Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 7 - 7
1 Sep 2021
Gill S Papworth M Fragkakis E Marrocco A Lui D Bishop T
Full Access

A previously fit and well 58 year old male suffered from a bilateral psoas haematoma (PH) following 52 days of veno-venous extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (VV-ECMO) for severe Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), refractory to all non-invasive and medical therapies. He developed multiple complications, including inability to walk or weight-bear, due to lumbar plexopathy triggered by bilateral PH compression, compounded by COVID-19-related mononeuritis multiplex. The patient was referred to our institution with a known diagnosis of bilateral PH and after spinal multidisciplinary team (MDT) input, was deemed not for surgical or interventional radiology treatments. The patient received extensive neurorehabilitation, coordinated by multiple MDTs. Although PH has been correlated to COVID-19, to the best of our knowledge this is the first reported case of such a complex presentation resulting in a dramatic bilateral PH. Health records from 3 large UK teaching hospitals were collected regarding treatment and follow up appointments, following patient's written informed consent. Patient's comorbidities, duration in hospital units, MDT inputs, health assessments, mobilisation progress and neurologic assessments, were all recorded. Data was collected retrospectively then prospectively due to lengthy in-patient stay. The literature review was conducted via PubMed and open access sources, selecting all the relevant studies and the ECMO guidelines. Patient received treatment from 3 different units in 3 hospitals over 212 days including 103 days in neurorehabilitation. Involvement of physiotherapy, dietitians, speech and language teams, neurologist, neurophysiotherapists, occupational therapists was required. The patient progressed from a bed-bound coma and inability to walk, to standing with lower limb backslab at discharge. Additionally, he was referred for elective exploratory surgery of the psoas region for scar debridement and potential nerve graft repair of the lumbosacral plexus. The surgery outcome is cautiously optimistic, with some improvement in nerve conduction studies, however is currently unknown regarding recovery progress and return to premorbid functional baseline. The novelty of this presentation yields significant learning points regarding early recognition of PH, requirements for vast MDT input and specialist use of VV-ECMO in severe COVID-19 patients. It also highlights the broad pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 causing neuropathy and coagulopathy; understanding this will optimise robust anticoagulation guidelines, required in VV-ECMO


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 5 | Pages 754 - 758
1 Sep 1996
Ochiai N Nagano A Sugioka H Hara T

We have assessed the efficacy of free nerve grafts in 90 cases of brachial plexus injury. Relatively good recovery of the elbow flexor and extensor muscles and of those of the shoulder girdle was found but recovery of the flexors and extensors of the forearm and of the intrinsic muscles of the hand was extremely poor. Poor results were found when spinal nerve roots seemed normal to the touch and appeared intact but had abnormal somatosensory evoked potentials or myelography. Recovery of the deltoid and infraspinatus muscles was better when injury had occurred to the circumflex and suprascapular nerves rather than to the plexus itself, perhaps because these nerves were explored in their entirety to determine the presence of multiple lesions. It is important to visualise the entire nerve thoroughly to assess the overall condition. Thorough exploration of the plexus and the use of intraoperative recording of somatosensory evoked potentials are essential


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 3 | Pages 358 - 365
1 Mar 2015
Zhu L F. Zhang Yang D Chen A

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using the intact S1 nerve root as a donor nerve to repair an avulsion of the contralateral lumbosacral plexus. Two cohorts of patients were recruited. In cohort 1, the L4–S4 nerve roots of 15 patients with a unilateral fracture of the sacrum and sacral nerve injury were stimulated during surgery to establish the precise functional distribution of the S1 nerve root and its proportional contribution to individual muscles. In cohort 2, the contralateral uninjured S1 nerve root of six patients with a unilateral lumbosacral plexus avulsion was transected extradurally and used with a 25 cm segment of the common peroneal nerve from the injured leg to reconstruct the avulsed plexus.

The results from cohort 1 showed that the innervation of S1 in each muscle can be compensated for by L4, L5, S2 and S3. Numbness in the toes and a reduction in strength were found after surgery in cohort 2, but these symptoms gradually disappeared and strength recovered. The results of electrophysiological studies of the donor limb were generally normal.

Severing the S1 nerve root does not appear to damage the healthy limb as far as clinical assessment and electrophysiological testing can determine. Consequently, the S1 nerve can be considered to be a suitable donor nerve for reconstruction of an avulsed contralateral lumbosacral plexus.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:358–65.