The objectives of our study were to compare patient reported outcome measures between manual and robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty.

Between 1st May 2021 and 31st August 2022, 539 consecutive patients who underwent 564 primary total hip arthroplasties were identified from the local registry database. Data were prospectively collected, and included patient demographics, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade, surgical approach, robotic-assistance, Oxford Hip Score (OHS), EQ-5D-3L and EQ-VAS pre-operatively and at twelve months.

Robotic-assistance, compared against manual total hip arthroplasty, was associated with an enhanced median (interquartile range) OHS (46 [42 – 48] vs 43 [36 – 47], p-value < 0.001), EQ-5D-3L (5 [5 – 7] vs 6 [5 – 8], p-value 0.002), and EQVAS (90 [75 – 95] vs 80 [70 – 90], p-value 0.003) at twelve months after surgery. Robotic-assistance was confirmed to be an independent predictor of a greater OHS at twelve months on a multivariate linear regression analysis (p-value 0.001).

Robotic assistance was superior to manual total hip arthroplasty in enhancing patient reported outcomes at twelve months after surgery.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients who had sustained an unstable ankle fracture with a posterior malleolus fracture (PMF) and without (N-PMF).

Adult patients presenting to a single academic trauma centre in Edinburgh, UK, between 2009 and 2012 with an unstable ankle fracture requiring surgery were identified. The primary outcome measure was the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). Secondary measures included Euroqol-5D-3L Index (Eq5D3L), Euroqol-5D-VAS and Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ).

There were 304 patients in the study cohort. The mean age was 49.6 years (16.3–78.3) and 33% (n=100) male and 67% (n=204) female. Of these, 67% (n=204) had a PMF and 33% did not (n=100). No patient received a computed tomography (CT) scan pre-operatively. Only 10% of PMFs (22/204) were managed with internal fixation. At a mean of 13.8 years (11.3 – 15.3) the median OMAS score was 85 (Interquartile Range 60 – 100). There was no difference in OMAS between the N-PMF and PMF groups (85 [56.25 – 100] vs 85 [61.25 – 100]; p = 0.580). There was also no difference for MOXFQ (N-PMF 7 [0 – 36.75] vs PMF 8 [0–38.75]; p = 0.643), the EQ5D Index (N-PMF 0.8 [0.7 – 1] vs PMF 0.8 [0.7 – 1]; p = 0.720) and EQ5D VAS (N-PMF 80 [70 – 90] vs PMF 80 [60 – 90]; p = 0.224).

The presence of a PMF does not affect the long-term patient reported outcomes in patients with a surgically managed unstable ankle fracture.

The aims of this study in relation to distal radius fractures were to determine (1) the floor and ceiling effects for the QuickDASH and PRWE, (2) the floor and ceiling effects when defined to be within the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the minimal or maximal scores, (3) the degree to which patients with a floor or ceiling effect felt that their wrist was ‘normal’, and (4) patent factors associated with a floor or ceiling effect.

A retrospective cohort study of patients sustaining a distal radius fracture during a single year was undertaken. Outcome measures included the QuickDASH, PRWE, EQ-5D-3L and normal wrist score.

There were 526 patients with a mean age of 65yrs and 77% were female. Most patients were managed non-operatively (73%, n=385). The mean follow-up was 4.8yrs. A ceiling effect was observed for both the QuickDASH (22.3%) and PRWE (28.5%). When defined to be within the MCID of the best score, the effect increased to 62.8% for the QuickDASH and 60% for PRWE. Patients that achieved the best functional outcome according to the QuickDASH and PRWE felt their wrist was only 91% and 92% normal, respectively. Sex (p=0.000), age (p=0.000), dominant wrist injury (p=0.006 for QuickDASH and p=0.038 for PRWE), fracture type (p=0.015), and a better health-related quality of life (p=0.000) were independently associated with achieving a ceiling score.

The QuickDASH and PRWE demonstrated ceiling effects following a distal radius fracture. Patients achieving ceiling scores did not consider their wrist to be ‘normal’ for them.

Mechanical ankle instability is elicited through examination and imaging. A subset of patients however report “functional” instability ie/ instability without objective radiological evidence. Little research compares operative outcomes between these groups. We hypothesised patients with “mechanical instability” were more likely to benefit from operative intervention than those with “functional instability”.

This was a single centre, retrospective case note review of prospectively collected data. Inclusion criteria: over six months of symptoms, failed conservative management, surgical stabilisation between 2016–2018. Data collected: demographics, operative procedure, preoperative and postoperative PROMs.

Nineteen patients were included. All had preoperative MRIs determining ligamentous involvement. Nine had radiological evidence of instability, eight had negative radiographs. Two were excluded due to no intraoperative radiographs.

There was no statistical difference in preoperative MOxFQ scores between the groups (p=0.2039). Preoperative EQ5D-TTO scores were statistically different (mean mechanical 0.58 vs functional 0.26, p=0.0162) but not EQ5D-VAS scores (mean mechanical 77 vs functional 53, p=0.0806).

Mechanical group's preoperative, 26 and 52 week scores respectively: Mean MOxFQ= 57.88, 22.13, 18.5. Mean EQ5D-TTO= 0.58, 0.78, 0.84. EQ5D-VAS= 77, 82, 82.5.

Functional group's preoperative, 26 and 52 week scores respectively: Mean MOxFQ= 71.87, 37.75, 23. Mean EQ5D-TTO 0.26, 0.63, 0.76. EQ5D-VAS 53, 80, 88.

This trend of improvement in PROMs was not reflected in patient satisfaction scores. 75% of respondents in the functional group reported dissatisfaction at 26 weeks versus no dissatisfaction in the mechanical group. We should consider counselling patients accordingly when offering surgery.

Arthritis of the mid-foot is a common presentation to the foot and ankle clinic, resulting from primary (idiopathic), post-traumatic, or inflammatory joint degeneration. Treatment in the initial stages is conservative, with midfoot fusion regarded as the operative treatment of choice; however there is a paucity of comparative and patient reported data regarding outcomes.

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS), were prospectively collected from October-2015 to March-2018. Diagnoses were confirmed with image guided injection and initial management was conservative. In total, 66 patients were managed conservatively and 40 treated with mid-foot fusion. MOxFQ (Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire) and EQ-5D-3L (Euroqual) PROMS were collected pre-operatively, at 26 weeks and at 52 weeks.

In the operatively managed group, the female:male ratio was 5.7:1, with a mean age of 61 (range 24–80), while in the conservatively managed group, the ratio was 2.1:1 with mean age 63 (range 29–86).

In the surgically managed group, 88.2% of patients reported improvement in symptoms at 26 weeks and 88.9% at 52 weeks. This was greater than the conservatively managed group, in which 40.6% reported improvement at 26 weeks and 33.3% at 52 weeks. Mean MOxFQ improvement in the surgically managed group was +30.7 and +33.9 at 26 and 52 weeks respectively, and in the conservative group, +9.4 and +4.3, at 26 and 52 weeks. Similarly, favourable surgical outcomes were reported across all domains of EQ-5D-3L.

This study has highlighted excellent early outcomes after surgical treatment and may represent promise for those patients for whom conservative management fails.

The Covid-19 pandemic restricted access to elective arthroplasty theatres. Consequently, there was a staggering rise in waiting times for patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty (THA). Concomitantly, rapidly destructive osteoarthritis (RDOA) incidence also increased. Two cohorts of patients were reviewed: patients undergoing primary THA, pre-pandemic (December 2017-December 2018) and patients with RDOA (ascertained by dual consultant review of pre-operative radiographs) undergoing THA after the pandemic started (March 2020 – March 2022). There were 236 primary THA cases in the pre-pandemic cohort. Out of the 632 primary THA cases post-pandemic, 186 cases (29%) had RDOA. Within this RDOA cohort, the pre-operative mean OHS, EQ5D3L and EQVAS (12.7, 10.5 and 57.6 respectively) were all poorer than in the pre-pandemic population (18.3, 9.4 and 66.7 respectively) (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the RDOA and pre-pandemic cohort in Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) at 12 months, perhaps due to their ceiling effect. Within the RDOA cohort, 7 cases required acetabular augments, 1 of which also required femoral shortening. The rate of intra-operative fracture, dislocation, infection, return to theatre, and revision were 2.2%, 2.7%, 4.3%, 3.8% and 2.2% respectively, greater than those reported in the literature. No fractures nor dislocations occurred in robot assisted arthroplasties. With ever increasing waiting lists, RDOA prevalence will continue to rise. Increased surgical challenges and potential use of additional implants generated by its presence excludes these patients from waiting list initiative pathways, potentiating the complexity of the operative procedure. Going forwards, the economic burden and training implications must be considered

Introduction. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are used as outcome of many surgical treatments such as Hip and knee joint replacements, varicose vein and groin hernia surgery. Outcome scores in orthopaedics tend to be site and/or pathology specific. Trauma related pathology uses a surrogate outcome scores. A unified outcome score for trauma is needed to help with the measurement of outcomes in trauma patients and evaluate the actual impact that trauma inflicts to patients' lives. Materials & Methods. We have designed a PROM especially for Trauma patients, in order to measure the extent of recovery to pre-injury state. This score uses as baseline the pre-injury status of the patient and has the aim to determine the percentage of rehabilitation after any form of treatment. This PROM is not site specific and can be used for every Trauma condition. It uses simple wording, user friendly and accessed via phone conversation. The outcome score consists of eleven questions. The first ten questions use the 5-point Likert scale and the final question a scale from zero to ten. The questions are divided into three subgroups (Symptoms, Function and Mental status). The final question assesses the extent of return to pre-injury status. The SF-12v2 questionnaire was used for the validation of the COST questionnaire. We gathered COST and SF-12v2 questionnaires from patients who were at the end of their follow-up after treatment for various trauma conditions, treated either conservatively either operatively. Results. A total of 50 COST questionnaires were gathered in out outpatients department. The participants were 33 male and 17 female patients (aged 44.2 ±18.9 years) and the questionnaires collected at mean 9.7 months post-injury. A Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.89 was identified for the whole construct. The three dimensions of the scale had good internal consistency as well (Cronbach's Alpha test values 0.73, 0.85 and 0.81 for symptoms, function and mental status respectively). Strong/moderate correlation (Spearman's Rho test 0.45–0.65) was observed between the respective physical/mental dimensions of the COST and SF-12v2 questionnaires. Conclusion. There is a need for a specific PROM for Trauma pathology which is not site specific and easy to use and understand. COST is a useful tool to Trauma surgeons to measure the outcomes of their patients and has high internal consistency

Background:. Closed femoral shortening (CFS) is a recognised procedure for managing leg length discrepancy (LLD). Method:. We report twenty-nine consecutive patients with LLD who underwent CFS using an intramedullary saw and nail. Mean age was 29.2 years (16.1–65.8). The primary outcome was accuracy of correction. Secondary outcomes were complications, union, ASAMI score and re-operation, alongside Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), using EQ5D-5L and GROC. Results:. Mean pre-operative limb length discrepancy was 3.4 cm (1.5–6.5). Mean planned and achieved shortening was 2.9 cm (1.7–5.0). Mean follow-up was 2.0 years (0.2–8.4). Minimal access surgery was possible in all cases but careful technique is essential. All patients achieved a correction within 5mm of the planned shortening (range 0–5mm). 28 patients (97%) achieved uncomplicated union. One patient had a non-union requiring exchange nailing and subsequent compression plating. 13 patients had nail removal at a mean of 1.7 years and 3 had locking screw removal. Patients had an overall positive experience with 81% reporting high PROM scores. Discussion:. This technique offered accurate limb length correction with few complications. Patients rehabilitated well with good functional outcomes. Conclusion;. CFS with an intramedullary saw is a well-tolerated and effective technique when managing LLD up to 5cm

Introduction. Chronic pain is one of the adverse outcomes in surgery for degenerative lumbar pathology (DLP). Postoperative complications as DVT, and chronic pain in pathologies as thoracotomy or breast cancer have been associated with poor control of postoperative pain. Study design. Prospective study of patients undergoing surgery for DLP. Purpose. To evaluate the relationship of postoperative pain with final outcomes in terms of chronic pain and quality of life. Outcome measures. Visual analogue scales (VAS) to assess lumbar and leg pain, Short Form-36v2 (SF-36), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI). Method. 263 patients with a mean age of 54.0 years (22–86 y) were reviewed and 131 patients were women (49.8%). Pain, quality of life and disability of patients were assessed in the immediate preoperative and 2 years after surgery. Epidemiological data collected were age, sex, educational level, employment status, diagnosis, treatment, and comorbidity (ASA). An external nurse evaluated postoperative pain four times every day and we selected the worst value of day. The reference value of postoperative pain was the VAS of third day when patient starts standing and PCA is removed. To compare means we used t-Student and Pearson's coefficient or Spearman's test was used to assess the correlation, and, finally, linear regression study (ANOVA) was performed with variables that showed statistically significant correlation. SPSS 15.0 statistical package. Results. The mean value of VAS on 3rd day (VAS-3) was 2.86 ± 2.2. Postoperative pain showed a moderately positive correlation with final pain, measured by Bodily Pain (r=0.310, p <0.05) and final VAS (r=0.318, p <0.001), and moderately negative with the Physical Component Scale of the SF36 (r=−0.269, p <0.05). No significant correlations existed with the other instruments. Preoperative pain, sex and MSC-SF36 was correlated with postoperative pain (r=0.262 p <0.05; r=− 0.261 p <0.003, r=− 0.306 p <0.001). According to linear regression studies each point in the VAS-3 will be an increase of 0.522 points in the final VAS (p <0.01). Conclusions. Postoperative pain has moderate but statistically significant influence in the final lumbar pain perception, assessed by VAS and Bodily Pain. Postoperative pain has an inverse relationship to the physical component of SF-36. However, postoperative pain is not correlated with disability measured by ODI or COMI

Introduction. An important number of factors affecting the outcome of surgical treatment have been identified, and these factors can affect the patient's selection for lumbar surgery. Study Design. Retrospective study with data collected prospectively on patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar pathology (DLP). Purpose. Identification and evaluation of epidemiological factors that influence the quality of life improvement, disability and chronic pain. Outcome measures. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to assess pain in lower back and extremities, Short Form-36v2 (SF-36), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI). Method. 263 patients were included in our study, with a mean age of 54.0 years (22–86 years). 131 patients were women (49.8%). Questionnaires were completed in the preoperative visit and 2 years after surgery. Epidemiological data collected were age, sex, educational level, employment status, diagnosis, treatment, and comorbidity measure by ASA. The most frequent diagnostics were degenerative discal disease (36,5%) and lumbar stenosis (30,4%) and a main surgical treatment was TLIF (31,9 %). To compare means we used t-Student and Pearson's coefficient or Spearman's test was used to assess the correlation, and, finally, linear regression study (ANOVA) was performed with variables that showed statistically significant correlation. SPSS 15.0 statistical package. Results. Sex and employment status was correlated with the improvement of COMI (r=− 0.257, p <0.05, r=0.272, p <0.05). Employment status was correlated with in ODI (r=0.249, p <0.05) and the degree of improvement physical component of SF-36 (PCS, r=− 0.254, p <0.05). Linear regression showed statistically significant influence of the age (r=0.334, p <0.05) and employment status (r=14.146, p <0.01) on ODI. COMI is statistically influenced by sex (r=− 0.869, p <0.01), age (r=0.027, p <0.05) and employment status (r=0.830, p <0.05). PCS is statistically influenced by the employment status (r=− 8.568, p <0.01), age (r=− 0.228, p <0.05) and sex (r=5.525, p <0.05). Conclusions. According to the present study we observed that the perception of change in the quality of life and disability after surgery of the lumbar spine is independent of the initial pathology, the type of surgery and previous pain and disability; but sex, age and employment status have an important influence