Purpose and Background. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSD) can affect 56–80% of physiotherapists. Patient handling is reported as a significant risk factor for developing WRMSD with the back most frequently injured. Physiotherapists perform therapeutic handling to manually assist and facilitate patients’ movement to aid rehabilitation, which can increase physiotherapists risk of experiencing high forces during patient handling. Methods and Results. A descriptive cross-sectional study was completed to explore and quantitatively measure the movement of ten physiotherapists during patient handling, over one working day, in a neurological setting. A wearable 3-dimensional motion analysis system, Xsens (Movella, Henderson, NV), was used to measure physiotherapist movement and postures in the ward setting during patient treatment sessions. The resulting joint angles were reported descriptively and compared against a frequently used ergonomic assessment tool, the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Physiotherapists adopted four main positions during patient handling tasks: 1) kneeling; 2) half-kneeling; 3) standing; and 4) sitting. Eight patient handling tasks were identified and described: 1) Lie-to-sit; 2) sit-to-lie; 3) sit-to-stand; facilitation of 4) upper limb; 5) lower limb; 6) trunk; and 7) standing treatments; and 8) walking facilitation. Kneeling and sitting positions demonstrated greater neck extension and greater lumbosacral flexion during treatments which scores highly with the RULA. Conclusion. This research identified that patient treatment tasks were more often performed in kneeling or sitting positions than standing. Current moving and handling guidance teaches moving and handling in a standing position; loading and stresses experienced by the physiotherapists may differ in sitting or kneeling positions. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. None. This work has been presented as a poster at the CSP conference Glasgow 2023

Background. The clinical assessment of Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) is usually undertaken at a single time point at clinic rather than through continuous monitoring. To address this, a wearable prototype sensor to monitor motion of the lumbar spine and pelvis has been developed. Sensor Development, Testing and Results. The system devised was based on inertial sensor technology combined with wireless Body Sensor Network (BSN) platform. This was tested on 16 healthy volunteers for ten common movements (including sit to stand, lifting, walking, and stairs) with results validated by optical tracking. Preliminary findings suggest good agreement between the optical tracker and device with mean average orientation error (°) ranging from 0.1 ± 2.3 to 4.2 ± 2.6. The sensor repeatability errors range from 0 to 4° while subject movement variability ranged from 4% to 14%. Parameters of angular motion suggest greater movement of the lumbar spine compared to the pelvis with mean velocities (°/s) for lumbar spine ranging from 15.3 to 74.13 and pelvis ranging from 5.6 to 40.74. Further analysis revealed the extent to which the pelvis was engaged, as a proportion of the total movement. This demonstrated that the pelvis underwent smooth transitions from low (0.02), moderate (0.4) to high (0.99) use during different movement phases. Conclusion. A wearable sensor has been developed to record and quantify lumbar and pelvic movement. This permits an understanding of the lumbo-pelvic relationship to be characterized in an objective way during daily tasks. The next stage of the project will involve testing with CLBP patients

Objective. To compare the effectiveness of the Aspen, Aspen Vista, Philadelphia, Miami-J and Miami-J Advanced collars at restricting cervical spine movement in the sagittal, coronal and axial planes. Methods. Nineteen healthy volunteers (12 female, 7 male) were recruited to the study. Collars were fitted by an approved physiotherapist. Eight ProReflex (Qualisys, Sweden) infra-red cameras were used to track the movement of retro reflective marker clusters placed in predetermined positions on the head and trunk. 3D kinematic data was collected during forward flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation from uncollared and collared subjects. The physiological range of motion in the three planes was analysed using the Qualisys Track Manager system. Results. The Aspen and Philadelphia collars were found to be significantly more effective at restricting movement in the sagittal plane compared to the Vista (p<0.001), Miami-J (p<0.001 and p<0.01) and Miami-J Advanced (p<0.01 and p<0.05) collars. The Aspen collar was significantly more effective at restricting axial rotation than the Vista (p<0.001) and the Miami-J (p<0.05) collars. The Aspen, Philadelphia, Miami-J and Miami-J Advanced collars were comparable at restricting lateral bending but the Vista was significantly less effective than all the collars at restricting movement in this plane. Conclusion. The Aspen collar was found to be superior to the other collars when measuring restriction of movement of the cervical spine in all planes, particularly the sagittal and transverse planes, while the Aspen Vista was the least effective collar

Purpose and Background. This pilot study aimed to determine the accuracy of lumbar spine combined movement (CM) testing for diagnosing facet joint mediated pain, by comparing CM to medial branch blocks (MBB) - the gold standard in the diagnosis of facet joint pain. A regular compression pattern of CM combines active extension and lateral flexion, which is believed to compress the facet joints greater than physiological uni-planar movements. Method and Results. 96 patients attending a pain clinic day case unit for diagnostic MBB were recruited. Patients' pain responses to CMs were measured prior to and thirty minutes following MBB. The effect of weight bearing and recumbence, RMDQ, EQ-5D and MYMOP were also measured. The regular compression CM test had 80% sensitivity (95%CI: 71% to 89%) and 50% specificity (95%CI: 28% to 71%). The regular compression CM group had the largest pre-post VAS difference (median 4 points). The patients whose pain was not relieved in recumbence (n=15) showed a significant VAS difference of 6 points p=0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between the pre and post pain scores, p<0.001. There was no association between MBB response and RMDQ, EQ-5D, MYMOP scores, duration of symptoms or standing as a provoking activity. Conclusion. Regular compression CM testing can be used as a diagnostic tool to identify patients with facet joint mediated pain, particularly when associated with high pain scores. Low back pain (LBP) provoked by standing and relieved with recumbence are common features in the LBP population but are not indicators of facet joint pathology, contrary to many clinicians' beliefs

We performed CT myelography in 38 patients with cervical myelopathy before and after laminoplasty to enlarge the canal. The sagittal and transverse diameters, the cross-sectional area, and the central point of the spinal cord were measured. After cervical laminoplasty, the mean sagittal diameter of the spinal cord at C5 increased by 0.8 mm, but the mean transverse diameter decreased by 0.9 mm. The mean cross-sectional area of the cord increased by 7.4% and that of the dural sac and its contents by 33.8% at C5. The centre of the spinal cord moved a mean 2.8 mm posteriorly at this level. Enlargement of the spinal canal is sufficient to decompress the spinal cord, but posterior movement may be the limiting factor in determining the decompressive effect of laminoplasty

We studied 27 patients with low back pain and unilateral L5 or S1 spinal nerve root pain. Significant radiological changes were restricted to the symptomatic root level, when compared with controls. Low back and leg pain were graded on a visual analogue scale. Dermatomal quantitative sensory tests revealed significant elevations of warm, cool and touch perception thresholds in the affected dermatome, compared with controls. These elevations correlated with root pain (warm v L5 root pain; r = 0.88, p < 0.0001), but not with back pain. Low back pain correlated with restriction of anteroposterior spinal flexion (p = 0.02), but not with leg pain. A subset of 16 patients underwent decompressive surgery with improvement of pain scores, sensory thresholds and spinal mobility. A further 14 patients with back pain, multilevel nerve root symptoms and radiological changes were also studied. The only correlation found was of low back pain with spinal movement (p < 0.002). We conclude that, in patients with single level disease, dermatomal sensory threshold elevation and restriction of spinal movement are independent correlates of sciatica and low back pain

Purpose. To describe the frequency of different patterns of pain response and their association with outcomes (prognosis) and MRI findings in patients experiencing sciatica. Methods. 176 consecutive consenting patients with radicular pain underwent an MRI and a clinical assessment at baseline using a standardized procedure of repeated lumbar movements and positioning guided. Based on their pain response, patients were divided into five groups: abolition centralization, reduction centralization, unstable centralization, peripheralization, and no effect on pain. Results. Overall, 84.8 % of patients reported experiencing one of the three forms of centralization, 7.3 % reported peripheralization and 7.9 % reported “No effect”. The median reduction in RMQ scores across all three centralization groups was 9.5 points at 3-months and 12.0 points at 12-months. The peripheralization group improved by a similar amount (7.0 and 14.0 respectively). In contrast, the ‘no effect’ group improved by 3.0 at both time points and this was significantly different (p<0.001) from the other groups. These results were mimicked in relation to leg pain. In addition, there was no association between the reported pain responses (centralization, peripheralization or no effect) and the type of disc lesion observed on MRI. Conclusion. In patients with sciatica, centralization was common. Centralization and peripheralization at baseline were equally associated with improvement in activity limitation and leg pain over time. As there was no association between MRI findings and the pain response to movement, these results do not support the belief that centralization only occurs if the annulus is intact and the intra-discal hydrostatic mechanism is functional

Objectives. Understanding lumbar facet joint involvement and biomechanical changes post spinal fusion is limited. This study aimed to establish an in vitro model assessing mechanical effects of fusion on human lumbar facet joints, employing synchronized motion, pressure, and stiffness analysis. Methods and Results. Seven human lumbar spinal units (age 54 to 92, ethics 15/YH/0096) underwent fusion via a partial nucleotomy model mimicking a lateral cage approach with PMMA cement injection. Mechanical testing pre and post-fusion included measuring compressive displacement and load, local motion capture, and pressure mapping at the facet joints. pQCT imaging (82 microns isotropic) was carried out at each stage to assess the integrity of the vertebral endplates and quantify the amount of cement injected. Before fusion, relative facet joint displacement (6.5 ± 4.1 mm) at maximum load (1.1 kN) exceeded crosshead displacement (3.9 ± 1.5 mm), with loads transferred across both facet joints. After fusion, facet displacement (2.0 ± 1.2 mm) reduced compared to pre-fusion, as was the crosshead displacement (2.2 ± 0.6 mm). Post-fusion loads (71.4 ± 73.2 N) transferred were reduced compared to pre-fusion levels (194.5 ± 125.4 N). Analysis of CT images showed no endplate damage post-fusion, whilst the IVD tissue: cement volume ratio did not correlate with the post-fusion behaviour of the specimens. Conclusion. An in vitro model showed significant facet movement reduction with stand-alone interbody cage placement. This technique identifies changes in facet movement post-fusion, potentially contributing to subsequent spinal degeneration, highlighting its utility in biomechanical assessment. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. This work was funded by EPSRC, under grant EP/W015617/1

Purpose and Background. Patients with low back pain are increasing globally. Physical dysfunction and psychosocial factors such as stress, anxiety, and fear of movement, often referred to as yellow flags, play a role in the persistence of low back pain. What is not known is the extent to which yellow flags are screened for and treatment adjusted accordingly by Physiotherapists in India. The aim was to determine the current knowledge and awareness of physiotherapists in India regarding psychosocial factors for managing patients with low back pain. Methods. Semi-structured interviews gathered data from of six physiotherapists, The interviews were conducted online. The data was transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Results. The main finding was that the physiotherapists in India had a limited knowledge regarding psychosocial factors for management of low back pain. They were not supportive of adding yellow flag screening into their routine treatments due to lack of t awareness of such screening tools Physical elements of low back pain were focused on during treatment by the therapists and recommended by management. The physiotherapists noted that high daily patient volume left them with limited time to alter treatment protocols. Conclusion. There appears to be limited information and education delivered to the physiotherapists in India regarding psychosocial factors for managing low back pain. The addition of these factors in the education and treatment protocols could address these important factors when managing patients with low back pain in India. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

Background. Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) can be delivered using head mounted display (HMD) to interact with 3D virtual environment (VE). IVR has shown promising results in management of chronic pain conditions, using different mechanisms (e.g., exposure to movement and distraction). However, it has not been widely tested for CLBP. Future development of IVR intervention needs inputs from gatekeepers to determine key considerations, facilitators and barriers. This qualitative study aimed to explore views and opinions of physiotherapists about IVR intervention for adults with CLBP. Methods. Four focus groups were conducted online, with 16 physiotherapists. A demonstration of existing IVR mechanisms was presented. The data were transcribed and analysed through descriptive thematic analysis. Results. IVR was thought to be a suitable adjunct for a subgroup of patients who are reluctant to engage with standard care. Motivation to perform challenging physical tasks was believed to be a potential benefit. Safety, possibility of addiction, and transferability of acquired skills from VE to ‘real world’ and hygiene were concerns and the intervention was preferred to be used under clinical supervision. VE personalisation to patient's goal and preference with delivery and progression being gradual depending upon patient's abilities was suggested. Technical knowledge was seen as a facilitator, while cost and technology acceptance were barriers for future implementation. Conclusion. Future studies would need to consider the reported views of physiotherapists to inform development and implementation of IVR intervention for CLBP. Conflicts of interest: No conflict of interest. Sources of funding: Funded by the government of Saudi Arabia

Background. BANDAIDE aka Back and Neck Discomfort relief with Altered behaviour, Intelligent Postures, Dynamic movement and Exercises (ISBN - 0995676933) is a concise self-help booklet containing strengthening exercises and illustrated information to enable patients self-manage their back and neck pain. The aim of this preliminary audit was to determine patient opinion on BANDAIDE. Institutional audit approval was obtained – No. 8429. Methods and Results. BANDAIDE was distributed to 40 patients, who were asked to evaluate the booklet using the Usefulness Scale for Patient Information Material (USE). USE consists of nine positive statements which are subdivided into three sub-domains; cognition, emotional and behavioural. The cognition sub-domain assesses the knowledge obtained from the material, the emotional sub-domain evaluates the effects of the material on an individual's ability to cope with the illness and the behavioural sub-domain assesses ability to self-manage. Responders were required to rate the extent to which they agreed with each of the nine statements on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 denotes ‘completely disagree’ and 10 denotes ‘completely agree’. Each subsection is on a scale of 0–30, with a higher score suggesting better usefulness. 23 participants provided their opinions of BANDAIDE through the USE. For the three sub-domains, the mean ratings for cognition, emotional and behavioural were 27.2, 24.7, and 26.4 respectively. Conclusions. This preliminary audit suggests that BANDAIDE provides coherent advice that enables a patient to self-manage their back and neck pain. Nevertheless, the opinions of a larger cohort should be pursued to obtain more robust conclusions. Conflict of Interest: George Ampat sells the BANDAIDE booklet online through Amazon and other platforms. S Rhodes and J Sims are employed by Talita Cumi Ltd, of which Bandaide is a trading name. Shantanu Kundu is a medical student and has no conflict of interest. Sources of funding: No funding was obtained

Background. Over 55,000 spinal operations are performed annually in the NHS. Effective postoperative analgesia facilitates early mobilisation and assists rehabilitation and hospital discharge, but is difficult to achieve with conventional, opioid-based, oral analgesia. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of two alternative techniques, namely intrathecal opioid and the more novel erector-spinae plane blockade, is unknown. The Pain Relief After Instrumented Spinal Surgery (PRAISE) trial aims to evaluate these techniques. Methods. PRAISE is a multicentre, prospective, parallel group, patient-blinded, randomised trial, seeking to recruit 456 adult participants undergoing elective, posterior lumbar-instrumented spinal surgery from up to 25 NHS hospitals. Participants will be randomised 1:1:1 to receive (1) Usual Care with local wound infiltration, (2) Intrathecal Opioid plus Usual Care with local wound infiltration or (3) Erector Spinae Plane blockade plus Usual Care with no local wound infiltration. The primary outcome is pain on movement on a 100mm visual analogue scale at 24 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include pain at rest, leg pain, quality of recovery (QoR-15), postoperative opioid consumption, time to mobilisation, length of hospital stay, health utility (EQ-5D-5L), adverse events and resource use. Parallel economic evaluation will estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Results. Differences in the primary outcome at 24 hours will be estimated by mixed-effects linear regression modelling, with fixed effects for randomisation factors and other important prognostic variables, and random effects for centre, using the as-randomised population. Treatment effects with 95% confidence intervals will be presented. Conclusion. The study is due to open in May 2024 and complete in 2026. Conflicts of Interest. No conflicts of interest declared. Sources of Funding. NIHR Health Technology Award – grant number NIHR153170. Trial presentations so far. APOMP 2023 and 2024; RCOA conference, York, November 2023; Faculty of Pain Management training day, London, February 2024

Background and purpose. The Fear Avoidance Model is used to explain why some patients with acute low back pain develop chronic low back pain (CLBP). Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) targeting dysfunctional behavioural cognitions (pain catastrophizing and fear of movement) is recommended. Purpose: to investigate whether a two-week CBT-based pain management program results in improvement in dysfunctional behavioural cognitions and whether these improved cognitions improve functional outcomes. Methods and Results. Cohort study including 524 consecutive CLBP-patients. Main outcome: functioning (ODI). Secondary outcomes: pain severity (NRS), pain catastrophizing (PCS), fear of movement (TSK). Assessments: pre- and post-treatment, 1 and 12-months follow-up (FU). Improvement over time was analysed with repeated measures ANOVA. Path analyses were used to examine the influence of pain catastrophizing and fear of movement on functional disability and pain severity. Multiple imputation was used to complete missing data. Participants with incomplete data (12.8%) did not differ from those with complete data (n= 457). 59% were females, mean age 46 (± 9.5) years, mean CLBP-duration 12 (± 10.8) years. All outcomes significantly improved at post-treatment and a slight significant improvement between post-treatment and 12 months FU was observed. Path analyses showed a direct effect for catastrophizing on post-treatment functioning and an indirect effect for catastrophizing through fear of movement on post-treatment functioning. Comparable results with pain severity as outcome. Conclusion. A two-week pain management program improved dysfunctional behavioral cognitions and functional outcomes in patients with longstanding CLBP up to one year. Targeting both pain catastrophizing and fear of movement during the program resulted in improved outcomes. Conflicts of Interest: JK O'Dowd is director of and shareholder in RealHealth. The authors declare that this abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national or international meeting. Sources of Funding:. No funding obtained

Purpose and Background. Physical mechanisms underlying back pain impairment are poorly understood. Measuring movement features linked to back pain should help understand its causes and decide on best management. Previous kinematic studies have pointed to diverse features distinguishing back pain sufferers. However, the complexity of 3D kinematics means that it is difficult to choose, a priori, which variables or variable combinations are most important. This study set out to obtain a rich set of kinematic data from spinal regions and lower extremities during typical movement tasks, and analyse all of these variables simultaneously to obtain globally important distinguishing features. To this end, a novel distance metric between pairs of motion sequences was used to construct distance matrices. Analyses were carried out directly on these distance matrices. Methods and Results. 20 controls (age: 28 ± 7.6, 10 female) and 20 chronic LBP subjects (age: 41 ± 10.7, 4 female) were recruited. Kinematic data were obtained whilst subjects stood from sitting (‘STS’), picking up (‘Picking’) and lowering (‘Lowering’) a 5kg box, and walking (right (‘WalkRight’) and left sides (‘WalkLeft’)). For each task, permutation tests for group differences were carried out, based on the pseudo-F statistic calculated from the distance matrices. A similar approach was used to identify local differences at time points and joints. Group mean motion sequences were compared using a custom OpenSim model. Significant differences were obtained for STS (pseudo-F=2.8, p=0.017), WalkRight (pseudo-F=3.27, p=0.008) and WalkLeft (pseudo-F=3.39, p=0.005). Conclusion. Comparisons of movement tasks between groups revealed significant differences for STS and walking. Visualisation of group mean motion sequences, and local analyses assisted in the detailed understanding of these differences. This provides a visually intuitive means of studying complex motion differences between groups, without prior assumptions regarding which variables are important. No conflicts of interest. No funding. Original study funded by Arthritis Research UK MRC (Medical Research Council) Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work

Purposes of the study and background. Clinical assessment of spinal function is a routine part of low back pain (LBP) assessment, yet there is no clear consensus on what constitutes ‘spinal dysfunction’ and how this informs treatment. This study's aims to develop a spinal function classification framework by gaining expert academic and clinical consensus on (i) spinal function assessment tests (ii) encountered LBP motor control/movement impairment (MCI/MI) sub-types (iii) their characteristics and (iii) exercises and feedback for each sub-type. Methods and Results. An online 2-round Delphi-survey of 4 world-leading academic experts and 36 clinical physiotherapists world-wide was employed. A five-point response scale was used to rate level of agreement on 174 items with a priori consensus defined by a ≠>80% level of agreement (LOA). Out of 15 spinal function assessment tests, 5 reached consensus with forward bend and sitting/standing tests highest scoring. 7 MCI/MI sub-types reached consensus as clinically encountered. 12 out of 128 of posture/movement descriptors within the 7 sub-types reached consensus. 7 exercises gained consensus in being considered as ‘important’ or ‘very important’ with exercises involving sitting, standing, forward bend scoring highest. Consensus was reached on MCI/MI sub-type specific exercises, compensation strategies and feedback to remedy these compensations. Conclusion. Academic and clinical expert consensus derived list of movement/posture descriptors, assessment tests and exercises considered clinically important provides a first to date, spinal function assessment classification framework for non-specific LBP. This offers a conceptual model for developing technologies (e.g. wearable sensors) to harness clinically useful information relating to spinal function, exercise performance and feedback for effective implementation of exercise therapies for non-specific LBP. No conflicts of interest. Sources of Funding: Health and Care Research Wales, RCBC Postdoctoral Research Fellowship

Purpose & Background. The ability to jump higher is a key factor for athletic performance and relies on many factors including spinal movement and trunk muscle activity. Manual therapy including Mulligan' Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) techniques are proposed to increase spinal movement and thus function. The evidence pf the effect of manual therapy on muscle activity is limited. We aimed to determine the immediate effects of an extension SNAG on the lower lumbar spine on jump height and rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), multifidus (M) and iliocostalis Lumborum (IL) muscle activity during the flight phase of vertical jump compared to a placebo intervention (flat hand pressure). Method. Eighteen healthy participants (16 males, age 28.11±5.01 years, weight 70.58±11.9 kg, height 1.70±0.07m, body mass index 24.28±3.30)from Cardiff University were randomly allocated to either an extension SNAG or placebo intervention. Surface Electromyography was normalised to maximum voluntary contraction and was collected during the flight phase of the jump and jump height was measured using jump and reach test. Results. There was a significant increase (p=0.01) in jump height for the SNAG group. No significant differences in RA, EO, M, IL muscle activity was noted between SNAG and placebo interventions In EO, LES and M descriptive analysis showed a decrease in muscle activity in on average 14 of the subjects. Conclusion. SNAG mobilisation can produce an immediate increase in jump height but no significant changes in muscle activity in healthy subjects. Further work is warranted in subjects with low back pain. No Conflict of Interests. No funding was obtained

Background and Aim of Study. Despite several hundred RCTs of exercise for persistent non-specific low back pain (NSLBP), the treatment targets of exercise are unclear. In a systematic review we observed 30 direct and indirect treatment targets of exercise described across 23 RCTs for persistent NSLBP. Since not all treatment targets and outcomes can be assessed in all RCTs, it is therefore important to prioritise these treatment targets through consensus from key stakeholders. These consensus workshops aimed to agree treatment targets for the use of exercise interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in persistent NSLBP using nominal group workshop (NGW) methodology. Methods and Results. The first UK workshop included people who had experience of exercise to manage their persistent NSLBP, clinicians who prescribe exercise for persistent NSLBP, and researchers who design exercise interventions tested in RCTs. The second workshop included participants attending an international back and neck pain research workshop. Twelve participants took part in the UK NGW and fifteen took part in the final ranking of the exercise treatment targets. In addition to the original list of 30 treatment targets, a further 26 ideas were generated. After grouping and voting, 18 treatment targets were prioritised. The top five ranked targets of exercise interventions for persistent NSLBP were: pain reduction, improvement in function, reduction of fear of movement, encouragement of normal movement and improvement of mobility. The results of the international NGW will also be presented. Conclusion. Future RCTs of exercise should consider more consistent assessment of these treatment targets. Sources of Funding: This PhD is funded by the Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University. Prof NE Foster is a UK National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator, and was supported by a UK National Institute for Health Research Professorship (NIHR-RP-011-015). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. Conflicts of Interest: No conflicts of interest

Purposes And Background. Having found a significant limitation of neural movement (66.6%) during SLR performed on the symptomatic side in patients with sub-acute lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (LIDH), we followed up on the same patients over 1.5 years to ascertain if changes in cord excursion accompany changes in clinical symptoms. Methods. 14 patients, who originally had sciatic symptoms due to subacute LIDH, were re-assessed both clinically and radiologically with a 1.5T magnetic resonance (MR) scanner. Displacement of the conus medullaris during the unilateral and bilateral SLR was quantified reliably with a randomized procedure and compared between maneuvers and with data from baseline. Multivariate regression models and backward variable selection method were employed to identify variables more strongly associated with decrease in low back pain and radicular symptoms. Results. Compared to previously presented baseline values, the data showed an extensive increase in neural sliding of 323.4% (2.52mm, p≤0.001) with the symptomatic SLR, 37.1% (0.82mm, p=0.0058) with asymptomatic SLR, and 48.2% (1.64mm, p≤0.001) with the bilateral SLR. Increase in neural sliding correlated significantly with decrease of both radicular symptoms (Pearson=−0.719, p≤0.001) and low back pain (Pearson=−0.693, p≤0.001). Multivariate regression models and backward variable selection method confirmed that improvement of neural sliding effects (p≤0.004) as the main variable being associated with improvement of self-reported clinical symptoms. Conclusion. To our knowledge, these are the first non-invasive data to objectively support the association between increase in magnitude of neural adaptive movement and decrease in clinical symptoms in in-vivo and structurally intact human subjects. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: This research was partly funded by Finnish National VTR Grant for Medical Research, grant number 128/2012

Aims

People with severe, persistent low back pain (LBP) may be offered lumbar spine fusion surgery if they have had insufficient benefit from recommended non-surgical treatments. However, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2016 guidelines recommended not offering spinal fusion surgery for adults with LBP, except as part of a randomized clinical trial. This survey aims to describe UK clinicians’ views about the suitability of patients for such a future trial, along with their views regarding equipoise for randomizing patients in a future clinical trial comparing lumbar spine fusion surgery to best conservative care (BCC; the FORENSIC-UK trial).

This prospective multicentre study was undertaken to determine segmental movement, disc height and sagittal alignment after total disc replacement (TDR) in the lumbosacral spine and to assess the correlation of biomechanical properties to clinical outcomes. A total of 173 patients with degenerative disc disease and low back pain for more than one year were randomised to receive either TDR or multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR). Segmental movement in the sagittal plane and disc height were measured using distortion compensated roentgen analysis (DCRA) comparing radiographs in active flexion and extension. Correlation analysis between the range of movement or disc height and patient-reported outcomes was performed in both groups. After two years, no significant change in movement in the sagittal plane was found in segments with TDR or between the two treatment groups. It remained the same or increased slightly in untreated segments in the TDR group and in this group there was a significant increase in disc height in the operated segments. There was no correlation between segmental movement or disc height and patient-reported outcomes in either group. In this study, insertion of an intervertebral disc prosthesis TDR did not increase movement in the sagittal plane and segmental movement did not correlate with patient-reported outcomes. This suggests that in the lumbar spine the movement preserving properties of TDR are not major determinants of clinical outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:81–9