Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 5, Issue 4 | Pages 335 - 342
19 Apr 2024
Athavale SA Kotgirwar S Lalwani R

Aims. The Chopart joint complex is a joint between the midfoot and hindfoot. The static and dynamic support system of the joint is critical for maintaining the medial longitudinal arch of the foot. Any dysfunction leads to progressive collapsing flatfoot deformity (PCFD). Often, the tibialis posterior is the primary cause; however, contrary views have also been expressed. The present investigation intends to explore the comprehensive anatomy of the support system of the Chopart joint complex to gain insight into the cause of PCFD. Methods. The study was conducted on 40 adult embalmed cadaveric lower limbs. Chopart joint complexes were dissected, and the structures supporting the joint inferiorly were observed and noted. Results. The articulating bones exhibit features like a cuboid shelf and navicular beak, which appear to offer inferior support to the joint. The expanse of the spring ligament complex is more medial than inferior, while the superomedial part is more extensive than the intermediate and inferoplantar parts. The spring ligament is reinforced by the tendons in the superomedial part (the main tendon of tibialis posterior), the inferomedial part (the plantar slip of tibialis posterior), and the master knot of Henry positioned just inferior to the gap between the inferomedial and inferoplantar bundles. Conclusion. This study highlights that the medial aspect of the talonavicular articulation has more extensive reinforcement in the form of superomedial part of spring ligament and tibialis posterior tendon. The findings are expected to prompt further research in weightbearing settings on the pathogenesis of flatfoot. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(4):335–342


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 18 - 18
17 Jun 2024
Andres L Donners R Harder D Krähenbühl N
Full Access

Background. Weightbearing computed tomography scans allow for better understanding of foot alignment in patients with Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity. However, soft tissue integrity cannot be assessed via WBCT. As performing both WBCT and magnetic resonance imaging is not cost effective, we aimed to assess whether there is an association between specific WBCT and MRI findings. Methods. A cohort of 24 patients of various stages of PCFD (mean age 51±18 years) underwent WBCT scans and MRI. In addition to signs of sinus tarsi impingement, four three-dimensional measurements (talo-calcaneal overlap, talo-navicular coverage, Meary's angle axial/lateral) were obtained using a post processing software (DISIOR 2.1, Finland) on the WBCT datasets. Sinus tarsi obliteration, spring ligament complex and tibiospring ligament integrity, as well as tibialis posterior tendon degeneration were evaluated with MRI. Statistical analysis was performed for significant (P<0.05) correlation between findings. Results. None of the assessed 3D measurements correlated with spring ligament complex or tibiospring ligament tears. Age, body mass index, and TCO were associated with tibialis posterior tendon tears. 75% of patients with sinus tarsi impingement on WBCT also showed signs of sinus tarsi obliteration on MRI. Of the assessed parameters, only age and BMI were associated with sinus tarsi obliteration diagnosed on MRI, while the assessed WBCT based 3D measurements were, with the exception of MA axial, associated with sinus tarsi impingement. Conclusion. While WBCT reflects foot alignment and indicates signs of osseous impingement in PCFD patients, the association between WBCT based 3D measurements and ligament or tendon tears in MRI is limited. Partial or complete tears of the tibialis posterior tendon were only detectable in comparably older and overweight PCFD patients with an increased TCO. WBCT does not replace MRI in diagnostic value. Both imaging options add important information and may impact decision-making in the treatment of PCFD patients


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1099 - 1107
1 Oct 2023
Henry JK Shaffrey I Wishman M Palma Munita J Zhu J Cody E Ellis S Deland J Demetracopoulos C

Aims

The Vantage Total Ankle System is a fourth-generation low-profile fixed-bearing implant that has been available since 2016. We aimed to describe our early experience with this implant.

Methods

This is a single-centre retrospective review of patients who underwent primary total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) with a Vantage implant between November 2017 and February 2020, with a minimum of two years’ follow-up. Four surgeons contributed patients. The primary outcome was reoperation and revision rate of the Vantage implant at two years. Secondary outcomes included radiological alignment, peri-implant complications, and pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes.