A1). Pre/post operative imaging, demographic data, operative time and ASA scores assessed. Internal/external imaging and national joint registry data were reviewed for follow up. No significant difference was found in overall failure rate of PFNA vs InterTan (4.84% vs 3.23%; p = 0.748). Overall, short nails were more likely to fail by cut-out than long nails (7.5% vs 1.2%; p = 0.015). Nails which failed by varus cut-out had a higher tip/apex distance (TAD) (26.2mm vs 17.0mm; p < 0.001). Of concern, varus cut-out occurred in two InterTan nails with TAD of <25mm. The PFNA enjoyed a shorter operative time for both the short (59.1 vs 71.8 mins; p = 0.022) and long nails (98.8 vs 114.3 mins; p = 0.016) with no difference in 120-day survival rate. Overall failure rates of the PFNA and InterTan nailing systems were comparable. However, the failure rate of short nails in this study is concerning. Using long nails with a lag screw design for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures may reduce failure rates. Cumulative frequency analysis suggests stringent tip-apex distances of less than 21mm may reduce failure rates in lag-screw design cephulomedullary nails. This dataset suggests that unstable intertrochanteric fractures may be more reliably managed with a long cephalomedullary device

Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) I one of the implants commonly used to stabilise subtrochanteric fractures or communited inter/pertrochanteric fractures. The aim of this project was to assess the outcome of PFNA in a busy District General Hospital. Between November 2009 to November 2012, 76 patients underwent PFNA. These patients were identified from the local hip fracture database, which is prospectively collected. The mean age of the patients was 80.11 years (range of 26.83 to 98.53). 27 were male and 49 female. Right hip was involved in 36 cases and left hip in 40. 9 patients required revision surgery due to failure of the primary surgery. 2 patients died due to other causes. 5 out of the 9 patients who underwent revision surgery had their primary surgery performed by a trainee under consultant supervision and a consultant surgeon performed the other 4 cases. In our series failure rate was 11.8%. We conclude that although PFNA is an excellent device to fix subtrochanteric or communited intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur one needs to be cautious and follow the correct operative technique to avoid failures

The first case was that of an 89-year-old woman with advanced dementia. After falling onto the left hip, she was admitted to the emergency room. Standard x-rays revealed an unstable intertrochanteric fracture. Closed reduction and internal fixation was performed using the long PFNA with a 105-mm helical blade, the second patient treated with this implant in our series. The operation was performed by an attending surgeon who was experienced with treatment of trochanteric fractures with intramedullary devices. Six weeks later the patient presented again with severe pain after she had fallen onto her left hip for a second time. Follow-up x-rays showed a perforation of the helical blade through the cortex of the femoral head after a shortening of the femoral neck by 2 cm. CCD angle was still 129 degrees, and there were no radiological signs of rotational displacement. The acetabular cartilage appeared intact. At her second operation, a replacement of the blade was performed using a shorter 95-mm implant. Postoperatively the patient was again mobilized under full weight bearing, and at 12 weeks follow-up, we found cut through again, we replaced hip with biopolar hemiarthroplasty

Introduction. Internal fixation of pertrochanteric fractures is evolving as newer implants are being developed. Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) is a recently introduced implant from AO/ASIF designed to compact the cancellous bone and may be particularly useful in unstable and osteoporotic hip fractures. This study is a single and independent centre experience of this implant used in management of acute hip fractures. Methods. 68 patients involving 68 PFNA nailing procedures done over a period of 2 years (2007–09) were included in the study. Average follow-up period of patients was 1 year. AO classification for trochanteric fractures was used to classify all the fractures. Radiological parameters including tip-apex distance and neck shaft angle measurement were assessed. Results. Average age of patients included in the study was 80 years. 18 patients died during the follow up period due to non-procedure related causes. Average tip-apex distance was 12.7 mm and radiological fracture union time was 5 months. Revision of short to a long PFNA was needed for periprosthetic fracture of shaft of femur in two patients. Two patients needed a complex total hip replacement eventually and further two patients had removal of the implant due to PFNA blade penetration through the femoral head. Discussion. PFNA is a technically demanding procedure and has a learning curve. Our experience shows that it is a useful implant in unstable pertrochanteric fracture fixation. A close radiological and clinical follow up is recommended due to the risk of late fracture and implant related complications

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial was performed to compare the outcome of treatment of unstable fractures of the proximal part of the femur with either a sliding hip screw or a short proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA-XS, Synthes). Eighty one patients (April 2007 – May 2008) presenting with unstable fracture of the proximal part of the femur were randomized, at the time of admission, to fixation with use of either a short proximal femoral nail antirotation (n=42) or a sliding hip screw (n= 39). The primary outcome measure was reoperation within the first postoperative year and mortality at the end of one year. Operative time, fluoroscopy time, blood loss, and any intra-operative complication were recorded for each patient. Follow-up was undertaken at 3, 6, and 12 postoperative months and yearly thereafter. Plain AP and lateral radiographs were obtained at all visits. All changes in the position of the implant, complications, or fixation failure were recorded. Hip range of motion, pain about the hip and the thigh, walking ability score and return to work status were used to compare the outcomes. There was no significant difference between 1 year mortality rates for the two groups. Mean Operative time was significantly less in PFNA group (Mean 25 min, range 19 – 56 min) than DHS group (Mean 38 min, range 28 – 70 min). Patients treated with a PFNA experienced a shorter fluoroscopy time and less blood loss. 6 patients in DHS group had implant failure as compared to none in PFNA group. The functional outcome was also better in PFNA group. When compared to DHS, PFNA-XS provides better functional outcome for unstable trochanteric fractures with less operative time, less blood loss and less complications, however one year mortality rate remains the same

Introduction. In comminuted intertrochanteric fractures, various operative options have been introduced. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were differences in clinical and radiologic outcomes among bipolar hemiarthroplasty(BH), compression hip screw(CHS) and proximal femur nail antirotatory(PFNA) in treating comminuted intertrochanteric fractures(AO type, A2(21, 22, 23)). Materials and Methods. We retrospectively evaluated total 150 patients(BH:50, CHS:50, PFNA: 50) who were operated due to intertrochanteric fractures from March 2010 to Dec 2012 and were older than 65 years at the time of surgery. We compared these three groups for radiologic and clinical outcomes at 12 months postoperatively, including Harris hip score, ability of ambulation(Koval stage), visual analogue scale and radiologic limb length discrepancy(shortening). Landmark and radiologic length was checked. –A: postoperative length. –A’: POD 1year. –B: immediate posteopative contralateral length(from hip center to distal tip of lesser trochanter). –B’: POD 1year contralateral length(from hip center to distal tip of lesser trochanter). –. Limb length(shortening) was adjusted considering difference of magnification. = {A × (B’/B)}− A’. Results. There was no statistical significance among three groups in clinical outcomes including Harris hip score, ability of ambulation(Koval stage), visual analogue scale. However, there was significant differences in radiologic limb discrepancy in plain radiographs at 12 months postoperatively.(radiologic shortening- BH: 2.3mm, PFNA: 3.0mm, CHS:5.1mm, p=0.000). Conclusions. There were no clinical differences among BH, PFNA and CHS in this study. However, notable differences were observed in limb length discrepancy according to selection of operative methods

The PFNA is used routinely at the RUH for unstable peri-trochanteric and femoral fractures. Failure of operative treatment is associated with increased morbidity and financial burden. We analysed surgical and fracture factors, aiming to identify those associated with fixation failure. Retrospective analysis of 76 consecutive patients treated with a PFNA between 2009–2012 was performed. Patient demographics were assessed, along with fracture classification, adequacy of reduction, tip apex distance (TAD) and grade of surgeon. Failure was defined as metal work failure, non-union or need for repeat procedure. The mean age was 78.9 years (25.9–97.4). 21 were male and 49 female. There were 17 failures (24.3%) (7 required further surgery). 10 failures were per-trochanteric, 2 sub-trochanteric and 5 mid-shaft fractures. Complications included 4 broken and 6 backed-out distal locking screws, 2 blade cut-outs, 1 nail fracture and 4 non-unions. All per-trochanteric were adequately reduced with a TAD <25 mm. 11/17 had consultant supervision. A high rate of backed-out distal locking screws was identified. We found no concerns with adequacy of reduction, TAD or consultant supervision

Introduction. The reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur are anatomically and mechanically different from most intertrochanteric fractures. These fractures are complex and very difficult to treat. To evaluate the results of the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures with cephalomedullary nails. Materials and Methods. Between 2005 and 2009, 1179 extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur were treated at our institution. Retrospective review of these x-rays identified 59 patients with reverse obliquity fracture pattern. We analysed our results of cephalomedullary nailing of these complex fractures and evaluated factors responsible for failure of fixation. Results. Of the 59 patients with reverse oblique fracture pattern, one patient was treated with DHS, and two other patients didn't have post-operative x-rays and therefore were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 56 patients treated with cephalomedullary nails, forty eight were treated with gamma nails, five with PFNA and three with ATN. There were 40 females and 16 males with median age of 81.3 years (17–103 years). Six of the fifty six (10.7%) failed to heal or had failure of fixation. The failure rate was four of forty eight for the gamma nails, one of five of the PFNA and one of three of ATN. One of thirty seven (2.7%) of anatomically reduced fractures and five of nineteen (26.3%) of non-anatomically reduced fractures had failure of treatment (p = 0.01). Three of thirteen (23.1%) with femoral medialisation and three of forty three (6.9%) without femoral medialisation had failure of treatment (p = 0.13). Four of forty four (9.1%) with avulsed lesser trochanter and two of twelve (16.6%) without avulsion had failure of treatment (p = 0.59). Three of thirty seven (8.1%) with tip apex distance (TAD) of less than twenty and three of nineteen (15.7%) with TAD more than twenty had failure of treatment (p = 0.65). Conclusion. Inspite of the recent advances in the methods of internal fixation available to surgeons, reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures continue to be a challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. In our study, although poor fracture reduction was observed to be the only significant factor associated with a high failure rate, femoral medialisation and tip apex distance of more than 20 had a high association with poor outcome

Aim:. To audit pertrochanteric fractures treated with a cephalomedullary device in a public health institution. Method:. A retrospective 3 year analysis from January 2007 to December 2010 using theatre records and patient files. Analysis was done in terms of age, time to surgery, duration of surgery, elective or emergency, type of device used, perioperative complications and other factors. Results:. A total of 96 cases were confirmed. The average age was 67.4 years (13 to 99 years). The average time to theatre was 6.9 days. The average duration of surgery was 2 hours 59 minutes. A Trigen reconstruction nail was used in 59.4 % of the cases followed by a PFNA (26%) and others (13.6%). In 30% of cases surgery time was >3 hours and most were done electively (85.4%) during normal working hours. Revision surgery due to poor surgical technique was reported in 8 of 96 (8.3%) cases. Conclusion:. Our audit confirms that pertrochanteric fractures are common in elderly and young patients involved in high velocity trauma especially motor vehicle accidents. Pertrochanteric fractures lead to prolonged morbidity in hospital stay and theatre time. Cephalomedullary devices have reduced these complications and resulted in early rehabilitation and hospital discharge with only 8% of revisions in 3 years