Aims. The aim of this study was to explore whether time to surgery affects functional outcome in displaced proximal humeral fractures. Methods. A total of 250 patients presenting within three weeks of sustaining a displaced proximal humeral fracture involving the surgical neck were recruited at 32 acute NHS hospitals in the United Kingdom between September 2008 and April 2011. Of the 125 participants, 109 received surgery (fracture fixation or humeral head replacement) as per randomization. Data were included for 101 and 67 participants at six-month and five-year follow-up, respectively. Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS) collected at six, 12, and 24 months and at three, four, and five years following randomization was plotted against time to surgery. Long-term recovery was explored by plotting six-month scores against five-year scores and agreement was illustrated with a Bland-Altman plot. Results. The mean time from initial trauma to surgery was 10.5 days (1 to 33). Earlier surgical intervention did not improve OSS throughout follow-up, nor when stratified by participant age (< 65 years vs ≥ 65 years) and fracture severity (one- and two-part vs three- and four-part fractures). Participants managed later than reported international averages (three days in the United States and Germany, eight days in the United Kingdom) did not have worse outcomes. At five-year follow-up, 50 participants (76%) had the same or improved OSS compared with six months (six-month mean OSS 35.8 (SD 10.0); five-year mean OSS 40.1 (SD 9.1); r = 0.613). A Bland-Altman plot demonstrated a positive mean difference (3.3 OSS points (SD 7.92)) with wide 95% limits of agreement (-12.2 and 18.8 points). Conclusion. Timing of surgery did not affect OSS at any stage of follow-up, irrespective of age or fracture type. Most participants had maximum functional outcome at six months that was maintained at five years. These findings may help guide providers of trauma services on surgical prioritization. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(1):33–41

Aims. Open reduction and plate fixation (ORPF) for displaced proximal humerus fractures can achieve reliably good long-term outcomes. However, a minority of patients have persistent pain and stiffness after surgery and may benefit from open arthrolysis, subacromial decompression, and removal of metalwork (ADROM). The long-term results of ADROM remain unknown; we aimed to assess outcomes of patients undergoing this procedure for stiffness following ORPF, and assess predictors of poor outcome. Methods. Between 1998 and 2018, 424 consecutive patients were treated with primary ORPF for proximal humerus fracture. ADROM was offered to symptomatic patients with a healed fracture at six months postoperatively. Patients were followed up retrospectively with demographic data, fracture characteristics, and complications recorded. Active range of motion (aROM), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and EuroQol five-dimension three-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. Results. A total of 138 patients underwent ADROM; 111 patients were available for long-term follow-up at a mean of 10.9 years (range 1 to 20). Mean age was 50.8 years (18 to 75);79 (57.2%) were female. Mean time from primary ORPF to ADROM was 11.9 months (6 to 19). Five patients developed superficial wound infection; ten developed symptomatic osteonecrosis/post-traumatic arthrosis (ON/PTA); four underwent revision arthrolysis. Median OSS improved from 17 (interquartile range (IQR) 12.0 to 22.0) preoperatively to 40.0 (IQR 31.5 to 48.0) postoperatively, and 39.0 (IQR 31.5 to 46.5) at long-term follow-up (p < 0.001). Median EQ-5D-3L improved from 0.079 (IQR -0.057 to 0.215) to 0.691 (IQR 0.441 to 0.941) postoperatively, and 0.701 (IQR 0.570 to 0.832) at long-term follow-up (p < 0.001). We found that aROM improved in all planes (p < 0.001). Among the variables assessed on multivariable analysis, a manual occupation, worsening Charlson Comorbidity Index and increasing socioeconomic deprivation were most consistently predictive of worse patient-reported outcome scores. Patients who subsequently developed ON/PTA reported significantly worse one-year and late OSS. Conclusion. ADROM in patients with persistent symptomatic stiffness following ORPF can achieve excellent short- and long-term outcomes. More deprived patients, those in a manual occupation, and those with worsening comorbidities have worse outcomes following ADROM. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(1):157–167

Sub-acromial decompression surgery (SAD) has been widely used to treat shoulder impingement. Its validity has been questioned in multi-centric clinical trials and dissatisfaction rates can be high (35%). It is difficult to predict which patients will benefit operatively as research into predictive factors is limited. The study aim was to conduct a root-cause analysis of reasons for dissatisfaction in a cohort of operated patients. All patients with SAD dissatisfaction in the local Upper Limb database between 2015-19 (n=74/296) formed our study cohort. Patients were scored on Oxford shoulder score (OSS), QuickDASH score, EQ-5D-3L (TTO+VAS) at weeks 26 and 52 post-operatively. Patients' clinical history, radiographs, consultation and operative notes were reviewed. 28% of patients were dissatisfied with surgery. Mean age =52.3±13.4 years with equal gender distribution. 87% were operated arthroscopically. 67% were in physically demanding occupations. There was a significant increase in OSS and QuickDASH at weeks 26 and 52 post-operatively (p<0.05), similar improvement was not noted in VAS pain score. Pain followed by stiffness were the main contributors of dissatisfaction. Multiple implicating factors were noted, the most common being acromio-clavicular joint arthritis (25.7%), suggesting concomitant pathologies as an additional cause for patient dissatisfaction. This is the first study to evaluate reasons for dissatisfaction following SAD. We noted high rates (28%) of dissatisfaction and a predilection for those involved in physically demanding occupations. We recommend meticulous pre-operative workup to identify co-existing pathologies and appropriate pre-operative counselling to improve outcomes in selected patients needing SAD following failure of conservative management

This prospective, randomized, controlled trial compares patient outcome after non-operative care versus open reduction and tunneled suspension device fixation (ORTSD) for grade III or IV acromioclavicular joint disruptions. Sixty patients aged between sixteen and thirty-five years with an acute grade III or IV AC joint disruption were randomized to receive ORTSD fixation or non-operative treatment. Functional assessment was conducted at six weeks, three months, six months, and one year using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hands (DASH), Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS) and Short Form (SF-12). Reduction was evaluated using radiographs. Complications were recorded, and an economic evaluation performed. There was no significant difference in DASH or OSS at one year between non-operative and ORTSD groups (DASH score, 4.67 versus 5.63; OSS, 45.72 versus 45.63). Patients undergoing surgery had inferior DASH scores at 6 weeks (p<0.01). Five patients who failed non-operative management subsequently received surgery. Overall cost of treatment was significantly greater after ORTSD fixation (£796.22 vs £3359.73 (p<0.01)). ORTSD fixation confers no functional benefit over non-operative treatment at one year. While patients managed non-operatively generally recover faster, a significant group remain dissatisfied following non-operative treatment requiring delayed surgical reconstruction

The treatment of massive rotator cuff tears remains controversial. There is lack of studies comparing patient-reported outcomes (PROM) of arthroscopic massive rotator cuff repairs (RCR) against large, medium and small RCRs. Our study aims to report the PROM for arthroscopic massive RCR versus non-massive RCR. Patients undergoing an arthroscopic RCR under a single surgeon over a 5-year period were included. Demographic data were recorded. Pre-operative Quick-DASH and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) were prospectively collected pre-operatively and at final review (mean of 18 months post-operatively). The scores were compared to a matched cohort of patients who had large, medium or small RCRs. A post-hoc power analysis confirmed 98% power was achieved. 82 patients were included in the study. 42 (51%) patients underwent massive RCR. The mean age of patients undergoing massive RCR was 59.7 and 55% (n=23) were female. 21% of massive RCRs had biceps augmentation. Quick-DASH improved significantly from a mean of 46.1 pre-operatively to 15.6 at final follow-up for massive RCRs (p<0.001). OSS improved significantly from a mean of 26.9 pre-operatively to 41.4 at final follow up for massive RCRs (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the final Quick-DASH and OSS scores for massive and non-massive RCRs (p=0.35 and p=0.45 respectively). No revision surgery was required within the minimum one year follow up timescale. Arthroscopic massive rotator cuff repairs have no functional difference to non-massive rotator cuff repairs in the short term follow up period and should be considered in appropriate patient groups

Aims. The PROximal Fracture of the Humerus Evaluation by Randomisation (PROFHER) randomised clinical trial compared the operative and non-operative treatment of adults with a displaced fracture of the proximal humerus involving the surgical neck. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term treatment effects beyond the two-year follow-up. Patients and Methods. Of the original 250 trial participants, 176 consented to extended follow-up and were sent postal questionnaires at three, four and five years after recruitment to the trial. The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS; the primary outcome), EuroQol 5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L), and any recent shoulder operations and fracture data were collected. Statistical and economic analyses, consistent with those of the main trial were applied. Results. OSS data were available for 164, 155 and 149 participants at three, four and five years, respectively. There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between operative and non-operative treatment at each follow-up point. No participant had secondary shoulder surgery for a new complication. Analyses of EQ-5D-3L data showed no significant between-group differences in quality of life over time. Conclusion. These results confirm that the main findings of the PROFHER trial over two years are unchanged at five years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:383–92

Frozen shoulder is a common condition that affects the working population. The longevity and severity of symptoms often results in great economic burden to health services and absence from work. This prospective cohort study aimed to investigate whether early intervention with arthroscopic capsular release resulted in improvement of symptoms and any potential economic benefit to society. Patients were recruited prospectively. Data was gathered by way of questionnaire to ascertain demographics, previous primary care treatment and absence from work. Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) was also calculated. Arthroscopic capsular release was performed and further data gathered at four week post-operative follow up. Economic impact of delay to treatment and cost of intervention was calculated using government data from the national tariff which costs different forms of treatment. Statistical analysis was then performed on the results. Twenty five patients enrolled. Mean pre-operative OSS: 37.4 (range 27–58, SD 7.4). Mean post-operative OSS: 15.9 (range 12–22, SD 2.3). P<0.01. Mean improvement in OSS: 21.5 (range 12–38, SD 7.1). The cost of non-operative treatment per patient was £3954. The cost of arthroscopic capsular release per patient was £1861, a difference of £2093. There were no complications. Arthroscopic capsular release improved shoulder function on OSS within four weeks. The cost of arthroscopic capsular release is significantly less than the cost of treating the patients non-operatively. Early surgical intervention may improve symptoms quickly and reduce economic burden of the disease. A randomised controlled trial comparing timings of intervention would further elucidate potential benefits

Glenohumeral dislocation is complicated with a greater tuberosity fracture in 16% of cases. Debate regarding the safety of closed reduction in the emergency department exists, with concerns over fracture propagation during the reduction manoeuvre. The study aim was to report the results of closed reduction, identify complications and define outcome for these injuries. 188 consecutive glenohumeral dislocations with a tuberosity fracture were identified from a prospective database from 2014–2017. 182 had an attempted closed reduction under appropriate sedation using standard techniques, five were manipulated in theatre due to contra-indications to sedation. Clinical, radiographic and patient reported outcomes, in the form of the QuickDASH and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), were collected. A closed reduction in the emergency department was successful in 162 (86%) patients. Two iatrogenic fractures of the proximal humerus occurred, one in the emergency department and one in theatre, representing a 1% risk. 35 (19%) of patients presented with a nerve lesion due to dislocation. Surgery was performed in 19 (10%) cases for persistent or early displacement (< 2 weeks) of the greater tuberosity fragment. Surgery resulted in QuickDASH and OSS scores comparable to those patients in whom the tuberosity healed spontaneously in an anatomical position (p=0.13). 18 patients developed adhesive capsulitis (10%). Glenohumeral dislocation with greater tuberosity fracture can be safely treated by closed reduction within the emergency department with a low risk of humeral neck fracture. Persistent or early displacement of the tuberosity fragment will occur in 10% of cases and is an indication for surgery

Management of irreparable rotator cuff tears is challenging and controversial. Surgeons have been utilising biological tissue scaffolding to augment repairs, but there are concerns regarding viability and function. We wished to investigate this viability and clinical outcome in a small group of patients. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon over a three-year period. Inclusion criteria were patients with large cuff tears and failure of non-operative treatment. Exclusion criteria were patients with glenohumeral arthritis and where cuff repair could not be successfully performed. Open rotator cuff repair followed by augmentation with Graft Jacket® Regenerative Tissue Matrix (Wright Medical) was performed in all patients. A structured cuff repair physiotherapy protocol was then followed. Follow-up was at six months and at minimum twenty-four months post-operatively where Constant scores (CS) and Oxford Shoulder scores (OSS) were noted and a repeat ultrasound performed. Fourteen patients underwent the procedure. No patient was lost to follow-up. There were seven males and seven females with a mean age of 63 years (range 31–77). At minimum twenty-four month follow-up, thirteen patients had flexion and abduction above 90 degrees and symmetrical external rotation. Mean CS was 81 (range 70–91) and mean OSS was 46 (range 41–48). Shoulder ultrasound revealed an intact Graft Jacket® in all thirteen patients. The final patient had lower functional movement and lower CS (34) and OSS (25) and ultrasound identified a re-rupture. This study indicates that augmentation of large rotator cuff repairs with biological tissue scaffolding is a viable option and has good functional results

We report a retrospective review of outcome after shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures. All patients managed with shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures between 1997 and 2008 were included. Clinical notes were reviewed and surviving patients completed postal Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) questionnaires. Results were analysed to assess whether there was a difference in outcome for those above the age of 70 years. A total of 96 patients were treated during this period. Female to male ratio was 3.36:1 with mean age 72 ± 9.6 (45–93) years at time of fracture. At time of review 30.2% of patients were dead. Two patients were lost to follow-up after discharge. Complete case notes were available in 68 patients. Response rate to the OSS was 67.2%. There were 20 patients below 70 years and 48 patients above 70 years of age. The ASA grade was II in 60% of patients. Mean follow-up was 52 months. There were 2 in hospital post-operative deaths due to medical complications. Mean OSS was 27 (3–47) of a maximum of 48, with no significant difference between groups. Overall complication rate was 27.9%, with no significant difference between groups. Ten year survival was 96.9% overall with no significant difference between groups. There appears to be no significant difference in functional outcome, complication rate, or implant survival between patients below or above the age of 70 years treated with primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the proximal humerus. This procedure however carries a high complication rate in this group of patients

Traumatic injuries to the sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) are uncommon representing only 3% of all injuries to the shoulder girdle. Acutely, the majority are managed non-operatively with physiotherapy rehabilitation. However, if there is evidence of neurovascular compromise emergency reduction is indicated. There is no consensus on treatment of SCJ dislocations and subluxations that remain symptomatic after conservative treatment. Multiple surgical techniques have been described to alleviate this problem. These include resection of the medial end of the clavicle and various stabilization techniques using Kirschner wires, muscle tendon (subclavius, sternocleidomastoid, semi-tendinosus and palmaris longus) and synthetic materials (Dacron). However, all techniques have reported problems in terms of pain, decreased range of movement and a relatively high complication rate. We report a new technique using a LARS® ligament (Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System) with good early post-operative results. 5 symptomatic SCJ dislocations were repaired over a 3 year period. The operations were conducted by the same surgeon and at the same unit. The patients were on average 20 years old (17–22). Mean follow up time was 21 months (9–41). Functional assessment was made using the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) and the OSS (Oxford Shoulder Score) outcome measures. An improvement between pre- and post-operative scoring was observed in both DASH median 51.7 (24.2–75.0) v 13.7 (8.3–20.8) (p=0.024) and OSS 20.6 (15–32) v 41.8 (39–47) (p<0.001). One patient had a pneumothorax intra-operatively but this resolved with conservative treatment. There were no long term complications experienced during follow up

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of revision for distal femoral arthroplasty (DFA) performed as a primary procedure for native knee fractures using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry (AOANJRR).

Introduction. Massive rotator cuff tears in the patient who is too young for a reverse shoulder replacement are a challenging situation. A technique using a ‘Grammont osteotomy’ of the acromion has been developed to allow a comprehensive approach, the so called “Full Monty”. Aim. To document the functional outcome of patients undergoing an acromial osteotomy for the repair of massive tears of the supraspinatus. Methods. Ten patients undergoing this procedure where entered in to the study. The mean age of the patients was 57 years (+/−16) and all bar one were male. Each patient had a pre-operative American Shoulder Elbow Score (ASES), Oxford Shoulder score (OSS), and range of movement documented. These outcome measures were repeated at a minimum of two years, as well as a patient satisfaction questionnaire. Results. The mean ASES preoperatively was 7(+/− 6) and 23(+/−3) post-operatively (p< 0.001). The mean pre-operative OSS was 22(+/−5) and 43(+/−4) post-operatively (p<0.001). 80% of patients deemed their treatment to be “successful” and 90% would recommend the procedure to a friend in the same plight. The mean post-operative forward flexion achieved was 153° (+/−58) and the mean abduction was 142° (+/−37). All patients could sustain a 1kg weight at arms length at 90° of abduction. One patient suffered a superficial wound infection and one patient had a non-union at the osteotomy site. Conclusion. These results suggest that this technique is a good surgical option for a patient with a “massive” rotator cuff tear that is not amenable to standard surgical techniques

Background. Floating shoulder (FS) is, according to Goss et al, a double disruption of the superior shoulder suspensory complex which usually results from a glenoid neck fracture and a ipsilateral midclavicular fracture. However, the interruption can interest the whole scapular belt from acromion to sterno-clavicular joint. It occurs mostly after a violent traumatism with direct lateral impact on the shoulder. That leads to complex therapeutic issues with sometimes uncertain results. Material. Between 1984 and 2009, 35 patients (30 men, 5 women), mean age 35 years [16–72] with FS, were treated in our department. Most of them sustained road accident (31cases) with polytraumatism context in 12 cases. A CT scan was realized in the majority of cases to specify the scapular fracture and look for intra-thoracic immediate complications. Mostly, glenoid neck fracture associated with a clavicular fracture has been found out (15cases). Orthopaedic treatment has been realized in 18 cases. Surgical management has been decided for open reduction of sterno-clavicular joint in 2 cases, isolated fixation of the clavicle in 9 cases, of the scapula in 3 cases, and of both scapula and clavicle in 3 cases. Criteria for clinical evaluation were an algo-functional scale (Oxford Shoulder Score, OSS), a subjective Constant Shoulder Score, a functional incapacity scale (Shoulder Simple Test, SST), scales of life quality (DASH and SF12) and global indications (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, SANE). Results. we noted a single migration of material. A patient presented a secondary displacement after orthopaedic treatment, and had additional surgical fixation before 6 months. In the mean follow up of 135 months [9–312], three patients were deceased and seven were unreachable. Five complained about rare pains, three of an important stiffness and chronic pains, and only one of brachial plexus injury. Functional results were satisfactory: OSS 14,75/60 [12–28], Subjective Constant score 79 [60–100], SST 10,75/12 [4–12], DASH 13,75/100 [0–84], SF12 physical 49,4 [36,8–54,8], SF12 mental 59,7 [57,2–61,8] andSANE 79% [50–100]. Discussion/conclusion. FS presents an immediate gravity because of possible intrathoracic injuries which can delay surgical treatment. FS which allowed orthopaedic treatments or required isolated fixation of the clavicle have excellent results. Scapular fractures which required surgical repair because of a significant displacement andan articular extension have more pejorative results

Aims

The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with limitations in function, measured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), six to nine months after a proximal humeral fracture, from a range of demographic, injury, psychological, and social variables measured within a week and two to four weeks after injury.

We retrospectively analysed the clinical results of 30 patients with injuries of the sternoclavicular joint at a minimum of 12 months’ follow-up. A closed reduction was attempted in 14 cases. It was successful in only five of ten dislocations, and failed in all four epiphyseal disruptions. A total of 25 patients underwent surgical reduction, in 18 cases in conjunction with a stabilisation procedure.

At a mean follow-up of 60 months, four patients were lost to follow-up. The functional results in the remainder were satisfactory, and 18 patients were able to resume their usual sports activity at the same level. There was no statistically significant difference between epiphyseal disruption and sternoclavicular dislocation (p > 0.05), but the functional scores (Simple Shoulder Test, Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand, and Constant scores) were better when an associated stabilisation procedure had been performed rather than reduction alone (p = 0.05, p = 0.04 and p = 0.07, respectively).

We recommend meticulous pre-operative clinical assessment with CT scans. In sternoclavicular dislocation managed within the first 48 hours and with no sign of mediastinal complication, a closed reduction can be attempted, although this was unsuccessful in half of our cases. A control CT scan is mandatory. In all other cases, and particularly if epiphyseal disruption is suspected, we recommend open reduction with a stabilisation procedure by costaclavicular cerclage or tenodesis. The use of a Kirschner wire should be avoided.