Aims. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and patterns of neuropathic pain over one year in a cohort of patients with chronic post-surgical pain at three months following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. Between 2016 and 2019, 363 patients with troublesome pain, defined as a score of ≤ 14 on the Oxford Knee Score pain subscale, three months after TKA from eight UK NHS hospitals, were recruited into the Support and Treatment After Replacement (STAR) clinical trial. Self-reported neuropathic pain and postoperative pain was assessed at three, nine, and 15 months after surgery using the painDETECT and Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaires collected by postal survey. Results. Symptoms of neuropathic pain were common among patients reporting chronic pain at three months post-TKA, with half reporting neuropathic pain on painDETECT (191/363; 53%) and 74% (267/359) on DN4. Of those with neuropathic pain at three months, half continued to have symptoms over the next 12 months (148/262; 56%), one-quarter had improved (67/262; 26%), and for one-tenth their neuropathic symptoms fluctuated over time (24/262; 9%). However, a subgroup of participants reported new, late onset neuropathic symptoms (23/262; 9%). Prevalence of neuropathic symptoms was similar between the screening tools when the lower cut-off painDETECT score (≥ 13) was applied. Overall, mean neuropathic pain scores improved between three and 15 months after TKA. Conclusion. Neuropathic pain is common in patients with chronic pain at three months after TKA. Although neuropathic symptoms improved over time, up to half continued to report painful neuropathic symptoms at 15 months after TKA. Postoperative care should include screening, assessment, and treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with early chronic postoperative pain after TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(6):582–588

Abstract. Introduction. Total knee replacement (TKR) is a successful operation for many patients, however 15–20% of patients experience chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP). Many will experience neuropathic characteristics. We describe the prevalence and patterns of neuropathic pain in a cohort of patients with CPSP three months after TKR. Methodology. Between 2016–2019, 363 patients with troublesome pain, ≤14 on Oxford Knee score pain subscale, at three months after TKR from eight NHS hospitals were recruited into the Support and Treatment After Replacement (STAR) trial. Self-reported neuropathic pain was assessed at three, nine and fifteen months after surgery using painDETECT and Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4). Results. At three months post-operative, 53% reported neuropathic pain on painDETECT and 74% on DN4. Half (56%) remained in neuropathic pain over the twelve-month follow-up period, 26% reported improvement, and 9% reported new neuropathic symtpoms or fluctuated in and out of neuropathic pain (9%). Overall mean neuropathic pain scores improved between three and 15 months after TKR. When the painDETECT cut-off score of ≥13(ambiguous/possible) was used, DN4 and painDETECT measures showed similar prevalence rates at each timepoint. Conclusion. Neuropathic pain is common among patients with CPSP at three months after TKR. Although symptoms improved over time, one quarter to one half of our cohort continued to report symptoms at fifteen months. We propose a painDETECT cutoff score of ≥13 be used to identify neuropathic features in the TKR population. Postoperative care should include identification, assessment, and treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with CPSP after TKR

A 60-year-old man developed severe neuropathic pain and foot-drop in his left leg following resurfacing arthroplasty of the left hip. The pain was refractory to all analgesics for 16 months. At exploration, a PDS suture was found passing through the sciatic nerve at several points over 6 cm and terminating in a large knot. After release of the suture and neurolysis there was dramatic and rapid improvement of the neuropathic pain and of motor function. This case represents the human equivalent of previously described nerve ligation in an animal model of neuropathic pain. It emphasises that when neuropathic pain is present after an operation, the nerve related to the symptoms must be inspected, and that removal of a suture or irritant may lead to relief of pain, even after many months

Background. Patients with low back-related leg pain (LBLP) can present with neuropathic pain; it is not known but is often assumed that neuropathic pain persists over time. This research aimed to identify cases with neuropathic pain that persisted at short, intermediate and longer-term time points, in LBLP patients consulting in primary care. Methods. LBLP patients in a primary care cohort study (n=606) completed the self-report version of Leeds Assessment for Neurological Symptoms and Signs (s-LANSS, score of ≥12 indicates possible neuropathic pain) at baseline, 4-months, 12-months and 3-years. S-LANSS scores and percentages of patients with score of ≥12 are described at each time-point. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. Results. At baseline, 48.3% (293/606) of patients presented with neuropathic pain, 25.0% (94/376) at 4-months, 22.6% (79/349) at 12-months and 21.6% (58/268) at 3-years. A small proportion (6.6%) scored ≥ 12 at all four time-points. Those who scored ≥ 12 at baseline and 4-months reported higher disability (RMDQ (0–23) 15.2) and depression scores (HADS (0–21) 8.6), and lower pain self-efficacy (PSEQ (0–60) 27.2), compared to those with neuropathic pain at one other time-point at most. Conclusion. Few LBLP patients in primary care present with long-term persistent neuropathic pain. Patients with neuropathic pain at baseline and short-term follow-up present with greater morbidity in terms of disability, depression and lower confidence to manage their pain. This is important because these patients may benefit the most from early intervention using neuropathic pain medication. These findings will inform research investigating potential prognostic indicators of persistent neuropathic pain. Conflicts of interest: None. Sources of funding: Support for SA Harrisson, a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Doctoral Fellow and NE Foster, an NIHR Senior Investigator, was provided by an NIHR Research Professorship awarded to NE Foster (NIHR-RP-011-015). K Konstantinou is supported by a Higher Education Funding Council for England/ NIHR Senior Clinical Lectureship. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health

Purpose of study: Pain mechanisms underlying the majority of low back and leg pain remain to be elucidated. A recently developed neuropathic pain questionnaire (PainDETECT) was used to assess for the presence of probable neuropathic pain in a group of patients with low back ± leg pain and the effect this has on them. Method: Patients with low back ± leg pain referred to an Extended Scope Practitioner Physiotherapy clinic who consented to take part completed the PainDETECT questionnaire, and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. Patients were then grouped by the PainDETECT score into probable neuropathic pain, unlikely neuropathic pain or pain of uncertain underlying mechanism. In patients imaged subsequent to assessment in the clinic (MRI) the PainDETECT scores were compared to evidence of compression of nerve roots. Results: 17% of patients had probable neuropathic pain, in 47% neuropathic pain unlikely and 36% uncertain. Those with probable neuropathic pain when compared to unlikely neuropathic pain were more disabled (p> .001), scored higher on a visual analogue scale (p=0.013), but were no different on the Fear avoidance scale (p=0.08). Those with neuropathic components to their pain always reported leg pain (93% below knee), whereas 63% of unlikely neuropathic pain patients had leg pain (38% below knee). The relationship between nerve root compression and neuropathic pain score was uncertain. Conclusion: Patients with a neuropathic component to their back pain report higher levels of pain, more leg pain and are more disabled by their problem

A subgroup of patients that undergo TKR surgery have evidence of neuropathic pain and central sensitization that may predispose to severe postoperative pain. This study assesses the correlation of MRI detected bone marrow lesions (BMLs) and synovitis with markers of neuropathic pain and central sensitization in patients undergoing TKR surgery and healthy volunteers. 31 patients awaiting TKR and 5 healthy volunteers were recruited. Each subject underwent a 3-T knee MRI scan that was graded for BMLs (0–45) and synovitis (0–3) using subsets of the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS). All subjects were asked to complete the PainDetect questionnaire to identify nociceptive pain (< 13), unclear pain (13–18) and neuropathic pain (>18). Correlation between BMLs and PainDetect score was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included the correlation of synovitis to PainDetect and temporal summation (TS) a measure of central sensitization to the PainDetect score. TS was determined using a monofilament to evoke pain. Pilot histological analysis of the prevalence of osteoclasts (TRAP. +. ) within BMLs versus normal subchondral bone was performed, implying a role in BML pathology. Increasing BML MOAKS score correlated with neuropathic pain (painDetect), r. s. = 0.38, p=0.013 (one-tailed). There was a positive correlation between synovitis and PainDetect score, τ =0.23, p= 0.031 (one-tailed). TS was greater in the neuropathic pain than in nociceptive pain patients, U = 18.0, p=0.003 (one-tailed). TRAP staining identified more osteoclasts within BMLs than contralateral condyle lesion free subchondral bone, z = −2.232, p = 0.026 (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, one-tailed). BMLs and synovitis are more prevalent in neuropathic pain and central sensitization in knee OA. Higher osteoclast prevalence was seen within BMLs which may help explain the association with BMLs and pain in OA

The purpose of this study was to establish whether exploration and neurolysis is an effective method of treating neuropathic pain in patients with a sciatic nerve palsy after total hip replacement (THR). A total of 56 patients who had undergone this surgery at our hospital between September 1999 and September 2010 were retrospectively identified. There were 42 women and 14 men with a mean age at exploration of 61.2 years (28 to 80). The sciatic nerve palsy had been sustained by 46 of the patients during a primary THR, five during a revision THR and five patients during hip resurfacing. The mean pre-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score was 7.59 (2 to 10), the mean post-operative VAS was 3.77 (0 to 10), with a resulting mean improvement of 3.82 (0 to 10). The pre- and post-neurolysis VAS scores were significantly different (p < 0.001). Based on the findings of our study, we recommend this form of surgery over conservative management in patients with neuropathic pain associated with a sciatic nerve palsy after THR. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:20–2

We investigated the effect of delay before nerve repair on neuropathic pain after injury to the brachial plexus. We studied 148 patients, 85 prospectively and 63 retrospectively. The mean number of avulsed spinal nerves was 3.2 (1 to 5). Pain was measured by a linear visual analogue scale and by the peripheral nerve injury scale. Early repair was more effective than delayed repair in the relief from pain and there was a strong correlation between functional recovery and relief from pain

Purpose of study and background. Neuropathic pain is a challenging pain syndrome to manage. Low back-related leg pain (LBLP) is clinically diagnosed as either sciatica or referred leg pain and sciatica is often assumed to be neuropathic. Our aim was to describe the prevalence and characteristics of neuropathic pain in LBLP patients. Methods. Analysis of cross-sectional data from a prospective, primary care cohort of 609 LBLP patients. Patients completed questionnaires, and received clinical assessment including MRI. Neuropathic characteristics (NC) were measured using the self-report version of the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs scale (SLANSS; score of ≥12 indicates pain with NC). Results. 52% of the patients diagnosed with sciatica and 39% of those diagnosed with referred leg pain presented with pain with NC. Irrespective of LBLP diagnosis, patients with NC reported significantly worse leg pain (mean 5.8 vs 4.7), back pain intensity (0.0 vs 0.0), disability (RMDQ 15.2 vs 12.4), high risk of persistent disabling pain (47.5% vs 31.5%), depression (HADS 7.3 vs 5.4) and anxiety (8.9 vs 6.7), compared to patients without NC. Sciatica patients with NC presented with higher leg pain (6.0 vs 4.8) and disability but less anxiety (8.6 vs 10.2) and depression compared to patients with referred pain with NC. Conclusion. LBLP patients with NC present with more severe pain, disability and psychological morbidity, but these characteristics differ according to clinical diagnosis, suggesting potential subgroups. The data will inform future research on the clinical course and prognosis of these patients. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: Support for SA Harrisson, a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Doctoral Fellow and NE Foster, an NIHR Senior Investigator, was provided by an NIHR Research Professorship awarded to NE Foster (NIHR-RP-011-015). K Konstantinou is supported by a Higher Education Funding Council for England/ NIHR Senior Clinical Lectureship. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health

Purpose of the study: The favourable outcome with knee arthroplasty can be compromised by persistent unexplained pain. Postoperative pain accounts for about 30% of the complaints of chronic pain present in 25% of the general population and would be to a large extent of neuropathic origin (DCN). The purpose of this work was to evaluate pain before and after knee arthroplasty in terms of intensity and clinical expression. Material and methods: A prospective monocentric epidemiology study was conducted to validate self-administrated questionnaires which, over a six month period, were completed by knee arthroplasty patients. A numerical scale (Nu) from 0 to 10, a 7-item questionnaire screening for neuropathic pain (burns, painful cold, electrical discharge, tingling, pins and needles, numbness, itching) scored 0 or 1 and positive if the score is ≥3 (DN4), an abridged qualitative pain questionnaire (QDSA) divided into a sensorial score (QDSAs) and an affective score (QDSAa), and a scale evaluating anxiety and depression (HAD) were recorded preoperatively, (T0), at 3rd postoperative day (PO), 1st (M1), 3rd (M2) and 6th (M6) postoperative month. Outcome was expressed as mean±SD or median and range. Results: Eight men and 39 women, mean age 66.6±10.7 years were included. These patients. Fourteen of 47 (25.9%) had DCN postoperatively (2 DN4 successively ≥3). The “tingles” item for postoperative DN4 was significantly predictive of DCN (specificity 88.9%, sensitivity 83.3%). Preoperatively, the median intensity of pain was 6 (5–10) and was significantly higher in patients with DCN compared with those without DCN at M1 (4 [1–8] vs 3 [0–7]) and M3 (4 [1–8] vs 2 [0–6]) (p < 0,009) including 3/14 patients with Nu > 7 at M3. At M6, 12.7 % (n = 6/47) patients still had DN4 ≥3. The QDSAs score was higher in patients with DCN at M1 (11.8±4.4 vs 4.8±4.5; p < 0.001) and M3 (10.2±6 vs 3.5±3.2; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the QDSAa scores and the HAD. Conclusion: The persistence of unusually intense pain after knee arthroplasty would suggest the pain could result from a neuropathological source which would require specific treatment because of the general insensitivity to analgesics

Background. There is a paucity of prognosis research in patients with neuropathic low back-related leg pain (LBLP) in primary care. Purpose. To investigate the clinical course and prognostic factors in primary care LBLP patients consulting with neuropathic pain (NP). Methods. LBLP patients in a primary-care cohort study (n=606) completed the self-report version of Leeds Assessment for Neurological Symptoms and Signs (s-LANSS, score of ≥12 indicates possible NP) at baseline and 4-months. Mixed effects models compared pain-intensity (highest of mean leg or mean back pain - 0–10 NRS at baseline, 4-months, 12-months and 3-years) between those with persistent NP (s-LANSS ≥12 at baseline and 4-months) and those without (s-LANSS ≥12 at baseline and <12 at 4-months). Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression examined association between potential prognostic factors (chosen from baseline self-report questionnaires, clinical examination, MRI scan findings) and persistent NP. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. Results. 44% (72/164) of patients with NP at baseline had persistent NP at 4-months. Mean pain intensity of patients with persistent NP was higher at 4-months, 12-months and 3-years compared to those without. In univariable analysis, only pain self-efficacy was significantly associated with persistent NP (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96 to 0.998). In multivariable analysis, none of the 7 investigated factors were significantly associated with persistent NP. Conclusion. Patients with persistent NP were consistently worse-off up to 3-years follow-up compared to those without. It was difficult to identify those patients with NP at baseline who would have persistent NP at 4-months. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: Sarah Harrisson is a Clinical Doctoral Fellow funded through a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Professorship for Nadine Foster (NIHR-RP-011-015). Nadine Foster is a NIHR Senior Investigator. Kika Konstantinou is supported by a Higher Education Funding Council for England/ National Institute for Health Research Senior Clinical Lectureship. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s), not necessarily those of the NHS, NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. This work relates to an Education and Continued Professional Development (level 2) award by the Musculoskeletal Association of Chartered Physiotherapists to Sarah Harrisson (June 2016)

Introduction. Nociceptive and neuropathic components both contribute to chronic pain. Since these components require different pain management strategies, correct pain diagnosis before and during treatment is important. Freynhagen et al. (2006) reported that they had developed and validated the pain-DETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) to detect neuropathic components in chronic low back pain patients. They also reported that 37% of unselected cohort of chronic LBP patients had predominantly neuropathic pain. However, the extent to which neuropathic components relate to the pathomechanism of pain deriving from osteoarthritis of hip joint remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to utilize PD-Q to investigate the relationship between neuropathic components and pain deriving from osteoarthritis of the hip joint. Methods. Between March and August 2010, 125 patients with osteoarthritis of hip joint completed PD-Qs about their pain. From this data set, we investigated whether or not the patients’ pain contained neuropathic components. Results. Only 6.4% of the patients had a score 19, indicating that a neuropathic component was likely (90%). Conversely, 79.2 % had a score 12, indicating that a neuropathic component was unlikely (15%). For the remaining 14.4% with an intermediate score (13–18), the presence of a neuropathic component remained uncertain. Conclusion. In this set of patients with osteoarthritis of hip joint, the PD-Q responses indicated that only a small percentage (6.4%) were likely to have a neuropathic component to their hip pain

Aims. To identify the prevalence of neuropathic pain after lower limb fracture surgery, assess associations with pain severity, quality of life and disability, and determine baseline predictors of chronic neuropathic pain at three and at six months post-injury. Methods. Secondary analysis of a UK multicentre randomized controlled trial (Wound Healing in Surgery for Trauma; WHiST) dataset including adults aged 16 years or over following surgery for lower limb major trauma. The trial recruited 1,547 participants from 24 trauma centres. Neuropathic pain was measured at three and six months using the Doleur Neuropathique Questionnaire (DN4); 701 participants provided a DN4 score at three months and 781 at six months. Overall, 933 participants provided DN4 for at least one time point. Physical disability (Disability Rating Index (DRI) 0 to 100) and health-related quality-of-life (EuroQol five-dimension five-level; EQ-5D-5L) were measured. Candidate predictors of neuropathic pain included sex, age, BMI, injury mechanism, concurrent injury, diabetes, smoking, alcohol, analgaesia use pre-injury, index surgery location, fixation type, Injury Severity Score, open injury, and wound care. Results. The median age of the participants was 51 years (interquartile range 35 to 64). At three and six months post-injury respectively, 32% (222/702) and 30% (234/787) had neuropathic pain, 56% (396/702) and 53% (413/787) had chronic pain without neuropathic characteristics, and the remainder were pain-free. Pain severity was higher among those with neuropathic pain. Linear regression analyses found that those with neuropathic pain at six months post-injury had more physical disability (DRI adjusted mean difference 11.49 (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.84 to 15.14; p < 0.001) and poorer quality of life (EQ-5D utility -0.15 (95% CI -0.19 to -0.11); p < 0.001) compared to those without neuropathic characteristics. Logistic regression identified that prognostic factors of younger age, current smoker, below knee fracture, concurrent injuries, and regular analgaesia pre-injury were associated with higher odds of post-injury neuropathic pain. Conclusion. Pain with neuropathic characteristics is common after lower limb fracture surgery and persists to six months post-injury. Persistent neuropathic pain is associated with substantially poorer recovery. Further attention to identify neuropathic pain post-lower limb injury, predicting patients at risk, and targeting interventions, is indicated. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1047–1054

Introduction. Pain after trauma has received relatively little research attention compared with surgical techniques and functional outcomes, but is important to patients. We aimed to describe nerve dysfunction and pain characteristics using tibial fractures as a model. We hypothesized that early nerve dysfunction was associated with neuropathic and chronic pain. Materials and Methods. Adult patients with isolated open or closed tibial diaphyseal fractures were prospectively observed for 1-year in 5 Major Trauma Centres. Nerve dysfunction was assessed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, acute pain with the visual numerical rating scale (VNRS), neuropathic pain with the doleur neuropathique-4 score and quality of life (QOL) using the EQ-5D score. Results. Of 77 included patients, twenty-six (33.8%) had Gustilo-Anderson grade II or worse injuries. Forty-six (63.0%) had operative repair; 0 operation notes reported nerve injury. Mean VNRS pain scores one week post-injury were 4.6/10 (SD 2.4). Seventeen patients (23.3%) presented with impaired sensation, persisting in 11 (15.1%) at 3-months. Neuropathic pain affected 16 (20.8%) patients one week post-injury; a further 20 (26.0%) had >2 symptoms of nerve pain. Only four (11.1%) received anti-neuropathic drugs. At 6-months, twenty-three (31.5%) reported mobility problems, 21 (28.8%) difficulty completing normal activities, 25 (34.2%) pain and 15 (20.5%) anxiety and depression. Conclusions. Nerve dysfunction and neuropathic pain are common early features in patients with tibial fractures, but are poorly recognised and inadequately treated. Pain has long-term effects on patients’ QOL. Future work should aim to improve identification and management of neuropathic pain

The April 2024 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360. looks at: Acute rehabilitation following traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation (ARTISAN): pragmatic, multicentre, randomized controlled trial; Prevalence and predisposing factors of neuropathic pain in patients with rotator cuff tears; Are two plates better than one? The clavicle fracture reimagined; A single cell atlas of frozen shoulder capsule identifies features associated with inflammatory fibrosis resolution; Complication rates and deprivation go hand in hand with total shoulder arthroplasty; Longitudinal instability injuries of the forearm; A better than “best-fit circle” method for glenoid bone loss assessment; 3D supraspinatus muscle volume and intramuscular fatty infiltration after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Abstract. Introduction. There is a need to develop approaches to reduce chronic pain after total knee replacement. There is an established link between disturbed sleep and pain. We tested the feasibility of a trial evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a pre-operative sleep assessment and complex intervention package for improving long-term pain after TKR. Methodology. REST was a feasibility multi-centre randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study and health economics. Participants completed baseline measures and were randomised to usual care or the intervention, a tailored sleep assessment and behavioural intervention package delivered by an extended scope practitioner three months pre-operatively with a follow-up call up at four-weeks. Patient reported outcomes were assessed at baseline, one-week pre-surgery, and 3-months post-surgery. Results. 57 patients were randomised and 20 had surgery within the study timelines. All patients allocated the intervention attended an appointment and most engaged with treatment. The intervention group reported improvements in sleep (Sleep Conditions Indicator) and neuropathic pain (painDETECT) scores. Participants found the sleep treatments and study processes to be acceptable. The mean cost of the intervention was estimated at £134.45 per patient. Conclusion. The feasibility study has shown that patient recruitment is feasible, engagement with and adherence to the intervention is high, and the intervention is acceptable to patients and clinicians. Preliminary findings show that the intervention group had improved sleep quality and had reduced levels of pre-operative neuropathic pain. This study has demonstrated that a full RCT is feasible and identified areas for improvement to optimize the trial design

A small proportion of patients have persistent pain after total knee replacement (TKR). The primary aim of this study was to record the prevalence of pain after TKR at specific intervals post-operatively and to ascertain the impact of neuropathic pain. The secondary aim was to establish any predictive factors that could be used to identify patients who were likely to have high levels of pain or neuropathic pain after TKR. . A total of 96 patients were included in the study. Their mean age was 71 years (48 to 89); 54 (56%) were female. The mean follow-up was 46 months (39 to 51). Pre-operative demographic details were recorded including a Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression score as well as the painDETECT score for neuropathic pain. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Knee score. The mean pre-operative VAS was 5.8 (1 to 10); and it improved significantly at all time periods post-operatively (p < 0.001): (from 4.5 at day three to five (1 to 10), 3.2 at six weeks (0 to 9), 2.4 at three months (0 to 7), 2.0 at six months (0 to 9), 1.7 at nine months (0 to 9), 1.5 at one year (0 to 8) and 2.0 at mean 46 months (0 to 10)). There was a high correlation (r > 0.7; p < 0.001) between the mean VAS scores for pain and the mean painDETECT scores at three months, one year and three years post-operatively. There was no correlation between the pre-operative scores and any post-operative scores at any time point. We report the prevalence of pain and neuropathic pain at various intervals up to three years after TKR. Neuropathic pain is an underestimated problem in patients with pain after TKR. It peaks at between six weeks and three-months post-operatively. However, from these data we were unable to predict which patients are most likely to be affected. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1227–33

Aims. The aims of this study were to report the outcomes of patients with a complex fracture of the lower limb in the five years after they took part in the Wound Healing in Surgery for Trauma (WHIST) trial. Methods. The WHIST trial compared negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) dressings with standard dressings applied at the end of the first operation for patients undergoing internal fixation of a complex fracture of the lower limb. Complex fractures included periarticular fractures and open fractures when the wound could be closed primarily at the end of the first debridement. A total of 1,548 patients aged ≥ 16 years completed the initial follow-up, six months after injury. In this study we report the pre-planned analysis of outcome data up to five years. Patients reported their Disability Rating Index (DRI) (0 to 100, in which 100 = total disability), and health-related quality of life, chronic pain scores and neuropathic pain scores annually, using a self-reported questionnaire. Complications, including further surgery related to the fracture, were also recorded. Results. A total of 1,015 of the original patients (66%) provided at least one set of outcome data during the five years of follow-up. There was no evidence of a difference in patient-reported disability between the two groups at five years (NPWT group mean DRI 30.0 (SD 26.5), standard dressing group mean DRI 31.5 (SD 28.8), adjusted difference -0.86 (95% CI -4.14 to 2.40; p = 0.609). There was also no evidence of a difference in the complication rates at this time. Conclusion. We found no evidence of a difference in disability ratings between NPWT compared with standard wound dressings in the five years following the surgical treatment of a complex fracture of the lower limb. Patients in both groups reported high levels of persistent disability and reduced quality of life, with little evidence of improvement during this time. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(8):858–864

Aims. In cases of severe periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee, salvage procedures such as knee arthrodesis (KA) or above-knee amputation (AKA) must be considered. As both treatments result in limitations in quality of life (QoL), we aimed to compare outcomes and factors influencing complication rates, mortality, and mobility. Methods. Patients with PJI of the knee and subsequent KA or AKA between June 2011 and May 2021 were included. Demographic data, comorbidities, and patient history were analyzed. Functional outcomes and QoL were prospectively assessed in both groups with additional treatment-specific scores after AKA. Outcomes, complications, and mortality were evaluated. Results. A total of 98 patients were included, 52 treated with arthrodesis and 47 with AKA. The mean number of revision surgeries between primary arthroplasty and arthrodesis or AKA was 7.85 (SD 5.39). Mean follow-up was 77.7 months (SD 30.9), with a minimum follow-up of two years. Complications requiring further revision surgery occurred in 11.5% of patients after arthrodesis and in 37.0% of AKA patients. Positive intraoperative tissue cultures obtained during AKA was significantly associated with the risk of further surgical revision. Two-year mortality rate of arthrodesis was significantly lower compared to AKA (3.8% vs 28.3%), with age as an independent risk factor in the AKA group. Functional outcomes and QoL were better after arthrodesis compared to AKA. Neuropathic pain was reported by 19 patients after AKA, and only 45.7% of patients were fitted or were intended to be fitted with a prosthesis. One-year infection-free survival after arthrodesis was 88.5%, compared to 78.5% after AKA. Conclusion. Above-knee amputation in PJI results in high complication and mortality rates and poorer functional outcome compared to arthrodesis. Mortality rates after AKA depend on patient age and mobility, with most patients not able to be fitted with a prosthesis. Therefore, arthrodesis should be preferred whenever possible if salvage procedures are indicated. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(7):669–679

Schwannomas are the most common tumours of the sheath of peripheral nerves. The clinical diagnosis is usually straightforward, but may be delayed for many years in a schwannoma of the posterior tibial nerve. The symptoms are often attributed to entrapment neuropathy or to lumbosacral radiculopathy. We describe 25 patients with a schwannoma of the posterior tibial nerve. Only three were diagnosed within a year of presentation. The mean time to diagnosis was 86.5 months with a median of 48 months (2 to 360). All the patients complained of pain, which was felt specifically in the sole of the foot in 18. A Tinel sign was detected in all 25 patients. MRI confirmed the diagnosis in all the cases in which it had been undertaken. Surgical resection of the lesion abolished the neuropathic pain. In patients with a long history of neuropathic pain in the lower limb in whom lumbar and pelvic lesions have been excluded, a benign tumour of the sheath of a peripheral nerve may explain the symptoms. Surgical resection of the tumour is safe and effective